Opportunity Index: Policy Presentation to School Committee

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
Advertisements

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
Support and Accountability to Address School and Student Risk in Washoe County School District February 28, 2014.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Reducing Chronic Absence What Will It Take? 2014.
Racial and Economic Segregation in Schools: Barrier to Quality and Equality in Education Baris Gumus-Dawes.
Progress and Promise: Lessons from the Boston Pilot Schools Center for Collaborative Education January 2006.
WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation for Overseas Schools International School Eastern Seaboard March , 2011.
Salem-Keizer Public Schools Budget Message.
DISTRICT MANAGEMENT COUNCIL ACADEMIC RETURN ON INVESTMENT (A-ROI)
2007 Grade 3-8 English Test Results. 2 Raising Achievement Over past several years, Board of Regents has voted measures to raise standards and require.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2000, 2001, and 2002.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
©IRRE First Things First : A Framework and Supports For District and School Reform William Moore, Ph.D Institute for Research and Reform in Education Boston,
Vision for Education in Tennessee Our Strategic Priorities ESEA Directors Institute Kathleen Airhart, Deputy Commissioner August 2014.
Pathways to Results ToTo Pathways Results. What is Pathways to Results? Improve student transition to college and careers Develop outcomes- and equity-focused.
Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation May 14, 2012 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team 1.
The effects of Socio-Economic Status on African American students’ achievement Nazzerine Charles & Kelly-Ann Thompson Education Fall 2008.
+ ECFRPC Sustainable Communities FHEA and Initial Sunrail Station Area Analysis James Carras Carras Community Investment Inc. September 20, 2013.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Slide 1 National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) States’ Data-Based Responses to Low Achieving Students on State Assessments Martha L. Thurlow National.
Quality First Teaching for All. Quality First Teaching for ALL The most effective way to narrow the gaps! A Top Priority for Schools! Context and Background.
“Males of Color” Initiative A Presentation to the Providence School Board May 11, 2015.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
1 CHILDREN FIRST NETWORK SUMMARY Winter 2009 Confidential – Not for Distribution.
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
Measuring Turnaround Success October 29 th, 2015 Jeanette P. Cornier, Ph.D.
WILMINGTON EDUCATION STRATEGY THINK TANK (WESTT) FAIR & ADEQUATE RESOURCING OF SCHOOLS DE Education Funding Improvement Commission January 7, 2016.
1 Module 4: Using Data to Drive Action Attendance & Truancy Among Virginia Students.
SHOW-ME TASK FORCE ON ACCREDITATION AND ASSESSMENT REPORT MISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS June 14, 2016.
Advancing Quality Partnerships
JMFIP Financial Management Conference
Data Driven Decisions for School Improvement
Santa Ana College School of Continuing Education
Educator Equity Resource Tool: Using Comprehensive Equity Indicators
Lorain City Schools 90 Day Entry Plan Update.
R.A.C.C.E. Radical Advocates for Cross Cultural Education
Merit & Incentive Pay Based on High Stakes Testing
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Benefits of Summer Programs on Low-income Elementary Aged Youth
The Certificate of Equity Based Teaching
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Post Desegregation Consent Decree Plan
Washington’s ESSA Consolidated Plan Implementation 101
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Chronic Absenteeism Equity Profile
Opportunity Index Update
Response to Intervention (RtI) What is a Teacher’s Role?
Unlocking Student Potential
Resource Allocation and District Action Reports: RADAR
Our new quality framework and methodology:
CORE Academic Growth Model: Results Interpretation
California School Dashboard
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
Completion Matters The NC Student Success Center
Aspiring Principals May 7,2013.
Young Lives, University of Oxford
Linda DeAngelo CIRP Assistant Director for Research
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Tiered Instruction and Interventions
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Feedback from Teacher Superintendent Council & Next Steps
Ensuring Equity for All Students
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
Significant Disproportionality Fiscal Webinar
Presentation transcript:

Opportunity Index: Policy Presentation to School Committee Dr. Dan O’Brien, Northeastern University & Dr. Nancy Hill, Harvard University Boston Area Research Initiative (BARI) Dr. Colin Rose Assistant Superintendent of Opportunity and Achievement Gaps Boston Public Schools

Opportunity Index Policy Statement The Boston Public Schools will formally adopt the “Opportunity Index” as a district-wide tool for making decisions that drive equity, coherence and innovation. Aligned with the School Committee’s Opportunity and Achievement Gaps Policy, the Opportunity Index uses data from students’ home neighborhoods along with individual and family level data as a means for measuring opportunity gaps throughout the district. In turn, the Boston Public Schools will close these opportunity gaps by using the Index to make decisions, such as resource allocation, program evaluation, and other prospective and retrospective assessments. The Index will be updated annually to ensure the most predictive factors and recent information available are incorporated.

Why Do We Need an Opportunity Index We know, and research supports, that there are many variables outside schools’ control that affect student achievement. Students come to school with an invisible backpack of varied opportunity. Our Challenge: Although many of our measures (eg. WSF) align to national best practices, we feel our current measures of student need are too blunt…and we lack a common equity framework that we use as a tool for making equity-driven decisions. The better we match need with resources, the closer we get to closing opportunity gaps. WSF does a good job right now but introducing more variable that matter will bring us to the next level of equity Students come to school with

What is the Opportunity Index The Opportunity Index is a powerful new tool for examining the needs of our students and their schools as a means toward increasing educational equity across the district; it will serve as a more robust, accurate, and differentiated measure of student and school need. The Opportunity Index is a composite index that introduces a range of data that is outside of the schools’ control, yet is predictive of students’ academic outcomes, including neighborhood and individual/family variables. By rolling multiple measures into one, more accessible metric, BPS will be able to direct resources and supports to the students who need it most.

Equity, Coherence, and Innovation Aligns to Opportunity and Achievement Gaps Policy and Implementation Plan Aligns to the professional learning and other tools of equity inside central office and all of our schools in the district Resource allocation as a “values statement” OAG Objective 5.3: Demonstrate equity, quality, and impact in funding and resources. Aligns to the equity conversations we are having around our curriculum and pedagogy around the Essential of Instructional equity, our Culturally and Linguistically Sustaining Practices work both at central office and every school in the district, and other tools such as the BPS racial equity tool that is being rolled out this year. Quite often people say resource allocation is a values statement- this in another step in saying equity is our value.

BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS MISSION: Create a place-based Opportunity Index that captures inequities that arise from factors outside of the control of schools. Akshata It is a “place-based” composite index, based on factors such as household income, employment rates, student academic performance, and crime in the neighborhoods of Boston using census tracts A composite score is calculated for each of the 177 U.S. Census tracts in the City of Boston, and each tract is then coded into one of five “Opportunity Zones.” Zone 1 includes neighborhoods with higher incomes, higher employment, higher academic performance, lower crime, and lower absenteeism; Zone 5 includes neighborhoods with lower incomes, lower employment, lower academic performance, higher crime, and higher absenteeism. In the current version of the index, each indicator is weighted equally, but we have more academic and crime indicators, weighting those two areas heavier

BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS MISSION: Create a place-based Opportunity Index that captures inequities that arise from factors outside of the control of schools. Akshata It is a “place-based” composite index, based on factors such as household income, employment rates, student academic performance, and crime in the neighborhoods of Boston using census tracts A composite score is calculated for each of the 177 U.S. Census tracts in the City of Boston, and each tract is then coded into one of five “Opportunity Zones.” Zone 1 includes neighborhoods with higher incomes, higher employment, higher academic performance, lower crime, and lower absenteeism; Zone 5 includes neighborhoods with lower incomes, lower employment, lower academic performance, higher crime, and higher absenteeism. In the current version of the index, each indicator is weighted equally, but we have more academic and crime indicators, weighting those two areas heavier Residential Segregation in Boston (% White by census tract)

BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS MISSION: Create a place-based Opportunity Index that captures inequities that arise from factors outside of the control of schools. Akshata It is a “place-based” composite index, based on factors such as household income, employment rates, student academic performance, and crime in the neighborhoods of Boston using census tracts A composite score is calculated for each of the 177 U.S. Census tracts in the City of Boston, and each tract is then coded into one of five “Opportunity Zones.” Zone 1 includes neighborhoods with higher incomes, higher employment, higher academic performance, lower crime, and lower absenteeism; Zone 5 includes neighborhoods with lower incomes, lower employment, lower academic performance, higher crime, and higher absenteeism. In the current version of the index, each indicator is weighted equally, but we have more academic and crime indicators, weighting those two areas heavier Racial Segregation in Boston (% White by census tract) Individual and Family Characteristics Matter

Academic Outcomes Between School Variations in Need Schematic of our theoretical and policy model Home Disparities --Family SES -Educational Activities Between School Variations in Need Academic Outcomes OI Assesses & accounts for Residential Segregation Neighborhood Disparities -SES -Resources The neighborhood disparities is the “inequitable consequence of living in a particular neighborhood.” The NOI wants to account for the unrandom nature of place Adapted from Reardon, S. Kalogrides, D. & Shores, K. (2016) The geography of racial/ethnic test score gaps. Center for Educational Policy Analysis Working Paper (16-10)

ELL, SPED, and FRP Lunch still matter, too. Bottom Line First… Neighborhoods matter Neighborhoods differed by as much as ~20 pts. on MCAS scores. Driven especially by public safety, socioeconomic status, and academic attainment of adults. ELL, SPED, and FRP Lunch still matter, too. “Risk” indicators are a great way to predict future outcomes. Though they don’t tell us why.

Neighborhood Constructs BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Neighborhood Constructs Academic Attainment (Adult) Public Safety Public Health Physical Disorder Socioeconomic Status Newcomer Residential Stability Custodianship

**METHODOLOGICAL MINUTE** BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS **METHODOLOGICAL MINUTE** Isolating “Neighborhood Effects” Compare Across: Neighborhood-level factors Compare within: Individual-level factors

**METHODOLOGICAL MINUTE** BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS **METHODOLOGICAL MINUTE** Multilevel Models Accounts for the fact that people living in the same neighborhood are more similar to each other than people living in different neighborhood. Really important for racial and socioeconomic residential segregation Accounts for all other factors being considered

Effects of Neighborhood on MCAS Scores Academic Attainment (Adult) Public Safety Public Health Physical Disorder Socioeconomic Status Newcomer Residential Stability Custodianship

Testing Neighborhood Effects Note: .03 ≈ 2.5 pts. between the lowest and highest scoring neighborhood

Neighborhood Opportunity Index Neighborhoods matter… …but there are clearly individual factors “outside of the control of schools.” Compare Across: Neighborhood-level factors

Individual Demographics BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS What do we mean by individual factors? Individual Demographics Prior School Experiences Attendance Suspensions Course Failures MCAS Failures FRPL/Poverty Special Services SPED ELL

Testing Individual-Level Factors Note: .1 ≈ 1.6 pts. difference between groups.

Predicting Performance Academic aptitude is formed continuously through development. Could we use performance in a previous school to determine the needs of students moving forward? Using “risk” indicators. Note: not possible for elementary school students

Predicting Performance Note: .1 ≈ 1.6 pts. difference in test score.

Conclusions: Place matters, the NOI can account for up to 20 points in MCAS Various factors matter, including SES, Safety, Adult Ed Attainment; for elementary, physical disorder & custodianship. Individual characteristics matter even more (the OI) For older students, we can predict future performance with “risk” indicators But individual-level characteristics provide additional precision The OI can be effectively used to account for a substantial amount of the variation outside of the control of schools It accounts for place-based differences in access to resources and stressful environments… And individual-level inequities across families within and across neighborhoods.

Possible Uses for the Index: Uses Are Numerous- Here Are a Few Examples: Partnerships Programming Funding Equity analyses Example: Expanded Learning Time - Summer Learning National Equity Leader in Resource Allocation: Innovative - Nothing as robust right now in K-12 education Advocating for Equity - Local, State, National We are working Quite often people say resource allocation is a values statement- this in another step in saying equity is our value. We do a fairly good job already with things such as WSF,

List of People to thank