© 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ethics BHV 390: Research Methods Kimberly Porter Martin, Ph.D.
Advertisements

Allyn & Bacon 2003 Social Work Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches Topic 5: Ethics and Politics in Social Work Research.
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Research Methods in Crime and Justice Chapter 3 The Ethical Principles that Guide Researchers.
University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
Informed consent requirements
The Consent Process: It’s More Than Just a Form A “10 Minute Training” Brought to you by Cyndi Long, MS, RD, CCRC CU Sports Medicine.
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Informed Consent, and Responsibilities Requirement for IRBs -DHHS: 45 CFR Part 46 -FDA: 21 CFR 56 Requirement for and.
Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.
TODAY’S TOPIC: Ethics – deconstructing consent and participation with “vulnerable” populations.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
IRB 101: Informed Consent Columbia University Medical Center IRB September 22, 2005.
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Ethics in Research The Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1,
Ethics in Research Stangor Chapter 3.
FOUNDATIONS OF NURSING RESEARCH Sixth Edition CHAPTER Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Nursing Research,
Ethics in Business Research
Human Subject Research by Students at William Paterson University May 2011.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
The Goals and Principles of Human Participant Protection Part 4: Vulnerable Populations.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Ethics and Research Chapter Four.
May I have your permission please? The consent process: What, Where, When, Who and Why Valerie Smith OHRP IRB Program Manager
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Ethics and Research. Ethics is Educational Research Committee on Scientific and Professional Ethics of American Psychological Association -- Ethical Principals.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
Experimental Research Methods in Language Learning Chapter 6 Ethical Considerations in Experimental Research.
Objective 9/23/15 Today we will be completing our research methods unit & begin reviewing for the upcoming unit assessment 9/25. Agenda: -Turn in all homework.
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
All About the Institution Review Board! Jennifer A. Jones, M.S. Jessica P Lauren E. Ewaniuk M.Ed ED 510 Fall 2011.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
THE TUSKEGEE SYPHILIS STUDY EFFECT ON CURRENT RESEARCH.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
Chapter 2: Ethical Issues in Program Evaluation. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Federal mandate for IRBs –Concern during 1970s about unethical research.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 5 Research Ethics All researchers, even students, have a responsibility to conduct ethical research.
 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.
Informed Consent Presented by Marian Serge, RN. Goals Informed consent process and form Title 38 CFR , Common Rule required elements and additional.
Informed Consent It’s a Process …not a form. Outline  Historical Background  Respect for Persons  Consent Process  Elements of Informed Consent 
Ethics. The branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct Moral principles that govern.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
HRPP Coordinator Meeting May 19, 2017
Conditional IRB Approval
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Chapter 3: Ethical guidelines for psychological research.
Chapter 3 Ethics in Research
Upcoming Changes to the Common Rule
Risk Determinations and Research with Children
Chapter 5 Research Ethics
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
Baruch College HRPP Office
Ethical Considerations
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
The Need for Ethical Principles
Exploring 45 CFR , Criteria for IRB Approval of Research
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
Human Participants Research
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Informed Consent Allison Blodgett, PhD, CIP Director of IRB Operations
Presentation transcript:

© 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Ethics and Research Chapter 4 © 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

What is Considered Ethical Regarding Research? Ethics refers to the question(s) of right and wrong. Researchers must consider if it is “right” to conduct a particular study. The question to ask is: “Will any physical or psychological harm result from this particular research?” By practicing ethical procedures, the researcher is doing “what is right.” © 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Statement of Ethical Principles Ethical behavior is defined as conforming to the standards of conduct of a given profession or group (Webster’s New World Dictionary). An agreement among researchers dictates what is considered right and wrong. The Statement of Ethical Principles suggests three very important issues: The protection of participants from harm Ensuring confidentiality of the research data The question of deceptions of subjects © 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Protecting Participants from Harm Considered the most important ethical consideration of all the principles It is the responsibility of all researchers to ensure that participants are protected from physical or psychological harm, discomfort, or danger due to research procedures Any study that could cause harm should not be considered © 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Protecting Participants from Harm (cont.) Another responsibility of the researcher is to obtain informed consent from each participant Three important questions to ask about harm in a study are: Could people be harmed? If so, could the same questions be investigated in a different way? Are the results important enough to risk possible harm to the participants? © 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 5

Ensuring Confidentiality Once data are collected, researchers should make sure that no one else has access to the data. Names of subjects should be removed from all data forms, if possible. The researcher should have no knowledge of particular data linked to a subject. All subjects should be assured that any data collected will be held in confidence, as well as that all participants have the right to withdraw from the study, if necessary. © 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Example of an Informed Consent Form CONSENT TO SERVE AS A SUBJECT IN RESEARCH I consent to serve as a subject in the research investigation entitled: ________________________________________________________________ The nature and general purpose of the research procedure and the known risks involved have been explained to me by ____________________________ The investigator is authorized to proceed on the understanding that I may terminate my service as a subject at any time I so desire. I understand the known risks are: __________________________________ I understand also that it is not possible to identify all potential risks in an experimental procedure, and I believe that reasonable safeguards have been taken to minimize both the known and the potentially unknown risks. Witness _________________________ Signed _________________________ (subject) Date __________________________ To be retained by the principal investigator

Should Subjects Be Deceived? Many studies cannot be carried out unless some deception takes place. Deception refers to intentionally misinforming the subjects to some or all aspects of the research topic. The possibility of harm could be created from these actions, so the following guidelines have been developed: Whenever possible, conduct the study using methods that do not require deception If alternative methods cannot be devised, the researcher must determine if deception is justified If participants are deceived, the researcher must ensure that the participants are provided with sufficient explanation as soon as possible © 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Examples of Unethical Research Practices

Research With Children Studies using children as participants present some special issues for researchers. The young are more vulnerable, have fewer legal rights, and may not understand the language of informed consent. © 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 10

Research With Children (cont.) The following guidelines need to be considered: Informed consent of the parents or guardians is required regarding the use of minors as subjects Researchers do not present themselves as diagnosticians or counselors in reporting results to parents, nor do they report information given by children in confidence Children may never be coerced into participation in any study Any form of remuneration for the child’s services does not affect the application of these ethical principles © 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Example of a Minor Consent Form Parental Permission for a Minor to Participate in Research Research Title  A. PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND My name is ________. I am a (graduate student/ faculty member) at State University and I am conducting a research study about __________. I am inviting your child to take part in the research because he/she is in the after school program I am studying. B. PROCEDURES If you agree to let your child participate in this research study, the following will occur: Your child will be invited to participate in an after school tutoring project. The tutoring sessions will take place between 3:45 and 4:45 PM on five Tuesdays and Thursdays during the spring semester. C.  RISKS There may be some discomfort for your child at being asked some of the questions. Your child may answer only those questions they want to, or they may stop the entire process at any time, without penalty to them. I have been given a copy of this consent form. Participation in this research study is voluntary. I agree further to indemnify and hold harmless State University and its agents and employees from any and all liability, actions, or causes of actions that may accrue to the subject minor as a result of his/her activities for which this consent is granted. Child’s name ______________________________________________________ Signature of Parent _________________________ Date _________________ Signature of Researcher ______________________ Date _________________

Regulation of Research The National Research Act of 1974 requires that all research institutions receiving federal funds establish an Institutional Review Board (IRB) to review and approve research projects. The IRB must have at least five members, including both men and women, at least one person nonaffiliated with the institutions, and one nonscientist. Those with potential conflicts of interest are excluded. UPM has an IRB which reviews research proposals to be done by UPM researchers © 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Criteria for IRB Approval institutional review board Minimization of risk to participants Risks that may occur must be reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits Equitable selection--i.e., the proposed research does not discriminate among individuals in the population Protection of vulnerable individuals Informed consent © 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Criteria for IRB Approval (cont.) Participants must have the right to withdraw from the study at any time without penalty Informed consent must be appropriately documented Data being collected must be monitored to ensure the safety of the participants Privacy and confidentiality must be ensured © 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

© 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Department of Health and Human Services Revised Regulations for Research with Human Subjects The revised guidelines exempt many projects from regulations by the HHS (Health and Human Services) The list of projects now free from the control of the HHS can be found under “More About Research” in your text. © 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Guidelines for Qualitative Research Bogdan and Biklen offer following suggestions for qualitative researchers: Avoid research sites where informants may feel coerced to participate Honor the privacy of informants Tell participants being interviewed how long interviews will take Protect identities of informants Treat informants with respect Clarify terms of any agreement negotiated with participants Tell the truth when findings are reported © 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.