Water Quality and Environmental Flows

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Advertisements

Ecosystem Flows Hydrology and Connectivity Joe Trungale October 2, 2006.
River Regulation / Dam Construction – Effects on Rivers and Streams.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Presentation Texas Water: What You Should Know November 6, 2010.
Terrain for the Lower Colorado River Flood Damage Evaluation Project Erin Atkinson, Halff Associates, Inc. Rick Diaz, Lower Colorado River Authority Symposium.
Region K Region K Facts… Major Cities: Austin Population (2000): 1,132,228 Population (2060): 2,713,905 Total Water Use (2000): 1,004,335 Acre-Feet *
Hydroelectric Relicensing in Vermont Brian Fitzgerald Vermont Agency of Natural Resources.
Wesley Henson, Alex Boswell-Ebersole, Molly Carver, Cristian Pacheco Skills Practicum, Summer 2012.
Region K Water Plan John E. Burke, P.E. Chairman, Lower Colorado Regional Planning Group (Region K) General Manager, Aqua Water Supply Corp.
Comparing the Storage Efficiencies of the Highland Lakes and the Proposed LCRA-SAWS Project Lower Colorado River Reservoirs Andrew Judd Semester Project.
Environmental Flows Under Texas Senate Bill 3: Did We Leave Enough Water for the Fishes? Kirk Winemiller, Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas.
Do Now: We know that groundwater and river basins alone do not contain enough water to meet our present needs. Are there any ways that we can harvest the.
Water Use. What is the hydrologic cycle? The water cycle Precipitation Evaporation transpiration.
2010 Yakima Basin Science & Management Conference Yakima River Basin Study June 16, 2010 Joel Hubble, Technical Projects Biologist Columbia-Cascades Area.
WATER AVAILABILITY MODELING for the SULPHUR RIVER BASIN Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Austin, Texas Consultant: R. J. Brandes Company.
Texas Bay and Estuary Study Program Cindy Loeffler Flows for the Future October 31, 2005.
An Interregional Water Solution with Conjunctive Use of Groundwater Haskell L. Simon President, Coastal Plains Groundwater Conservation District Vice President,
Ecological Characteristics of Region K. Region K.
Alan F. Hamlet, Philip W. Mote, Nate Mantua, Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO/CSES Climate Impacts Group Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University.
HYDROELECTRIC POWER AND FERC. HYDRO 101A ”Water Runs Down Hill”
January 27, 2011 Summary Background on Delta Flow and Habitat Relationships Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
Integrated Watershed Planning In Texas An Evolving Process National Waterways Conference Charleston, West Virginia September 25, 2009 Bill Mullican, P.G.,
Watershed Restoration Overview for the Klamath Basin.
Run of the River Introducing a healthy rivers board game Proudly presented by: Swap with Regional WW logo.
PROJECT PLAN: The Nature Conservancy Corps of Engineers ICPRB Presentation Potomac Watershed Roundtable January 9, 2009.
BASIN SCALE WATER INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT EVALUATION CONSIDERING CLIMATE RISK Yasir Kaheil Upmanu Lall C OLUMBIA W ATER C ENTER : Global Water Sustainability.
Reservoir Development Update Region K Meeting July 11, 2012 Karen Bondy, P.E. Manager of Resource Strategy 1.
High Altitude View of ACF Regional Water Plans.
Water Resources G. Tyler Miller’s Living in the Environment 13 th Edition Chapter 14 G. Tyler Miller’s Living in the Environment 13 th Edition Chapter.
15.4 Human Influences on the Hydrologic Cycle Runoff and the infiltration rate are greatly influenced by human activity. A major concern in many urban.
1. 2 Required under water right Establishes limit on LCRA firm water contract sales from lakes Industry standard for evaluating available water supply.
Chapter 21 Water Supply, Use and Management. Groundwater and Streams Groundwater –Water found below the Earth’s surface, within the zone of saturation,
Environmental Flow Instream Flow “Environmental flow” is the term for the amount of water needed in a watercourse to maintain healthy, natural ecosystems.
Colorado River Management. Examine the competing demands for water in a specific river basin. Evaluate the strategies that have been adopted to meet these.
CABY and WEAP: Modeling to Support the IRWMP Process David R. Purkey, Ph.D. Natural Heritage Institute David N. Yates, Ph.D. National Center for Atmospheric.
Benefit (Cost) Sharing In the context of the Okavango.
Unit 8 Lesson 2 Human Impact on Water Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
AQUASTAT FAO’s global information system on water and agriculture Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
WHY IS INTEGRATED RIVER BASIN PLANNING IMPORTANT? Module 1 pp 1.1.
Groundwater & Surface Water Crossroads Bastrop County ▲ Milam & Robertson Counties Where the Colorado & Brazos Rivers Intersect the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer.
12-31 EMC Approval of Broad River Basin Hydrologic Model November 8, 2012 Division of Water Resources NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
“THERE IS NOT ENOUGH WATER IN THE SYSTEM TO DO EVERYTHING WE WANT” CONFLICTS.
Unit 4 Lesson 1 Human Impact on Water
5th Shire River Basin Conference 22 February 2017 Shire River Basin Management Project Shire Basin Planning Tool Sub-Component A1 Development of a.
Assemblymember Adrin Nazarian
River Regulation / Dam Construction – Effects on Rivers and Streams.
Presented by Jon Traum, P.E.
Unit 4 Lesson 1 Human Impact on Water
Colorado River Commission of Nevada (CRCNV)
Development and Application of a Groundwater-Flow Model of the Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifers, Aiken County, South Carolina to Support Water Resource.
Ten Reasons to Use South Carolina’s Surface Water Quantity Models
Aquatic ecosystem research and Water in the Environment
Texas Hydrological Conditions An Overview
Allocation of Ogallala Groundwater Supplies
Is water a renewable resource?
Challenges in a Changing World
Environmental Flow Protection in TCEQ Permitting
Liana Prudencio and Sarah E. Null
Georgia Agricultural Metering Program
State Agency Perspective of Estuary Program Subcommittees
Verde River Flow Restoration Initiative Colorado River Program
Using Bugs and GIS to Assess and Manage Watershed Health
Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
October 29, 2018 Terry Lauritsen, P.E.
Water Scarcity and Drought EEA Assessment
OBJECTIVE HYDROSPHERE
Challenges in a Changing World
State of the Environment reporting Agenda 5.
Water Use in Agriculture ● 2009 EEA Report ● SoE-WISE Reporting ● Water Accounts
Presentation transcript:

Water Quality and Environmental Flows Maintaining Quantity for Quality’s Sake Presented By: Jennifer Benaman Quantitative Environmental Analysis, LLC November 1, 2005

maintain aquatic habitat Freshwater inflows for Project Overview Water for rural communities Higher water levels in Highland Lakes Lake Buchanan Austin Instream flows to maintain aquatic habitat Water for San Antonio San Antonio Water for agriculture (up to 150,000 ac-ft/yr) Stakeholders in both regions benefit-”Win-Win” Project Colorado Basin Water for upstream rural communities Highland lake levels are more stable during dry periods, specifically raising the average water levels of Lakes Travis and Buchanan during these periods Riverine and terrestrial environment is protected by maintaining adequate instream flows in the Colorado River Water for agriculture (to maintain a $300M economy vital to this state) The Matagorda Bay is protected San Antonio region - SAWS gets water At affordable costs Reliably delivered Over long term Freshwater inflows for Matagorda Bay file name LSW11_ _._ _

How will the project conserve and develop 330,000 acre-feet of water? Maintain higher water levels in Highland Lakes How will the project conserve and develop 330,000 acre-feet of water? Colorado Columbus Build Off-Channel Storage P Use Groundwater for Agriculture when Surface Water Insufficient Conserve Agricultural Irrigation Water Wharton Wharton Bay City Matagorda The lower Colorado River Basin's irrigation demands will be reduced due to conservation, build new off-channel storage facilities to capture water from the river, pump groundwater when surface water is insufficient, change how Highland Lakes are operated to slightly reduce the amount of water taken from them, and use more run of river flows, all of which when combined will meet all of the own remaining in-basin needs and leave up to 150,000 acre-feet for San Antonio. Only when done as a combined system can the project goals be achieved. Provide beneficial Inflows Matagorda Bay file name LSW11_ _._ _

State Legislative Requirements As per HB 1629, the project must Protect and benefit basin interests Be consistent with state regional water plans Provide inflows adequate to maintain ecological health and productivity of Matagorda Bay Maintain current instream river flow protections Ensure San Antonio practices stringent conservation measures Provide broad public and scientific review process Benefit stored water levels in Lakes Travis and Buchanan file name LSW11_ _._ _

Environmental Study Teams Matagorda Bay Health Respond to the mandate that bay inflows remaining after any Project diversions will be adequate to maintain the health and productivity of the Matagorda Bay System Aquatic Habitat/Blue Sucker Study the impact of the LSWP on the riverine habitats in the river below Austin Water Quality Study the impact of the LSWP on the water quality of the river file name LSW11_ _._ _

Matagorda Bay Health Evaluation Detailed analysis of inflows to the bay system, both from the Colorado River and the coastal drainage system into the bay which stem in part from return flows from irrigation areas Salinity modeling of the bay system including the marsh systems on the northern boundary of Matagorda Bay and East Matagorda Bay The effects on bay habitat of various freshwater inflow regimes The effects of changes in inflow on bay food supply (nutrients and sediment) Development of statistical relationships between inflow and biota Synthesis of these various components of “bay health” file name LSW11_ _._ _

River Water Quality Implications Current LCRA Water Management Plan Release stored water from Highland Lakes for downstream irrigators during summer Net effect: summer flows higher than “natural” Potential Effect of LSWP Irrigators obtain water from local (downstream) sources. More frequent low flows in summer Changes in the timing, duration, and frequency of low flows may affect water quality file name LSW11_ _._ _

River Model Approach Use state-approved QUAL-TX Focus on critical low flow condition Expand TCEQ grid Collect additional data to constrain model Calibrate to new data, scale to warmer temperatures Future critical condition anticipated to be in summer Perform future simulations in coordination with expected flow regime Longhorn Dam Smithville TCEQ grid New grid file name LSW11_ _._ _

New Data Collection Water quality under “low-flow”/warm conditions Dye tracer for hydraulic characterization Diel DO for daily dissolved oxygen fluctuations Bay habitat mapping Salinity data for model development in the bay file name LSW11_ _._ _

For Additional Information www.lcra.org/lswp file name LSW11_ _._ _