A Whole Child Picture View of Child Well-Being in the Home, Community and Health Care System: Findings from the National Survey of Children's Health Christina.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Allison Miles, MPH Kara Gehring, MPH Adapting the National Survey of Children’s Health Questions to Adolescent Health Indicators.
Advertisements

Measures of Child Well-Being from a Decentralized Statistical System: A View From the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics Stephen J. Blumberg, Ph.D.
Is Caregiver Depression Associated with Children’s ADHD Symptoms and Overall Functioning? Randi Scott SUMR Final Presentation August 07, 2008.
Profile of Children with Special Health Care Needs in Ohio Anthony Goudie, Ph.D.
MCHB Welcome to the MCH Epidemiology Conference, 2008 US Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources And Services Administration Maternal.
State Variation in Prevalence of Children Living in Households with Tobacco Smokers Kathleen Newton, BS, Oregon MPH Program & Child & Adolescent Health.
Planning for Transition from Pediatric to Adult Health Care for Youth with Mobility Limitation Todd C. Edwards, PhD, Janice F. Bell, PhD, MPH, Donald L.
Methodologic Overview of Two National Data Sets Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Issues in Comparing Findings.
Stephen J. Blumberg, PhD Christina D. Bethell, PhD, MBA Paul W. Newacheck, DrPH The CSHCN Screener Key Findings, Methods Issues, and its Relationship with.
Growing up with Autism: The Sibling Experience By: Victoria Carrillo California State University Long Beach School of Social Work May 2012.
Future Research Agenda for MCH: Children with Special Health Care Needs November 10, 2004 Washington, DC Deborah Allen, ScD Boston University School of.
Ramey & Ramey (1998) Early Intervention: activities designed to enhance a young child’s development Initial evaluation of child’s abilities and needs (in.
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Adults Reading to Two Year Old Children: A Population-based Study Olivia Sappenfield Emory University School of Public Health.
Alternative Models for Stratifying CSHCN Identified through Three National Surveys Child Health Services Research Meeting June 26, 2005 Boston, MA Alternative.
Mental Healthcare Utilization as Adolescents Become Young Adults Jennifer W. Yu, Sc.D. Sally H. Adams, Ph.D. Claire Brindis, Dr.P.H. Charles E. Irwin,
Quality and Utilization in Healthy Kids programs in California Michael R. Cousineau, Dr. PH. Gregory D. Stevens, Ph.D. Em Arpawong, MPH Kyoko Rice Trevor.
1 Medical Home for Children in Washington State Washington State Data from the 2003 National Survey of Children’s Health Teresa Vollan MCH Assessment Washington.
1 Minnesota Medical Home Project: Evaluation Feasibility Study Saturday, June 7, 2008 SHRIG Meeting, Academy Health.
Health care utilization behaviors of school-based health center users and non-users Gorette Amaral, MHS; Sara P. Geierstanger, MPH; Samira Soleimanpour,
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Effect of Parental Depression on School Attendance and Emergency.
The 2003 National Survey of Children's Health DataSpeak Presentation February 2007 Michael Kogan, Ph.D. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)
Potential of Medicaid and SCHIP Expansions To Increase Insurance Coverage for CSHCN Amy Davidoff, Ph.D. Alshadye Yemane, B.A. The Urban Institute American.
Development and Use of Neighborhood Health Analysis: Residential Mobility in Context Katie Murray, The Providence Plan The Urban Institute April 24, 2003.
Comparing and interpreting findings on the prevalence and characteristics of children and youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN) in three national.
The Delaware ACE’s Story
Results Baseline Differences Between Groups No significant differences were found between ethnic groups on baseline levels of Praise (F = 2.006, p>.05),
Monitoring MCHB’s Six Core Outcomes for CSHCN Paul Newacheck, DrPH MCH Policy Research Center.
TRANS-FEMALE YOUTH, DEVELOPMENT, AND HIV RISK Erin C. Wilson, DrPH- San Francisco Department of Public Health,
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Centers for Disease Control and Prevention *The findings and conclusions in this presentation.
Mental Health Data Available from the 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health Stephen J. Blumberg, Ph.D. Kathleen S. O’Connor, M.P.H. Presented at the.
Results of the Title V Five Year Needs Assessment Dr. Manda Hall, MD Title V Maternal and Child Health Director Raquel Flores Research Specialist Texas.
The Impact of Smoking Cessation Interventions by Multiple Health Professionals Lawrence An, MD 1 ; Steven Foldes, PhD 2 ; Nina Alesci, PhD 1 ; Patricia.
ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES AND BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Caregiving Youth: Uncovering a hidden population
Allegany County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS
Attachment style and condom use across and within dating relationships
Prevalence of Adverse Childhood Experiences
Factors affecting social work service use among hospice patients:
Cecil County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Wicomico County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Texas Pediatric Society Electronic Poster Contest
Access to Care for Immigrant Children in California:
Prince George’s County
Washington County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Parental Adverse Childhood Experiences:
Maternal Demographics
Florida State University College of Nursing Tallahassee, Florida
Harford County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Baltimore County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
The 4-H Study on Positive Youth Development
Adolescents, Young Adults, and Adults
Baltimore City March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Improving the Lives of Callers: Call Outcomes and Unmet Needs
The Influence of Protective Factors on Perceived Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences Laura Kenny, MPHc Thomas Jefferson University Background Results.
A NEW UNDERSTANDING OF CHILDHOOD TRAUMA
Using Relationships of Support to Nurture the Language of Emotions
Queen Anne’s County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Garrett County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Denver Office of Children’s Affairs
Calvert County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Service Array Assessment and Planning Purposes
Worcester County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Talbot County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages S22-S33 (May 2011)
Including People with Disabilities: Public Health Workforce Competencies Module 3 Competency 2: Discuss methods used to assess health issues for people.
The Norwalk Story: How one community is using the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ®) to build a system for developmental screening for young children.
Frederick County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Share your thoughts on this presentation with #IAS2019
Introduction to the Family-Centered Medical Home
Presentation transcript:

A Whole Child Picture View of Child Well-Being in the Home, Community and Health Care System: Findings from the National Survey of Children's Health Christina Bethell, PhD, MBA, MPH1, Paul Newacheck, DrPH2, Lisa Simpson, MBA, BCh, MPH, FAAP3, Julie Robertson, MSW1 and Scott Stumbo, MA1 1Pediatrics Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States; 2Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States and 3AcademyHealth, Washington, DC, United States Background Results: Prevalence of Whole Child Summary Measures Results: Meeting All Three Whole Child Indices Protective factors such as access to quality health care, smoke-free homes and strong family connections influence health promotion and health outcomes across the lifespan among children. These factors do not exist in isolation and better health outcomes are often the result of multiple, intersecting factors. In fact, the largest promoter of children’s health is likely not an individual asset, but rather the combined influence of multiple factors.1,2 Figure 2. United States Ranking Map for meeting all three Whole Child Summary Measures (Health Care Access and Quality of Care, Home Environment, and Neighborhood Safety and Support). The Home Environment component on TV is the most significant predictor of meeting the HE Summary Measure. Overall, almost 20% more children would meet the measure, differentially affecting older children. If the HE did not include the TV component, over twice as many children age 6-17 years would meet this measure (50.1 vs 24.7). Children who met the HE Summary Measure, age 6-17 years, were more likely to share ideas with their parents very well (76.6%) than children who did not meet the HE Summary Measure (67.5%, p<.001). Children who met the HE Summary Measure more often had parents who felt they were coping very well with the demands of parenthood (66.4%), compared to children who did not meet the HE Summary Measure (57.9%, p<.001). Nationwide: 9.5% State Range: 4.3-17.8 Objectives To characterize the experiences of all children and CSHCN in three key contextual areas: Home Environment, Neighborhood and School Environment, and Access and Quality of Health Care with the aim of informing program reform through a “whole child” approach to supporting healthy development. Home Environment (28.5% of children met summary measure) Neighborhood and School Safety and Support (51.1% of children met summary measure) Access to Quality Health Care (41.3% of children met summary measure) 9.5% Methods Data for this study were drawn from the 2007 NSCH public use data files prepared by the Data Resource Center for Child and Adolescent Health. The 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) was conducted between April 2007 and July 2008 with at least 1700 parents of children 0-17 years old from each state.3,4 The NSCH is directed and funded by the Maternal and Child Health Bureau and conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics. Public use data files are prepared by the Data Resource Center for Child and Adolescent Health, a project of the Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative.4   Whole Child Summary Measures Home Environment Summary Measure The Home Environment Summary Measure describes the environmental elements that a family can provide to promote optimal health for their child, and that are not highly dependent on household income or other resources. The components of the Home Environment Summary Measure depend on a child’s age. Children age 0-5 meet all criteria for the Home Environment Summary Measure if they: (1) Have 4 or more family meals per week, (2) Are read or sung to every day, (3) Were ever breastfed, (4) Watch 2 hours of television per day or less (for children 1 year or older), (5) have No exposure to tobacco smoke inside their home. Children age 6-17 meet all criteria for the Home Environment Summary Measure if they: (1) Have 4 or more family meals per week, (2) Have no television in their bedroom AND watch 2 hours of television per day or less, (3) Parents have met all or most of their friends, (4) Usually or always do all required homework, (5) No exposure to tobacco smoke inside their home. Access to Quality Health Care Summary Measure The Quality Health Care Measure includes measures of basic health services that help enable children to get better, stay healthy and develop to their full potential. To meet measure criteria for the health care system performance summary measure, children must: (1) Receive care within a medical home, (2) Have health insurance that is adequate to meet their medical needs, (3) Have had at least one preventive visit in the previous 12 months. Neighborhood Safety and Support Summary Measure The Neighborhood safety and support measure includes physical and social neighborhood and community resources that help create a positive environment for growth and development. Children meet all criteria for this Summary Measure if they: (1) Are usually or always safe in their community or neighborhood, (2) Live in a supportive neighborhood, (3) Parent feels child is usually/always safe at school (age 6-17 years only). Statistical Analysis National and state-by-state population prevalence for all health and quality of care variables were weighted to represent the population of non-institutionalized children age 0 to 17 years in the United States and Children with Special Health Care Needs5. Stratification of type of special health care needs was also examained6. For bivariate analyses, standard t-tests or chi-square tests of statistical differences were used. Nested t-tests were used to compare each state’s prevalence to the nation. Multivariate analyses include type of health insurance in a series of logistic regression analyses, controlling for child’s age, sex, race, ethnicity, primary household language, and household income. CSHCN were less likely to meet each of the three summary measures; however, the low rates among all children show that the home, community and health care environment are barriers to promoting well-being among children. Over one-quarter of children did not meet any of the three summary measures, and only 9.5% met all three criteria; highest rates were among younger children, children with higher household income, and non-CSHCN. While only 9.5% of children met all three criteria, 37.7% met two or more whole child summary measures. This is consistent with the MCHB Core Outcomes for CSHCN, in which there are low rates of CSHCN meeting all core outcomes, but significantly more who are missing one piece of a comprehensive system of care7. 5.1% 8.0% 15.1% Discussion Recognizing that children’s health and well-being rest upon a foundation built not only on their access to quality medical care, but also on their home environment and neighborhood context, is vital to viewing a child as a whole person. The Affordable Care Act focuses on providing children with the preventive care that they need to grow and thrive. Understanding the multiple layers of influences on a child’s life--family, school, neighborhood and medical care--is essential to providing necessary interventions and resources. A child’s home environment includes factors that a family can influence such as readiness for school, clean air and can help foster healthy relationships with adults. The neighborhood context can impact the child’s willingness to engage in activities in school and the neighborhood, influencing social skills and academic engagement. Finally, access to quality medical care can help to mitigate health conditions which could negatively impact the health and well-being of the child. Understanding the areas of systemic performance, and the differential impact on subpopulations is essential to improving programs to promote the well-being of all children and CSHCN across the lifespan. Significant correlations exist between all three of the neighborhood safety and support measures, with no single item driving the summary measure. As expected, highest correlations were between supportive neighborhoods and safe neighborhoods (0.289) and safe neighborhoods and safe schools (0.320). Children, age 0-5 years, who meet the Neighborhood Environment Measure are more likely to have outings 4 or more days per week (57.9%) compared to children who did not meet the summary measure (43.9%). Children, age 6-17 years, who meet the Neighborhood and School Environment Measure are more likely to usually/always be engaged in school, participate in extracurricular activities, and not repeat a grade. Children who met the Access to Quality Health Care Summary Measure are significantly less likely to miss more than a week of school due to illness and over three times less likely to have unmet health needs (2.2%), compared to children who did not meet the Health Care Summary Measure (9.9%, p<.001). References 1 Starfield, B. Equity, social determinants, and children's rights: coming to grips with the challenges. [Review]. Ambul Pediatr. 2005;5(3):134-7. 2 Stevens GD. Gradients in the health status and developmental risks of young children: the combined influences of multiple social risk factors. Matern Child Health J 2006;10:187-99. 3 Blumberg SJ, Foster EB, Frasier AM, et al. Design and operation of the National Survey of Children’s Health, 2007. Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics; 2009. 4 National Survey of Children’s Health. Data Resource Center. Available at: http://www.nschdata.org. Accessed January 28, 2010. 5 Bethell CD, Read D, Stein R, et al. Identifying children with special health care needs: development and evaluation of a short screening instrument. Ambul Pediatr. 2002;2:38–48. 6 Bramlett MD, Read D, Bethell C, Blumberg SJ. Differentiating subgroups of children with special health care needs by health status and complexity of health care needs. Matern Child Health J. 2009;13: 151–163. 7 Strickland B, van Dyck PC, Kogan MD, Lauver C, Blumber SJ, Bethell CD, Newacheck PW (In Press) The 2009-2010 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs: Monitoring Systems Quality in a Changing Health Care Environment. Funding was provided by the Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative (CAHMI), The Data Resource Center for Child and Adolescent Health (DRC). The DRC is supported by Cooperative Agreement 1-U59-MC06980-01 from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) , Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB).