User’s Group Board of Directors Jefferson Lab Comments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Environment, Safety and Health Steve Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting March 29, 2012.
Advertisements

Briefing to the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (CRENEL) Joseph McBrearty, Deputy Director for Field Operations.
1 DOE Annual Review -June 15,2005 An Overview of Conventional Facilities (Civil Construction) U. S. ILC Civil studies and cost issues for Snowmass Fred.
Navigating the Maze How to sell to the public sector Adrian Farley Chief Deputy CIO State of California
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
DOE-HSS Review of LBNL Science Divisions 10/23/08.
FY2010 PEMP Notable Outcomes October 15, FRA, LLC Board of Directors 10/15-16/2009 Office of Quality and Best Practices Performance Evaluation Management.
1/18/2005Module 41 How the NCSX Project Does Business Work Planning & Design Review Processes.
NCSX Management Overview Hutch Neilson, NCSX Project Manager NCSX Conceptual Design Review Princeton, NJ May 23, 2002.
24 April 2015 FY 2016 Budget Request to Congress for DOE’s Office of Science Dr. Patricia M. Dehmer Acting Director, Office of Science
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Baseline Jim Yeck NSLS-II Deputy Project Director NSLS-II PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
J EFFERSON L AB – A N I NTRODUCTION Hugh Montgomery; May 14, 2012.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
LIGO-G M Planning and Implementation Strategy for Advanced LIGO Gary Sanders LSC Meeting Hanford, August 14, 2001.
All Hands Meeting FY 2008 Budget Pier Oddone Fermilab December 20, 2007.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Raymond L. Orbach Director Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Presentation to BESAC December 6, 2004.
Welcome to Jefferson Lab R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab Hypernuclear Workshop May 27, 2014.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 International Linear Collider In August 2004 ICFA announced their technology selection for an ILC: 1.The.
Office of Science (SC) Overview John Yates Office of Operations Program Management, SC-33 Office of Science Briefing for DOE FIMS Training at ANL – May.
Jefferson Lab Overview Bob McKeown April 20, 2015.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond L. Orbach Director, Office of Science April 29, 2004 PRESENTATION FOR THE BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL.
Jefferson Lab’s Enabling Technologies: A Call for Strategic Planning W. OREN JLAB Engineering Division 9 February 2012.
StatusUpdate Jian-ping Chen, JLab SoLID Collaboration Meeting September 11-12, 2015.
Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Americas Region Team WBS x.2 Global Systems Program Overview for FY08/09.
Request for Information & Capability Statements Richland Acquisitions Post-FY 2018 November 17-19, 2015.
Budget Outlook Glen Crawford P5 Meeting Sep
26 April, 2016 LCLS II Cryomodules and Cryoplant, Joe Preble LCLS-II Overview JLAB Organization for LCLS-II JLAB responsibilities & Schedule and Status.
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
LCLS-II Prototype Cryomodule FDR J. Blowers, C.M. Ginsburg, T. Peterson, R. Stanek, J. Theilacker (FNAL) 21 – 22 January 2015 Homework Responses.
1 Jefferson Lab Organization – December 2009 Director Accelerator Science Advisory Comm. Nuclear Physics Program Adv. Comm. Photon Science Program Adv.
Brookhaven Science Associates 2006 RHIC & AGS Annual Users’ Meeting June 5-9, 2006 Sam Aronson Interim Director.
Image courtesy of Oak Ridge National Laboratory Eric R. Colby † Office of High Energy Physics Office of Science U. S. Department of Energy Office of Science-Led.
DOE Accelerator Safety Workshop 2017 Bob Lowrie
CBETA Project ALD’s Cost and Schedule Review February 6, 2017
Preliminary Review of LERF as Cryomodule Testing Facility for LCLS-II
Updating the Value Proposition:
Jefferson Lab Overview
LCLS-II Cost Details E. Daly / C. Hovater / M. Wiseman with help from Accel Ops and Engineering 03-AUG-2017.
Jefferson Lab Reliability Task Force and Initiatives
Town Hall Meeting USSE2 O&M Services.
Shared Services Open Forum
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Management Breakout: MREFC Budget Summary Victor L
Introduction to Jefferson Lab
Jefferson Lab Hugh Montgomery Jefferson Lab UGBOD January 2015.
Linac Ops Budget Structure & Approach WBS 1 – LCLS Mgmt & Admin
Scope, Requirements Deliverables & Schedule
LINAC OPS Budget Review
LERF Readiness Review: Charge
CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES STATUS
M. Scharfenstein - ES&H Coordinator 14 May 2009
FY2018 LABORATORY CALENDAR
Scientific Computing Strategy
CryoPlant Commissioning
Ian Evans SSRL Safety Office
Project Management Issues John N. Galayda, SLAC April 24, 2002
Project Status Review May 13-15, 2008.
Introduction FY09 Linac Ops Review
Integrated Safety and Environmental Management
LCLS-II Cryoplant Controls Workshop.
SOLID Collaboration Meeting
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Conventional Facilities
Onsite Training at JLab
ESHAC #8 Safety Readiness Review Thomas Hansson, ESH
CF Scope, Management & Organization
Update on the JLEIC pCDR
SNS-PPU upgrades the existing accelerator structure
CMGC Overview SLAC Site Plan Systems Description Construction Schedule
Presentation transcript:

User’s Group Board of Directors Jefferson Lab Comments January 10, 2017

Jefferson Lab Safety History FY2016 Last Recordable Injury – April 2016

Safety versus Schedule I have often claimed safety trumps schedule: You worry about safety I will worry about the schedule Soon after the last time I said that in an All Hands Meeting, we stepped out of line: We allowed urgency to install the Darklight Experiment test to overrule work planning Students “helping” did not have appropriate PPE, for example Techs stepped up to stop the individuals Division Level Management then STOPPED the WORK, until a plan was in place This was rightly called out in Safety Culture Survey Indeed there was a breakdown Accelerator Division conducted a lessons learned exercise We discussed this extensively in the Director’s Safety Council, management at the division level understands not to fall into this trap, being reinforced down the line. On a different note It is not often recognized that we invited the Users Group Board to be represented on the Director’s Safety Council. Ed Brash (CNU) has been attending our meetings for two to three years… he helped very actively when we tried to raise our game vis-à-vis student training and supervision. Thank you Ed.

Collaborative Projects LCLS II FRIB Description 4 GeV superconducting linac in existing SLAC tunnel New user facility at MSU for rare isotope studies Collaboration ANL, Cornell, FNAL, LBNL, SLAC, Jefferson Lab MSU, State of Michigan, DOE SC, Jefferson Lab Jefferson Lab Scope Cryoplant design, acquisition & commissioning Cryomodule and cavities for half of linac Qo R&D, LLRF, machine physics Cryogenic system design, procurement, fabrication, and integration Cryomodule engineering and design finalization Status  CD 2/3A complete  Several cryoplant procurements going well  All cryomodule procurements placed  Prototype cryomodule completed and started acceptance testing.  FDR for 2K cold compressors complete  Beta 0.041 design complete - Beta 0.29 design underway Prototype Cryomodule =0.29 Cryomodule Both Projects are carefully managed. Our participation is very much appreciated Discussions to increase scope for each

FY17 Budget Nominally, first year of full operations in 12 GeV-era and Operations budget should have increased correspondingly. President’s Budget (NP = $636M) up 3% JLab Ops up $5.5M; but insufficient for full operation Major increases in isotope program (+$8M) and RHIC (+$7.5M) Senate Mark: $636M Language for FRIB construction and RHIC ops House Mark: $620M Language for FRIB construction, RHIC ops, and CEBAF ops No Federal Budget yet: Continuing Resolution (CR) until April 28. Held to FY16 level - NP $15.4M below Pres. Budget JLab $5.5M below Pres. Budget NP=DOE Office of Nuclear Physics

FY17 Planning Anticipate considerable uncertainty in transition between Administrations NP additional Ops support? If a full year CR, NP has substantial shortfall FY17 @ FY16 CR Budget level: Major impact on non-labor spending (travel, hardware, contract labor, etc.) Reduced Weeks of Accelerator Operation: FY17 @ Pres Budget = 23 weeks FY17 @ FY16 Level = 16 weeks Workforce: New/replacement hires limited to critical needs In extremis, forced vacations and furloughs would be considered Reduction in force not anticipated U.S. has made a major investment in CEBAF. Laboratory has a clear mission, nuclear physics and accelerator technology, which is supported by DOE. We will work to mitigate negative effects of budget constraints on all aspects of the program, especially the workforce.

Utilities Infrastructure Modernization Overall Progress  89.2% complete CTF Building – complete CTF Equipment – 79% complete C6 Warm Compressor – 85% complete Communications – Complete CTF Cooling Tower – Complete Computer Center Consolidation – 12 % Complete Computer Center Cooling & Power – Complete

Jefferson Lab 2025 Campus Plan We appreciate your support of the multiple traffic pattern changes. We see the Hogan Road changes as a definite improvement to our access.

Director’s Perspective Emphases Core Nuclear Physics Finish the upgrade project, safely, on time, and within budget. Full-time operations. Operations budgets continue to be a concern here. Reliability and Risk Mitigation Advance new NP projects beyond the upgrade Develop Jefferson Lab EIC design: Technical Designs, Collaboration, (Land now secured) Technology Collaborations Large projects, like FRIB and LCLS-II, within context of a Nuclear Physics program – management is key Management/Personnel Operations Functions: Facilities, Procurement, Financial Management, Budget Office, Human Resources, Information Technology, Legal, ES&H are vital to the functioning of the lab What the lab can achieve depends on your efforts, Jefferson Lab successes will be your successes. Jefferson Lab world- leading Nuclear Physics

Spares/discards follow

IT News Multifactor Authentication – Planning to finish by Feb 28, 2017 Deployment for JLab system administrators was completed on Sept 29 (DOE priority) Central computing will be split during Christmas Shutdown to separate Open Science functions from standard user requirement User feedback on implementation details was very useful. Most Lab employees will have to comply with MFA Are planning a group by group deployment Detailed plan available in December SSL Decryption Most web traffic is now encrypted providing avenue of attack outside of existing scanning techniques. Using advanced features on the firewall to provide scans—working well Open to exemptions for file sharing services, banks… please let us know if you are having problems

JSA PEMP Grade Summary FY07 – FY16 S&T Performance Goals FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 1.0 Accomplishment A− A 2.0 Construction and Operations of User Research Facilities and Equipment B+ A- 3.0 Science and Technology Research Project/Program Management Leadership and Stewardship 4.0 Leadership and Stewardship of the Laboratory B M&O Performance Goals 5.0 Integrated Safety, Health, and Environmental Protection 6.0 Business Systems Integrated Safety, Health, and Environmental Protection 7.0 Operating, Maintaining, and Renewing Facility and Infrastructure Portfolio 8.0 Integrated Safeguards and Security Management and Emergency Management Systems