Sarasota/Manatee Metropolitan Planning Organization Moving Forward Population (Census/American Fact Finder): Manatee County (2010-2014): 322,833-351,746 Sarasota County (2010-2014): 380,000-396,962 Total for 2 county region: somewhere between 700,000 – 750,000 Sarasota/Manatee Metropolitan Planning Organization

Sarasota/Manatee MPO Give brief history of MPOs in the US, and how ours developed. Interstate Highway System 1950s-1960s Federal Highway Act of 1962: condition attached to federal transportation financial assistance Explain who is on our board, committees, and talk about coordination that takes place at the MPO level between local governments, working with other MPOs, FDOT, FHWA, FTA, and public. Talk about the UPWP, Project Priorities, TIP, and LRTP, and Public Participation Plan

Early 1900s Rural focus: Federal $ to states No help for city streets Connecting farms to markets Improving country roads for cars No help for city streets We’ll start by taking a brief look at the history of transportation planning. Going back to the early 1900s, the focus was on connecting farms to markets. Cities were not given State or Federal assistance in developing their streets. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Images courtesy of State Archives of Florida; Florida Memory

Role of Transit Thriving, privately run service Government granted franchises and regulated services Transit at this time was a privately owned and operated service that ran within and between cities. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Image courtesy of State Archives of Florida; Florida Memory

1940s and 1950s: Interstate Highways Program 1944: 40,000 mile system approved ($ limited) 1956: Highway Trust Fund established The Interstate Highway System was established in 1944 from the need to evacuate quickly in case of an atomic attack. This was the first time there was a coordinated effort in planning. Funding for this program was limited until 1956 when the Highway Trust Fund was established. Growing Tension Over Urban Interstates All this road building often caused major damage to communities. Here we see the construction of I-95 in Miami in 1960. Note how it goes right through existing homes, almost as if someone took an erasure to the landscape. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Image courtesy of State Archives of Florida; Florida Memory

1960s: Emerging Federal Transportation Policy 1962 Federal Highway Act established “3 C” regional planning requirement: Continuous Comprehensive Cooperative Recognizing this tension, the 1962 Federal Highway Act was signed into law. The law required assistance for families and businesses displaced due to highway construction. It also required a continuous, comprehensive, and cooperative planning process, which we call the “3C” process. The image here shows Highway A1A in Cocoa Beach in the 1960s. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Image courtesy of State Archives of Florida; Florida Memory

Civil Rights and Environmental Protection Reforms Civil Rights Act of 1964 National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 Civil rights and environmental protection became a focus in the 1960s. Federal laws were enacted that mandated nondiscriminatory conduct and consideration of environmental impacts in all federally-supported programs – including transportation. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Images courtesy of State Archives of Florida; Florida Memory

1970s: The Origin of MPOs 1973 Highway Act mandated Metropolitan Planning Organizations for urban areas over 50,000 in population Required multimodal approach Allocated Highway Trust Fund $$ for planning purposes (PL funds) The 1973 Highway Act signaled wide-spread recognition that the local element was missing in the top-down approach to transportation planning. MPOs were created to fill that gap and give local areas a voice. Funding for MPOs came from the Highway Trust Fund. The Sarasota Manatee MPO was established in 1978 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Image courtesy of State Archives of Florida; Florida Memory

Sarasota/Manatee Urbanized Area Continuous, Comprehensive, Cooperative Decision-making forum since 1977: Two counties Nine cities and towns Two transit agencies One airport One seaport MPOs are required by law in areas with a population of 50,000 or more. These are known as Urbanized Area Boundaries. The MPO is formed by interlocal agreement with FDOT and local governments. We are responsible for reviewing and administering all policies and procedures applicable for state and federal transportation funding. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Multi Modal Planning for ALL Users

1980s: New Federalism Reduced federal regulation and spending Transportation programs successfully defended Highway and transit legislation unified The 1980s saw an emphasis on reducing federal regulation. Transportation programs were successfully spared from federal budget cuts. The image shows Governor Graham presenting musician Jimmy Buffet with an Highway A1A sign, 1980. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Image courtesy of Donn Gughi, State Archives of Florida; Florida Memory

1990s: Major Policy Legislation Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) The 1990s saw the introduction of some major legislation. The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (known as ISTEA) was the first major change in transportation planning and policy since the era of the Interstate Highway System. MPOs were given greater power. The act identified high priority corridors as part of the national highway system, and provided funds for the first non-motorized commuter trails. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Image courtesy of Federal Highway Administration, www.fhwa.dot.gov

Reauthorization: 1998 TEA-21 and 2005 SAFETEA-LU Streamlined planning process Focus on environmental justice Public involvement Important legislation since ISTEA includes TEA-21 and SAFETEA-LU. TEA-21 stands for the 1998 Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century. SAFETEA-LU stands for the 2005 Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act – A Legacy for Users. These Acts emphasized environmental justice and the involvement of minority and low income citizens in the planning process. The image shows construction of the sound wall on I-95, which is an excellent example of the MPO working with disadvantaged populations. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2012: MAP-21 and 2015: FAST Act Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act Requires performance-based planning and programming Invest resources in projects to achieve individual targets that collectively will make progress toward national goals. MAP-21 stands for the “Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century” Act. It is the first long-term highway authorization enacted since 2005. It creates a streamlined and performance-based surface transportation program and builds on the programs and policies established under ISTEA. Fixing America’s Surface Transportation --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MAP-21 Performance Measures Approach U.S. DOT Florida DOT Sarasota/Manatee Safety Safety/ Security Infrastructure Condition Preservation Congestion Reduction Mobility Mobility/ Congestion/ Reliability System Freight Movement and Economic Vitality Economy Economy/ Freight Reduced Project Delivery Delays Project Delivery Environmental Sustainability Environment Environment/ Livability

LEAD IMPLEMENT PLAN COMMUNICATE Mobility & Access Economic Development Congestion Management Project Delivery Job Creation Public Safety & Security Title VI/ADA/Civil Rights Freight Environment/Livability Regional Coordination Performance Measures Improved Investment Consistency with Plans Emphasis on Region Infrastructure Tourism Public Information and Participation Public Health System Reliability Continuing Comprehensive Cooperative Today, there is a long list of concepts and priorities that must addressed in transportation planning which you can see at the bottom of this slide. We incorporate these concepts within the four goal areas of our strategic plan: Lead; Plan; Implement; and Communicate.

Sarasota/Manatee MPO Organization Chart Sarasota/Manatee MPO Governing Board Public Involvement Technical Advisory Committee Citizens Advisory Committee Organizationally, we have three advisory committees to the MPO Governing Board: the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Advisory Committee, the Citizen’s Advisory Committee, and the Technical Advisory Committee. Public Involvement is encouraged throughout the process. Let’s take a closer look at each Committee. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bicycle, Pedestrian, Trails Advisory Committee

Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Advisory Committee (BPTAC) The picture here shows The Legacy Trail in Venice. The BPTAC is made up of a broad representation of interested groups and citizens including local governments, law enforcement, educators, cyclists, hikers, walkers, environmentalists, and businesses. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Specialized interest and knowledge Broad representation of affected areas and interests Recommended by local jurisdictions “Minorities, the elderly, and the handicapped must be adequately represented” The Citizens’ Advisory Committee or CAC is made up of interested citizens who are appointed by local jurisdictions. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Representatives of modal agencies and local governments Planners, engineers, public works Provide technical input The CAC meets jointly with the Technical Advisory Committee or TAC. TAC members represent modal agencies, local governments, and citizens with specific expertise related to transportation planning. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MPO Governing Board Sets big-picture framework for transportation decisions Direct authority for MPO plans and programs Elected officials The MPO Governing Board reviews recommendations from committees and staff and sets the big-picture framework for transportation decisions. This Board has direct authority over MPO plans and Programs. When an issue needs to be discussed in greater depth than can occur at Board meetings, the Executive Committee will meet. The MPO Executive Committee consists of the Chairman, Vice-Chairman, and two at-large Board members. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MPO Staff Provide information and technical support Prepare documents Foster interagency coordination Facilitate public input and feedback Engage consultants as needed Manage the planning process MPO staff enact the decisions made by the MPO Board. We currently have 9 staff members: From left to right: Leigh Holt, Multi Modal Program Manager Diana McCartney, Administrative Secretary Kim Smith, Bicycle and Pedestrian Education Coordinator Georganna Gillette, Transportation Program Specialist Laura Carter, Operations Manager Steven Bostel, Transportation Analyst Bob Kamm, Executive Director Carol Holden, Executive Assistant Katrina Morrell, Multi Modal Communications Specialist Now that we’ve discussed who we are, let’s take a look at the work we produce….. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sunshine Law Meetings must be open to the public Reasonable notice of all meetings must be provided Meeting minutes taken and open for public inspection Applies to meetings of two or more members of a board when discussing matters that may foreseeably come before the board Applies to a board member and non-board member when latter individual is used as a conduit Applies to telephone and computer conversations

MPO Plans

Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Details comprehensive plan for transportation modes Includes long and short range goals and strategies Identifies funding sources and estimates costs Provides framework for choosing transportation projects Updated every five years The Long Range Transportation Plan provides a common vision for the community’s future transportation needs and guides the investment of public funds over a timeline of 20 or more years. It provides a framework for choosing transportation projects. Both short and long term strategies for all transportation modes are addressed. The LRTP is updated every five years. We are currently working on the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Project Priorities Project applications requested from counties, local municipalities, and transportation providers Projects reviewed by committees and staff MPO Board adopts Project Priorities for consideration by Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) The MPO only reviews projects eligible for State and Federal funding. Locally funded projects are selected by County Commission or City Council/Commission. Transportation planning is a bottom-up process that begins with local elected officials. Every spring, the MPO requests project ideas from municipalities, the County, and transportation providers. Only projects seeking State and Federal funding are prioritized. Local projects are the responsibility of the governing body where the project is located. Potential projects must be in line with the Long Range Transportation Plan. Projects are reviewed by MPO Committees and citizens. A draft prioritized list is submitted to the MPO Board for consideration. Once adopted, the list is forwarded to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for consideration. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Lists priority projects from the LRTP Provides five-year implementation schedule Allocates state and federal funds for capital projects Becomes part of statewide TIP (STIP) Adopted every year The Transportation Improvement Program (or TIP) lists each transportation project to be implemented over the next five years. It serves as our short range plan. The TIP may only contain projects that are in the approved Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). The TIP is updated throughout the year as needed. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Public Participation Plan Outlines organizational structure and work products Describes MPO public communication tools Prescribes public comment periods Adopted every three years Results reported annually Public involvement begins with our Public Participation Plan. This document outlines our communication tools and ways for citizens to get involved. This document is reviewed and updated every three years. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Public participation Comprehensive Cooperative Must be consistent Financially Feasible LRTP Local Comprehensive Plan Project Priorities This chart shows the flow of our external work products. The development of our Long Range Transportation Plan must be consistent with the local Comprehensive Plan. The LRTP determines Project Priorities and the projects outlined in the Transportation Improvement Program or TIP. The TIP, in turn, must be consistent with the Florida Department of Transportation’s five year work program. This is all part of the 3-C Process mentioned earlier. Continuous Comprehensive Cooperative -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Must be consistent FDOT 5 Year Work Program TIP

Project Priorities Process F F I

FDOT Adopted 5-Year Work Program

State Transportation Revenue Fiscal Year 2015-16 Florida Department of Transportation; Office of Comptroller – General Accounting Office; Revenue Management Section; Spring 2017

   Federal Aid Highway Apportionments Three funding streams distributed through MPOs National Highway Performance Program Surface Transportation Block Grant (50%) Interstate Maintenance Highway Safety Improvement Program National Highway Freight Program Transportation Alternatives Congestion Mitigation Metropolitan Planning    Motor Fuel Tax – primary source of funding for both highway and transit Other Miscellaneous Sources – tires, new tractor/trailer purchases, etc. Deposited into Federal Highway Trust Fund Allocated via complex funding formulas in Federal Authorization Act Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

Total Adopted 5-Year Work Program $46,609M Five Year Work Program FY 2017-2021 Funding Sources for Commitments (in millions) I MPOs Total Adopted 5-Year Work Program $46,609M July 2016 Florida Department of Transportation; Office of Comptroller – General Accounting Office; Revenue Management Section; Spring 2017

Implementation Feasibility (FEAS) Project Development and Environmental Studies (PD&E) Design/Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (ROW) Construction (CST) “Concept to Concrete” 5 Steps: So now that we’ve identified projects, we need to implement them. Projects often take longer and cost more than people realize. Each project goes through a five step process. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Projects may take 15 years or more to complete once they are funded

1: Feasibility Studies (FEAS) Determine if design and location economically justified Examine alternatives Can cost of construction and maintenance be funded? The first step in project implementation is a Feasibility Study. Feasibility Studies determine if the project can be justified and if there is funding for construction and maintenance. Existing conditions are reviewed and alternatives are examined to determine which approach is most viable. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2: Project Development and Environment Studies (PD&E) What kind of improvement needed Cost and impacts of improvement How to minimize negative impacts Step 2 in project implementation is the Project Development and Environment Studies (or PD&E). Now that the project has been deemed feasible, the PD&E determines what kind of improvement is needed when considering travel demand in 20 to 25 years. The costs and impacts – both environmental and community impacts - are considered. The image shown here is from the PD&E for the Viera Interchange project. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3: Design (PE) Typically done by consultants Determines project details Results in production of construction plans In the design phase, the project details are ironed out and a set of construction plans is produced. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4: Right of Way (ROW) Acquisition of additional land needed for road expansion and water retention Eminent Domain – pay fair market value for property Legal, regulated procedure Often most expensive part of a project Step 4 involves the purchasing of additional land needed to complete a project. These issues can make or break a project as it is often the most expensive part of a project. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5: Construction (CST) Maintenance of traffic Continued access for residents and businesses Landscaping The final step in project implementation is construction. During construction, crews must maintain traffic flow and allow continued access for residents and businesses. Landscaping is considered a part of the construction costs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For every $1 spent on transportation, there is a $5 return. Cost Very expensive and increases over time Right of Way cost often exceeds construction cost Transportation projects are expensive but, according to the Department of Transportation, for every $1 spent on transportation, there is a $5 return. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For every $1 spent on transportation, there is a $5 return.

Questions? Leigh Holt leigh@mympo.org 941-359-5772 (C) 321-302-5848 Ryan Brown Multi Modal Planner Alvimarie Corales-Cuadrado Multi Modal Planner Rachel McClain Planning Assistant Neveen Nawawy Transportation Planner Corinne Tucker Public Involvement Coordinator We are NOT in the business of creating traffic jams and sidewalks to nowhere! Our goal is to develop transportation plans and programs that improve quality of life and add to the economic viability and safety of the community. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------