3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Low Emittance Tuning (LET). Through Dispersion Free Steering.
Advertisements

Sha Bai, Philip Bambade, Glen White FJPPL – FKPPL ATF2 workshop LAL, 11~13 February, 2013 Orthogonality of beam waist corrections in the presence of IPBSM.
Coupling Correction in ATF2 EXT 7 th ATF2 Project Meeting, december 2008 C.Rimbault, LAL Orsay.
ILC BDS Alignment and Tuning Studies Glen White SLAC/QMUL 8 November 2005 Progress report and ongoing plans for BDS alignment and tuning strategy.
ATF2 FB/FF layout Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group FONT meeting January 11, 2007.
Optics for Skew Correction and Emittance Measurement Leo Jenner This talk is going to look familiar if you were at the recent LC-ABD meeting in Manchester…
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
Status of very high priority beam tuning software Special ATF2 project meeting, Korea, 1 st October 2008 Cécile Rimbault, on behalf of High Priority task.
Alignment and Beam Stability
Kicker Optics – or – Selected ATF-II EXT Line Performance Issues ATF-II Technical Review, April M. Woodley1/40.
ATF2 optics … 1 3 rd Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF ATF2 optics, tuning method and tolerances of initial alignment, magnets, power supplies etc.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Lattice simulation of lattice errors and optics corrections. November 1, 2007 Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
ATF2 Tuning Updates Glen White, SLAC Sept
Fifth ATF2 Project Meeting, dec. 2007, KEK, Japan Emittance measurements with multiple wire-scanners and quadrupole scans in ATF EXT C. Rimbault,
Mark Woodley, SLACATF2 Software Review (June 18, 2008)1 ATF2 Layout/Optics (v4.0) nBPM (SLAC) nBPM (KEK) FONT Compton / laserwire ODR Existing ATF Extraction.
First investigations of ATF2 at SLAC Axel Brachmann, Thomas Himel, Tom Markiewicz, Janice Nelson, Toshiyuki Okugi, Mauro Pivi, Tor Raubenheimer, Marc Ross,
Summary of Commissioning and Tuning session Philip Bambade LAL-Orsay 5 th ATF2 project meeting KEK, 21 December 2007.
ILC BDS Static Beam-Based Alignment and Tuning Glen White SLAC 1.Aims. 2.Error parameters and other assumptions. 3.Overview of alignment and tuning procedure.
Mark Woodley, SLACATF2 Project March 20-21, Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning.
Emittance Measurements and Related Experimental Results 15th ATF2 Project Meeting, January M. Woodley1/44.
ATF2 Software tasks: - EXT Bunch-Bunch FB/FF - IP Bunch-Bunch FB - FB Integration Status Javier Resta-Lopez JAI, Oxford University FONT meeting 1th August.
ATF2 Commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 7 /9 ATF2 beam commissioning meeting, KEK.
July 19-22, 2006, Vancouver KIRTI RANJAN1 ILC Curved Linac Simulation Kirti Ranjan, Francois Ostiguy, Nikolay Solyak Fermilab + Peter Tenenbaum (PT) SLAC.
Low emittance tuning in ATF Damping Ring - Experience and plan Sendai GDE Meeting Kiyoshi Kubo.
EXT: Summary of activities, software development, and tuning performance 11th ATF2 Project Meeting, January M. Woodley1/29.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
Analysis of Multipole and Position Tolerances for the ATF2 Final Focus Line James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Mark Woodley, SLAC5th ATF2 Project Meeting (December 19, 2007)1 ATF2 Layout/Optics (v3.8) nBPM (SLAC) nBPM (KEK) FONT Compton / laserwire ODR Existing.
Mark Woodley, SLACATF2 Project March 20-21, Next version of MAD decks (v3.7): what needs to be added/deleted?
Emittance Tuning Simulations in the ILC Damping Rings James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
DMS steering with BPM scale error - Trial of a New Optics - Kiyoshi Kubo
Emittance measurements with multiple wire-scanners and quadrupole scans in ATF EXT C. Rimbault, Brossard, P. Bambade (LAL) Main goal : - Try to improve.
Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning ( Short summary of ATF2 meeting at SLAC in March 2007 ) and Hardware Issues for beam Tuning Toshiyuki.
DRAFT: What have been done and what to do in ILC-LET beam dynamics Beam dynamics/Simulations Group Beijing.
Simulation of the α, dispersion, coupling and β multiknobs in large β optics Sha Bai, Philip Bambade, Benoit Bolzon, Javier Resta Lopez
Status and plan of Beta-matching in Extraction line Kiyoshi Kubo.
Wakefield effect in ATF2 Kiyoshi Kubo
2nd ATF2 Project Meeting (May 30, 2006)M. Woodley [SLAC]1 ATF2 Layout/Optics (v3.3) nBPM (SLAC) nBPM (KEK) FONT Compton / laserwire ODR Existing ATF Extraction.
ILC BDS Commissioning Glen White, SLAC AWLC 2014, Fermilab May 14 th 2014.
4 th ATF2 Project Meeting, 31 May 2007 A. Seryi 1 Summary of SLAC simulation study of emittance growth in the ATF extraction line SLAC team: J. Amann,
Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.
Simulation for Lower emittance in ATF Damping Ring Kiyoshi Kubo Similar talk in DR WS in Frascati, May 2007 Most simulations were done several.
IP Tuning Task Updates Glen White, SLAC January
Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
ILC BDS Alignment, Tuning and Feedback Studies
Alignment and beam-based correction
Updated coupling study-2 from 12 March 08 measurements
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
Emittance Diagnostics
Tolerances & Tuning of the ATF2 Final Focus Line
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Emittance Dilution and Preservation in the ILC RTML
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
EXT Tuning 13th ATF2 Project Meeting, January M. Woodley.
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
ATF2 IP Tuning Task Simulation Updates
ILC BDS Emittance Diagnostics: Design and Requirements
Low Emittance Tuning in CESR TA
Emittance Diagnostics
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
Emittance Diagnostics
ATF2 Layout/Optics (v3.6) Existing ATF Extraction Line
Simulation of the FCC-ee lattice with quadrupole and sextupole misalignments Sergey Sinyatkin.
BEAM REALISTIC ERROR ORBIT IMPACT ON SASE PERFORMANCE
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
First Look at Error Sensitivity in MEIC
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Integration of Detector Solenoid into the JLEIC ion collider ring
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
Error Sensitivity in MEIC
Presentation transcript:

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Correction of Anomalous Vertical Dispersion in the ATF2 EXT Line (v3.6) Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 K1(+) K2(+) possible location for 1 μm laserwire σy = 1.4 μm For MAD files see http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~mdw/ATF2/v3.6 Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

Simulation Parameters use Peter Tenenbaum’s Lucretia1 simulation code included perfect beam from Damping Ring (εx=2×10-9 m, εy=3×10-8 m) … errors begin after extraction septa, unless otherwise noted perfect Final Focus dipole errors2: ΔY = 100 μm (rms) quadrupole errors: ΔX = 50 μm, ΔY = 30 μm, Δθ = 0.3 mrad (rms) sextupole errors: ΔX = 50 μm, ΔY = 30 μm, Δθ = 0.3 mrad (rms) BPM resolution: 5 μm (rms) not included wire scanner rolls: │θ│ ≤ 0.2° (uniform) wire scanner beam size errors: σ = σ0(1+Δσrelative)+Δσabsolute quadrupole strength errors (ΔK/K) BPM offsets BPM rolls tuning in FF 1http://www.slac.stanford.edu/accel/ilc/codes/Lucretia/ 2EXT dipoles BH1 and BH2 are assumed to have nonzero sextupole components Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Simulation Procedure apply errors steer flat (EXT only) launch into FF use 2 virtual correctors steer to 2 virtual BPMs (one at the IP and one 90° upstream) virtual BPMs are perfect measure dispersion in diagnostic section scan input beam energy measure orbits fit position vs energy at each BPM correct dispersion in diagnostic section back-propagate measured η to start of diagnostic section to get η0 and η′0 use QF1X + QF6X multiknobs for ηx and η′x correct ηy and η′y using skew quads in inflector (thin lenses at quad centers) correct coupling scan 4 skew quadrupoles sequentially deduce projected εy from wire scanner measurements set each skew quad to minimize projected εy Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 errors only (100 seeds) Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 errors, FF launch Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 errors, steer flat, FF launch Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 errors, steer flat, correct coupling, FF launch Note: red lines represent maximum integrated strength of IDX skew quad (KLmax ≈ 0.1 T) Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 errors, steer flat, correct ηx, correct coupling, FF launch Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

ηy vs η′y at exit of KEX2 (start of diagnostic section) 100 seeds after steering EXT Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

ηy vs η′y at exit of KEX2 (start of diagnostic section) perfect EXT; scan each skew quad Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

both ηy and η′y can be corrected with any single skew quad! Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 ηy correction: residual x-y coupling Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Scheme 1: 2 skew quads SQ1 SQ6 ------- ------- βx = 5.920 10.036 αx = 4.480 -5.320 ηx = 0.585 -0.566 βy = 9.053 11.557 αy = -7.212 6.631 Δμx = - 343.575 Δμy = - 179.568 kl/klmax = 0.221 -0.178 residual = 0.5288 Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Scheme 1 Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Scheme 2: 2 skew quads SQ2 SQ5 ------- ------- βx = 14.557 13.494 αx = -18.187 18.354 ηx = 0.177 -0.174 βy = 118.109 119.830 αy = 10.711 -12.069 Δμx = - 5.337 Δμy = - 172.957 kl/klmax = 0.023 0.001 residual = 0.0442 Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Scheme 2 Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Scheme 3: 2 skew quads SQ3 SQ4 ------- ------- βx = 101.073 101.000 αx = -34.197 34.920 ηx = 0.209 -0.209 βy = 28.629 28.649 αy = 22.275 -22.484 Δμx = - 2.362 Δμy = - 171.062 kl/klmax = 0.036 0.006 residual = 0.1318 Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Scheme 3 Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Scheme 4: 4 skew quads SQ1 SQ2 SQ5 SQ6 ------- ------- ------- ------- βx = 5.920 14.557 13.494 10.036 αx = 4.480 -18.187 18.354 -5.320 ηx = 0.585 0.177 -0.174 -0.566 βy = 9.053 118.109 119.830 11.557 αy = -7.212 10.711 -12.069 6.631 Δμx = - 167.871 173.208 343.575 Δμy = - 3.516 176.473 179.568 kl/klmax = 0.058 0.008 -0.010 -0.027 residual = 1.8430e-004 Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Scheme 4 Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Scheme 5: 4 skew quads SQ2 SQ3 SQ4 SQ5 ------- ------- ------- ------- βx = 14.557 101.073 101.000 13.494 αx = -18.187 -34.197 34.920 18.354 ηx = 0.177 0.209 -0.209 -0.174 βy = 118.109 28.629 28.649 119.830 αy = 10.711 22.275 -22.484 -12.069 Δμx = - 1.460 3.822 5.337 Δμy = - 0.951 172.013 172.957 kl/klmax = 0.042 -0.028 0.007 -0.005 residual = 4.3953e-004 Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Scheme 5 Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Scheme 6: 4 skew quads SQ1 SQ3 SQ4 SQ6 ------- ------- ------- ------- βx = 5.920 101.073 101.000 10.036 αx = 4.480 -34.197 34.920 -5.320 ηx = 0.585 0.209 -0.209 -0.566 βy = 9.053 28.629 28.649 11.557 αy = -7.212 22.275 -22.484 6.631 Δμx = - 169.330 171.693 343.575 Δμy = - 4.467 175.529 179.568 kl/klmax = 0.080 0.010 -0.011 -0.048 residual = 2.1308e-004 Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Scheme 6 Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Scheme 7: 3 skew quads SQ2 SQ5 SQ8 ------- ------- ------- βx = 14.557 13.494 0.696 αx = -18.187 18.354 -0.561 ηx = 0.177 -0.174 0.007 βy = 118.109 119.830 34.124 αy = 10.711 -12.069 2.668 Δμx = - 5.337 289.667 Δμy = - 172.957 200.657 kl/klmax = 0.013 0.010 -0.005 residual = 0.0016 Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Scheme 7 max(|KL|)=0.0022 Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Scheme 8: 3 skew quads SQ1 SQ6 SQ8 ------- ------- ------- βx = 5.920 10.036 0.696 αx = 4.480 -5.320 -0.561 ηx = 0.585 -0.566 0.007 βy = 9.053 11.557 34.124 αy = -7.212 6.631 2.668 Δμx = - 343.575 457.538 Δμy = - 179.568 204.174 kl/klmax = 0.013 0.011 0.005 residual = 0.0000 Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Scheme 8 max(|KL|)=0.0021 Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006

3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006 Conclusions simulated system performance is adequate for the achievement of ATF2 goal “A” (35 nm IP σy) if small assumed quadrupole roll errors and vertical dipole misalignments are the only sources of coupling, skew correction seems unnecessary if quadrupole roll errors are increased by a factor of 10, coupling correction provides 20% improvement in IP σy Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006