Preprints and Other Interim Research Products NIH perspectives

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by: Jerry Legge Associate Provost for Academic Planning (Interim), and Professor of Public Administration and Policy (SPIA) Provost Advisory.
Advertisements

Management, Population and Marketing of institutional repositories / open access journals Iryna Kuchma, eIFL Open Access program manager, eIFL.net Presented.
Integrating the gender aspects in research and promoting the participation of women in Life Sciences, Genomics and Biotechnology for Health.
CHORUS Implementation Webinar May 16, 2014 Mark Martin Assistant Director, Office of Scientific and Technical Information Office of Science U.S. Department.
US DOE’s Public Access Plan: A vision reaching fruition Ms. Deborah Cutler Alt. US INIS Liaison Officer Office of Scientific and Technical Information.
Knowledge Translation: A View from a National Policy Perspective KU-02 Conference Oxford, England July 2, 2002.
LEVERAGING THE ENTERPRISE INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT Louise Edmonds Senior Manager Information Management ACT Health.
Presented by Ansie van der Westhuizen Unisa Institutional Repository: Sharing knowledge to advance research
Designing the Microbial Research Commons: An International Symposium Overview National Academy of Sciences Washington, DC October 8-9, 2009 Cathy H. Wu.
Data Management and Accessibility S.M. Kaye PPPL Research Seminar 12/16/2013.
Heather Joseph, Executive Director The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition Washington, DC USA THE SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING & ACADEMIC RESOURCES.
1 Judy Hewitt, PhD On Detail to Office of Extramural Research National Institutes of Health May 18, 2015 Center for Scientific Review Advisory Council.
Symposium on Global Scientific Data Infrastructures Panel Two: Stakeholder Communities in the DWF Ann Wolpert, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Board.
Breakout # 1 – Data Collecting and Making It Available Data definition “ Any information that [environmental] researchers need to accomplish their tasks”
Providing access to your data: Determining your audience Robert R. Downs, PhD NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Center for International.
NIH BioCADDIE / Force11 Data Citation Pilot Kickoff Meeting Nine Zero Hotel, Boston MA, 3 February 2016 Introduction: Tim Clark, Maryann Martone and Joan.
Faculty Councils Brad Whittaker Director, Research Services and Industry Liaison Strategic Research Plan.
BIMILACI 2007 Partners for Quality Infrastructure: The FIDIC Vision Washington, May 10, 2007 Dr. Jorge Díaz Padilla FIDIC President.
Why ANDS? 16 May, 2011 Mathew Wyatt. Trends towards open data  Data science  Gov 2.0  Research 2.0  Open Science  Freedom of Information.
ODIN – ORCID and DATACITE Interoperability Network ODIN: Connecting research and researchers Sergio Ruiz - DataCite Funded by The European Union Seventh.
SciENcv: NLM’s Fed-wide biosketch tool NIH Regional Meeting May 2016 Neil Thakur, PhD Office of Extramural Research Bart Trawick, PhD National Center for.
National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Planning for a Team Science Evaluation ∞ NIEHS: Children’s Health Exposure Analysis.
Announcing the 2014 National Digital Stewardship Agenda.
SHERPA/RoMEO Open Access Policy Tool for Publishers Peter Millington Centre for Research Communications University of Nottingham SHERPA/RoMEO for Publishers.
SciENcv: a Federal biosketch tool NIH Regional Meeting October 2016 Neil Thakur, PhD Office of Extramural Research Bart Trawick, PhD National Center for.
NIH – A Vision Through 2020 Philip E. Bourne, PhD, FACMI Associate Director for Data Science
NRF Open Access Statement
Jeff Moon Data Librarian &
Jennie Larkin, PhD Senior Advisor
Research Indicators for Open Science
Continuous Improvement Project (A Guideline For Sponsors)
Open access publishing - researcher's perspective
Neil Thakur Office of Extramural Research February 23, 2017
VCU Strategic Plan 2025: Excellence and Access
SciENcv: NLM’s Fed-wide biosketch tool NIH Regional Meeting May 2016
Ways to upgrade the FAIRness of your data repository.
Open access as a means to produce high quality data Anja Gassner Head Research Method Group Sentinel Landscape Coordinator FTA World Agroforestry Centre.
Summit 2017 Breakout Group 2: Data Management (DM)
World landscape of repositories and repository networks: achievements, challenges, opportunities Dominique Babini OAI 10 - CERN - UNIGE Workshop on Innovations.
The Challenge.
Open Impacts: Recommendations
Promoting a culture of preprinting in the life sciences
Working with your archive organization Broadening your user community
General Finnish DMP Guidance
Rebecca Lawrence Managing Director, F February 2018
Open Science at the Royal Society Dr Stuart Taylor Publishing Director
Access  Discovery  Compliance  Identification  Preservation
JH Trial Innovation Unit (TIU)
Erica Westenberg September 28, 2017
EOSCpilot Skills Landscape & Framework
Advancing South-South Cooperation for Effective Implementation of
Scientific Data as Research Infrastructure
SwafS : Encouraging the re-use of research data generated by publically funded research projects.
Creating a Culture of Open Data in Academia
As we reflect on policies and practices for expanding and improving early identification and early intervention for youth, I would like to tie together.
Open Science: the crucial importance of metadata
Objectives, activities, and results of the database Lituanistika
Day on the Square Debrief Summary March 23, 2018
PRE-QUALIFIED AND PREFERRED SUPPLIER PROGRAM
OPEN ACCESS POLICY Larshan Naicker Rhodes University Library
Bird of Feather Session
Brokering as a Core Element of EarthCube’s Cyberinfrastructure
Research Data: Infrastructure, Re-use and Dark Knowledge
Research data lifecycle²
OECD Global Science Forum February, 2007
NIH Biosketch and SciENcv
Pillars of Performance
Interoperability and data for open science
Cultivating Semantics for Data in Agriculture and Nutrition
Fundamental Science Practices (FSP) of the U.S. Geological Survey
Presentation transcript:

Preprints and Other Interim Research Products NIH perspectives Neil Thakur Office of Extramural Research National Institutes of Health July 19, 2017 Boston

Interim Research Products Broad definition (to avoid many small rules): Complete, public research products that are not final Preprints are complete and public drafts of scientific documents. Arguably speeds dissemination, establishes priority, generates feedback, and may reduce publication bias. Preregistering a protocol is publicly declaring key elements of a research project in advance. May reduce biases like p-hacking.

NIH’s interest: Stable infrastructure to advance science Integrity Open (accessible, impactful, egalitarian) Preserved and reliable (versioning, linkages, metadata) Encourage responsible standards and beneficial innovation Allow disciplines to adopt at their own pace Innovation can increase rigor and dissemination Prevent bad practices from taking root Ensure more preprints= better science

Integrity through standards and best practices Citation format standards: DOI, list object type (e.g. Preprint, protocol) Example: Bar DZ, Atkatsh K, Tavarez U, Erdos MR, Gruenbaum Y, Collins FS. Biotinylation by antibody recognition- A novel method for proximity labeling. BioRxiv 069187 [Preprint]. 2016 [cited 2017 Jan 12].  Available from: https://doi.org/10.1101/069187. To cite preprints arising from NIH awards DOI Recommend CC-BY license Statement: not peer-reviewed Acknowledge funding Declare competing interests Repository best practices FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) Open metadata Machine accessible and readable Transparent policies Versioning links to published version tracks key changes Permanent/archival plan https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-17-050.html

Considerations for a central service Allowable under federal rules General principles Does not limit innovation or competition Open participation Publicly accountable Opportunities for evaluation and improvement Align with NIH/NLM goals and operations Many of these concepts described in the ASAPbio RFA

Infrastructure: Support multiple repositories for multiple disciplines A central service that will … Support integrity for all affiliated repositories Complements and strengthens multiple repositories (disciplinary, publisher, institutional) Ensure adherence to NIH policies Ensure standards and promote advances in best practices: e.g., competing interests, plagiarism, rigor, misconduct, JATS, CC-BY license, open metadata, APIs/machine accessibility, discovery/push tools, indexing, tagging, etc.

Infrastructure: Support multiple repositories for multiple disciplines A central service that will … Support innovation in the quality and impact of preprints e.g., Commenting/community evaluation, metrics, text-mining Reflect the interests of the scientific community A place where the community can explore tagging, linking, innovation, etc. Accountable stewardship of resources and science

Infrastructure: Support multiple repositories for multiple disciplines A preprint central service that will interconnect repositories and objects to solve problems Future of science dissemination Enhance access to all research products Manage increased volume and complexity Incentivize great science Use products to solve problems Accomplished through public-private partnerships