Transmit diversity for MIMO-OFDM

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1212r0 Submission October Jeng-Hong Chen, Pansop Kim, Winbond ElectronicsSlide 1 Performance of Circulation Transmission (Sub_BC)
Advertisements

Prakshep Mehta ( ) Guided By: Prof. R.K. Shevgaonkar
Semi-Blind Equalization for OFDM using Space-Time Block Coding and Channel Shortening Alvin Leung Yang You EE381K-12 March 04, 2008.
EE359 – Lecture 16 Outline MIMO Beamforming MIMO Diversity/Multiplexing Tradeoffs MIMO Receiver Design Maximum-Likelihood, Decision Feedback, Sphere Decoder.
Space Time Block Codes Poornima Nookala.
MIMO-OFDM MIMO MIMO High diversity gain (space-time coding) High diversity gain (space-time coding) High multiplexing gain (BLAST) High multiplexing gain.
12- OFDM with Multiple Antennas. Multiple Antenna Systems (MIMO) TX RX Transmit Antennas Receive Antennas Different paths Two cases: 1.Array Gain: if.
Cooperative Diversity Scheme Based on MIMO-OFDM in Small Cell Network Dong-Hyun Ha Sejong University.
Lecture 9,10: Beam forming Transmit diversity Aliazam Abbasfar.
Doc.: IEEE /180r0 Submission March 2002 Monisha Ghosh, et al., Philips Slide 1 On The Use Of Multiple Antennae For Monisha Ghosh, Xuemei.
Doc.: IEEE /0075r0 Submission January 2004 H. Sampath, PhD, Marvell SemiconductorSlide 1 Pros and Cons of Circular Delay Diversity Scheme for.
Doc.: n-proposal-statistical-channel-error-model.ppt Submission Jan 2004 UCLA - STMicroelectronics, Inc.Slide 1 Proposal for Statistical.
Presented by: Sohaib Malik.  A radio whose functionality can be changed by changes in only the software  Key feature: ◦ Reprogramability ◦ Reusability.
Space-Time and Space-Frequency Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Transmitter Diversity Techniques King F. Lee.
Doc.: IEEE /1401r0 Submission November 2014 Slide 1 Shiwen He , Haiming Wang Quasi-Orthogonal STBC for SC-PHY in IEEE aj (45GHz) Authors/contributors:
Doc.: IEEE /0909r0 Submission July 2012 Jong S. Baek, AlereonSlide 1 Analysis, simulation and resultant data from a 6-9GHz OFDM MAC/PHY Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0075r1 Submission January 2004 H. Sampath, R. Narasimhan, Marvell SemiconductorSlide 1 Advantages and Drawbacks of Circular Delay.
Adaptive Usage of Main Resources in MIMO-Cognitive Radio Networks Shalva Kvirkvelia (PHD student) Prof. Teimuraz Kortua Prof. Jemal Beridze.
Doc.: aj Submission November 2014 Slide 1 Shiwen He , Haiming Wang Quasi-Orthogonal STBC for IEEE aj ( 45GHz ) Authors/contributors:
1 Downlink Single-user MIMO Comparison for IEEE m Document Number: C80216m-08/407 Date Submitted: May 05, 2008 Source: Senjie Zhang
Doc.: IEEE /229r1 Submission March 2004 Alexandre Ribeiro Dias - Motorola LabsSlide 1 Multiple Antenna OFDM solutions for enhanced PHY Presented.
1 Downlink Single-user MIMO Comparison for IEEE m Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/407r1 Date Submitted: Source: Senjie Zhang, guangjie.
Doc.: IEEE /0632r1 Submission May 2016 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Performance Analysis of Robust Transmission Modes for MIMO in 11ay Date:
Technology training (Session 6)
Proposal for Statistical Channel Error Model
Channelization for HRb OFDM
Space Time Codes.
Multiple Antennas: Performance Gains with Channel Measurements
Space-Time and Space-Frequency Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Transmitter Diversity Techniques King F. Lee.
Short Training Sequence Compatibility with Legacy g Devices
Length 1344 LDPC codes for 11ay
Co-BCast: High-Rate WiFi Broadcasting in Crowded Scenarios via Lightweight Coordination of Multiple Access Points Hang Qiu, Konstantinos Psounis, Giuseppe.
On Tap Angular Spread and Kronecker Structure of WLAN Channel Models
September 2004 doc.: IEEE n September 2004
An Overview of ax Greg Kamer – Consulting Systems Engineer.
Space Time Coding and Channel Estimation
Linglong Dai and Zhaocheng Wang Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
HNS Proposal for n Physical Layer
New preamble structure for AGC in a MIMO-OFDM system
Inprocomm PHY Proposal for IEEE n: MASSDIC-OFDM
Validation of n Channel Models
802.11n Channel Model Validation
Field Measurements of 2x2 MIMO Communications
HDR a solution using MIMO-OFDM
Sharp Laboratories USA
Backwards compatibility
Submission Title: [Harmonizing-TG3a-PHY-Proposals-for-CSM]
Partial MAC and PHY Proposal for n
UWB Receiver Algorithm
Power Variations with WWiSE Cyclic Preamble Structures
Power Variations with WWiSE Cyclic Preamble Structures
Partial MAC and PHY Proposal for n
ETRI Proposal to IEEE TGn
Multiple Antennas: Performance Gains with Channel Measurements
Detailed Responses to “Reasons and Cures” Comments on MCS Set
Optimal Combining of STBC and Spatial Multiplexing for MIMO-OFDM
Preambles for MIMO channel estimation
MIMO (Multiple Input Multiple Output)
Interleaver Performance Comparison of Winbond and TGn Sync
STBC in Single Carrier(SC) for IEEE aj (45GHz)
Multiple Antenna OFDM solutions for enhanced PHY
20us effective preambles for MIMO-OFDM
PER Prediction for n MAC Simulation
Turbo-equalization for n/ac
HNS Proposal for n Physical Layer
Institute for Infocomm Research (I2R)
20us effective preambles for MIMO-OFDM
PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models
Joint Coding and Modulation Diversity with RBD pre-coding MU-MIMO
Backward compatibility of CDD preambles
Presentation transcript:

Transmit diversity for MIMO-OFDM November 2003 Transmit diversity for MIMO-OFDM Sumeet Sandhu, Minnie Ho Communications Technology Lab Intel Corporation November 2003 Sumeet Sandhu, Intel Corporation

Overview Diversity # 1 : OSTBC November 2003 Overview Diversity # 1 : OSTBC Orthogonal space-time block codes (e.g Alamouti) Diversity # 2 : CDD Cyclic delay diversity Sumeet Sandhu, Intel Corporation

November 2003 System #1 OSTBC On the kth tone, Alamouti code on 2 transmit antennas and 2 OFDM symbols x1 x2 x2* -x1* Channel vector at nth receive antenna hn,k (2 x 1) Equivalent SISO channel after receiver processing |hn,k| Full diversity ! Sumeet Sandhu, Intel Corporation

November 2003 System #2 CDD Signal on 2 transmit antennas with N=12-point FFT, cyclic prefix=4, cyclic delay d=2 ( x9 x10 x11 x12 ) ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 ) ( x7 x8 x9 x10 ) ( x11 x12 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 ) Channel vector at nth receive antenna and kth tone hn,k (2 x 1) Equivalent SISO channel w * hn,k , where w = [1 exp(j*2*pi*d*k/N)] Sumeet Sandhu, Intel Corporation

OSTBC vs CDD : 2 transmit antennas November 2003 OSTBC vs CDD : 2 transmit antennas 0.9 dB for 2x3 2.2 dB for 2x1/2 Should channel model be standard (50 ns rms) ?? Gains look too high and show Alamouti in good light Sumeet Sandhu, Intel Corporation

OSTBC vs CDD : 6 Mbps vs 54 Mbps November 2003 OSTBC vs CDD : 6 Mbps vs 54 Mbps 1.6 dB for 6 Mbps 3 dB for 54 Mbps May need to do 40 MHz simulations (to check gain of Alamouti), may need to include channel estimation errors Sumeet Sandhu, Intel Corporation

OSTBC : 4 transmit antennas November 2003 OSTBC : 4 transmit antennas Rate 3/4 orthogonal space-time block code Provides full order 4 diversity Sumeet Sandhu, Intel Corporation

OSTBC vs CDD : 4 transmit antennas November 2003 OSTBC vs CDD : 4 transmit antennas -0.5 dB Sumeet Sandhu, Intel Corporation

Performance summary 1 receive antenna Alamouti gains 1.5-3 dB over CDD November 2003 Performance summary 1 receive antenna Alamouti gains 1.5-3 dB over CDD 3 receive antennas Alamouti gains <1 dB 40 MHz instead of 20 MHz Gain likely to be smaller Channel estimation errors Alamouti likely to be more sensitive Change numbers Sumeet Sandhu, Intel Corporation

Practical issues Scalability Alamouti : not scalable with Tx antennas November 2003 Practical issues Scalability Alamouti : not scalable with Tx antennas CDD : easily scalable for 1-4 Tx antennas Backward compatibility Alamouti : requires HT receivers CDD : transparent to legacy devices Latency Alamouti : 1 OFDM symbol delay, even # padding CDD : no additional delay Make bigger case of decoding delay and SIFS Sumeet Sandhu, Intel Corporation

Conclusions Alamouti Pros : optimal performance November 2003 Conclusions Alamouti Pros : optimal performance Cons : incompatible with 11a, decoding delay (SIFS) CDD Pros : 11a compatible, transparent to Rx, scalable Cons : sub optimal performance Question for TGn How important is range in a mixed 802.11n network with heterogeneous MIMO/SISO devices ? Sumeet Sandhu, Intel Corporation