Redundancy and diverse routing for data exchange

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Express5800/ft series servers Product Information Fault-Tolerant General Purpose Servers.
Advertisements

NAESB Coordinate Interchange
PER
Allan Wick, CFE, CPP, PSP, PCI, CBCP Chief Security Officer WECC Joint Meeting October 8, 2014.
11 TROUBLESHOOTING Chapter 12. Chapter 12: TROUBLESHOOTING2 OVERVIEW  Determine whether a network communications problem is related to TCP/IP.  Understand.
Power of N: Redundancy in the World of IP Recording Discover the criteria one of the largest financial institutes considered when assessing their redundancy.
1. 11/26/2012: NERC Board of Trustees adopted CIP v5 CIP thru CIP CIP and CIP Version 5 Filing FERC requested filing by 3/31/2013.
SERVER LOAD BALANCING Presented By : Priya Palanivelu.
Data Center Basics (ENCS 691K – Chapter 5)
A Scalable, Commodity Data Center Network Architecture.
NERC Lessons Learned Summary March NERC lessons learned published in March 2015 Two NERC lessons learned (LL) were published in March2015 LL
NERC PER-005 Overview May 10, Who, What, When, Where, Why WHO: RC, TOP, BA WHAT: –R1: Systematic Approach to Training –R2: Verify operator capabilities.
April 23 rd OWG UFLS Survey & Power Factor Review.
1111 Reliable Network/Service Infrastructures. 222 Availability, Reliability and Survivability AvailabilityReliabilitySurvivability The expected ratio.
Project System Protection Coordination Requirement revisions to PRC (ii) Texas Reliability Entity NERC Standards Reliability Subcommittee.
Project Real-time Monitoring and Analysis Capabilities Mark Olson, Senior Standards Developer Texas RE NSRS October 5, 2015.
1 TDTWG Report to RMS Recommended Solutions for SCR 745 ERCOT Unplanned System Outages and Failures Wednesday, August 10th.
Company LOGO Network Architecture By Dr. Shadi Masadeh 1.
High Availability Environments cs5493/7493. High Availability Requirements Achieving high availability Redundancy of systems Maintenance Backup & Restore.
CIIMS Update Stacen Tyskiewicz CIIMS Chair March 22, 2016.
NERC BAL-005, BAL-006, FAC-001 Gary Nolan WECC ISAS April 20, 2016.
Course Description/001 Objectives in This Course 1. Understanding components in computer networks - What are the major network hardware components? - What.
Component 9 – Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 2-3 Network Media and Hardware Communication Devices This material was developed by Duke.
Reliability Standard TPL Transmission System Planned Performance for Geomagnetic Disturbance Events September 28, 2016 TPL Standard Status.
Artificial Intelligence In Power System Author Doshi Pratik H.Darakh Bharat P.
Onsite CRM Security
Dr. Ir. Yeffry Handoko Putra
Chapter 8. Electrical Systems
Chapter 12: Architecture
Chapter 19: Network Management
Chapter 9 Optimizing Network Performance
NERC Published Lessons Learned Summary
Stacen Tyskiewicz CIIMS Chair July 12, 2016
NOGRR-169 OWG discussion Bill Blevins June 28, 2017.
Ghana Academic and Research Network (GARNET)
Exploring the Functions of Networking
High Availability Linux (HA Linux)
Stacen Tyskiewicz CIIMS Chair October 18, 2016
Distributed Systems.
Planning Geomagnetic Disturbance Task Force (PGDTF) Update to the ROS
Transmission Outage Coordination
ERCOT SCR745 Update ERCOT Outage Evaluation Phase 1 and Phase 2
Distributed Databases
Living in a Network Centric World
Living in a Network Centric World
Network Management Checking Performance + Traffic & Configuration
CHAPTER 3 Architectures for Distributed Systems
Towards Reliable Application Deployment in the Cloud
Networking devices.
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM MEHTAP PARLAK Industrial Engineering Department, Dokuz Eylul University, Turkey 1.
Protocols and the TCP/IP Suite
Valiant Communications Limited
“TOP-010-1: Data Quality, Analysis Quality, and Alarm Process Monitor”
Chapter 8. Electrical Systems
Living in a Network Centric World
Living in a Network Centric World
Valiant Communications Limited
Living in a Network Centric World
Living in a Network Centric World
Data Center Architectures
MAINTAINING SERVER AVAILIBILITY
Network Architecture By Dr. Shadi Masadeh 1.
Enterprise Integration
Steve Rueckert – Director of Standards
Protocols and the TCP/IP Suite
Living in a Network Centric World
Living in a Network Centric World
Living in a Network Centric World
WIAB WECC Interchange Authority Backup
Living in a Network Centric World
Presentation transcript:

Redundancy and diverse routing for data exchange TOP-001-4 Redundancy and diverse routing for data exchange Pawel Krupa/SCL

TOP-001-4, Redundancy and Diverse data exchange capabilities On April 17th, 2017, FERC approved TOP-001-4 including new requirements for redundancy and diverse routing of transmission operator, balancing authority, and reliability coordinator data exchange capabilities. TOP-001-4 will replace current TOP-001-3 as of July 1, 2018.

TOP-001-4, Redundancy and Diverse data exchange capabilities Requirements 20 through 24 address the exchange capabilities including testing requirements for data necessary to perform real time monitoring and system analysis. R20. Each Transmission Operator shall have data exchange capabilities, with redundant and diversely routed data exchange infrastructure within the Transmission Operator's primary Control Center, for the exchange of Real-time data with its Reliability Coordinator, Balancing Authority, and the entities it has identified it needs data from in order for it to perform its Real-time monitoring and Real-time Assessments.

TOP-001-4, Redundancy and Diverse data exchange capabilities R21. Each Transmission Operator shall test its primary Control Center data exchange capabilities specified in Requirement R20 for redundant functionality at least once every 90 calendar days. If the test is unsuccessful, the Transmission Operator shall initiate action within two hours to restore redundant functionality. R23. Each Balancing Authority shall have data exchange capabilities, with redundant and diversely routed data exchange infrastructure within the Balancing Authority's primary Control Center, for the exchange of Real-time data with its Reliability Coordinator, Transmission Operator, and the entities it has identified it needs data from in order for it to perform its Real-time monitoring and analysis functions.

TOP-001-4, Redundancy and Diverse data exchange capabilities R 24. Each Balancing Authority shall test its primary Control Center data exchange capabilities specified in Requirement R23 for redundant functionality at least once every 90 calendar days. If the test is unsuccessful, the Balancing Authority shall initiate action within two hours to restore redundant functionality.

TOP-001-4, Redundancy and Diverse data exchange capabilities Redundant and diversely routed data exchange capabilities consist of data exchange infrastructure components (e.g., switches, routers, servers, power supplies, and network cabling and communication paths between these components in the primary Control Center for the exchange of system operating data) that will provide continued functionality despite failure or malfunction ion of an individual component within the Transmission Operator's (TOP) primary Control Center. Redundant and diversely routed data exchange capabilities preclude single points of failure in primary Control Center data exchange infrastructure from halting the flow of Real-time data. Requirement R20 does not require automatic or instantaneous fail- over of data exchange capabilities. Redundancy and diverse routing may be achieved in various ways depending on the arrangement of the infrastructure or hardware within the TOP's primary Control Center.

TOP-001-4, Redundancy and Diverse data exchange capabilities Possible issues to consider: Is the ICCP considered the redundant and diversely routed data exchange infrastructure? If yes, how we are going to conduct redundant functionality tests? If the ICCP does not fulfill the requirements of diversely routed and redundant data exchange capabilities, what other options exists to comply with those requirements?

TOP-001-4, Redundancy and Diverse data exchange capabilities Possible solutions