Dr Salah Taqi Consultant Anethseia & ICU

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leadership. Knowledge. Community. Introduction Canadian Cardiovascular Society Antiplatelet Guidelines.
Advertisements

Stenting Patients Needing Non-Cardiac Surgery
Review of 2014 ACC/AHA Guidelines and Implications for Clinical Care Natalea Johnson, MD CA-2 Seth Palesch, MD CA-2 Bernie Miller, MD CA-2 Katie Seligman,
Ryan Hampton January  Risks and benefits of surgery  Timing of surgery  Type of Surgery  Goal is to uncover undiagnosed problems or treat prior.
Cardiovascular Pre-Operative Evaluation for Non-Cardiac Surgery Jessica Thom PGY-1.
Focusing on the Surgical Patient with Cardiac Problems By Kate J. Morse, RN, ACNP-BC, CCRN Nursing2009, March ANCC contact hours Online:
Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery 2007 ACC/AHA and 2009 ESC GUIDELINES.
Perioperative and Consultative Medicine Pamela J. Pride MD, FHM Medical University of South Carolina 2/7/2012.
Preoperative Cardiac Evaluation Jonathan Hastie January 31, 2006.
1 Covenants of the Medical Home Neighborhood  How Primary Care Physicians and Specialists can “Choose Wisely”
Leadership. Knowledge. Community. Canadian Cardiovascular Society Antiplatelet Guidelines Antiplatelet Therapy for Vascular Prevention in Patients with.
1 What is… ? Disparities Among Women in Acute Cardiac Care Frances Canet, MD Cath Conference Thursday, May 26, 2011.
Appendix: Clinical Guidelines VBWG. I Intervention is useful and effective III Intervention is not useful or effective and may be harmful A Data derived.
Perioperative and Consultative Medicine Pamela J. Pride MD, FHM Medical University of South Carolina 2/7/2012.
New guidelines for CABG
Cardiovascular Disease in Women Module V: Prognosis and Treatment Outcomes.
Management of Stable Angina SIGN 96
Estimate of Certainty (Precision) of Treatment Effect Level of evidence of B or C does not imply that recommendation is weak. LEVEL A Multiple populations.
Management of Chronic Stable Angina AIMGP Seminar Series Mirek Otremba 2007.
3/99medslides.com1 Guidelines for Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery ACC/AHA Task Force JACC 1996; 27: Circulation 1996;
Myocardial Ischemia: Concepts in Management Topics in Clinical Medicine February 14, 2007.
Historical perspective It all started with Aspirin….
Pre-operative Cardiovascular Evaluation: Guidelines and More Eric A. Brody MD, FACC Medical Director, NA Cardiology and Medical Services Associate Professor.
ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines on the management of PAD.
PRODIGY Objective Study Design Primary Composite Endpoint
Preoperative Cardiac Evaluation
Dr. Alireza Pournajafian – Assistant Professor of Anesthesia
Cardio-Pulmonary Pre Operative Risk Assessment Andy Shakespeare MD PGY2 Baylor Scott and White IM
Evaluation of the Cardiac Patient Before Non-Cardiac Surgery
2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Developed in Collaboration with.
Segment 1 Perioperative Risk Assessment. Need Advice – How Low is Low Dear Consult Sages ; I need your help and guidance to provide better service to.
수요저널 우종신. ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update 2011 Class I 1. After PCI, use of aspirin should be continued indefinitely. (Level of Evidence.
1 R1 임준욱 Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Therapy Use in 426 Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Stent Implantation.
2009 ACCF/AHA Focused Update on Perioperative Beta Blockade Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and.
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate.
A Clinical and Echocardiographic Score for Assigning Risk of Major Events After Dobutamine Echocardiograms JACC Vol. 43, No June 2, 2004:2102–7.
Choosing Wisely: Cardiology Jeffrey Ziffra D.O. Mercy Medical Center – North Iowa 10/14/2016.
Case 66 year old male with PMH of HTN, DM, ESRD on renal replacement TIW, stroke in 2011 with right side residual weakness, atrial fibrillation, currently.
2014 ACC/AHA Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery Developed in Collaboration With.
Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Management for Patients Who Undergo Noncardiac Surgery  Emmanuelle.
_________________ Caitlin M. Gibson, PharmD, BCPS
Disclosures Speaker’s bureau: Research support: Consulting: Equity
Anticoagulation after peripheral Vascular Intervention
Stent Thrombosis and Optimal Duration of DAPT
Multi Modality Approach to Diagnosis of Ischemia in Post CABG Cases
PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION in the ELDERLY Module 2 CARDIAC ASSESSMENT
Procedural factors associated with PCI-related ischemic stroke
Antithrombotic Therapy in Peripheral Artery Disease
Women, Bleeding, and Coronary Intervention
Ischaemic Heart Disease Acute Coronary Syndrome
POISE-2 PeriOperative ISchemic Evaluation-2 Trial
15th November 2017 James Holmes
Glenn N. Levine et al. JACC 2016;68:
Achieving Long-Term Protection Post-MI
The Use of Antiplatelet Therapy in the Outpatient Setting: Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines  Alan D. Bell, MD, CCFP, André Roussin, MD, FRCPC,
Glenn N. Levine et al. JACC 2016;68:
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
Section V: Erectile dysfunction: The patients you see
Terms of Use. Terms of Use.
Section F: Clinical guidelines
2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease  Glenn N. Levine, MD, FACC, FAHA,
Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Management for Patients Who Undergo Noncardiac Surgery  Emmanuelle.
Impact of Platelet Reactivity Following Clopidogrel Administration
The effect of congestive heart failure on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization  Richard L. Amdur, PhD, Bernard.
Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit with
The Case for Routine CYP2C19 ( Plavix® ) Genetic Testing
Atlantic Cardiovascular Patient Outcomes Research Team
Lee A. Fleisher et al. JACC 2014;64:e77-e137
PowerPoint 16:9 Screen Ratio Template *
P2Y12 receptor inhibitor therapy for secondary prevention of patients with stable coronary artery disease. P2Y12 receptor inhibitor therapy for secondary.
Presentation transcript:

Dr Salah Taqi Consultant Anethseia & ICU Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery 2014 Dr Salah Taqi Consultant Anethseia & ICU 11/10/2018 Footer Text

2009 Case 85 yrs. old CCU patient Fall due to syncope  Ankle bi Malleolar badly displaced fracture. Found to have Sick Sinus Syndrome  Transvenous Ventricular pacemaker Sever Aortic Stenosis Dopamine 5mcg/kg/min For urgent ORIF 11/10/2018 Footer Text

Extracts

Lecture Outline Review of evidence classifications Pre-operative cardiac evaluation algorithm Definition of high & low risk surgery Introduction to risk calculator Supplemental Preoperative Evaluation Perioperative therapy recommendations

The American Heart Association Evidence-Based Scoring System  Classification of Recommendations Class I: Conditions for which there is evidence, general agreement, or both that a given procedure or treatment is useful and effective. Class II: Conditions for which there is conflicting evidence, a divergence of opinion, or both about the usefulness/efficacy of a procedure or treatment Class IIa: Weight of evidence/opinion is in favor of usefulness/efficacy. Class IIb: Usefulness/efficacy is less well established by evidence/opinion. Class III: Conditions for which there is evidence, general agreement, or both that the procedure/treatment is not useful/effective and in some cases may be harmful.   Level of Evidence Level of Evidence A: Data derived from multiple randomized clinical trials Level of Evidence B: Data derived from a single randomized trial or nonrandomized studies Level of Evidence C: Consensus opinion of experts Circulation 2006 114: 1761 – 1791.

2014: Now, with color!!! Sx MET Fliesher et al. “2014 ACC/AHA Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery.” http://content/onlinejacc.org/

Procedure Type Low Risk High Risk Combined surgical and patient characteristics predict a risk of Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) < 1% Ex: Cataracts, plastics Any procedure with MACE risk > 1% No longer distinguishes between intermediate and high risk because recommendations the same Risk can be lowered by less invasive approach (endovascular AAA) Emergency procedures increase risk

Definition of Timing of Surgery Time-Sensitive Emergent Urgent Elective Life or limb is threatened if not in operating room within 24 hours Delay of 1-6 weeks for further evaluation would negatively affect outcome Delay for up to 1 year Life or limb is threatened if not in operating room within 6 hours

Calculators for predicting perioperative cardiac morbidity Class IIa: A validated risk-prediction tool can be useful in predicting the risk of perioperative MACE in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery Class III: No benefit For patients with low risk of perioperative MACE, further testing is not recommended before the planned operation RCRI- Revised Cardiac Risk Index American College of Surgeons NSQIP Risk Calculator

Revised Cardiac Risk Index RCRI Revised Cardiac Risk Index 1. History of ischemic heart disease 2. History of congestive heart failure 3. History of cerebrovascular disease (stroke or transient ischemic attack) 4. History of diabetes requiring preoperative insulin use 5. Chronic kidney disease (creatinine > 2 mg/dL) 6. Undergoing suprainguinal vascular, intraperitoneal, or intrathoracic surgery Risk for cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal cardiac arrest:0 predictors = 0.4%, 1 predictor = 0.9%, 2 predictors = 6.6%, ≥3 predictors = >11% 6 predictors of complications Major cardiac complications included: Myocardial infarction Ventricular fibrillation Cardiac arrest Complete heart bock Pulmonary edema 0-1 predictors = low risk 2+ = high risk

http://www.mdcalc.com/revised-cardiac-risk-index-for-pre-operative-risk/

ACS NSQIP Calculator 21 predictors of risk for major cardiac complications NSQIP MICA risk-prediction rule created in 2011 525 US hospitals participated > 1 million operations included Outperformed RCRI in discriminative power (esp. with vascular) Calculates risk of: MACE, death, PNA, VTE, ARF, return to OR, unplanned intubation discharge to rehab/nursing home, surgical infection, UTI Predicts length of hospital stay Limitations: Not validated outside NSQIP ASA status Functional status/dependence

http://riskcalculator.facs.org/PatientInfo/PatientInfo

RCRI ACS NSQIP Calculator Creatinine > 2 ARF H/o heart failure H/o heart failure within 30 days IDDM DM Thoracic, Intra-abdominal, or vascular CPT code H/o ischemic heart disease Previous Cardiac event H/o CVA or TIA ASA status Age Wound class Ascites Sepsis Ventilator Disseminated cancer Steroid use HTN Previous MI Sex DOE Smoker COPD Dialysis BMI Emergence RCRI: h/o MI, positive ETT, angina, use of nitrites, EKG with pathologic Q waves NSQIP: MI within 6 months, PCI ever, angina ever, any cardiac surgery (not PPM or ICDs) **CAD not itself a risk factor

Supplemental Preoperative Evaluation Includes ECG Assessment of LV function Exercise Stress Testing for Myocardial Ischemia and Functional Capacity Pharmacological Stress Testing Noninvasive Radionuclide DSE (Dopamine stress Echo) Special Situations

Algorithm

Review of Evidence Classification  Classification of Recommendations Class I: Conditions for which there is evidence, general agreement, or both that a given procedure or treatment is useful and effective. Class II: Conditions for which there is conflicting evidence, a divergence of opinion, or both about the usefulness/efficacy of a procedure or treatment Class IIa: Weight of evidence/opinion is in favor of usefulness/efficacy. Class IIb: Usefulness/efficacy is less well established by evidence/opinion. Class III: Conditions for which there is evidence, general agreement, or both that the procedure/treatment is not useful/effective and in some cases may be harmful.   Level of Evidence Level of Evidence A: Data derived from multiple randomized clinical trials Level of Evidence B: Data derived from a single randomized trial or nonrandomized studies Level of Evidence C: Consensus opinion of experts Circulation 2006 114: 1761 – 1791.

Resting ECG Reasonable (Class IIa) – known CAD, significant arrhythmia, PVD, CVD, or other significant structural heart disease, except for low-risk surgery (LOE = B) May be Considered (Class IIb)– asymptomatic patients without known CAD, except for low-risk surgery (LOE = B) No Benefit (Class III) – for asymptomatic patients undergoing low-risk procedures (LOE = B) General consensus suggests that an interval of 1-3 months is adequate for stable patients

Assessment of LV Function Reasonable (Class IIa) –dyspnea of unknown origin (LOE=C) Reasonable (Class IIa) – known CHF with worsening dyspnea or other change in clinical status (LOE=C) May be Considered (Class IIb)– reassessment in stable patients with previously documented LV dysfunction if not assessed within 1 year (LOE=C) No Benefit (Class III) – routine preoperative evaluation (LOE=B)

Exercise Stress Testing for Ischemia and Functional Capacity Reasonable (Class IIa) – to forego further exercise testing with cardiac imaging and proceed to surgery in patient with elevated risk and excellent functional capacity (>10 METs) (LOE=B) May be Considered (Class IIb)– for patients with elevated risk and unknown functional capacity if it will change management (LOE=B) May be Considered (Class IIb) – to forego for patients with elevated risk and moderate to good FC (4-10 METs) (LOE=B) May be Considered (Class IIb)– for patients with elevated risk and poor (<4 METs) or unknown FC if it will change management (LOE=C) What exactly is elevated risk?

Exercise Stress Testing for Ischemia and Functional Capacity No Benefit (Class III) – routine screening with noninvasive stress testing for patient at low risk for noncardiac surgery (LOE=B)

Pharmacological Stress Testing Noninvasive Reasonable (Class IIa) for patients at elevated risk and have poor Functional Capacity (either DSEcho or pharm stress Myocardial perfusion imaging MPI) (LOE=B) No Benefit (Class III) for routine screening for patients undergoing low-risk noncardiac surgery (LOE=B)

Timing of Elective Non Cardiac Surgery after PCI Class I: Elective noncardiac surgery should be delayed: 14 days after balloon angioplasty 30 days after BMS implantation Elective noncardiac surgery should optimally be delayed: 365 days after drug-eluting stent (DES)implantation Class IIa When noncardiac surgery is required: A consensus decision among treating clinicians as to the relative risks of surgery and discontinuation or continuation of antiplatelet therapy can be useful.

Timing of Elective Non Cardiac Surgery after PCI Class IIb* Elective noncardiac surgery after drug eluting stent implantation may be considered: After 180 days if the risk of further delay is greater than risks of ischemia and stent thrombosis Class III: No Benefit/Harm Elective noncardiac surgery should not be performed: Within 30 days after BMS implantation if dual antiplatelet therapy needs to be discontinued Within 12 months after DES implantation if dual antiplatelet therapy needs to be discontinued Within 14 days of balloon angioplasty if aspirin needs to be discontinued

Choosing Appropriate PCI Intervention Urgent Surgery Consider CABG combined with noncardiac surgery Surgery 2-6 weeks with high bleeding risk Consider balloon angioplasty with provisional BMS Surgery in 1-12 months Consider BMS and 4-6 weeks of ASA and P2Y12 inhibitor with continuation of ASA perioperatively Surgery > 12 Months or low bleeding risk PCI and DES with prolonged aspirin and P2Y12 platelet receptor-inhibitor

Antiplatelet Agent Recommendations Class I Urgent Non Cardiac Surgery 4-6 weeks after BMS or DES Continue DAPT unless RR of bleeding outweighs benefit of preventing stent thrombosis Patient with coronary stent & surgical procedure mandates discontinuation of P2Y12 platelet receptor inhibitor Continue aspirin perioperatively, re-start P2Y12 platelet receptor inhibitor ASAP after surgery Obtain a consensus between surgeon, anesthesiologist, cardiologist & patient to weigh RR of bleeding versus preventing stent thrombosis when deciding perioperative antiplatelet management

Antiplatelet Agent Recommendations Class IIb Non-emergent/Non-urgent, Non Cardiac surgery: If patients have not had previous stenting, you may continue aspirin perioperatively when the risk of potential increased cardiac events outweighs the risk of bleeding http://blogs-images.forbes.com/daviddisalvo/files/2011/10/5-aspirin.jpg

2009 Case 85 yrs. old CCU patient Fall due to syncope  Ankle bi Malleolar badly displaced fracture. Found to have Sick Sinus Syndrome  Transvenous Ventricular pacemaker Sever Aortic Stenosis Dopamine 5mcg/kg/min For urgent ORIF 11/10/2018 Footer Text

Femoral Peripheral Nerve block PNB Popleteal fossa Sciatic PNBlock 11/10/2018 Footer Text

Ultrasound Guided Femoral Sciatic 11/10/2018 Footer Text

Below Knee Tourniquet 11/10/2018 Footer Text

Happy and awake Patient TV 11/10/2018 Footer Text

References Fliesher et al. 2014 ACC/AHA Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery. http://content/onlinejacc.org/ http://riskcalculator.facs.org/PatientInfo/PatientInfo http://www.mdcalc.com/revised-cardiac-risk-index-for-pre-operative-risk/