Humans Have Evolved Specialized Skills of Social Cognition: The Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis by Esther Herrmann, Josep Call, María Victoria Hernàndez-Lloreda,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C. D. Toliver AP Statistics
Advertisements

Chapter 2 Exploring Data with Graphs and Numerical Summaries
Descriptive Measures MARE 250 Dr. Jason Turner.
MANOVA: Multivariate Analysis of Variance
Analysis of Variance The contents in this chapter are from Chapter 15 and Chapter 16 of the textbook. One-Way Analysis of Variance Multiple Comparisons.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)-the General Linear Model (GLM)
Ariel Strayer Patti Carlson.  Chimpanzees and Bonobos are humans’ closets living relatives.  Despite this closeness, their behaviors differ in many.
5 Number Summary Box Plots. The five-number summary is the collection of The smallest value The first quartile (Q 1 or P 25 ) The median (M or Q 2 or.
Box and Whisker Plots A Modern View of the Data. History Lesson In 1977, John Tukey published an efficient method for displaying a five-number data summary.
Vocabulary for Box and Whisker Plots. Box and Whisker Plot: A diagram that summarizes data using the median, the upper and lowers quartiles, and the extreme.
BOX PLOTS/QUARTILES. QUARTILES: 3 points in a set of data that separate the set into 4 equal parts. Lower Quartile: Q1 (The median for the lower half.
Box and Whisker Plots and Quartiles Sixth Grade. Five Statistical Summary When describing a set of data we have seen that we can use measures such as.
Quartiles & Extremes (displayed in a Box-and-Whisker Plot) Lower Extreme Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Upper Extreme Back.
Lecture 8 Distributions Percentiles and Boxplots Practical Psychology 1.
Humans Have Evolved Specialized Skills of Social Cognition: The Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis Ashley Allen Marisa Molina Herrman, E., Call, J. Hernandez-Lloreda,
Cognition HERRMANN, E., CALL, J., HERNANDEZ-LLOREDA, M. V., HARE, B., & TOMASELLO, M. (2007). HUMANS HAVE EVOLVED SPECIALIZED SKILLS OF SOCIAL COGNITION:
Materials Reminders. Get out your agenda if you see your name below. You need to come to my room tomorrow. Period 2Period 7.
6-9 Data Distributions Objective Create and interpret box-and-whisker plots.
What is variability in data? Measuring how much the group as a whole deviates from the center. Gives you an indication of what is the spread of the data.
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE By ADETORO Gbemisola Wuraola.
1 Further Maths Chapter 2 Summarising Numerical Data.
Quantitative data. mean median mode range  average add all of the numbers and divide by the number of numbers you have  the middle number when the numbers.
6.8 Compare Statistics from Samples MM1D3a: Compare summary statistics (mean, median, quartiles, and interquartile range) from one sample data distribution.
1 Chapter 4 Numerical Methods for Describing Data.
Section 4-8 Box and Whisker Plots. A Box and Whisker plot can be used to graphically represent a set of data points Box whiskers.
Social Science Research Design and Statistics, 2/e Alfred P. Rovai, Jason D. Baker, and Michael K. Ponton Between Subjects Analysis of Variance PowerPoint.
Vocabulary to know: *statistics *data *outlier *mean *median *mode * range.
Cumulative frequency Cumulative frequency graph
Box Plots March 20, th grade. What is a box plot? Box plots are used to represent data that is measured and divided into four equal parts. These.
5-Number Summary A 5-Number Summary is composed of the minimum, the lower quartile (Q1), the median (Q2), the upper quartile (Q3), and the maximum. These.
Box and Whisker Plots Example: Comparing two samples.
StatisticsStatistics Unit 5. Example 2 We reviewed the three Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median, and Mode. We also looked at one Measure of Dispersion.
Probability & Statistics Box Plots. Describing Distributions Numerically Five Number Summary and Box Plots (Box & Whisker Plots )
Please copy your homework into your assignment book
Chapter 16: Exploratory data analysis: numerical summaries
a graphical presentation of the five-number summary of data
Box and Whisker Plots.
From: Perioperative Use of Dobutamine in Cardiac Surgery and Adverse Cardiac Outcome:Propensity-adjusted Analyses Anesthes. 2008;108(6): doi: /ALN.0b013e f.
Find the lower and upper quartiles for the data set.
Differences Among Group Means: Multifactorial Analysis of Variance
Box and Whisker Plots Algebra 2.
A Modern View of the Data
Numerical Measures: Skewness and Location
Lesson 10-3 Data Distributions
Box and Whisker Plots 50% Step 1 – Order the series.
BOX-and-WHISKER PLOT (Box Plot)
The absolute value of each deviation.
Changes in archaeal diversity during great ape diversification.
One way ANOVA One way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) is used to test the significance difference of mean of one dependent variable across more than two.
How to make a box and whisker plot
Box-And-Whisker Plots
Box and Whisker Plot of the Distribution of Perceived Stress Scores for TMD Controls and TMD CasesThe horizontal line within the box is the median value.
Statistics and Data (Algebraic)
Box-and-Whisker Plots
Main Idea and New Vocabulary
12.4 Box-and-Whisker Plots
Box-and-Whisker Plots
. . Box and Whisker Measures of Variation Measures of Variation 8 12
Intensity of statistical methods and reporting subdivided by the journal groups. Intensity of statistical methods and reporting subdivided by the journal.
Box-And-Whisker Plots
Box-And-Whisker Plots
Box and Whisker Plots.
Results of the performance study experiment: Compression (sample size: n = 5). Results of the performance study experiment: Compression (sample size: n.
BOX-and-WHISKER PLOT (Box Plot)
Between-country and within-country variability in the number of nursing care activities left undone—composite score in 488 European hospitals. Between-country.
Fig. 2. Proportion of motile objects and track length
Ch. 12 Vocabulary 15.) quartile 16.) Interquartile range
LSM = liver stiffness measure, CAP = controlled attenuation parameter.
Fig. 1 Injury-type frequencies and handicap in injured M. analis ants.
Presentation transcript:

Humans Have Evolved Specialized Skills of Social Cognition: The Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis by Esther Herrmann, Josep Call, María Victoria Hernàndez-Lloreda, Brian Hare, and Michael Tomasello Science Volume 317(5843):1360-1366 September 7, 2007 Published by AAAS

Fig. 1. Physical domain (A)and social domain (B). Physical domain (A)and social domain (B). The box plots show the full distribution of the proportion of correct responses for physical and social domains of the PCTB for each species: median, quartiles, and extreme values. Boxes represent the interquartile range that contains 50% of values (range from the 25th to the 75th percentile). The line across the box indicates the median. The whiskers represent maximum and minimum values, excluding outliers [indicated by circles, at least 1.5 times the interquartile range (i.e., 1.5 box lengths from the upper or lower edge of the box)] and extremes [indicated by asterisks, at least 3 times the interquartile range (i.e., >3 box lengths from the edge)]. Statistical comparisons on each domain were made by multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), followed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests for each domain. Post-hoc tests (the Bonferroni correction was used when the equality of variances assumption holds, and the Dunnett t3 correction was used otherwise) followed in case a significant effect was detected. Performance on the PCTB as a whole differed significantly across species (MANOVA with species and gender as between-subject factors and performance in both domains of the PCTB as the dependent variables; Wilk's Lambda: F4,472 = 123.965, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.51). No statistically significant differences were detected between genders, but there was an interaction between species and gender (Wilk's Lambda: f4,472 = 2.815, p < 0.025, η2 = 0.02). Univariate analyses (ANOVA) showed that the differences across species were significant for both domains: physical (F2,237 = 19.921, p <0.001, η2 = 0.14) and social (F2,237 = 311.224, p <0.001, η2 = 0.72). Univariate analyses for the interaction between species and gender revealed that there was a significant interaction for the physical domain (F2,237 = 5.451, p = 0.005, η2 = 0.04) but not for the social domain (F2,237 = 0.224, p = 0.799). Post-hoc tests (Dunnett t3 correction) revealed that humans and chimpanzees performed better than orangutans in the physical domain (for both p < 0.001, with no difference between humans and chimpanzees). However, post-hoc tests (Dunnett t3 correction) showed that human children outperformed both chimpanzees and orangutans in the social domain (both p < 0.001). Post-hoc tests for the interaction between species and gender in the physical domain showed that female children were better than male children (p = 0.001). No other gender differences were found. Esther Herrmann et al. Science 2007;317:1360-1366 Published by AAAS

Fig. 2. Space (A), quantities (B), causality (C), social learning (D), communication (E), and theory of mind (F). Space (A), quantities (B), causality (C), social learning (D), communication (E), and theory of mind (F). The box plots show the full distribution of the proportion of correct responses on the six scales of the PCTB for each species: median, quartiles, and extreme values. Boxes, lines, whiskers, outliers, and extremes are as described in Fig. 1. Statistical comparisons on each scale were made by MANOVA, followed by ANOVAs for each scale. Post-hoc tests (the Bonferroni correction was used when the equality of variances assumption holds, and the Dunnett t3 correction was used otherwise) followed in case a significant effect was detected. Performance in the physical domain differed significantly across species (MANOVA with species and gender as between-subject factors and performance in the three scales of the physical domain as the dependent variables; Wilk's Lambda: f6,470 = 6.934, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.08). No statistically significant differences were detected between genders. However, there was a significant interaction between species and gender (Wilk's Lambda: f6,470 = 2.393, p = 0.027, η2 = 0.03). Univariate analyses (ANOVA) showed that the differences across species were significant for the scales space (f2,237 = 11.033, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.09) and causality (f2,237 = 8.617, p <0.001, η2 = 0.07). No species difference was found for the scale quantities (f2,237 = 1.970, p = 0.142). Univariate analyses for the interaction between species and gender revealed that there was a significant interaction for the scales space (f2,237 = 4.095, p = 0.018, η2 = 0.03) and quantities (f2,237 = 3.147, p = 0.045, η2 = 0.03) but not for causality (f2,237 = 0.199, p = 0.820). Post-hoc tests (Bonferroni correction) revealed that humans and chimpanzees performed better than orangutans in the scales of space and causality (for all p < 0.001), with no difference between chimpanzees and humans on these scales. Post-hoc tests for the interaction between species and gender for space showed that chimpanzee males outperformed females (p = 0.047). Post-hoc tests showed that human females outperformed males on the quantities scale (P = 0.004). No other gender differences were found. Performance in the social domain differed significantly across species (MANOVA with gender and species as between-subject factors and performance in the three scales of the social domain as the dependent variables; Wilk's Lambda: f6,470 = 96.846, p <0.001, η2 = 0.55). No statistically significant differences were detected between gender, and no significant gender-species interaction was found. Univariate analyses (ANOVA) showed that the differences across species were significant for the all three scales: social learning (f2,237 = 382.145, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.76), communication (f2,237 = 24.717, p <0.001, η2 = 0.17), and theory of mind (f2,237 = 70.646, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.37). Post-hoc tests (Dunnett t3 correction) revealed that humans outperformed chimpanzees (p <0.001) and orangutans (p < 0.001) in social learning, communication, and theory of mind. The performance of chimpanzees and orangutans in all three scales did not differ. Esther Herrmann et al. Science 2007;317:1360-1366 Published by AAAS