Cultural Diversity & Language

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Context and Reference 3.1 Linguistic relativity Jamila Zawger Samar Terengganu * Weaam Radi.
Advertisements

The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis To what extent, if at all, does our language govern our thought processes?
The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis Sampson (1980) Elena Galkina.
Language, Society, and Culture
DISCOURSE AND WORLD M.A (ENGLISH) DR. ABDELRAHIM HAMID MUGADDAM.
What is Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Sociolinguistics Introduction Adapted from Todd M. Ferry class notes.
Culture & Language Relationship There are many ways that a language interacts with the culture of its speakers For many people, the language(s) they use.
Language & the Mind LING240 Summer Session II, 2005 Lecture 6 Language Influencing Perception & Thought.
Lost in translation What is lost in translation from one language to another? Why? If only translating was this simple...
John J. Macionis Prentice Hall
LANGUAGE AND CULTURE. Culture – the concept more or less synonymous with civilization (opposed to “barbarism”); classical conception of culture (art,
Defining ‘Culture’ Linguistic Relativity Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis.
WORLD GEOGRAPHY Oct. 21, Today Unit 5 - Language.
WEEK 6 POLIITENESS AND CULTURE.  The concept of politeness is crucial in any communication, but particularly in cross cultural communication  Communication.
Ways of Knowing: Language. What is language? Language is:- rule-governed intended creative and open-ended.
Chapter 7 Language, Culture and Society
The cultural environments facing business An overview.
Linguistic determinism Linguistic relativity Whorfianism Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis Edward Sapir & Benjamin Lee Whorf.
Applied Linguistics Applied Linguistics means
Speech Acts: What is a Speech Act?
INDICATORS FOR PRAGMATIC INSTRUCTION Some quantitative tools.
FACE & FACE WORK Social & Cognitive Approaches to
Understandings of Identity. Chapter 1 – Thinking About Identity and Ideologies2 To What Extent are Ideology and Identity Interrelated? Question for Inquiry.
POLITENESS STRATEGIES: Taken from: BROWN AND LEVINSON (1987: ) POLITENESS: Some Universals in Language Usage.
Functions of Speech 1. Expressive 2. Directive 3. Informative (Referential) 4. Metalinguistic 5. Poetic 6. Phatic 7. Heuristic 8. Commissive 9. Performative.
COMMUNICATION OF MEANING
contrastive linguistics
Chapter 7 Verbal Intercultural Communication
The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Language & Culture.
Language Chapter topics Language Is Symbolic
PART TWO COMPARATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORKS International Business
Chapter 3: The variation problem 2: Intra-speaker variation
Politeness Negative and Positive Face
PRAGMATICS 3.
International Business Part Two Comparative Environmental Frameworks
CULTURAL AWARENESS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING
Verbal Intercultural Communication
In this lecture, we will learn:
Speech Acts: some notes useful for the assignment
TEACHING LANGUAGE SKILLS: TEACHING SPEAKING
Media Literacy ENG2D Fairbloom.
UNIT 3 - POLITENESS.
contrastive linguistics
'The Geography of Thought – Richard Nisbett (2003)
Sense perception WoK Number 1 – October 2013.
Linguistic relativity and Second language acquisition
Functions of Speech 1. Expressive 2. Directive 3. Informative (Referential) 4. Metalinguistic 5. Poetic 6. Phatic 7. Heuristic 8. Commissive 9. Performative.
Language and the thought process
Ethnography of Communication Somayyeh Pedram GS31063
Intercultural Communication
Perspectives on ideology
PERSUASION SOCIAL INFLUENCE & COMPLIANCE GAINING
Political Culture and Political Socialization
Perspectives on ideology
International Business Part Two Comparative Environmental Frameworks
Identity & Ideology Perspectives on ideology Social Studies 30-1
COMPARATIVE Linguistics 2018/2019
Chapter Five Gender and Language.
Culture Part 2 Symbols/Language.
contrastive linguistics
Ways Of Thinking & Communicating L
Media Literacy.
contrastive linguistics
Sherfield and Moody Cornerstones
Cultural values: the role of perception
TEACHING AND RESEARCHING LANGUAGE AND CULTURE
Perspectives on ideology
Presentation transcript:

Cultural Diversity & Language

Linguistic Relativity SAPIR-WHORF-HYPOTHESIS an individual's thoughts and actions are determined by the language or languages that individual speaks; „It is quite an illusion to imagine that one adjusts to reality essentially without the use of language and that language is merely an incidental means of solving specific problems of communication or reflection. The fact of the matter is that the 'real world' is to a large extent unconsciously built upon the language habits of the group. No two languages are ever sufficiently similar to be considered as representing the same social reality. The worlds in which different societies live are distinct worlds, not merely the same world with different labels attached... We see and hear and otherwise experience very largely as we do because the language habits of our community predispose certain choices of interpretation." -Sapir (1958:69) “The borders of my language are the borders of my world.” Ludwig Wittgenstein (Die Grenzen meiner Sprache sind die Grenzen meiner Welt.)

Teaching a Foreign Language LANGUAGE LEARNING: language only LANGUAGE EDUCATION: language + culture first comes accuracy, then appropriacy (politeness etc.)

Conceptions of time Hopi Piraha: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDM8G5tuHF8

Conceptions of deixis Aborigines tribe: Guugu Yimithirr “The boy is standing east of the house.”

Conceptions of colours Our language doesn't force us to see only what it gives us words for, but it can affect how we put things into groups. In other words, the influence of language isn't so much on what we can think about, or even what we do think about, but rather on how we break up reality into categories and label them.

Politeness aim: maintenance of „face“ “This standard is based on collective values or norms which have been acquired by individual agents usually earlier in their lives as part of a socialisation process. Those norms or collective values such as the deference shown to elderly people, the physical distance we maintain from other people on order to feel comfortable, etc. have been “programmed” early in our lives and thus determine the individual’s subjective definition of rationality (Hofstede 1984: 18), a definition of rationality which may or may not be shared by different societies.” (Márquez-Reiter 2000: 2)

Positive PS vs. Negative PS jokes nicknames tag questions (“You have been overreacting a little, haven’t you?”) in-group jargon and slang special discourse markers (“please”  imperative) questioning hedging presenting disagreement as opinions variables in degrees of politeness: the social distance of the speaker and hearer the relative 'power' of the speaker over the hearer the absolute ranking of impositions (Zumutungen) in the particular culture

Variables in Degrees of Politeness “The greater the social distance between the interlocutors (e.g., if they know each other very little), the more politeness is generally expected. The greater the (perceived) relative power of hearer over speaker, the more politeness is recommended. The heavier the imposition made on the hearer (the more of their time required, or the greater the favour requested), the more politeness will generally have to be used."

Ideologies Victor Klemperer: „LTI – Tagebuch eines Philologen“ (Lingua Tertii Imperi) Volks-, ent-, „Säuberung“ etc. „Die LTI ist ganz darauf gerichtet, den einzelnen um sein individuelles Wesen zu bringen, ihn als Persönlichkeit zu betäuben, ihn zum gedanken- und willenlosen Stück einer in bestimmter Richtung getriebenen und gehetzten Herde, ihn zum Atom eines rollenden Steinblocks zu machen. Die LTI ist die Sprache des Massenfanatismus.“

Sources Márquez-Reiter, Rosina (2000): Linguistic politeness in Britain and Uruguay. A contrastive study of requests and apologies. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub. Co (Pragmatics & beyond, new ser. 83). Klemperer, Victor (1987): LTI: Notizbuch eines Philologen. Köln: Röderberg. http://instruction2.mtsac.edu/rjagodka/BUSM_51_Project/Negotiating/Thailand.pdf https://www.linguisticsociety.org/content/does-language-i-speak-influence-way-i-think https://linguistlist.org/ask-ling/sapir.cfm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USr5pTuZHPY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDM8G5tuHF8 https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/politeness/E9FC00C681300A3F22F37CD9AC565C0F https://www.thoughtco.com/politeness-strategies-conversation-1691516