Joint Variable Message Format

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Addressing the Network – IPv4 Network Fundamentals – Chapter 6.
Advertisements

Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below (FBCB2) Communications System
Chapter 19: Network Management Business Data Communications, 4e.
United States Army Combined Arms Center TIER III SUPPORT.
Web Server Administration
Protocols and the TCP/IP Suite
Gursharan Singh Tatla Transport Layer 16-May
Lecture slides prepared for “Business Data Communications”, 7/e, by William Stallings and Tom Case, Chapter 8 “TCP/IP”.
NETWORKING CONCEPTS. TCP/IP The TCPIIP protocol suite was developed prior to the OSI model TCP/IP protocol suite was defined as having four layers: Host-to-network,
Fundamentals of Computer Networks ECE 478/578 Lecture #2 Instructor: Loukas Lazos Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Arizona.
1 EVALUATING INTELLIGENT FLUID AUTOMATION SYSTEMS USING A FLUID NETWORK SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT Ron Esmao - Sr. Applications Engineer, Flowmaster USA.
VALIDATION METHODOLOGY
70-291: MCSE Guide to Managing a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Network Chapter 3: TCP/IP Architecture.
Chapter 9.
SIGNALING. To establish a telephone call, a series of signaling messages must be exchanged. There are two basic types of signal exchanges: (1) between.
HPC use in Testing Ad Hoc Wireless Sensor Networks
Examining TCP/IP.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Parallel and Distributed Simulation Introduction and Motivation.
Working in the Virtual Environment Practical Experience
13 Step Approach to Network Design Steps A Systems Approach 8Conduct a feasibility Study 8Prepare a plan 8Understand the current system 8Design.
Bradley Cowie Supervised by Barry Irwin Security and Networks Research Group Department of Computer Science Rhodes University DATA CLASSIFICATION FOR CLASSIFIER.
1 Postal Operations John Rapp Senior Vice President, Operations.
Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense
UML - Development Process 1 Software Development Process Using UML.
Network Traffic Monitoring and Analysis - Shisheer Teli CCCF.
GORT Planning/Guidance Session with LTG Barclay
Content Interoperability: Achieving Clinical Data Quality Success Lin Wan, Ph.D., Chief Technology Officer Stella Technology.
Sensors Journal, IEEE, Issue Date: May 2013,
Web Server Administration
CompTIA Security+ Study Guide (SY0-401)
Chapter 19: Network Management
Introduction An introduction to the software and organization of the Internet Lab.
Lec 5: SNMP Network Management
Connectivity Verification
The Devil and Packet Trace Anonymization
DoD Cyberspace Workforce Definitions
Part I. Overview of Data Communications and Networking
CHAPTER 2 THE OSI MODEL.
TechStambha PMP Certification Training
ISO/OSI Model and Collision Domain
Seminar report on IPv4 & IPv6
CT1303 LAN Rehab AlFallaj.
Software Requirements
CompTIA Security+ Study Guide (SY0-401)
Adam Schlesinger NASA - JSC October 30, 2013
ECET 375 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
ECET 375 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com.
ECET 375 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com.
Transport Layer Unit 5.
Protocols and the TCP/IP Suite
An introduction to the organization of the Internet Lab
An introduction to the organization of the Internet Lab
Extending IP to Low-Power, Wireless Personal Area Networks
DoD Cyberspace Workforce Definitions
Royalty Accounting and Revenue Processing System (RAPS) Certification
Mission Command Center Excellence Directorate of Training
Mission Command Center Excellence Directorate of Training
Chapter 8: Monitoring the Network
COMBAT HUNTER TRAINER COURSE
Technical University of Cluj-Napoca
Lec 5: SNMP Network Management
Lecture 2: Overview of TCP/IP protocol
An introduction to the organization of the Internet Lab
70-293: MCSE Guide to Planning a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Network, Enhanced Chapter 2: TCP/IP Architecture.
Xiuzhen Cheng Csci332 MAS Networks – Challenges and State-of-the-Art Research – Wireless Mesh Networks Xiuzhen Cheng
Protocols and the TCP/IP Suite
Cyber Security of SCADA Systems Remote Terminal Units (RTU)
Network programming Lecture 1 Prepared by: Dr. Osama Mokhtar.
International Standards and Contemporary Technologies,
Presentation transcript:

Joint Variable Message Format System of Systems Risk Reduction for Network Integration Evaluation 15.2 Paolo Prezioso Mentored by Jennifer Zbozny and Michael Sukits Introduction Results Results (continued) The System of Systems Risk Reduction (SoSRR) is a process used by the United States Army to test and validate interoperability of communications systems and the applications. This study utilized this process to analyze system capabilities and understand limitations in preparation for the Army’s Network Integration Evaluation (NIE) 15.2. The NIE is conducted biannually at Fort Bliss, Texas and White Sands Missile Range, NM, and provides an operational environment to test Army platforms, communications equipment, and sensors in battlefield scenarios to ensure functionality. The Program Executive Office Command Control Communications-Tactical (PEO C3T) conducted the SoSRR prior to field testing so that issues could be identified and mitigated early, configurations have been optimized, and systems are interoperable. The PEO C3Ts main system under test at NIE 15.2 is the Mid-Tier Networking Vehicular Radio (MNVR) and a significant portion of the SoSRR was dedicated to preparing the system, which hosts with the Wideband Networking Waveform, to interface with the other C3T portfolio of systems, prior to the program’s Limited User Test at NIE 15.2 (Burge, 2014). Format (VMF), User Datagram Protocol (UDP), Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP), and Internet Group Message Protocol (IGMP). During the period analyzed, no IGMP or C2 messages succeeded, so they are not displayed. Joint Variable Message Format Conclusion Graph 1: Average MCR of JVMF for January 20 to February 6 The purpose of this study was to establish limitations of the various transports and applications used by the United States Army. The PEO C3T was able to use the results to create a list of restrictions and expectations of the functionality of the MNVR radio and the Mission Command applications it transports. Hundreds of thousands of data samples were collected to create accurate descriptions of the networks’ and radios’ performance. Initially, the MNVR was unsuccessful in completing all test threads and the systems did not integrate as planned, but issues such as these were expected and mitigated appropriately. C2 messaging and MCR/SOS testing failed during the test period represented, but after system configurations, messages were sent successfully and completion rates were captured. The results from this study will be used to shape test threads and execution at NIE 15.2 and aid in continued developmental efforts. In response to the integration issues identified during the test, PEO C3T decided to maintain an enduring lab architecture to gauge developmental efforts and conduct trade analyses of fixes. Situational Awareness Graph 2: Average MCR of Situational Awareness for January 20 to February 6 Packet Completion Rate by Protocol Methods and Materials Testing began by executing functional messaging between mission command applications in the test environment. After the team verified that messages flow between applications within the Tactical Systems Integration Facility at brigade and battalion levels, testing extended down to the Lower Tactical Internet. The team then planned to bridge the Upper Tactical Internet with the Lower Tactical Internet to ensure communications across the PEO C3T portfolio of systems. Lastly, stress testing of the networks radios, such as MNVR, and waveforms aided in understanding message latency and position-location-information (PLI) accuracy and timeliness. To help stress the network, various simulation/stimulation tools were utilized to inject data, messages, PLI, and node movement. Graph 3: Average PCR for January 20 to February 6 Speed of Service by Protocol References Burge, D. (2014, May 11). Fort Bliss hosts semi-annual Network Integration Evaluation to test latest Army equipment. El Paso Times. Retrieved from http://www.elpasotimes.com/news/ci_25743122/fort-bliss-hosts-nie-test-latest-army-equipment Metz, W., & Sukits, M. (2014). PEO C3T SoSRR for NIE 15.2 - Test Plan. Test Plan reviewed at APG Graph 4: Average SOS for January 20 to February 6 The SoSRR examined performance of C2 messaging, Joint Variable Message Format completion rate, Situational Awareness completion rate, and other messaging protocols. The messaging protocols tested include Variable Message Approved for Public Release. Distribution is unlimited. May 2015