NEW DESIGN OF THE TESLA INTERACTION REGION WITH l* = 5 m

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Collimation Simulations and Optimisation Frank Jackson ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Advertisements

Beam-Beam Effects for FCC-ee at Different Energies: at Different Energies: Crab Waist vs. Head-on Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk FCC-ee/TLEP physics.
Overview of Beam Delivery System Final Focus Optics Collimator Final Doublet Extraction/Dump Others S.Kuroda ( KEK ) MDI meeting at SLAC 1/6/2005.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.
ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.
1 August 12, 2005 Running 2mrad IR in e-e- mode: BDS constraints A.Seryi August 12, 2005.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
1 27 Sep 05 Discussion of anti-DID ( “DIDNT” ? ) A.Seryi September 27, 2005.
Beam Delivery System Review of RDR(draft) 1.Overview 2.Beam parameters 3.System description 3.1 diagnostic, tune-up dump, machine protection MPS.
March A. Chancé, J. Payet DAPNIA/SACM / Beta-beam ECFA/BENE Workshop The Decay Ring -First Design- A. Chancé, J.Payet CEA/DSM/DAPNIA/SACM.
October 31, BDS Group1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Hybrid” Layout 2006e Release Preliminary M. Woodley.
New Progress of the Nonlinear Collimation System for A. Faus-Golfe J. Resta López D. Schulte F. Zimmermann.
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
Backgrounds in the NLC BDS ISG9 December 10 – Takashi Maruyama SLAC.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
ELIC Low Beta Optics with Chromatic Corrections Hisham Kamal Sayed 1,2 Alex Bogacz 1 1 Jefferson Lab 2 Old Dominion University.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
Global Design Effort ILC Crab Cavity Overview and requirements Andrei Seryi SLAC on behalf of ILC Beam Delivery and Crab-Cavity design teams Joint BNL/US-LARP/CARE-HHH.
Plan for Review of FCC- ee Optics and Beam Dynamics Frank Zimmermann FCC-ee Design Meeting 31 August 2015.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Collimation Baseline Configuration and Collimation Studies Frank Jackson ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory.
ILC-GDE Meeting Beijing Feb Effect of MDI Design on BDS Collimation Depth Frank Jackson ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory Cockcroft Institute.
ILC luminosity optimization in the presence of the detector solenoid and anti-DID Reine Versteegen PhD Student CEA Saclay, Irfu/SACM International Workshop.
Interaction Region Issues M. Sullivan for the EIC User Group Meeting Jan. 6-9, 2016.
SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors G. Burtin, R.J. Colchester, G. Ferioli, J.J. Gras, R. Jung,
BDS/MDI Deepa Angal-Kalinin Andrei Seryi AD&I Meeting, DESY, May 29, 2009.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Preliminary Result on L*=1.5m CEPC Interaction Region Yiwei Wang, Dou Wang, Sha Bai Yingshun Zhu, Teng Yue CEPC acc. meeting, 5 September 2014.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
Super Tau Charm Lattice ST20_49/55 Pantaleo Raimondi La Biodola, May
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
LHeC Final Focus System Jose L. Abelleira, PhD candidate CERN, EPFL Thanks to: H. Garcia, R. Tomas, F. Zimmermann 2012 CERN-ECFA-NuPECC Workshop on the.
Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.
News from the interaction region study Bernhard Holzer, Anton Bogomyagkov, Bastian Harer, Rogelio Tomas Garcia, Roman Martin, Luis Eduardo Medina Presented.
1 April 1 st, 2003 O. Napoly, ECFA-DESY Amsterdam Design of a new Final Focus System with l* = 4,5 m J. Payet, O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
Collimation Simulations and Optimisation
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
LOW EMITTANCE CELL WITH LARGE DYNAMIC APERTURE
Review of new High Energy Rings
Benchmarking MAD, SAD and PLACET Characterization and performance of the CLIC Beam Delivery System with MAD, SAD and PLACET T. Asaka† and J. Resta López‡
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
LHeC interaction region
Large Booster and Collider Ring
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
ILC Baseline BDS Collimation Depth Calculations
Optimization of CEPC Dynamic Aperture
Electron collider ring Chromaticity Compensation and dynamic aperture
The 2mrad horizontal crossing angle IR layout for the ILC
Status of SuperKEKB Design: Lattice and IR
Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
Comparison of the final focus design
S.Kuroda ( KEK ) Final Focus Optics Collimeter Final Doublet
Final Focus System: gg Interaction Region
2001 Collimation System & FF integrated design (NLC)
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
Studies of crossing angle and SR effects for CLIC TENTATIVE
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
ILC Beam Switchyard: Issues and Plans
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

NEW DESIGN OF THE TESLA INTERACTION REGION WITH l* = 5 m O. Napoly, J. Payet CEA/DSM/DAPNIA/SACM

New Final Focus ‘à la NLC’ Advantages from the machine point-of-view: Better chromaticity correction  larger l* l* = 5m  final doublet moved out of the detector solenoid l* IP waist β* chromaticity : ξ = l* / β*

New Final Focus with l* = 5m Advantages from the detector point-of-view Larger forward acceptance at low angles Final doublet moved out of the calorimeter  less e.m. showers in the detector Lighter Tungsten-mask and simpler support

Main issues of the Design Final Focus Optics Extraction of Synchrotron Radiation from Final Doublet (i.e. check collimation depths) Extraction of Spent Beam from Final Doublet

Final Focus Optics Matching conditions : Two approaches : The R12, R34 terms of the transfert matrix between the paired sextupoles {SV1, SV2} {SH1,SH3} are set to zero Two approaches : x and y corrections « à la NLC » Interleaved sextupole pairs Additional sextupole (+ octupoles, decapoles not implemented) x correction « à la TDR » + y correction « à la NLC » Non interleaved sextupole pairs

NLC-like Optics @ IP ’x = 10 mrad

NLC-like : Beam sizes and Luminosity

NLC-like : Emittance growth with S.R. Optimization with dipole locations

Hybrid Optics @ IP ’x = 2.6 mrad

Hybrid : Beam sizes and Luminosity

Hybrid : Emittance growth with S.R.

The collimation section We use the TDR collimation section with some changes : Reverse the first dispersion bump Introduce a second energy spoiler (ΔΨx =2 between the 2 energy spoilers)

NLC-like optics : Central trajectories

The collimation depths The images of the slits are transported for several energies to each relevant emission positions in the Final Doublet. Their intersection points define the collimated phase space volume and are taken as origins of the synchrotron radiation rays. The emitted synchrotron radiation beam is determined by the rays originating from all 4D corners and all (discrete) energies.

S.R. in FD : 1st order transport FFADA At 1st order transport, the aperture of the collimators are in agreement with the on-momentum predictions for the collimation depths Betatron spoilers : gx = 1.8 mm gy = 0.7 mm BETA Energy spoilers : gx = 1.8 mm (NLC) gx = 1.2 mm (Hybrid) Momentum acceptance : ±0.6 % (NLC) ±0.9 % (Hybrid)

S.R. in FD : all δ-order transport NLC-like optics All order momentum transport generates distortions of the central orbits and beam focusing. The energy spoiler apertures must be reduced in order to keep a good synchrotron radiation extraction. -1.25 % < d < +1.25 % Hybrid optics

S.R. in FD : all δ-order transport NLC-like optics Betatron spoilers : gx = 1.8 & 1.3 mm gy = 0.7 mm Energy spoilers : gx = 0.8 mm Momentum acceptance : -0.39 % , +0.52 % Betatron spoilers : gx = 1.8 & 1.2 mm gy = 0.7 mm Energy spoilers : gx = 0.9 & 0.7 mm Hybrid optics Momentum acceptance : -0.42 % , +0.57 %

Spent beam extraction  Angular acceptance of the final doublet as a function of energy and angle 

Spent beam extraction Better extraction of low energy charged particles (e+e- pairs, beam-beam bremsstrahlung)

Conclusions Design of l* = 5 m new TESLA final focus is possible within the 600m TDR length constraint. Two solutions are investigated, using the NLC chromaticity correction scheme. For the both cases : The momentum bandwidth is comparable or better than the TDR. The collimation requirements are about a factor 2 tighter than the TDR. The code BETA develops a new tool to investigate the impact of off-energy particle collimation. The spent beam extraction through final doublet is roughly equivalent. Several optimizations are still needed