FSNWG Adaptation Learning Programme 29th September 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DRM Working Group FAO Rome
Advertisements

Building capacity in Communication and ICT applications for CBA Simone Sala Federica Matteoli Research and Extension Division Natural Resources Department.
Key Challenges and Opportunities for Reducing Vulnerability 1.Diversification - No Framework for Implementing and Evaluating Payments for Ecosystem Services.
Increasing productivity and resilience Messages and project examples.
A business case to reduce rural poverty through targeted investments in water in sub-Saharan Africa WWF5 Session How can food market measures boost.
The Resilient Coasts Initiative A Partnership Response.
Risk and Resilience: A Canadian Perspective on Climate Change Adaptation Donald S. Lemmen, PhD Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Directorate Natural.
Encourage Investment, Technical Cooperation, Policy, Education, Awareness and Extension PLAN OF ACTION FOR PILLAR TWO FOR THE EUROSIAN SOIL PARTNERSHIP.
Developing links with agricultural research centres Andrew Challinor and Tim Wheeler.
Adaptation in Eastern and Southern Africa Supporting ground level and policy change Jo-Ellen Parry, Program Manager
Reducing Vulnerability at the Community Level Jo-Ellen Parry, Program Manager Adaptation in Eastern and Southern Africa.
Research on Sustainable Intensification in the CGIAR Research Programs.
Produce: A concise statement of the issue or challenge associated with giving farmers a voice in climate service production How do we involve farmers in.
National Policy and Strategy for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 15 March, 2004.
Providing Gender and Equity Balance in the NAPCC on Agriculture SUMAN SAHAI Gender and Economic Policy Discussion Forum, Inst. of Social Studies Trust.
Strengthening Evidence-Based Climate Change Adaptation Policies (SECCAP) for Agriculture with support from Project inception meeting for Malawi 27 May.
NIGERIA Developing CSA within the NAIP while reinforcing inter-sectoral consistency: progress, bottlenecks and support needs With technical facilitation.
Adaptation knowledge needs and response under the UNFCCC process Adaptation Knowledge Day V Session 1: Knowledge Gaps Bonn, Germany 09 June 2014 Rojina.
GECAFS Regional research Regional GECAFS projects GEC and the Indo-Gangetic Plain food system GECAFS Scenario science developing “comprehensive” natural/social.
Promoting CARICOM/CARIFORUM Food Security (Project GTFS/RLA/141/ITA) (FAO Trust Fund for Food Security and Food Safety – Government of Italy Contribution)
PARTNERSHIPS IN SUPPORT OF CAADP Progress Report Brief Progress Report AUC Page 1 of 14.
Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) program of the CGIAR James Hansen, Kevin Coffey IRI Review Columbia University, New York June 24,
Conservation Agriculture -Policy Environment REGIONAL CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE STUDY TOURS MARCH 2010 Lindiwe Majele Sibanda (PhD) Harare,
South and East Africa Regional Working Group. Charge to Regional Working Groups Each Regional Group identifies: Strengths – Gaps –Opportunities, towards.
ObjectivesResearch questionsActivities Nutrition, food safety and value addition 1.1 Improving HH food and nutrition security, particularly the vulnerable.
Gender in Community Based Adaptation (CBA) Planning Processes Adaptation Learning Programme CIGN meeting April 2016.
Collective marketing enhancement as contribution to resilient agriculture An initiative to establish a marketing network of small scale Toxin Free Crop.
Strategic opportunities for sustainable crop production: FAO Perspective Gavin Wall, Director and OiC, Plant Production and Protection Division, FAO.
Communicating community-based adaptation: Experiences from the Adaptation Learning Programme Capacity building workshop on CBA for youth organising committee.
Weather index insurance, climate variability and change and adoption of improved production technology among smallholder farmers in Ghana Francis Hypolite.
Workshop on Enhancing the Horn of Africa Adaptive and Responsive Capacity to Climate Change Impacts November 2014, Nairobi Kenya Group Number 3 Presented.
Increasing Community Resilience to Drought in Sakai sub-location, Kisau Division of Makueni District Presented by Prof. Shem O. Wandiga Centre for Science,
Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services (GFRAS) UN CSTD Inter-Sessional Panel 24 January 2017 Karim Hussein Executive Secretary, GFRAS
LU in Ihemi Cluster Background – Details
Breakout Group Presentations – Day 4 Land Use Dialogue in the Ihemi Cluster, Southern Tanzania 31 October – 4 November Iringa, Tanzania.
Contents About Acre Africa
Elements of a sustainable food system
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
GEOGLAM and UN Sustainable Development Goals
Pacific Islands Training Institute on Climate and Extreme Events
Climate Change Elements of the SADC Regional Agricultural Policy (RAP)
Alebel B. Weldesilassie (PhD) EDRI
PSC Climate & Extreme Events: Shared Lessons – Day 1
ICT for Climate Action in an agrarian community
Institute for climate change and adaptation, University of Nairobi
Break out group - Dominica
CGIAR Research Program Dryland Systems
SESSION 4 DISCUSSION SESSION
PEAC Review Workshop: Lessons & Recommendations
1. Monitoring & Early Warning System
Alan Duncan NBDC Reflection Workshop Nov 2012
Scoping Assessment on Climate Change Adaptation: Thailand
Jamaica’s Drought tool
RESULTS FROM THE INNOVATION LAB FOR SMALL SCALE IRRIGATION
Implementation of SAPCC:
Partnerships and networks
Resilience and Adaptation – Lessons from StARCK+
Policy to Mitigate Effects of ENSO-Related Climate Variability
Catholic Relief Services
Egerton University Vision & Mission
Community-based adaptation & Communicating climate change
Designing Market Information Services
Climate Change Elements of the SADC Regional Agricultural Policy (RAP)
Climate-Smart Agriculture
Project Duration: 3 years
Community-based adaptation & Communicating climate change
Dr Margaret Makelo (SDAR)
Extension Education and Society
STRENGTHENING/IMPROVING THE CAPACITY OF
Government of Nepal Ministry of Agriculture & Livestock Development
Presentation transcript:

FSNWG Adaptation Learning Programme 29th September 2016 Decision making with a climate lens: Developing the National Seasonal Agricultural Planner in Kenya What will we present in this session - a user based perspective, evidence on what has been working well, learning for future improvements for CIS Q&A as we go along Sticky notes – we need your feedback and questions and will collect at the end FSNWG Adaptation Learning Programme 29th September 2016

Value of climate information is realised when it: Is ‘translated’ to relate to local livelihoods, knowledge, experience, levels of uncertainty Recognises knowledge and capacity of users to: Understand and adapt to the reality of short term variability & long term climate change Understand and use forecasts, probabilities for decision making Generate local climate knowledge Record & use climate data – contributing to localised / right-scaled information Value of climate information is realised when it: Listens and responds to locally expressed needs And when it informs decisions Many ways to do this at different timescales. PSP is one Point 1: Translation means converting the information into forms that can be easily understood in the local context Point 2: When climate information listens and responds to locally expressed needs, then it is adequately put to use. Point 3: Key considerations for accessibility include communication in local languages and using communication systems that reach different users (considering technology they have access to e.g. radios, mobiles phones; local communication channels e.g. community meetings, religious gatherings; presentation formats e.g. text only, pictures, graphs, symbols) etc Point 4, sub-point 4: Localised e.g. using recorded data to develop agro-met. analyses for the local area. It can build up the observational data record and used to downscale met. forecasts Is accessible to everyone who needs it (communication channels, language…)

Why National Seasonal Agricultural Planner? Bringing together national stakeholders to discuss & interpret seasonal forecasts for decision making on: National level plans & actions Support needed and linkages in different counties, agro- climatic zones Feed into county to community level processes (PSP/CCOF), plans & actions Began in OND 2014, up to current season Mention valuing variability and pastoralists Point 1: Uncertainties and risks are due to climate and other factors that affect their lives and livelihoods Point 2: Decisions are based on their knowledge, experience, capacity and access to services and resources Point 3: Climate change exacerbates vulnerabilities, across different timescales, levels and livelihoods Point 4: indirectly introduces adaptive capacity and the CBA flower

Who has been involved? Ministries of Environment, Mineral Resources and Regional Development Authorities (KMD) Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries Mention valuing variability and pastoralists Point 1: Uncertainties and risks are due to climate and other factors that affect their lives and livelihoods Point 2: Decisions are based on their knowledge, experience, capacity and access to services and resources Point 3: Climate change exacerbates vulnerabilities, across different timescales, levels and livelihoods Point 4: indirectly introduces adaptive capacity and the CBA flower NDMA, World Vision, FAO, USAID, Gender and Climate Change Network, Transparency International, Acre Africa, Chase Bank, Centaury Microfinance… Especially useful in discussing agricultural implications of seasonal forecasts with consideration of markets (input supply to sale of produce) & linkage to private sector (insurance, banks…)

Contents of National Seasonal Agricultural Planner

Seasonal climate outlook Analogue year - These conditions are similar to those we saw during the short rains of 1998 and to a lesser degree 2010. Mention valuing variability and pastoralists Point 1: Uncertainties and risks are due to climate and other factors that affect their lives and livelihoods Point 2: Decisions are based on their knowledge, experience, capacity and access to services and resources Point 3: Climate change exacerbates vulnerabilities, across different timescales, levels and livelihoods Point 4: indirectly introduces adaptive capacity and the CBA flower

What does it mean for agriculture? Interpreting agricultural implications for the coming season through reflecting on the: Past (analogue year) Seasonal outlook Mention valuing variability and pastoralists Point 1: Uncertainties and risks are due to climate and other factors that affect their lives and livelihoods Point 2: Decisions are based on their knowledge, experience, capacity and access to services and resources Point 3: Climate change exacerbates vulnerabilities, across different timescales, levels and livelihoods Point 4: indirectly introduces adaptive capacity and the CBA flower

Interpreting climate information for agriculture Past (analogue year) Mention valuing variability and pastoralists Point 1: Uncertainties and risks are due to climate and other factors that affect their lives and livelihoods Point 2: Decisions are based on their knowledge, experience, capacity and access to services and resources Point 3: Climate change exacerbates vulnerabilities, across different timescales, levels and livelihoods Point 4: indirectly introduces adaptive capacity and the CBA flower

Interpreting climate information for agriculture Linked to seasonal forecast Cropping Advice – Below Normal Rainfall (40% probability over most of Kenya) Crop types Selection   Agronomy Pest and diseases Weather related disasters Soil and Water conservation Post -harvest management Marketing Other comments Cereals- eg Maize, wheat, rice, sorghum, millet Plant early maturing high yielding, hybrid varieties from registered stockists. Contact extension officers to select suitable variety. Early land preparation and early planting recommended for best results. Farmers should use adequate inputs such as farm yard manure. Possible cases of streaks, stalk borers, army warms. Ensure adequate spraying with recommended pesticides. Dry conditions during flowering may affect yield of crops such as maize Places with higher rains: Consider enhanced rain and water harvesting and conservation May not be a serious problem Commodity prices may go up due to reduced crop production; farmers should enhance food storage for home consumption Expected Poor rainfall distribution may affect crops yields; consider crop diversification, insurance and other mitigation measures. Legumes eg beans, cowpeas, grams, groundnuts Plant early maturing high yielding, hybrid varieties from registered stockists. Early land preparation and early planting recommended for best results Possible increased cases of root rots; more pests such as ball worms, thrifts, aphids. Ensure adequate spraying with recommended pesticides. As above Poor rainfall distribution may affect crops yields Mention valuing variability and pastoralists Point 1: Uncertainties and risks are due to climate and other factors that affect their lives and livelihoods Point 2: Decisions are based on their knowledge, experience, capacity and access to services and resources Point 3: Climate change exacerbates vulnerabilities, across different timescales, levels and livelihoods Point 4: indirectly introduces adaptive capacity and the CBA flower

Where from here? Developing a user based climate information service

Actor network map for climate information services ALP, Kenya example Messages: multiple actors with complex relationships National met services can be a bottleneck between global climate science and users With users at the centre, the role of met services as one service provider among many for realising climate resilience becomes clearer Developing a service that puts user needs at the heart of the service. How to know what information will be useful? Critical for users not only as recipients of information but the decision makers. Means moving from just producing and disseminating climate information (ref to WB value chain) to providing a service (CIS), which requires: Consideration of the diversity of users at national to local level and their dynamic decision making contexts (influenced by vulnerabilities, capacities, socio-economics etc.). CIS providers to have a good understanding of actors’ social and institutional linkages and governance processes – and relate to these so as to generate demand for climate information and ensure it is meaningful, useful and usable to the range of users. Linkages, collaboration and sustained engagement between actors - producers, intermediaries and users November 9, 2018

User based CIS value chain - actors

User based CIS value chain – multiplier functions November 9, 2018

The multiplier function Actors working in: policy; projects or programmes on adaptation, DRR, development, resilience, agriculture FSN, others; Government sectoral departments; Met services; NGOs at any level Puts changing user information needs & knowledge at the center Facilitates linkages across the chain to create and add value at each stage Ensures learning is integrated across the value chain Supports two-way communication/ feedback between users, producers and intermediaries, building trust and confidence Motivates enabling institutional frameworks and resource flows for sustained multi-stakeholder engagement in CIS Recognition of this role is critical to effective climate information services for climate resilient/smart agric. & all sectors Facilitates linkages/ relationships across actors and functions to create and add value at each stage. Continued convening, engagement, Dialogue, monitoring systems e.g. CARE (NGO) involvement in PSP, linking adaptation and resilience to climate change with livelihoods, development and risk management Puts changing user information needs & knowledge at the center – Collective interpretation with users, support use of CI with other information (e.g. markets, NRM) and sector processes and opportunities (integration) Ensures learning is integrated across the value chain – help actors reflect and act on what it takes to develop decision relevant and context specific climate data and information for different users . Capacity building of different actors (e.g. PSP process principles as will be in the findings) Support two-way communication/ feedback between users, producers and intermediaries – facilitating dialogue, building trust, tracking climate informed decisions and impact Motivates enabling institutional frameworks and resource flows for sustained multi-stakeholder engagement in CIS. Advocating for resource flows

Thank you alp@careclimatechange.org http://careclimatechange.org/our-work/alp Coming soon “Climate information for agricultural decision-making and planning in rural communities: A Guide to Participatory Scenario Planning” ALP is supported by