Check of Lambda Simulations in TOF-West

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
A Feasibility Study on Measuring a Strange Sea Asymmetry in the Proton 14/07/05Laura Gilbert, Jeff Tseng.
PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.
Current Status of Hadron Analysis Introduction Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF  Current status of charged hadron PID  CGL and track projection point on TOF.
Non-identified Two Particle Correlations from Run I Understanding drift chamber tracking – Tracker and candidatory – Two particle efficiencies/ghosts A.
Mock Data Challenge PbPb collisions - July 2010 Prashant Shukla Nuclear Physics Division BARC, Mumbai India 1 India CMS, July 2010, BARC, Mumbai.
BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO CNS workshop, Tokyo Univ. Identified Charged Single Particle Spectra at RHIC-PHENIX Tatsuya Chujo (BNL) for the PHENIX.
 Production at forward Rapidity in d+Au Collisions at 200 GeV The STAR Forward TPCs Lambda Reconstruction Lambda Spectra & Yields Centrality Dependence.
 End now? Régis Lefèvre Masterclass – Thursday, March 27th 2014.
Kalanand Mishra April 27, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Year -2 topics simulations needs for these Barbara Jacak March 2, 2001.
M. Muniruzzaman University of California Riverside For PHENIX Collaboration Reconstruction of  Mesons in K + K - Channel for Au-Au Collisions at  s NN.
FTPC status and results Summary of last data taken AuAu and dAu calibration : Data Quality Physic results with AuAu data –Spectra –Flow Physic results.
5/9/111 Update on TMVA J. Bouchet. 5/9/112 What changed background and signal have increased statistic to recall, signal are (Kpi) pairs taken from single.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
How to… (a.k.a. Photon PID and Pizero Analysis) G. David, April 20, 2000 A report on the status and advertisement of the tools
ANALYSIS AT CERN KAZUKI OSHIMA 2 particle correlation about Pb-Pb 3.52TeV.
Experience from analyzing pp collisions in ALICE Konstantin Mikhaylov ITEP, Moscow K.Mikhaylov, ITEP Alice Week, CERN October
Charged and Neutral Kaon correlations in Au-Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV using the solenoidal tracker at RHIC (STAR) Selemon Bekele The Ohio State.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Overview: K0s correction stability tests Jet-pt correction closure test Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
HI July Exercise and Muon DQM preparation Mihee Jo Mihee Jo / Lab meeting.
QM2004 Version1 Measurements of the  ->     with PHENIX in Au+Au Collisions at 200 GeV at RHIC PPG016 Figures with Final Approval Charles F. Maguire.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event at 7 TeV 1QCD low pT meeting, 18/03/2011.
4/27/101 Test of KFParticle with K 0 s J. Bouchet.
M. Brooks, 28-Mar-02 Heavy/Light meeting 1 Muon Analysis Work Getting Code ready for first data pass - DONE Get ready for second pass on DSTs - muon identification.
1 D *+ production Alexandr Kozlinskiy Thomas Bauer Vanya Belyaev
QM2002 (July / / Nantes / France)Susumu SATO (JSPS) for the PHENIX collaboration page 1 Susumu SATO Japan Society for the Promotion of Science,
Object-Oriented Track Reconstruction in the PHENIX Detector at RHIC Outline The PHENIX Detector Tracking in PHENIX Overview Algorithms Object-Oriented.
Study of influence of particle identification and resonances excitation on correlation functions mesured by ALICE setup. 1. Influence of particle identification.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
Susanna Costanza - Pavia Group PANDA C.M., Stockholm – June 14, 2010
Yet another approach to the ToF-based PID at PANDA
Search for A’ from p0  A’ g
Kaon and Phi production in p-C and p-W reactions A
Searching for CHAMPs at CDF
Measurement of track length and time-of-flight hypothesis
Charles F. Maguire Vanderbilt University
Checks of TOF Fiducial Cuts
NA61 and NA49 Collaboration Meeting May 14-19, 2012, Budapest
Search For Pentaquark Q+ At HERMES
KLOE General Meeting - LNF March,
STAR Geometry and Detectors
Takafumi Niida from Univ. of Tsukuba for the PHENIX Collaborations
EMCal Recalibration Check
Takafumi Niida from Univ. of Tsukuba for the PHENIX Collaborations
Run4 f K+K- analysis: analysis train
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
EMCal Recalibration Check
TOF Fiducial Cut on 325 +/- 25 MeV/c (++ Field)
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
for the PHENIX collaboration
->K+K- Production at 62.4GeV Au+Au Collisions
Problems with the Run4 Preliminary Phi->KK Analysis
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
High-pT Identified Charged Hadrons in √sNN = 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions
The “Other” STAR-PHENIX Discrepancy Differences in the f analyses
2 Getting Started.
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Identified Charged Hadron Production at High pT
2 Getting Started.
2 Getting Started.
Quarkonium production, offline monitoring, alignment & calibration
Understanding the decay background for measuring fragmentation photons
Rare and Forbidden Decays in the Standard Model
Problems in π0 Reconstruction
Presentation transcript:

Check of Lambda Simulations in TOF-West Charlie Maguire 7/21/09 Group Meeting

Goals, Plans, and Methods for Lambda Simulations Check for strange backgrounds using HYDJET events Centrality dependence of backgrounds (next slide for real data anomaly example) Search for any cut improvements using simulated combinatoric backgrounds Plans Generate 100K central HYDJET events (0 – 5%) Embed Lambda events into the HYDJET input stream in order to have a sufficient number simulated Lambda at high transverse momentum Evaluate the Lambda reconstruction using the same cuts in simulation as were used in the real analysis Methods (all software tools do exist except CONDOR production macros) Use latest (July 25) version of HYDJET which has fixed the “repeat” bug Filter HYJDET generated events according to psuedo-rapidity cut from -0.6 to +0.6 and then add Lambda events producing output OSCAR files (event size TBD) PISAEvent files analysis uses anctfw2.root NTUPLE (pisaRootRead correlations) simDST.root files analysis uses simDSTCheck.root and simDSTCheckPairs.root Produced by the simDSTCheck.so library which uses the real data analysis cuts 7/21/09 Group Meeting

Goals, Plans, and Methods for Lambda Simulations Anomalous Peak at Low Mass in Most Central Bin Dillon’s Result from Taxi 143 for 7-9 GeV/c pT Bin Reported to Group on March 19 7/21/09 Group Meeting

pisaRootRead Analysis To Determine Acceptance Efficiency for Lambda Embedding Lambda generation 1) pT 0 to 10 GeV/c 2) -0.4 to + 0.4 eta 3) -15o to +35o in f Require detection of proton in TOF-W Sister p- must be seen somewhere 1) At least DC/PC1 2) Perhaps PC2? Maximum efficiency = 1515/33000 = 4.5 % Sets requirement on the embedding multiplicity 7/21/09 Group Meeting

Is there a slight drop in simDSTCheck Single Particle Analysis Evaluate correctness of TOF-West reconstruction Use time and path-length corrections from Shengli 20K proton events Same vertex kinematics as 33K L events 33K L events Kinematics on slide 4 Single particle detection only No sister particle cut Maximum pion momentum < 3 GeV/c for this set of L Is there a slight drop in proton mass towards higher momentum? 7/21/09 Group Meeting

simDSTCheck Single Particle Analysis Evaluate correctness of TOF-West reconstruction Use time and path-length corrections from Shengli 33K L events Kinematics on slide 4 40K pion events Same vertex kinematics as 33K L events Single particle detection only No sister particle cut Maximum pion momentum < 3 GeV/c for this set of L 7/21/09 Group Meeting

simDSTCheck Single Particle Analysis Evaluate correctness of TOF-West reconstruction Use time and path-length corrections from Shengli 200 central HYJDET++ events Events had weak-decay off New PISA particles (no geantinos) Eta from -0.6 t0 +0.6 Repeated particles removed Can clearly see the three mass bands Some background between kaon and proton bands Pion band appears to have some extra shoulder? The simDSTCheck.root has “MC truth” information which we can use to diagnose these extra features 7/21/09 Group Meeting

“Pion” is any negative in the West Arm simDSTCheck Reconstructed Pair Analysis Evaluate correctness of TOF-West pair reconstruction Use time and path-length corrections from Shengli Reconstructed pairs from 33K L events Proton is 0.6 to 1.2 in TOF-West m2 “Pion” is any negative in the West Arm with DC quality as 31 or 63 Same cuts as for 33K L events The green blip are the 16 true L determined from the MC “truth” data 7/21/09 Group Meeting

Next Steps To be added 7/21/09 Group Meeting