Rights of Complainants in Competition Law Proceedings

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rule-Making Book II EU Administrative Procedures – The ReNEUAL Draft Model Rules 2014 Brussels, May th Herwig C.H. Hofmann University of Luxembourg.
Advertisements

Financial Services and Consumer redress Unit DG SANCO The Commission‘s initiative on Collective Redress.
The fundamentals of EC competition law
Brussels, 12 July 2006 Klaus-Otto JUNGINGER-DITTEL State aid rules and programming of Structural Fund’s programs for
Procedure under the Merger Regulation. Procedure – legal documents The Merger Regulation Art. 4 – notification of concentration Art. 7 – suspension of.
Health and safety at work
1 Consent for treatment A summary guide for health practitioners about obtaining consent for treatment Bridie Woolnough Resolution Officer Health Care.
Asst. Prof. Dr. Alexander Bürgin IUE1 European Union Law and the Courts Repetition.
WELCOME. CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT 1986 Consumer Protection Act 1986 Consumer is the purpose and most powerful motivating force of production Consumer.
European Commission – Directorate General for Competition Dr. K. Mehta, Director, Cartels A PRIMER ON ANTI-TRUST POLICY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION UCL – Louvain-la-Neuve.
The EU Emission Trading Scheme put to the test of State aid Joëlle de Sépibus.
European Commission, DG Competition Fifth Annual Conference on Competition Enforcement in the CCE Member States 21 February 2014, Bratislava 1 Due Process.
European Competition Policy. References Faull & Nikpay: The EC Law of Competition. 2nd Ed. Oxford University Press, 2007 Bellamy, C., Child, G. European.
STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF COMPETITION AGENCIES. GENERAL STRUCTURE OF CA CAs differ in size, structure and complexity The structure depicts power distribution.
VICTIMS’ RIGHTS New EU Directive establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime 20 September 2012 CABVIS Conference.
Appeals in patent examination and opposition in Germany Karin Friehe Judge, Federal Patent Court, Munich, Germany.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Lecture 4. OUTCOMES What must the equity plan include?. What must affirmative action measures include? Which factors are taken into account in determining.
1 MARKET SURVEILLANCE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION A coordinate approach for metrology Lucia Palmegiani Policy Officer, DG ENTR I.5 WELMEC, WG 5, Malta, 23 October.
1 FRAND COMMITMENTS AND EU COMPETITION LAW Thomas Kramler European Commission, DG Competition (The views expressed are not necessarily those of the European.
EU Legislation Rob Schnepper April 2003 Riga, Latvia.
1 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS IN TURKEY: COMPETITION LAW ASPECTS Ece Gürsoy One Fleet PlaceLevent Cad. Alt Zeren Sokak London EC4M 7WSNo 7/ Levent.
Merger Control in Uruguay American Bar Association- South American Regional Conference Buenos Aires, March, 2007 Guyer & Regules Juan Manuel Mercant.
Court of Justice of the European Union
The dominance concept: new wine in old bottles Miguel de la Mano * Member of the Chief Economist’s Office DG COMP, European Commission FTC/DOJ Hearings.
EU Discussion Paper on Exclusionary Abuses Michael Albers European Commission DG Competition 54th Antitrust Law Spring Meeting Washington DC, 30 March.
The Role of NEPA Leasing and Mineral Rights Sales Subject to Environmental Use and Planning Provisions –The National Environmetal Policy Act of 1969 requires.
Practice of the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee Andrew Andrusevych, Resource and Analysis Center “Society and Environment”
Dace Berkolde Director State Aid Control Department Ministry of Finance Latvia 1.
Queensland Ombudsman A trusted expert in fair and just public administration.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 29 – Customs union Bilateral screening:
Legal Foundations of European Union Law II Tutorials Karima Amellal.
ICC roundtable Istanbul, 30 April 2010 Procedural Fairness: Update on Recent OECD Activities Antonio Capobianco OECD Competition Division
1 Package on food improvement agents Food additives Food enzymes Flavourings Common procedure Developments since earlier consultation.
POLICE REPORT.
Competition Law Understand the legal rules relating to monopolies, mergers and anti-competitive practices.
competition rules in inland transport
Introduction to Human Rights Law – Part 2
C. What is a Feasibility report
Consumer Protection Act, 1986
EU law and the legislative procedure of European Union
Dr. José Ignacio Cubero Marcos University of the Basque Country
Interactive Gaming Council Board Meeting I-Gaming Legal status
Filip Křepelka, Masarykova univerzita
Competition law Class 8-9
IPR AND CONCENTRATIONS
OFFICE FOR THE PROTECTION OF COMPETITION
Complainant's rights within the competition proceedings Access to file
Options to Protect an Invention: the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and Trade Secrets Hanoi October 24, 2017 Peter Willimott Senior Program Officer WIPO.
UNIVERSITY OF MONTENEGRO INSTITUTE OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES
POLICE REPORT.
University of Zagreb Law Faculty Doctoral Study in European Law Scientific Research Seminar: The Role of the Court Practice in the Evolution of EU Law.
Data protection reform – update from the ICO
SolarCity vs. Salt River Project
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Public procurement oversight
European actions.
Legal English and the Common Law AY 2017/2018
Regional Tax ECLI:EU:C:2009:709
REPORTING SUSPECTED FRAUD AND CORRUPTION
 DRAFT CEMR Response to the Consultation on the EU Budget Review Communication (COM (2010) 700 final)    Brussels, December 2010.
Chapter 6 Powers and Functions of Administrative Agencies.
Legal Foundations of European Union Law II
Ordre Public and Arbitration under Austrian Law
Overview of standards-related obligations and reporting by Mongolia
TURKISH COMPETITION LAW ENFORCEMENT:
Merger Control : Basics of Substantive Assessment Horizontal and Non-Horizontal Mergers Definition of Relevant Market.
Magdalena Bar Annual EELF Conference 2016
International Training Centre of the ILO
LECTURE No 6 - THE EUROPEAN UNION’s JUDICIAL SYSTEM I (courts)
Presentation transcript:

Rights of Complainants in Competition Law Proceedings Michael Albers Hearing officer for EC Competition Proceedings European Commission

Content Who can lodge a complaint? Who can lodge a complaint in Commission antitrust & merger proceedings? What are the rights of a complainant? What are the rights of a complainant in Commission antitrust & merger proceedings? European Commission

Who can lodge a complaint? Generally: Every person can complain informally A filter (admissibility test) may apply to formal complaints Admissibility test depends on rights conferred on complainants Admissibility tests under EC law Antitrust: legitimate interest & provision of market information and legal assessment Mergers: sufficient interest Art. 86 ECT/State Aid: none.“Pro bono publico” European Commission

Who can lodge a complaint in Commission antitrust & merger proceedings? Mainly: Customers/consumers Suppliers Competitors Consumer and trade associations European Commission

What are the rights of a complainant? Generally: Complainants have certain basic rights, mainly examination of complaint and reasoned response by competition authority Additional rights depend on purpose attributed to complaints by legislator: The principal task of public authorities is normally to implement competition policy Private interest can overlap with public policy Pursuance of private interest by public authority oscillates between being a mere “reflection” of public interest and granting support to complainant’s interests European Commission

What are the rights of complainants in Commission antitrust proceedings? “To be heard” by Commission and to learn normally within 2 months of the action that Commission intends to take Alternatively, “to be closely associated to proceedings”, in particular to comment on Statement of Objections or commitment proposal, and to attack final decision before courts, OR to obtain within reasonable period of time a reasoned decision rejecting the complaint (with documents on which Commission relies), and to attack this decision, to apply to European Courts for failure to act European Commission

What are the rights of « complainants » in Commission merger proceedings? « To be heard » by Commission Alternatively, to comment on Statement of Objections/remedy proposal and to attack final decision OR to obtain reasoned response in case of a non-notified concentration, to apply to European Courts for failure to act European Commission