Olympic Agenda 2020 – midway through

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Advertisements

Guidance Note on Joint Programming
CDCs 21 Goals. CDC Strategic Imperatives 1. Health impact focus: Align CDCs people, strategies, goals, investments & performance to maximize our impact.
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO GFCS Governance proposal Process of development.
What is Sport Governance? Ensuring legal obligations are met and appropriate policies are in place Putting an organisation in a position to control and.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working: Follow Up Review Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- November 2009.
Sharing Good Practice in Quality
WIIFM? The LAI and You LAI Action Plan: Promoting Libraries, Supporting Members Philip Cohen, Vice President.
World Anti-Doping Code Designed to meet the challenges of its day Association of National Olympic Committees Sir Craig Reedie, WADA President 7 November.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.
Studying Sports Development: Researching, teaching and writing in the field th April, 2008 Brunel University London Dick Palmer Advisor, IOC Olympic.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
World Anti-Doping Code Process and Content Copenhagen, 13 November 2002.
Critical Role of ICT in Parliament Fulfill legislative, oversight, and representative responsibilities Achieve the goals of transparency, openness, accessibility,
The WIPO Development Agenda: An Overview Geneva May, 2009 Esteban Burrone World Intellectual Property Organization.
Community Issues And Needs Associated With Microbicides Clinical Trials Presenter: John M. Mutsambi, Community Liaison Officer with University of Zimbabwe.
Principles of good practice Jana Kunická Community Philanthropy Initiative Coordinator European Foundation Centre.
Unite and Deliver An update Francesco Galtieri UN Development Operations Coordination Office (DOCO), New York JPO Workshop, Maputo, May 2009.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Strategic Plan th October Management and Governance “GeSCI’s corporate structures and management arrangements were appropriate for.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
Section C: Olympic Games: a global perspective 3. Role of the IOC.
Mounir BENHAMMOU Director of Administrative and Financial Department Secretariat General of the Arab Maghreb Union EN/CSC2/2014/Pres/05.
Casualty Actuarial Society ERM for the CAS. Centennial Goal The CAS will be recognized globally as a leading resource in educating casualty actuaries.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
1 The GCC Metrology Group GULFMET Mohammad Al Mulla GSO - Building for Integration
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
The International Conservation Volunteers Alliance Accreditation Program Conservation Volunteers Alliance >The first world organisation established to.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Ethics and Good Governance Oceania National Olympic Committees.
RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Principles of Good Governance
Roles & Responsibilities of an Impressive Program Governance Plan
Embedding the golden threads that lead to quality care every time……
Code of Ethics and Ethics Panel
Auditing & Investigations I
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
Trust, Accountability and Integrity: Board Responsibility for
The GEO-6 Matrix Drafting Approach
Revision of IES 4 David McPeak IESBA Meeting October 2011 Event:
Second SDG Partnerships Webinar:
XXII ANOC General Assembly Prague
World Anti-Doping Agency - Update
TERMS OF REFERENCE - FINANCE COMMITTEE
Protection of the clean athlete is a shared responsibility
Board and Staff Roles 2014 Capacity Building Institute
2017 On the Ball Initiative On the Ball is a collaborative HSE initiative designed to refresh and re-energise HSE , with the ultimate goal of achieving.
Launch of Towards 2020 GWP Strategy.
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Strategic Plan Implementation July 18, 2018
Safeguarding athletes from harassment and abuse in sport
Assessment of Quality in Statistics GLOBAL ASSESSMENTS, PEER REVIEWS AND SECTOR REVIEWS IN THE ENLARGEMENT AND ENP COUNTRIES Mirela Kadic, Project Manager.
Resolutions of the XXIII ANOC General Assembly Tokyo 2018
Portfolio, Programme and Project
EU Marine Strategy DG Environment B.1.
Strategy
REFIT Platform 20/02/2019 Diversity Europe Group.
World Anti-Doping Agency - Update
ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance
Scouting Ireland Corporate Governance
The GEF Public Involvement Policy
Roles and Responsibilities
ASSESSMENT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE CHAMBER COMMITTEES REPORT- 2017
Wide Ideas Idea Management Software Idea Management Process
Presentation transcript:

Olympic Agenda 2020 – midway through When the IOC adopted Olympic Agenda 2020, we did so with the overarching goal to strengthen the role of the Olympic Movement in a world that is changing faster than ever before.   The 40 detailed recommendations of Olympic Agenda 2020, that are well known to the NOCs, are focused on three pillars that are essential for us to have a positive impact in the wider world: credibility, sustainability and youth. This year is the half-way point since the adoption of our Olympic Agenda 2020. To use a sports analogy, it is half-time now and we have the opportunity to look back at how we played in the first half. Olympic Agenda 2020 was always meant to be work in progress. We are on a journey together with all our stakeholders and partners, including the NOCs. Olympic Agenda 2020 was always meant for the entire Olympic Movement and we are encouraged by the efforts we see across the world by the NOCs to follow these principles. For the rest of the presentation, we will look at the achievement around the 4 key themes of Olympic Agenda 2020 that affect the NOCs. The uniqueness of the Olympic Games Athletes at the heart of the Olympic Movement Olympism in Action: Keeping Olympism alive 365 days a year IOC’s role; Unity in Diversity The end of the presentation will include an update by Valerie Fourneyron on the Independent Testing Authority and Mark Parkman on the Olympic Channel, both topic which are a high interest to the NOCs. Tomorrow, Pere Miro and his team will give you an update on the services that the IOC provides to the NOCs through Olympic Solidarity and NOC Relations.

Independent Testing Authority (ITA) 2 November 2017, ANOC General Assembly Valérie Fourneyron, ITA Chair

Call for an Independent Testing Authority Foundation Board Members Business model Current status

Call for an Independent Testing Authority Joining the ITA is a further commitment to fight doping and protect sport Regain trust from athletes and public and strengthen credibility through independence and transparency Improve efficiency and effectiveness of anti-doping as not-for-profit organisation Standardise A-D process and harmonise quality of collection and testing across sports/countries Increase transparency and independence of testing and prosecution Ensure neutrality of anti-doping programme and address IFs’ existing or perceived conflict of interests Foster expertise and know-how retention and transfer Enhance use of intelligence across sports/countries and increase competence of A-D personnel Back in 2015, the Olympic Summit called for the creation of an independent testing unit to strengthen the global anti-doping system and to make testing in sport independent s well as addressing any existing or perceived conflict of interest in the administration of antidoping matters. The project was endorsed by WADA who mandated a feasibility study conducted by PwC, established a working group and a Steering Group to reflect on the project. In May 2017, the WADA ITA Steering Group, composed of representatives from both the Governments and the Olympic Movement agreed on the Governance structure of the ITA. The ITA will be an independent Swiss foundation that will provide doping control and other related services to IFs and MEOs and the project is receiving strong support from IFs, the IOC, WADA and the Olympic Movement at large. Mission: Provide not-for-profit doping controls and other related services to IFs and MEOs Assist IFs and MEOs in fulfilling their obligations under the World Anti-Doping Code Prevent/Address existing and/or perceived conflict of interest Ensure neutrality in the establishment of the Anti-Doping programme Harmonise standard level of testing The ITA will also contribute to: Increase sharing of intelligence across sports and countries Improve costs management linked to the fight against doping and increase efficiency of the investments Improve APMU system Develop storage and re-analysis programmes Consolidate IF efforts and resources Unite the world of sport in the fight against doping by leveraging IOC/IFs’ collective power

Foundation Board Members Independent Chair: Dr Valérie Fourneyron, France Independent Member: Prof Peijie Chen, China Athlete representative: Ms Kirsty Coventry, Zimbabwe IFs representative: Mr Francesco Ricci Bitti, Italy IOC representative: Prof Uğur Erdener, Turkey The ITA is being established as Swiss Foundation by the IOC and to safeguard its independence, the WADA ITA Steering Group agreed to have: 1 Independent Chair, 1 Independent Member and 1 Athlete representative. In addition there is also 1 IF representative and 1 IOC representative as well as a WADA ex-officio member. The selection of the members was done so as to ensure: Expertise in the field of Anti-Doping and diversity of such expertise Cultural Diversity Gender equality

Business Model Basic Optional Out-of-competition testing (collection + lab analysis) Athlete whereabouts info management Athlete Biological Passport Management In-competition testing (*) (collection + lab analysis) Case prosecution (1st instance) Further prosecution/ Appeals management Test distribution plans (incl. risk assessment) TUEs Management & Panel Approval Sample storage & re-analysis (**) Results Management  Olympic Movement contribution to cover the start-up costs so that those are not reported on the IFs – long term goal is for the ITA to be self-sufficient. The ITA Business Model has been built on the “pay-per-use” principle to avoid an increase in costs for IFs compared to the current operations and context. Client Pricing Centralising the sports organisations anti-doping programmes under the ITA will facilitate economies of scale for each client which will have a direct impact on the pricing; Each client to be quoted individually based on type of samples, tests and analysis required as well as the sample collection missions (Location of athlete, number of athletes covered by 1 mission, etc.); Result management costs depending on the number of Adverse Analytical Findings and prosecution costs Clients only pay for their individual use of the ITA (**) Not included in the Financials. Concept and related financials to be developed

Current Status Statutes are being revised by the Swiss Surveillance Authority for Foundations before finalising the creation of the Foundation Recruitment of the Director General is ongoing Search for offices in Lausanne area is ongoing IFs are contacting the IOC, the DFSU and board members of the ITA on a regular basis to express their interest in joining the ITA. PyeongChang 2018 Role of the Director General • Contribute to and implement the ITA’s strategic plan in accordance with the ITA Board instructions.; • Provide strategic advice, assistance and regular reporting to the Foundation Board; • Propose and update an operational plan to deliver the strategic objectives of the Foundation; • Manage effectively the daily operations of the Foundation, the conduct of all its activities and the actual administration of its assets; PyeongChang 2018 ITA is expected to be present at the 2018 PyeongChang Olympic Games and it is aimed for it to chair the Games TaskForce to ensure its independence. Currently this is being prepared with the DFSU to ensure in any case that the Games Task Force will be chaired independently from the IOC. The Games TaskForce is also composed of representatives from PyeongChang Organising Committee, Laboratory Experts, the WADA Independent Observer Mission and the Korean Anti-Doping Agency. While the ITA is being created, the IOC Medical and Scientific Department has also begun to work with the DFSU to ensure in any event that the Games TaskForce will be chaired by an independent body. In Rio 2016 as similar TaskForce was in place but was chaired by the IOC Medical and Scientific Director. In PyeongChang 2018 the IOC will not be a member of the TaskForce and will only be there to provide administrative support. Before the start of the Games, there will be a transfer of knowledge from the PreGames TaskForce to the Games TaskForce and POCOG. Responsibility of the Games TaskForce: monitoring and overseeing doping control programme which is delivered by POCOG,  approving all changes to the test distribution plan in particular out of competition testing (Task Force will be ratify on a daily basis the TDP proposed by POCOG.  The numbers (with some flexibility) in each event in Competition and grand total out of competition have already been agreed with POCOG in order to have the right facilities and personnel in place, and enough resources to do the testing.  However, the detail of exactly which countries, sports and individuals will be up to the TaskForce) Overseeing the TUE committee assessing all AAFs and decide whether to proceed to refer to CAS for a disciplinary hearing   assessing any reports of departures from the international standard or potential non-analytical ADRVs and refer, if appropriate, for a Disciplinary Hearing by the CAS Anti-Doping Division instructing the IOC on required actions in event of any AAF and to provide all required documentation for CAS