CHOOSING A CASE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 04 PROCESS OF CONSTITUTIONAL LITIGATION: STANDING AND JUSTICIABILITY Shigenori Matsui.
Advertisements

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Legal Systems “tipping the scales of justice”. What is a system Set of identifiable elements –Police, courts, corrections, victims etc. Individual elements.
Supreme Court Cases Use your knowledge of the Bill of Rights to determine how the Supreme Court should rule for each case.
CHAOULLI V. QUEBEC (AG), CASE SUMMARY WAIT TIMES QUEBEC’S HEALTH INSURANCE ACT (s.15) QUEBEC’S HOSPITAL INSURANCE ACT (s.11) VIOLATION OF QUEBEC’S.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 08 PITH AND SUBSTANCE
Seating Plan – CLU 3MI-01 Front of Classroom Windows.
The Fourth and Fifth Amendments How do they protect our rights?
What are our duties under the law? I n Canada, law and justice is not only the business of Members of Parliament, judges, lawyers and police services!
1 China-EU Forum Beijing, 9 – 10 July, 2010 The protection of employees Forth section.
Limitations to the Charter
Chapter 2 The criminal investigation process. In this chapter, you will look at the role of police and the courts in the criminal investigation process.
Chapter Fifteen Order and Civil Liberties. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved The free exercise clause of the First Amendment.
How does a criminal case start? Prosecution examination Report to the police Instructions to jurors Sentence.
The Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms Law 120 Ms. Nicholson
Crime and Due Process. There is always a question as to how we should deal with “improper evidence” in the courtroom; different nations approach the question.
Which of the five types of crimes are shown in the pie chart? Bell Ringer.
Legal aspects of forensics. Civil Law private law ◦ Regulates noncriminal relationships between individuals, businesses, agency of government, and other.
Unit #2.  Would the Charter of Rights and Freedoms have any application in April’s complaint?  What is the difference between a right and a privilege?
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms Continued. Section 3-5Democratic Rights Found in section 3, the right to vote (also referred to as the “franchise”)
Chapter 10 The Criminal Process. A.k.a. Procedural criminal law Two most essential elements of Canadian Criminal Process are: - Truth - Justice.
March 31, 2006 Last class Today: Impact of the Charter (continued from last week) Review for final exam Please fill out electronic course evaluation:
I can understand that sources of law include The Constitution, The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Treaties, statutes, and common law. I can understand.
Chapter 2 The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Pierre Trudeau – wanted a “just society” and rights entrenched.
Legal Studies * Mr. Marinello ARRESTS AND WARRANTS.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. HOW DOES THE CHARTER PROTECT INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS? Focus question #1.
PROTECTION OF RIGHTS 1. Balancing Rights 2. Rights of Accused 3. Rights of Victims 4. Questions to Complete.
The Criminal Justice System. Arrest Procedure The Arrest: To arrest a person the police must have probable cause. (reason to believe that criminal activity.
Canada’s Justice System Chapter 2 Review. No one, no matter how important or powerful, is above the law - not the government; not the Prime Minister;
Adversarial System Generates competition between Crown and defence Aim of both is to seek justice Crown- Burden of proof is on the Crown to “prove case.
The Judicial System What Courts Do and Crime. Stages of Criminal Justice.
LECTURE 4: THE CONSTITUTION AND DUE PROCESS. The Constitution and Due Process The US Constitution set out how US laws are passed and enforced. – The legislative.
Criminal Justice Process: The Investigation
Criminal Law 2.5 Investigation & Pre-Trial Proceedings
Criminal Law Day 2.
Protections Theme: Rights
Chapter 2 The criminal investigation process
Introduction to the Federal Court System
Chapter 24: Governing the States Section 4
Arrest and Detention.
Justice Delayed is Justice Denied : Indian Scenario
THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms
CRMJ 410 Innovative Education--snaptutorial.com
THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION
Welcome to Law! CLU 3MR Lesson 1.
Limitations to the Charter
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Arrest and Detention.
Arrest and Detention.
The Bill of Rights and the Criminal Trial Process
THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION
If the statement is false explain why it is false
The Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms
Canadian Charter Of Rights and Freedoms
Trial Procedures Lesson 54 CLU 3MR.
Arrest and Detention.
Trial Procedures Lesson 39 CLU 3ER.
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Search & Seizure The act of taking possession of this property.
Canada’s Court System.
Law 12 Criminal Trial Process.
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The Canadian Legal System
The Structure of Canada’s Courts
Unit 2: Rights and Freedoms
School Searches and You
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Constitutional Framework
Presentation transcript:

CHOOSING A CASE

R. v. Morgentaler, 1988: Struck down the abortion law, tossing the issue back to Parliament.

R. v. Big M Drug Mart, 1985: One of the first rulings to strike down and void a law -- the Lord's Day Act

Han Vriend v. Alberta, 1998: Sparked a national debate; helped advance the rights of gays and lesbians.

R. v. Collins, 1987: Set the test for excluding evidence in criminal cases, a vital component in expanding the rights of the accused and limiting police powers.

Maria Hunter v. Southam Inc., 1984: Defined reasonable expectation of privacy and essential components of a reasonable search and seizure for both individuals and corporations.

McKinney v. University of Guelph, 1990: Created the test limiting the Charter to the public sphere; advocated deference to legislatures on broad, socio-economic matters.

Andrews v. Law Society of B. C Andrews v. Law Society of B.C., 1989: Struck down prohibition against non-citizens practising law.

Chaoulli and Zeliotis v. A. G. Quebec and A. G Chaoulli and Zeliotis v. A. G. Quebec and A. G. Canada, 2005: Delays in obtaining surgery were deemed to threaten life and security of the person.

Chaoulli, 2005: Struck down Quebec prohibitions on private health insurance; demonstrated the Court's willingness to enter contested public debates and challenge sacred legislative cows

R. v. Stinchcombe, 1995: Revolutionary ruling enshrined the right to pre-trial disclosure in criminal cases, placing strict obligations on police and prosecutors.

R. v. Askov, 1990: Led to tens of thousands of charges being dismissed in Ontario due to court delays.

Charkoui v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2007: Struck down portions of immigration security-certificate regime that denied detainees full answer and defence.

http://www.chartercases.com/

Assignment You will use Chicago Style Citation (the website will help you learn how to do this)

Actual Project Create a typed report analyzing the case Provide Context (explain the era and the laws already in place) Explain what happened in SIMPLE terms Explain the verdict and why the judge made it How did this case transform our law Relate this case to another future case that was influenced by it