Landmark Freedom of Speech Cases

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Schenck v US Facts of the case Charles Schenck, Secretary of the Socialist party, was charged with violating the Espionage Act of 1917 Along with.
Advertisements

Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) Summary of Case: Pennsylvania's schools were giving public school money to private schools in the surrounding area. Most of which.
Landmark Cases.
Famous court cases #4 Emmitt and Jordan.
DO NOW: COPY THE VOCABULARY IN YOUR NOTEBOOK 1.Civil liberties: one's freedom to exercise one's rights as guaranteed under the laws of the country 2.1.
Learning target: I can analyze the Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States to understand the importance of the First Amendment.
Supreme Court Cases. What you need to know to present your case: The background of the case – What happened? – What were both sides of the argument? Constitutional.
Texas v. Johnson DECIDED: June 21, 1989 ARGUED: March 21, 1989.
Our First Amendment Rights
SUPREME COURT CASES. Marbury v. Madison (1803)  William Marbury was commissioned Justice of the Peace of the District of Columbia at the end of President.
1. Issue: Can the press print articles that are against the government if the Information is true? 2. Case Summary: John Peter Zenger was charged with.
Freedom of Expression Laura Lantrip Alina Mihelin.
SUPREME COURT CASES. Marbury v. Madison (1803)  William Marbury was commissioned Justice of the Peace of the District of Columbia at the end of President.
Supreme Court Case Story Project George Doyle. Island Trees School District Board of Education v. Pico The board of education ordered certain books deemed.
Civil Liberties during Wartime pg. 27 – Unit 5 Study Packet.
Made it a crime:  To convey information with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the U.S. armed forces or to promote the success of its.
Texas v. Johnson What are the facts of the case? What is the constitutional issue before the US Supreme Court? What was the Supreme Court’s ruling.
Two cases Roe V. Wade and Morse v. Frederick. Roe v. Wade 1969 Norma Rae McCorvey asked for an abortion due to an unwanted pregnancy and was denied under.
Freedom of Speech.
Supreme Court Case Research Melanie Rosen. PROTECTED SPEECH Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment of the United States.
Texas vs. Johnson Argued: March 21, 1989 Decided: June 21, 1989 By: Garialdy De Jesus.
TEXAS VS. JOHNSON 1989 By: Nick Limon Aliah Medina 7 th.
Texas vs. Johnson and Tinker vs. Des Moines By Emily Franklin.
March 14, 2014 Aim: Did the Sedition Act violate the First Amendment? Do Now: – Are there any factors preventing you from fully exercising your right to.
US Government: Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Supreme Court Case Project By: Meadow Noonan.
FIRST AMENDMENT SUPREME COURT CASES. HAZELWOOD V. KUHLMIER Student newspaper Students wrote an article about teenage pregnancy Principal stopped the.
Baker v. Carr Facts  Charles Baker was a Republican who lived in Shelby County, Tennessee who argued that although the Tennessee Constitution requires.
Freedom of Speech: First Amendment “The test of democracy is freedom of criticism.” ~David Ben-Gurion.
COURT CASE BRIEFINGS XAVIER CUMMINS MICHAEL VIZZI CHRISTIAN DALUSUNG ALYSSA NEWSOM.
1 ST AMENDMENT; FREE SPEECH AND FREEDOM OF THE PRESS ELIZABETH MANWILL MIA MAY RAMI KHALAF MATT MARTY.
Freedom of Speech and Press 1 st Amendment Forms of (Speech) Expression Spoken Written Symbolic.
Argued: March 19, 2007 Decided: June 25, =2&i= &w=580&fh=&fw=&ll=&pl=&r=
The WIB The War Industries Board was set up to oversee production of war supplies –Managed the buying and distributing of war materials –Set production.
Aim: What are the landmark First Amendment cases of the 20 th Century? Do Now: What does the First Amendment protect?
Do Now: Are there any factors that prevent you from fully exercising your right to free speech? Are these factors fair?
Texas v. Johnson. Background Facts Johnson took place in a Republican national convention in Dallas, Texas. The purpose of the demonstration was to protest.
YOUR NAME DATE OF PRESENTATION COURSE NAME Texas vs. Johnson Flag Burning/Freedom of Speech.
The Supreme Court Intro The Court of Last Resort.
Chapter 13 Constitutional Freedoms Section 5
Brennan Novak and Robert Gardner
VS, Argued: March 19, 2007 Decided: June 25, 2007
21 to 30 yrs. and later extended to 40 yrs. of age.
First Amendment in Schools
First Amendment in Schools
FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
Schenck vs United States
Texas v. Johnson(1989)Flag Burning, Freedom of Speech
1st Amendment.
Civil Liberties Americans have held liberty in high regard since lost their liberties spurred a break from Great Britain. Americans valued the idea of.
Espionage and Sedition Acts
Who was Charles Schenck?
Freedom of Speech 1.
Texas Vs Johnson.
The First Amendment By:Jennifer Huerta.
Lesson 9 American Government
By Katherine Ramirez & Alicia reta
1st and 2nd Amendment Project
FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
Other Civil Liberties Issues
How did the Charles Schenck impact the U.S. freedom of speech?
First Amendment in Schools
Modern Issues in the U.S. Agenda: DO NOW: Legal or Illegal?
Texas v Johnson Decided 1989.
Warm Up – February 13 Read the article on Engel v. Vitale that is on my website under today’s date and answer the following questions: 1. Who was Steven.
Civil Liberties during Wartime
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989) Alysha Gerba.
Schenck v. United States 249 U.S. 47
Texas v. Johnson By Kane Deyell.
Texas v. Johnson (1989) 491 U.S. 397 Morgan Fraley Pd. 7/8.
Texas v. johnson (1989) Snyder v. phelps (2011)
Presentation transcript:

Landmark Freedom of Speech Cases Created By: Michael Vitak

Schenck v. United States 1919

Distributed anti-draft brochures to soldiers leaving to serve in WWI Advised the soldiers to appeal the draft Charged with attempting to cause insubordination in the military

Schenck v. United States Dealt with Freedom of Speech Distributed anti-war brochures Convicted under the Espionage Act of 1917 Was Schenck distribution of anti-war propaganda protected under the First Amendment? Established the “clear and present danger” test Schenck v. United States Tried under the Espionage Act of 1917 The case reached the Supreme Court in 1919 The legal question was whether Schenck distribution of anti-war propaganda was protected by the first amendment? The decision was unanimous, and the justices convicted Schenck Sentenced to 6 months in prison This established the clear and present danger clause This allowed the courts to analysis each case independently

Debs v. United States 1919

Debs was the leader of the socialist party of america Arrested after giving a speech arguing for citizens refusal to serve in the military Charged under the Espionage Act of 1917

Debs v. United States Dealt with the Freedom of Speech Arrested after speaking out against the draft Did Debs’ arrest under the Espionage Act violate his First Amendment rights? His conviction was upheld Convicted in a federal district court Reached the supreme court in 1919 The question before the supreme court was whether Debs’ conviction under the Espionage act violated the First Amendment? Unanimous decision Conviction was upheld because it nearly mirrored Schenck v. United States

Texas v. Johnson 1989

During a political demonstration at the Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas Gregory Lee Johnson doused an American flag with kerosene and set it on fire. This was in response to President Reagan’s policies, and no one was hurt. Johnson was charged for desecration of a venerated object, which violated Texas law. He was sentenced to one year in jail and fined $2,000.

Texas v. Johnson Dealt with the Freedom of Speech, Press, and Assembly Is burning the American flag protected under the First Amendment? The ruling invalidated laws in 48 states This case found its way to the Supreme Court, and the Justices were faced with whether desecration of an American flag was a form of speech that is protected under the First Amendment? In a 5 to 4 decision they ruled in favor of johnson The ruling reversed laws in 48 states This allows Americans to openly burn an American flag, and still remains extremely contentious

Morse v. Fredrick 2007

At a school sponsored event Joseph Fredrick held up a banner that read “Bong Hits for Jesus” The School principle confiscated the banner and suspended Fredrick Due to their rules against displaying drug related materials

Morse v. Fredrick Dealt with the Freedom of Speech, Press, and Assembly Does the school have a right to prohibit students from promoting the use of illegal drugs? Does the principal have immunity from litigation for disciplining Fredrick? The Supreme Court was faced with two constitutional questions Do schools have the right to prohibit students from promoting the use of illegal drugs? Does the school principle have immunity from litigation after she disciplined Fredrick? The court voted 5 to 4 in favor of Morse, the school principle Justice Roberts gave majority opinion, and said that students have the right to free speech but that does not extend to pro-drug messages All of the Justices agree that the principle should have legal immunity.

Presentation Summary: Schenck v. United States-1919 Freedom of Speech Anti-WWI Clear and Present Danger Clause Debs v. United States-1919 Convicted because of Schenck v. United States Texas v. Johnson-1989 Freedom of Speech, Press, and Assembly Allows citizens to burn the American flag Morse v. Fredrick-2007 “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” Limited School Student’s Freedom of Speech