Is this conversation meaningful or meaningless?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michael Lacewing Religious belief Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Advertisements

LUDWIG WITTGENSTEIN Early on in his philosophical career Witt put forward a picture theory of meaning’. First thought that the primary function.
Epistemology revision Responses: add a ‘no false lemmas’ condition (J+T+B+N) Responses: replace ‘justified’ with ‘reliably formed’ (R+T+B) (reliabilism)
Religious Language Speaking about God Part 1. Why Religious language? The concept of a God is: Something other Something timeless We talk of things using.
Ludwig Wittgenstein EARLY: PICTURE THEORY LATER: LANGUAGE GAMES.
Ludwig wittgenstein. Biography 26 April April 1951 Was a homosexual, 3 of his brothers committed suicide His work is usually divided between.
This week’s aims To explain and analyse Bultmann’s approach to religious language To review the religious language unit To practise planning and writing.
Wittgenstein By Jamie, Marco, Tom and Brad. The background Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein (26 April April 1951) He was born in Vienna, Austria.
“There is only one God, but there are many different ways to know God
Language Games L/O: To understand and be able to explain clearly what is meant by the term Language Games Starter: Recapping Myth and Symbol. Get into.
This week’s aims To practise planning and writing answers to past questions To set out written work in a clear, integrated, logical form To explain and.
Criticisms of Flew Possible responses Hare – religious statements are unfalsifiable and non-cognitive but still play a useful role in life (parable of.
Michael Lacewing Religious belief Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
PHI 208 Course Extraordinary Success tutorialrank.com
Revision Tips For Mock Question 2, 3 and 4 ask you to :
Homework due Complete all activities in the booklet up to page 26 Research and ensure you bring into college examples of creation myths, myths of good.
Religious Language.
Religious responses to the verification principle
DIL check 1. Complete all the tasks in the booklet up to page 10 Summary of analogy 2. Write a one page revision summary of ‘Religious language as non-
Ludwig Wittgenstein EARLY: PICTURE THEORY LATER: LANGUAGE GAMES.
AO2 Religious Language.
How do you decide what to believe?
Think, pair, share A: Privation B: The Fall of Man A:Seminally B: Free will.
Body and Soul Key Words! In your group, write as many key words and definitions on this topic as possible!
Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must remain silent.
Language Games and the Via Negativa.
RM Hare - The Parable of the Paranoid Lunatic
Reading material Articles: Tillich on symbols & Aquinas on analogy questions 1. What is art? 2. Does it open up new levels of reality for you? 3. Does.
What was AJ Ayer’s book called?
Welcome back to Religious Studies
Welcome to a taster session in: A Level Religious Studies
Think pair share What type of argument is the cosmological argument?
Did King Harold die at the battle of Hastings?
Can you make three connections between these pictures?
Existentialism: the metamorphosis Assessment
In pairs, write a list of all the reasons people believe in God.
Odd one out? Theodicy Vale of Soul making Summum Bonum Qualia Original Sin Freewill Christ Likeness.
Is this statement meaningful?
Religious beliefs, religious attitudes
What is the difference between a sign and a symbol?
The Verification Principle
What does the word ‘box’ mean?
Supportive evidence – different forms of myths to convey meaning: creation myths; myths of good against evil; heroic myths. Myths help to overcome.
What does this mean? The SOS distress call literally means ‘save our souls’. When someone makes such a call, they are not asking for some invisible ghost-like.
DIL check 1. Complete all the tasks in the booklet up to page 10 Summary of analogy 2. Write a one page revision summary of ‘Religious language as non-
RELIGIOUS LANGUAGE.
How did we prove that the world was not flat?
Flying pig spotted in Amazon Jungle…
Think, pair, share A: Explain Hick’s analogy of the celestial city B: Explain Swinburne’s analogy of the toy’s in the cupboard. A: Explain Hare’s analogy.
Discussion: Can one meaningfully talk of a transcendent metaphysical God acting (creating sustaining, being loving) in a physical empirical world? Ayer.
OCR training programme Get Ahead - improving delivery and assessment of Units G581: Analogy Question.
FLEW AND HARE - OVERVIEW
University of Mississippi Career Center
‘A triangle has three sides’
Think, pair, Share The paradox of the stone Can God make a stone that is too heavy for him to lift? Discuss in pairs.
By the end of today’s lesson you will
‘Torture is Good’ How does that phrase make you feel?
Write down as many myths as you can think of!
Think, pair, Share ‘Conscience is a reliable guide to moral decision making.’ Discuss in pairs.
They Say, I Say Chapter 1 and 12
Exam technique.
By the end of today’s lesson you will
Religious Language.
Religious beliefs, religious attitudes
Argument for the existence of God
Final Course Reflection ELED Dr. Jiyoon Yoon
Welcome to a taster session in: A Level Religious Studies
A guide for the perplexed (who think it is all meaningless)
Ethics, Philosophy and Religion
Autumn term Christmas UNIT RE assessment criteria
Presentation transcript:

Is this conversation meaningful or meaningless? Think, Pair, Share Is this conversation meaningful or meaningless?

Language games and Wittgenstein

Learning Outcomes To be able to explain how language games are used be Wittgenstein to explain religious language.

Possible Conclusion to the VP and FP: VP and FP present strong challenges to religious belief. However they are not the only ways to assess R.L. For many religious believers the language used to talk about God is symbolic, mythological or different from everyday language. Thus, religious people may say that VP and FP are not relevant challenges to R.L. as the nature of R.L. is different from those spoken about in the VP and FP.

Wittgenstein and Language Games Another area you might be asked to discuss is that of ‘Language Games’. Much later in his career, years after he had influenced the Logical Positivists, Ludwig Wittgenstein changed his views on how language works. (Particularly in Tractatus). In his Philosophical Investigations (published after his death), Wittgenstein focused on the uses language can be put to. Famously, he wrote: “Don’t’ ask me for the meaning, ask for the use.” So, he was less concerned with the truth or falsity of language (contrast the Logical Positivists). For religious language, he thought that function might be more important than meaning.

Think, Pair, Share List 5 words you may use differently depending who you are speaking to....

Role play! Come up with a conversation between friends where people are using language in a way many people would not understand… Next steps: Explain in your own words whether their conversation is meaningful or meaningless in your notes.

“Philosophical problems arise when language goes on holiday.” Language Games Wittgenstein argued that language works through a series of ‘language games’. That is, meaning only comes out of context; we have to know what ‘game’ that our terms are participating in. He then went on to say that problems in philosophy may occur through misunderstanding that words can be used in different language games. For Wittgenstein, meaning is all about observing convention – just like in a game. There’s a right way and a wrong way to do things. So with religion – there might be conventional or unconventional ways to talk about God. “Philosophical problems arise when language goes on holiday.”

So for example... ‘God allows suffering to develop our character and we will get rewarded in heaven’ This fits into the Christian interpretation of the world but would not fit into the Hindu or atheist language games.

Complete these in your notes, use your article to help you: Does language work in a game? Can you give examples? Is religion another ‘language game’? Is Wittgenstein’s later view right: is the use of language more fundamental than meaning? Stretch yourself: D.Z Phillips response to language games.

Lebensform Wittgenstein used the term ‘Lebensform’ or ‘form of life’ to denote the context in which language might be used. Wittgenstein thought it was useful to think of language in terms of a game, which we know how to play once we understand the rules. He was not implying the language is trivial or that words are used as a way of playing tricks, but he thought that the analogy of the game would be useful in highlighting the scope and limitations of language. He uses the example of a chess piece. We might learn that a certain piece is called a ‘King’ but we will not really understand this until we have played chess and understand the significance of the king within the game. There is no point arguing about how language is used. If you want to play the language game you just have to accept the rules that have been argued by everyone else. The ‘Lebensform’ of chess player has its own rules.

Your own words Write a paragraph explaining Wittgenstein's language games in your own words. This is help your essay technique! Stretch yourself: Include a link to the previous paragraph. Where would you use this in an essay on ‘religious language is meaningful’?

Evaluation point: ‘The concept of Language games makes religious language coherent’ Answer in your notes