Going Viral with UMBSON

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is it? What is it? Quality Matters (QM) is a nationally recognized, faculty- centered, peer review process designed to certify the quality of online.
Advertisements

© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho. © 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho COURSE LEAD RESPONSIBILITIES TRAINING Feb. 7,
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Information Literacy Embedded in the Curriculum: A Collaborative Process or One way to spend your grant money Jennifer Groome, Reference Librarian Jack.
Birzeit University Experience in Designing, Developing and Delivering e-enabled Courses Palestine December,2005 Dr. Osama Mimi, Birzeit University.
Quality Matters : Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning Teaching with New Technologies May 2007.
Employing e-Portfolios in Instructional and Co-Curricular Settings Jennifer Matthews, Senior Consultant Blackboard Inc April 13, 2005.
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Blackboard, Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools Presentatio.
Information Literacy Embedded in the Curriculum: A Collaborative Process or One way to spend your grant money Jenny Groome, Reference Librarian Jack Dougherty,
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Blackboard, Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools Presentatio.
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Course Management System Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools.
Select Slides… Spring 2013 Training Strengthening Teaching and Learning through the Results of Your Student Assessment of Instruction (SAI) For Faculty.
Storyboard UNIV 101 – The online student Carla Oñate Instructional Designer.
E VALUATION PLAN FOR COURSE DESIGN Embedding Literacy and Numeracy Module.
ENHANCING QUALITY IN ONLINE LEARNING Nadeosa Conference Durban University of Technology 8-9 July 2015 Dr Ephraim Mhlanga.
Quality Online Preparation: Qualities of Faculty, Courses, and Preparation Programs By Dr. Erin O’Brien Valencia College League of Innovation Conference,
Course Work 2: Critical Reflection GERALDINE DORAN B
Use of Quality Matters in the Faculty Mentor-Mentee Relationship
Through the Looking Glass: Examining QM through Different Lenses in the Development of an Online EMBA. Presenters: Dr. Karen Donovan Ms. Cindy Hart & Dr.
Online Quality Course Design vs. Quality Teaching:
Developing a Template for Use Across Departments in Temple University's College of Public Health Lorraine Ford, Assistant Director of Information Technology;
Closing the loop: How to redesign a course for blended learning
An introduction to developing and teaching an online course
Set Sail on a Three-Course Tour: Three examples of a QM Reviewed Course Krista MacDonald Doña Anna Community College Sharon Lalla New Mexico State University.
Instructional Design Groundwork:
Using Canvas Resources to manage REC, RSI, LDA, SLO
A community of learners improving our world
Twelve Step Program to Meeting Quality Matters
Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
Harvesting the Benefits of QM Culture for Institutional Accreditation
OTL Meets QM: Getting Started in an Online Course
Interact 2: Communicating
Specific Review Standard 5.3
Quality on Demand: Innovative Resources for Training and Course Design
No Instructional Designer! Now What?
Jerry Yerardi • Michelle Bautista • Paolo Mercado
IMPACTS OF ICT IN EDUCATION
Collaborating Toward Better IT Accessibility
Governor Visits to School
Online Teaching Conference
An Introduction to COELAS and Course Development
HRM 562 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
HRM 562 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Evaluating Digital Learning Implementation with the CWiC Framework
New Agent Professional Development
Tools for Infusing QM Standards into the Course Development Process
Good Teaching Practices
Providing Customized Training on Quality Online Design and Delivery
Engagement Follow-up Resources
Anderson Online DJT/SLB/DFM.
Adjunct, newbies, and non-tenure track faculty – oh my!
COURSE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OVERVIEW AND GUIDELINES
Specific Review Standard 5.3
A Two-Phased Approach to Online Faculty Development
Leanne Havis, Ph.D., Neumann University
Engagement Follow-up Resources
Case Method - JMSB Program
Writing the Institutional Report
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Professor Lindsay Henning Program Director,
Crafting Online Course Standards while Maintaining Academic Freedom
Trying to get the Horse in Front of the Buggy
InWEnt Blended-learning approach in perspective of DRM related Capacity Building in India 06/05/2019 An introduction course on InWEnt Blended-learning.
Pedagogical Practice, Shift, and Professional Growth in Online Courses
Seven Principles of Good Teaching
EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN UNIVERSITY Faculty of Education
Katherine M. Hitchcock, Ph.D. Michelle Franz
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Introduction to myIMPACT-Adjuncts
Presentation transcript:

Going Viral with QM @ UMBSON Faculty and Instructional Designers “catch” Collaboration!

University of Maryland School of Nursing Office of Learning Technologies Presenters: Joanne Pinna Senior Instructional Technologist Angela Staten Instructional Technologist Matt Rietschel Assistant Professor/Assistant Dean Nichole Schumaker Instructional Technologist Christopher Moore Multimedia Technician Leah Smith Academic Program Specialist Other Team Members:

Presentation Topics How we started Application of QM framework Before & after Buy in and time efficiency Applicable to your institution Discovered faculty losing 2 weeks teaching time and students lost 2 weeks learning time and both increased stress time without standards Explain implementation and application of QM framework Timeline of implementation Model how template and course shells depict SRSs  Course template images before and after QM design Compare and contrast amount of time and stress before QM and after QM implementation Discuss how QM design can be used at your institution, in course design or other faculty/ID tools and documents

Stages of Vaccine Development Pre-adoption SON identifies variation is a burden to online courses SON faculty (two) and instructional designer attends MOL conference SON informal use of QM standards Adopting Formal internal review of graduate courses MD Higher Education Commission (MHEC) grant transitioned DNP program from face-to-face to hybrid or blended program Post-graduate DNP courses re-conceptualized to align with QM Adopted Formal, external QM evaluation of seven DNP courses 2011-2013 Continue integration of QM into all courses Start of the search for the “cure” to Template variation

Viral Symptoms - No Template

Before Template Creation Syllabus Announcements Assignments

Session Activity: Find that Info! Session Activity/Interactivity: Find That Info!   Request two volunteers  First volunteer will be asked to find pertinent course info in an old course UMSON offered before adopting QM-style course design  Second volunteer will be asked to find the same pertinent course info using QM-style course design (I.e. "new course"); both attempts will be timed and each volunteer will discuss their experiences  **consider new name: “First Day of Class”

Developing the Vaccine Creation of Templates No Template Three Templates  One Unified Template Explain how courses were first created in Blackboard without templates, to the creation of three templates, and then how the best elements from all three templates were combined into one unified template.

Vaccine - Phase I Three Templates

Vaccine – Phase II One Unified Template Items are required to be in a course before the semester begins.

Unified Template with Standards Course Information – (syllabus, objectives, readings, evaluation and grading criteria ): STANDARD 2.1, STANDARD 2.4, STANDARD 2.5, STANDARD 3.1, STANDARD 3.2, STANDARD 3.3 Start Here: STANDARD 1.1 - Instructions make clear how to get started and where to find various course components. Welcome Announcements: STANDARD 2.1 - The course learning objectives, or course/program competencies, describe outcomes that are measurable. Faculty Information: STANDARD 1.8 - The self-introduction by the instructor is appropriate and is available online. . Course Model/Schedule: STANDARD 2.4, STANDARD 2.5, STANDARD 4.4, This section follows QM standards for interactivity between faculty and students. Items are required to be in a course before the semester begins. This section follows QM standards with UMB and UMBSON technical support services and academic and student support services.

Importance of Start Here

Template Creations Announcements Assignments Syllabus Modules

Vaccine - Phase III How We Support Our Faculty Source: https://acmsblog.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/one-on-one.png?w=584

Encourage Collaboration Open-door policy, 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Dedicated main phone line and email address Service Ticket System Customer Service focused New ways your institution is encouraging successful collaboration open office from 8 am – 5 pm service ticket system dedicated main phone line and exclusive email address IDs are polite and courteous; deliver service with strong customer focus in mind (ultimately, we serve the students and we partner with faculty to do so)

Vaccine – Phase IV Faculty Buy-in for QM @ UMB Course shells follow QM Sample course content items Course templates for all types of courses = TIME How your institution gets faculty buy-in for QM All course shells are created with a preset navigation menus on the left sidebar and footer of each webpage so that students can familiarize themselves with where to find pertinent course information: syllabus (SRS 1.2), course schedule, faculty information (SRS 1.8), and announcements.  Course content templates, such as practice quiz (SRS 3), sample course model (SRS 1.2), discussion board rules (SRS 1.3), web conference minimum technology specifications (SRS 1.7), etc. Pre-made templates are included for different types of courses, such as web-based, hybrid, and traditional (face-to-face) Survey to students asking them to find course info in reliable places

Build Faculty Working Relationships Provide methods of Communication Build confidence using Technology Create one-on-one Opportunities Employ elements of Collaboration How IDs have built working relationships with faculty  Phone, email, and in-person communications; open-office door policy; LT staff attend university functions to meet and chat with faculty  We help build faculty confidence by opening the collaboration (talking) gap between LT and Faculty; we are approachable, friendly, knowledgeable and considerate/mindful of the demands of their time and attention as faculty members; we treat them as a partner and provide excellent customer/client service  Employ elements of COLLABORATION: (communication as the key component to collaboration)   1. Cooperation 2. Assertiveness 3. Autonomy 4. Responsibility/Accountability 5. Communication 6. Coordination 7. Mutual Trust and Respect

Session Activity: Find that Info Now! Session Activity/Interactivity: Find That Info!   Request two volunteers  First volunteer will be asked to find pertinent course info in an old course UMSON offered before adopting QM-style course design  Second volunteer will be asked to find the same pertinent course info using QM-style course design (I.e. "new course"); both attempts will be timed and each volunteer will discuss their experiences  **consider new name: “First Day of Class”

Created 3 Templates using QM Standards Summation Created 3 Templates using QM Standards Consolidated to 1 Unified Template Encouraged Collaboration Positive Faculty Feedback Go Viral with QM @ Your Institution Outcomes from implementing QM design standards Identify all possible returns on investment of implementing QM-designed templates for all course delivery formats. Apply same idea of QM design to your tasks when making course design decisions examples: gained instruction time, streamlined task list for setting up courses for faculty and IDs, students learn and trust locations in the LMS where they can find specific course items, gained confidence of students and faculty in using LMS, etc. found main elements are valued across the board Time and stress Make QM go Viral @ Your Institution Create vignettes for faculty and IDs to role-play scenarios and switch roles to identify with each other Hold a mock QM review in each department with no-strings attached and IDs in attendance to help moderate process and offer suggestions in the final review Tools to Use Use web conferencing software and texting/SMS apps to provide another way for faculty and IDs to interact “Lunch and Learn” sessions presented by IDs on top 10 questions asked each semester by faculty and students Provide written and visual explanations, model ‘how-to’ solutions and give faculty assistance while they are using software/LMS

Time for Questions & Answers! Thank you!