Beef Carcass and Primal Cuts Placing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Animal Selection and Evaluation
Advertisements

Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship
Stockman’s Practice Info
Beef Grading Dr. Gretchen Hilton Assistant Professor Meat Judging Team Coach.
BEEF CARCASS YIELD AND QUALITY GRADING
Meat Cut Identification. Beef Top Round Steak Beef Top Round Steak The Top Round Steak is the most tender of the various round steaks. This boneless.
Welcome to the Wonderful World of Meat!
Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.
South Carolina Meats Judging Workshop Concepts in Pork Carcass and Cut Placing.
Pork Judging ANSI Pork Judging FFA judging Pork carcasses (un-ribbed and ribbed) Fresh Hams Fresh Center Loins Retail Cut Classes.
Beef Chuck Cuts. Beef : Chuck : Arm Roast Cookery Method –Moist Contains round arm bone and may contain cross sections of rib bones. Includes several.
Beef Judging ANS4615. Beef Judging Key to beef judging requires accurate grading skills Successful evaluation of quality and yield grading is essential.
Beef Retail Cut Session Home. Chuck Arm Roast Chuck Arm Roast (Boneless) Chuck Arm Steak Chuck Arm Steak (Boneless) Chuck Blade Roast Chuck Blade Steak.
USDA Quality and Yield Grades Established in 1927 Sets standards of quality and cutability (yield of edible meat) Assures products that conform to.
Beef Retail Cut Session Home. Chuck Arm Roast Chuck Arm Roast (Boneless) Chuck Arm Steak Chuck Arm Steak (Boneless) Chuck Blade Roast Chuck Blade Steak.
Lamb Carcass Grading.
Slaughter Overview and Cuts of Beef
Pork. HAM FRESH HAM LEG This is made up of the round hip bone, the aitch bone, and consists of fat covering about halfway up the leg. This has a large.
Pork Carcass Value Determining Traits. Important Carcasses are ranked from the most valuable to the least valuable. –Therefore a general understanding.
Principles of Marketing and Evaluating Beef Cattle
Beef Carcass and Primal Cuts Placing Confidence Value determination Logical reasoning Personal drive Competitiveness Team work Point conveyance Responsibility.
Beef. Round Round Steak This steak is identified by the round leg bone and three muscles. At the top of the screen is the top round, at the lower left.
Beef Retail Cuts. Chuck Chuck 7-Bone Pot Roast Shoulder Top Blade Steak Chuck Eye Steak Chuck Steak Chuck Pot Roast Shoulder Top Blade Steak Flat Iron.
Beef Retail Cut Session
Beef Primal Cuts Chuck Shank Rib Short Plate Short Loin Flank Sirloin Round.
AGR Meat Processing Technology Beef Fabrication and Identification of Cuts Dr. Stanley F. Kelley Fall 2000.
Understanding Beef.
Meat Goat Carcass Merit Dr. Dwight Loveday University of Tennessee-Knoxville Department of Food Science & Technology.
Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.
Beef Carcass Evaluation AS101
Beef Round, Loin, Flank, Rib. IV. Miscellaneous Information A.Roasts are two inches thick or thicker B.Steaks are one inch or less C.Pork Dressing % -
1. What are the guides to meat quality? (V-155). 1. What are the guides to meat quality? Government grades and manufacturer or retailer brands are guides.
U.S. Quality Grades Sex Class Maturity Marbling Firmness.
Beef Notes. Chuck Rib Short LoinSirloin RoundBrisket and Shank Short Plate and Flank.
Objective: Define cutability, degree of lean, marbling, and quality features used to market beef and swine.
Beef Quality Grading, Yield Grading and Pricing. Slaughter By-Products ($/cwt) $66/cwt$109/cwt Fab/Processing Credit Items: Fat $8.50/cwt Bone $5/cwt.
MEATS.
Beef Grading and Evaluation
People Ethical Treatment Animals People Eating Tasty Animals.
Lesson 3 Unit – Meats Advanced Livestock
Beef Maturity. Marketing and Regulatory Programs Maturity Physiological maturity determined by evaluating the size, shape and ossification of the bones.
General Meat Carcass Information
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship.
Understand quality features of beef, pork and poultry Objective 4.02.
Class of Beef Ribs Class of Beef Ribs - Results.
Beef Retail Cuts Beef7-1.htm.
Principles of Cutting Meat
AnSc 1101 Meat Grading. Outline Retail yield Inspection vs. grading Carcass Anatomy Quality Grading Yield Grading.
QUALITY GRADING LIVESTOCK Quality Standards for Beef, Pork and Poultry  The United States Department of Agriculture sets forth quality features.
Live Animal Evaluation Sheep
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship.
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship
Beef Judging ANS4615.
Species: BEEF Primal: Round Retail: Bottom Round Roast.
Primal and Retail Cuts of Beef
Beef meat notes.
Live Animal Evaluation Beef
AGR Meat Processing Technology
BEEF CARCASS YIELD AND QUALITY GRADING
Pork Carcass Value Determining Traits
Iowa 4-H/FFA Meat Judging Contest
Lamb Grading.
People Ethical Treatment Animals People Eating Tasty Animals.
2017 Iowa 4-H/FFA Meat Contest
Iowa 4-H/FFA Meat Judging Contest
Enterprise: Animal Science
TENNESSEE 4-H MEAT JUDGING PRESENTATION Beef Hindquarter Retail ID
Judging Wholesale and Retail Classes
Meats Identify the differences between beef, pork, and lamb cuts;
TENNESSEE 4-H MEAT JUDGING PRESENTATION Beef Forequarter Retail ID
Presentation transcript:

Beef Carcass and Primal Cuts Placing Why Meats Judging? Confidence Value determination Logical reasoning Personal drive Competitiveness Team work Point conveyance Responsibility

Beef Carcass Placing Quality and Yield grading already covered 90% of what you need to place beef carcasses Determining Factors Carcass Size/Weight Carcass Quality (Grading) Carcass Cutability (Grading) Potential Defects

USDA Beef Carcass Premiums and Discounts

Carcass Size/Weight Cuts must fit in the box Highly efficient system Process runs smoothest with similar carcasses Excessively large and small carcass are discounted Primals and portion cuts Ideal size/weight 600 – 900 pound carcass Most fit this window

Carcass Quality Measure of consumer acceptability (cooked palatability) and value Primary Indicators Maturity Lean color*, firmness, texture Skeletal ossification along vertebra Most in contest will be “A” May include Older but will usually be noticeable to those paying attention If “C” or older place at bottom What about “B”?

A - Maturity A – Maturity (9-30) Sacral Distinct Separation Lumbar No ossification Thoracic Rib Slight Tendency to be Flat Chine Soft , very red in color

B - Maturity B – Maturity (31-42) Sacral Completely Fused Lumbar Nearly completely ossified Thoracic Some ossification ~ 10% Rib Slightly wide, slightly flat Chine Slightly soft, slightly red

C - Maturity C – Maturity (43-72) Sacral Completely Fused Lumbar Completely ossified Thoracic Partial ossification ~ 35%, outlines visible Rib Slightly wide, slightly flat, slightly bleached/flinty Chine Tinge of red to mostly white

D - Maturity D – Maturity (73 – 96) Sacral Completely Fused Lumbar Completely ossified Thoracic Considerable ossification 70% or more, outline visible Rib Moderately wide and flat Chine Moderately hard and flat

E - Maturity E – Maturity (96 >) Sacral Completely Fused Lumbar Completely ossified Thoracic Considerable outlines to barely visible Rib Very wide and flat Chine Hard and white or yellow

Lean Maturity

Beef Quality Cont Marbling will be the primary indicator Provided maturities are similar Determine marbling in the exposed ribeye Pay attention to amount and distribution Lesser concern: external fat color White vs. Yellow, soft or oily

Moderately Abundant Slightly Moderate Slight Small Modest

Degree of Marbling Eating Quality USDA Prime Slightly Abundant USDA Choice Small Modest Moderate USDA Select Slight Eating Quality

Beef Quality Grading

Cutability “Boneless Closely Trimmed Retail Cuts” – 4 main primals (Chuck, Rib, Loin, Round) Primary Concerns Trimness – amount of trimmable fat Largest impact on Yield or cutability Most cuts with backfat in excess of 0.4 inch will require “excessive” trimming Fat thickness at ¾ position of ribeye

Cutability Cont Primary focus Other Evaluations Muscling – 2nd most important Used in relationship to carcass weight REA at 12 rib is the main indicator Other Evaluations %KPH in relation to carcass weight Overall muscling in round and chuck Adjusted fat thickness (round, brisket)

Major Defects

Beef Carcass Placing Priority 70% Quality, 30% Cutability The value difference between Se, Ch, Ch°, Pr is greater than value differences across YG Quality grade 1st and rank, Yield grade 2nd Rank by YG within QG, except 1.5, 2.0 YG can be used to place lower quality over high quality, low cutability YG 4 heavy discount Standard and YG 5 placed last

Terms in Brief Although not writing, may be used in questions Quality -Less ossification -Firmer ribeye -Whiter fat -Finer textured ribeye -Brighter, cherry red color -Greater amount of evenly dispersed marbling Trimness -Less fat opposite the ribeye -Less fat over the round, sirloin, loin edge, lower rib and chuck -Less fat over the inside round and brisket -Less KPH -Less cod/udder fat Muscling -Larger ribeye -Thicker round -Plumper cushion -More bulging heel -Shorter shank -Heavier muscled sirloin -Fuller rib -Thicker chuck

Gender Determination in Beef Carcasses

Beef Ribs Placing Most ribs will be fabricated into steaks Quality is the most important trait Evaluate Quality in BOTH the Rib face and Blade face of the ribeye Select and lower quality should be discounted Equal quality should be ranked on cutability Extremely fat, YG 4 & 5 ribs should be discounted

Rib Placing Emphasis Place based on 70% Quality, 30% Cutability All ribs should be Quality Graded 1st Evaluate for Cutability 2nd USDA Standard ribs (low marbling, Traces and lower) should be placed last Yield Grade 4 and 5 type ribs should be heavily discriminated

Beef Ribs

Beef Rib Terminology Quality -Higher degree of marbling in the ribeye -Greater amount of marbling in the eye of the blade face -Finer textured lean in the ribeye, eye of the blade -Firmer lean -Less ossification in the thoracic buttons Trimness -Less fat opposite the ribeye -Less fat over the lip -Less fat over the back -Less fat along the rib ends -Less fat over the blade face -Less seam fat in the blade face Muscling -Larger ribeye -Fuller back -Larger eye of blade -Greater area of exposed lean in the blade face

Beef Full Loin Placing Full loins are evaluated similar to ribs Fabricated into steaks Quality is most important factor Evaluate in Loin face and Sirloin face Select or lower are discounted Loins of equal quality are place by YG Trimness is most important YG 4 and 5 loins should be discounted

Full Loin Placing Emphasis Loins should be evaluated based on 70% Quality and 30% Cutability First step - Quality Grade and place Second step - Determine cutability and place within Quality Grade USDA Standard loins should be placed last YG 4 and 5 loins are heavily discriminated

Beef Full Loins

Beef Full Loin Terminology Quality -Higher degree of marbling in loin eye -Greater amount of marbling in the sirloin face -Brighter, more cherry-red color in loin eye and sirloin face -Finer textured lean in the loin eye and sirloin face -Firmer lean in the loin eye and sirloin face Trimness -Less fat opposite the loin eye -Less fat over the tail -Less fat over the back -Less fat over the sirloin -Less fat along the flank -Less fat over the sirloin face -Less seam fat in the sirloin face Muscling -Larger loin eye -Fuller back -Heavier muscled sirloin -Greater area of exposed lean in the sirloin face

Beef Short Loin Placing Beef short loins are placed very similar to beef full loins Extra emphasis on quality Almost entirely fabricated into steak cuts T-bone, Porterhouse, Strips, Filets Due to high value as steaks, Quality is extremely important

Short Loin Placing Emphasis Beef short loins are evaluated based on 80% Quality and 20% Cutability First step – Place on Quality Grade Second step – Sort within QG using YG USDA Standard loins should be place last YG 4 and 5 short loins are heavily discounted

Beef Short Loins

Beef Short Loin Terminology Quality -Higher degree of marbling in the loin eye -Greater amount of marbling in the sirloin face* -Brighter more cherry-red colored loin eye and sirloin face* -Finer textured lean in the loin eye and sirloin face* -Firmer lean in the loin eye and sirloin face* *Includes the LD, GM and PM Trimness -Less fat opposite the loin eye -Less fat over the tail -Less fat over the back -Less fat over flank edge -Less fat over sirloin face -Less seam fat in sirloin face Muscling -Larger loin eye -Fuller back -Greater are of exposed lean in sirloin face -Larger LD, GM, and PM

Beef Round Placing Beef rounds are the exception to the rule in beef class placing Almost all the emphasis is placed on round cutability Trimness of rounds is most important Muscles of locomotion Will mostly be utilized as roasts with moist cookery, not steaks

Beef Round Placing Emphasis Beef rounds should be evaluated 90% on cutability and 10% on quality First step – Place on cutability Trimness and muscling Second - Sort within cutability groups based on dimension (size and weight) Quality typically only plays a role when two rounds are so similar that a break point is needed

Beef Rounds

Beef Round Terminology Trimness -Less fat over the round face (evaluate knuckle and rump individually) -Less fat over the center-section -Less fat over the cushion -Less seam fat in the round face -Less fat along the flank edge -Less cod fat Muscling -Greater area of exposed lean in the round face -Larger knuckle -Larger rump face -Longer, wider center-section -Deeper, plumper cushion -Shorter shank -More bulging heel

Comments and Questions?