Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Advertisements

Gautam A. Madan, MDS, Sonal G. Madan, MDS, Gauri Madan, MDS, A. D
Operative Approach and
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 385, Issue 9985, Pages (June 2015)
The PSA Era is not Over for Prostate Cancer
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
The Origin of the Bone Scan as a Tumour Marker in Prostate Cancer
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Emerging Trends in the Treatment of Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Potential and Limitations of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Kidney, Prostate, and Bladder Cancer Including Pelvic Lymph Node Staging:
Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Prostate Cancer: Highlights from 2006
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Pulling the Trigger on Pancreatic Cysts
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 73, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 72, Issue 3, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages e53-e56 (April 2013)
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
The Importance of Transurethral Resection in Managing Patients With Urothelial Cancer in the Bladder: Proposal for a Transurethral Resection of Bladder.
Nerve-Sparing Open Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Retrograde Nerve-Sparing (NS) Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP): Technical Aspects and Early Results  Jens J. Rassweiler, Marto Sugiono, Marcel.
Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages e41-e42 (April 2010)
Volume 67, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystoprostatectomy
The PSA Era is not Over for Prostate Cancer
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
The Origin of the Bone Scan as a Tumour Marker in Prostate Cancer
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Long-term Cancer-specific Survival in Patients with High-risk, Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer and Tumour Progression: A Systematic Review  Sven van.
The Inside-Out Transobturator Male Sling for the Surgical Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy: Midterm Results of a Single-Center.
Radical Perineal Prostatectomy and Simultaneous Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection via the Same Incision  Hansjörg Keller, Joachim Lehmann, Jörn Beier 
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
The Economic Costs of Overactive Bladder in Germany
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Antonio Galfano, Silvia Secco, Aldo Massimo Bocciardi  European Urology 
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Jacques Irani  European Urology Supplements 
Learning Curve of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a University Teaching Hospital: Experience after the First 600 Cases  Luis Martínez-Piñeiro, Felipe.
Volume 385, Issue 9985, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 71, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Luis Martínez-Piñeiro  European Urology 
Volume 69, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Axel Heidenreich  European Urology Supplements 
Prognostic Factors in Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Tumors
Management of Prostate Cancer: Global Strategies
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Fernando P. Secin, Fernando J. Bianco, Nicholas T
Axel Heidenreich  European Urology Supplements 
Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Introduction European Urology Supplements
Presentation transcript:

Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages 487-496 (September 2015) Does Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reduce the Rate of Positive Surgical Margins at Radical Prostatectomy in a Randomised Clinical Trial?  Erik Rud, Eduard Baco, Dagmar Klotz, Kristin Rennesund, Aud Svindland, Viktor Berge, Eskild Lundeby, Nicolai Wessel, Jon-Roar Hoff, Rolf Eigil Berg, Lien Diep, Heidi B. Eggesbø, Lars Magne Eri  European Urology  Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages 487-496 (September 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.039 Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Trial profile using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 guidelines. MRI=magnetic resonance imaging; RALP=robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. European Urology 2015 68, 487-496DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.039) Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 The 30-sector tumour map used for registration of all tumours at magnetic resonance imaging and histology served as the basis for correlation analysis. All suspected tumours were marked in red, and any extraprostatic extension was indicated. The map was then presented to the surgeon before surgery. The three possible planes of dissection are indicated with stippled lines. Extended and non–nerve-sparing surgery was combined for statistical analyses. Figure adapted by Kari C. Toverud from Girouin et al. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1498–509, with permission from Springer. © Kari C. Toverud. Ant.=anterior; lat.=lateral; med.=medial; NVB=neurovascular bundle; Post.=posterior. European Urology 2015 68, 487-496DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.039) Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Distribution of positive surgical margin (PSM) sites is marked with small circles. The PSM sites ventral to the basal urethra represent the bladder neck. Both the apex and the base are at high risk for PSMs. Figure adapted by Kari C. Toverud from Girouin et al. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1498–509, with permission from Springer. © Kari C. Toverud. Ant.=anterior; lat.=lateral; med.=medial; MRI=magnetic resonance imaging; Post.=posterior. European Urology 2015 68, 487-496DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.039) Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 In patients with cT1, the relative risk of positive surgical margins (PSMs) was 41% lower in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) group, and there was a reduction in PSMs regardless of the surgical procedure. There was no significant difference in the surgery between the two groups. Unexpectedly, in patients with cT2–3, the overall PSM rate increased by 6% (95% confidence interval, −6 to 18; p=0.4) in the MRI group, despite the fact that unilateral nerve-sparing surgery and non–nerve-sparing surgery were performed 13% more frequently in the MRI group. BNS=bilateral nerve-sparing surgery; MRI=magnetic resonance imaging; NNS=non–nerve-sparing surgery; PSM=positive surgical margins; UNS=unilateral nerve-sparing surgery. European Urology 2015 68, 487-496DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.039) Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Bilateral nerve-sparing surgery was chosen in 15 of 110 patients (14%) when magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suggested T3 disease. For unknown reasons, the surgeon chose not to consider the MRI findings. Six of the patients turned out to have pT3 in which two had positive surgical margins (PSMs); the remaining nine were pT2 and one had PSM. In 95 of 110 patients (86%), the surgical procedure harmonised to a larger extent with the MRI finding; however, 24 of 27 patients (89%) with PSMs were found in this group. This illustrates that the degree of non–nerve-sparing excision was not sufficient. BNS=bilateral nerve-sparing surgery; MRI=magnetic resonance imaging; NNS=non–nerve-sparing surgery; NSM=negative surgical margins; PSM=positive surgical margins; UNS=unilateral nerve-sparing surgery. European Urology 2015 68, 487-496DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.039) Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 6 The associated tumour for each case of positive surgical margins (PSMs) and whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected it or not. Also shown is whether the PSMs were associated with extraprostatic extension in the same area. MRI identified most tumours and sectors associated with PSMs, suggesting that the surgeons did not sufficiently consider the MRI findings. EPE=extraprostatic extension; MRI=magnetic resonance imaging; PSM=positive surgical margins. European Urology 2015 68, 487-496DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.039) Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions