A complexity scoring system for degenerative mitral valve repair

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Max B. Mitchell, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Advertisements

Of mice and men and surgical transcatheter aortic valve insertion

Lost in translation The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc

Stephen R. Broderick, MD, MPHS

Can papillary muscle interventions improve mitral valve repair durability for ischemic mitral regurgitation? Christos G. Mihos, DO, Orlando Santana,

Endoscopic Robotic Mitral Valve Surgery

Ultrasound, endoscopy, and the recurrent nerve

Intrinsic cardiac stem cells are essential for regeneration

Does Prior Coronary Bypass Surgery Present a Unique Risk for Reoperative Valve Surgery? Andrew Breglio, BS, Anelechi Anyanwu, MD, Shinobu Itagaki, MD,

Marc R. Moon, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Abracadabra I, II…HeartMate 3?

Form ever follows function

A new approach: Ischemic mitral regurgitation guidelines by and for surgeons Patrick M. McCarthy, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Functional mitral stenosis after mitral valve repair is a true anatomic problem that originates from the time of surgery Vincent Chan, MD, MPH, Thierry.

It is still mostly about the mitral valve

Bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: One size fits all?

Surgeons, valve repair in severely unbalanced atrioventricular septal defect, and the emperor's new clothes David M. Overman, MD The Journal of Thoracic.

The lord of the rings Antonio Miceli, MD, PhD

The variability of the mitral valve anatomy and terminology

A near 100% repair rate for mitral valve prolapse is achievable in a reference center: Implications for future guidelines Javier G. Castillo, MD, Anelechi.

Early rupture of an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene neochord after complex mitral valve repair: An electron microscopic analysis Javier G. Castillo,

Support Your Specialty

Quality of mitral valve surgery at the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Juan A. Crestanello, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients

Innovation and science: The future of valve design

The assessment of cost effectiveness and the effectiveness of cost assessment in cardiothoracic surgery Vinay Badhwar, MD The Journal of Thoracic and.

It's not “just a shunt” but sometimes it should be…

Military surgeons just want to have fun

Do we need a bibliometrician to know which way the wind is blowing?

Stephen R. Broderick, MD, MPHS

Get it right the first time

Surgery for aortic and mitral valve disease in the United States: A trend of change in surgical practice between 1998 and 2005 Scott D. Barnett, PhD,

Fenton H. McCarthy, MD, MS, Nimesh D. Desai, MD, PhD

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysms: Stabilizing the repair destabilizing the aortic valve? M. Sertaç Çiçek, MD, FACC The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.

In search of the smoking gun in calcific aortic valve disease

Replicating the success of mitral valve repair in the aortic valve

A fate worse than death Jennifer S. Lawton, MD

Attachment disorder in thoracoabdominal surgery

Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc

Commentary: Ongoing advancements in the understanding of tricuspid valve dynamics and functional geometry Daniel J.P. Burns, MD, MPhil The Journal of.

Passing the torch The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

How much is enough to warrant prophylactic tricuspid repair?

Sutureless valve implantation: Every detail counts

Prognosis and “granularity”: Building on staging foundations?

Shunt right or left? Decision 2016

Warfarin or aspirin after mitral valve repair: Why work harder?

T. Brett Reece, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

The origins of open heart surgery at the University of Minnesota 1951 to 1956 Richard A. DeWall, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Mitral repair failures are not the robot's fault!

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

The future of cardiac surgery training: A survival guide

Another case of underprovision of mitral valve repair surgery: Lessons from the Veterans Affairs health system Anelechi C. Anyanwu, MD, David H. Adams,

Tricuspid annulus diameter does not predict the development of tricuspid regurgitation after mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to degenerative.

Bicuspid aortopathy: Seeing the forest for the trees

Commentary: Have mitral valve simulators made it to reality?

Ralph E. Delius, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Therapeutic R2 resection for pleural mesothelioma

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

“The more things change…”: The challenges ahead

Ryan R. Davies, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Francesco Nappi, MD, Cristiano Spadaccio, MD, PhD

Preoperative PFTs: The answer is blowing in the wind

Perioperative renal function and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair: Where do we go from here? Leonard N. Girardi, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.

Of mice and men… The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Chordal replacement with polytetrafluoroethylene sutures for mitral valve repair: A 25- year experience Tirone E. David, MD, Susan Armstrong, MSc, Joan.

Journal changes and initiatives

Intraoperative endocardial ultrasonography: Improving safety in mitral valve surgery Juan A. Crestanello, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.

Zone zero thoracic endovascular aortic repair is all about “location, location, location” Kevin L. Greason, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.

Presentation transcript:

A complexity scoring system for degenerative mitral valve repair Anelechi C. Anyanwu, MD, Shinobu Itagaki, MD, Joanna Chikwe, MD, Ahmed El-Eshmawi, MD, David H. Adams, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Volume 151, Issue 6, Pages 1661-1670 (June 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.01.033 Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Distribution of complexity scores. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 151, 1661-1670DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.01.033) Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Technique scores (mean and standard error [bars]) according to complexity score. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 151, 1661-1670DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.01.033) Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Mitral complexity scores Mitral complexity scores. Score, 1 is Simple; 2 to 4 Intermediate; 5 or more Complex. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 151, 1661-1670DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.01.033) Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions