Regulatory Update Mercury & Air Toxics Standards (MATS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reducing Toxic Pollution from Power Plants
Advertisements

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
DECEMBER 17, 2013 | WESTBOROUGH, MA Reliability Committee & Transmission Committee & Markets Committee Capacity Zone Modeling Al McBride MANAGER, AREA.
Reshaping Power Generation New EPA Rules and NAAQS CPES Energy & Environmental Conference March 14, 2012, Cromwell Ct Robert V Bibbo, Normandeau Associates.
CAIR & MATS 2012 Southern Sectional AWMA Annual Meeting & Technical Conference September 12, 2012 Chris Goodman, P.E. Environmental Strategy.
MATS 2015: Are Your Units Ready? Outage Management for Power Plants July 15, 2014 Stephanie Sebor.
Recent EPA Regulation Development Presented by Bill Luthans to the 56 th Meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee Meeting for the Improvement of Air Quality.
Reducing Toxic Pollution from Power Plants March 16, 2011 EPA’s Proposed Mercury and Air Toxics Standards.
A History and Status of CEMS Applications in USEPA Regulations Dale Evarts US EPA December 16, 2002 Better Air Quality in Asian Cities 2002
Texas Lignite Industry. Texas Lignite  Because >95% of lignite mining operations in Texas are in support of electric generation…..whatever impacts the.
Perspective On Growing EPA Environmental Mandates David Stippler, Indiana Utility Consumer Counselor 2012 NASUCA Annual Meeting Baltimore,
December 4, Utility MACT Air & Waste Management Association/EPA Information Exchange December 4, 2002 William H. Maxwell Combustion Group/ESD.
Robert L. Burns, Jr., Esq. Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC August 1, 2013 Impact of Environmental Regulation on Coal Combustion for Electrical.
Integrated Planning Model (IPM) What It Is, Who Uses It, How It Works, What It Can Show You Presentation for For the Clean Air Act Advisory Committee Permits/New.
Reducing Toxic Pollution from Power Plants April 13, 2011 EPA’s Proposed Mercury and Air Toxics Standards.
ACC Open Meeting – November 18, 2010 Four Corners Power Plant 1.
A&WMA Georgia Regulatory Update Conference Current State of the Air in GA Jac Capp, GA EPD, Branch Chief, Air Protection Branch April 16, 2013.
Update on Multi-pollutant Legislation Richard Long, Region 8 Wrap Meeting Nov. 14, 2001.
ISO New England Regional Update Wholesale Electricity Markets & State Energy Policy Seminar Connecticut Business & Industry Association December 14, 2010.
Particulate Matter Monitoring Required by the Utility MATS Eric Swisher| | ext. 17 August 22, 2012 Presented to ARIPPA.
BREAKING THE COAL HABIT Stefanie A. Brand, Director New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel 31 Clinton St., 11 th Floor P.O. Box Newark, N.J Phone: ,
MERCURY POLICIES: A VIEW FROM THE ELECTRIC POWER SECTOR Michael T. Rossler Indiana Energy Conference September 16, 2004.
Final Amendments to the Regional Haze Rule: BART Rule Making June 16, 2005.
UTILITY MACT WORKING GROUP STATE AND LOCAL STAKEHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS.
Assessment of Mercury Rules for Electric Generators in North Carolina September 9, 2015 Presented to the Environmental Management Commission – Air Quality.
EPA Cooling System Regulations Hall of States Briefing February 22, 2011.
NTEC -- April 24, Utility Air Toxics Regulatory Finding National Tribal Environmental Council April 24, 2001 William H. Maxwell U.S. EPA OAQPS/ESD/CG.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
EPA’s Proposed Clean Power Plan House Committee on Natural Resources and Environment February 12, 2015 Tegan B. Treadaway Assistant Secretary Office of.
1 Market Evolution Program Long-Term Resource Adequacy Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting May 14, 2003.
Indiana Energy Conference EPA Clean Power Plan—111(d) November 13, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
June 26, Background of Federal GHG Regulation Supreme Court determines greenhouse gases (GHGs) are “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act U.S.
1 Public Power Looking to Participate in New Coal Generation Public power communities are very concerned about affordable electricity and –Coal is the.
1 Consideration of Final Rulemaking Clean Air Interstate Rule Environmental Quality Board Meeting Harrisburg, PA December 18, 2007 Joyce E. Epps Director,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Participation In Interstate Legal Processes Federal vs. State Authority August 10, 2005 Brazilia, Brazil.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
Larry S. Monroe, Ph.D. Senior Research Consultant Southern Company Birmingham, Alabama October 22, 2010 Coal-Fired Power Plants Environmental Control Technology.
Greenhouse Gas Initiatives: progress and perspective Sandra Meier Environmental Energy Alliance of New York.
APPA Conference Call on EGU MACT Rule January 20, 2011.
Regional Implications of the Clean Power Plan Lanny Nickell Midwest Energy Policy Conference October 6 th,
Final Rulemaking: 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 139 Measurement and Reporting of Condensable Particulate Matter Emissions Environmental Quality Board Meeting.
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee August 4, 2016 Harrisburg, PA
First in Service First in Value
Clean Air Act Litigation Update State Air Director Meeting May 2015
Recommendations for Finalizing RGGI Model Rule
EPA Options for the Federal Regulation of Coal Combustion Waste Lisa Evans Earthjustice October 22, 2010.
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Roundtable
Briefing on 2017 CAISO Policy Initiatives Roadmap
NSPS Rulemakings for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Michael I. Henderson ISO New England Inc.
Draft 2013 Energy-Efficiency Forecast
What, Me, Worry? The New Outlook for Natural Gas in New England
CAIR Replacement Rule and Regional Haze
Cold Snap Task Force Update
Department of Environmental Quality
Benefits of New England’s Proposed Capacity Market
Marginal Cost Pricing: Why Is It Important? Have We Achieved It?
Patrick Cummins January 30, 2019.
About Dominion: One of America’s Leading Energy Companies
EPA’s Current Air Toxics Activities
Western Regional Haze Planning and
Best Available Control Technology for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Sources
CAA Air Toxics and §129 Combustion Program Update
Winter Reliability Program Updated
Learned in the Past 20 Years? John J. Reed
Presentation transcript:

Regulatory Update Mercury & Air Toxics Standards (MATS) Patrick Bird, USEPA Region 1 NESCAUM Stationary Source Conference Albany, NY April 4, 2013 11/9/2018 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Overview of Action On February16, 2012 EPA promulgated the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), the first national standards to reduce emissions of mercury and other toxic air pollutants from new and existing coal- and oil-fired power plants Standards will reduce emissions of: Metals, including mercury (Hg), arsenic, chromium, and nickel Acid gases, including hydrogen chloride (HCl) and hydrogen fluoride (HF) Particulate matter Air toxic pollutants are linked to cancer, IQ loss, neurological damage, heart disease, lung disease and premature death Standards create uniform emissions-control requirements based on proven, currently in-use technologies and processes 11/9/2018 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Overview of Action (cont.) On November 30, 2012, EPA published proposed amendments to emission limits for new power plants and revisions to startup/shutdown provisions for new and existing power plants. Startup/shutdown provisions – Some air pollution control devices require appropriate temperature to be reached before engaging. Reconsideration proposed engaging “as soon as technically feasible.” On March 28, 2013, EPA finalizes proposed revisions to November 2012 reconsideration, focusing on new power plants. Finalized amendments do not address issues posed in the reconsideration related to startup and shutdown. For more information on these Mercury and Air Toxics Standards: http://www.epa.gov/mats 11/9/2018 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Compliance Dates for Existing EGUs Initial Notifications – August 14, 2012 Required existing sources to analyze three previous years of operating history to determine appropriate subcategory Initial Compliance Deadline – August 14, 2015 (3 year compliance period) Compliance Extensions As described in EPA OECA memo dated December 16, 2011 “Fourth Year” - Pursuant to CAA §112(i)(3)(B), permitting authority extensions “… necessary for the installation of controls.” “Fifth Year” - Pursuant to CAA §113(a), Administrative Orders (AOs) “… for a specific and documented reliability concern.” FERC to act as advisor to EPA on AO extension decisions (May 17, 2012 FERC Policy Statement) 11/9/2018 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Will MATS Turn the Lights Out? No. For 40 years, we have been able to implement the Clean Air Act without causing the lights to go out. MATS will not change that. EPA and DOE analyses indicate that there will be more than enough electric generating capacity to meet the nation’s needs. EPA projects 4.7 GW will retire out of the more than 1000 GW that make up the nation’s electric generating capacity. That’s less than one half of one percent. Most of this capacity is decades old and does not have modern pollution controls installed. “They (the FPC) refer to the unrealistic requirements that emissions be measured at the top of the stack, instead of at ground level where people live and breathe.” 11/9/2018 Published in New York Times, July, 9, 1974

MATS - Nationally Significant 11/9/2018 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Source: National Electric Energy Data System (NEEDS 4.10 MATS) (EPA, December 2011) and EPA’s Information Collection Request (ICR) for New and Existing Coal- And Oil-Fired Electric Utility Stream Generation Units (2010)

Status of Compliance Extensions Region Extensions* Notes Region 1 None at this time Region 2 1 PR (expected) Region 3 3 WV Region 4 None at this time, closures expected Region 5 4 IN, 5 MI Region 6 1 TX Region 7 4 KS, 7 MI , 5 NE Region 8 Region 9 4 AZ, 1 HI Region 10 * Section 112(i)(3)(B) extensions 11/9/2018 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

MATS Compliance in Region 1 To date, no §112(i)(3)(B) compliance extension requests Most New England EGUs expected to be in compliance with MATS Units in question of meeting 2015 compliance date Schiller Station (NH) SR 4 and 6 – 51 MW coal fired units August 2012, tested several sorbent injection control technologies on SR 4 & 6 Plant closures Salem Harbor Station (MA) – 750 MW coal- and oil-fired plant, slated for closure June 2014. Mount Tom Station (MA) – 150 MW coal-fired plant, approved for dynamic de-list bid for 2016. Unknown operating status thereafter. 11/9/2018 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Watching Economic Factors Projections of natural gas prices Low natural gas prices have resulted in historically low wholesale electricity prices ISO-New England system analyses Not-for-profit corporation created in 1997 to oversee New England’s restructured electric power system Major responsibilities Reliable operation of the electric grid Administer wholesale electricity markets Plan for future system needs 11/9/2018

Electricity Generation in New England Source: ISO-NE. Energy Sources in New England. 2012. Source: ISO-NE. Energy Sources in New England. 2012. 11/9/2018 Source: ISO-NE. Energy Sources in New England. 2012. Source: ISO-NE. Energy Sources in New England. 2012.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Electricity Generation in New England Source: ISO-NE. Energy Sources in New England. 2012. 11/9/2018 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Electricity Generation in New England Source: ISO-NE. Energy Sources in New England. 2012. 11/9/2018 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Electricity Generation vs. Capacity in New England Source: ISO-NE. CELT Report. 2012. Source: ISO-NE. Energy Sources in New England. 2012. 11/9/2018 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Forward Capacity Market The locational capacity market whereby the ISO-NE will project the needs of the power system three years in advance and then hold an annual auction to purchase power resources to satisfy the region’s future needs. ISO-NE proposed changes to auction rules for FERC approval Removal of auction floor price proposed for 2017/2018 commitment period, (auction held in February 2014) Price could drop from ~$3.40/kW-mnth to $0.99-0.20/kW-mnth Based on financial projections conducted by UBS Utilities 11/9/2018 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Combination of Economic Factors ISO-NE expects significant retirements of coal- and oil-fired plants by end of decade ISO-NE Strategic Transmission Analysis: Generation Retirements Study, December 2012 In this study, 28 units representing nearly 8,300 MW of capacity were assumed to be at risk of retirement by 2020 11/9/2018 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Source: Sheilendranath, Akarsh. ISO-NE. Strategic Transmission Analysis: Generation Retirements Study. Planning Advisory Committee Meeting. December 13, 2012. Slide 11. 11/9/2018 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Closing Thoughts National rollout of MATS is as expected. Regionally, MATS has little to no impact on electricity generating fleet or regional electricity reliability. Economic factors, largely based on the price of natural gas, are driving the New England electricity generation mix. New England could see major retirements of coal- and oil-fired EGUs because of economic, not environmental, considerations. 11/9/2018 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Contact Information Patrick Bird USEPA Region 1 5 Post Office Square, 05-02 Boston, MA 02109 Phone: 617-918-1287 Fax: 617-918-0287 Email: bird.patrick@epa.gov 11/9/2018 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency