Michigan’s Lessons and Uses of the CTEAG

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

MEAP-Access OEAA / OSE-EIS Webcast March 9, 2011.

Advertisements

Designing Accessible Reading Assessments National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 7, 2007 Overview of DARA Project.

Listening. Learning. Leading. Using Factor Analysis to Investigate the Impact of Accommodations on the Scores of Students with Disabilities on English-Language.

ASSESSMENT & ACCOUNTABILITY Luci Willits Chief of Staff.

2015 SpEd Assessment Updates TETN Event # Presented June 5, 2013 TEA’s Student Assessment Division.

Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.

Oregon’s Alternate Assessment: Past, Present, and Future Tense Oregon Department of Education Dianna Carrizales, PhD Office of Student Learning and Partnerships.

WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS The presenters are: Erika Bolig – OSA Professional Development Coordinator Linda Howley – OSA Assessment Consultant for Students.

Alternate Performance Task Assessment APTA Parent Power Point Presentation Beth Judy, Coordinator Office of Assessment and Accountability 1.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Presentation to California Teachers Association State Council.

1 MEAP Assessment Matrix and Design Principles for PROMISE on 8/12/04 Presented by Michael Radke Ph.D. Supervisor, Michigan Educational Assessment Program.

New Hampshire Enhanced Assessment Initiative: Technical Documentation for Alternate Assessments Standard Setting Inclusive Assessment Seminar Marianne.

Georgia Modification Research Study Spring 2006 Sharron Hunt Melissa Fincher.

The State of the State TOTOM Conference September 10, 2010 Jim Leigh Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2014 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting Smarter.

Monitoring Accommodations in South Dakota Linda Turner Special Education Programs.

Assessment Cadre #3: “Assess How? Designing Assessments to Do What You Want”

Statewide Assessment Update Vince Dean, Ph.D. Director, Office of Standards & Assessment January 30, 2013 SIFN.

Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.

NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.

Information on New Regents Examinations for SCDN Presentation September 19, 2007 Steven Katz, Director Candace Shyer, Bureau Chief Office of Standards,

Students in the Gap: Understanding Who They Are & How to Validly Assess Them.

NCEXTEND2 Assessments Mike Gallagher, NCDPI Nadine McBride, NCDPI Sheila Garner Brown, TOPS.

TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction National Center and State Collaborative California Activities Kristen Brown, Ph.D. Common Core.

A Closer Look at Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski Conference.

Social Studies Classroom Based Assessments (CBAs ) Tacoma Public School K – 5 Implementation Plan

Gwinnett Comprehensive Accountability and Assessment System Georgia’s Changing Landscape April 2014.

1 ELPA Initial Screening Policies and Procedures ELPA Initial Screening Policies and Procedures Fall 2009 Michigan Department of Education.

Overview of Michigan’s Secondary Assessments of Science Edward Roeber Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability.

Michigan Merit Examination (MME) Overview Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Pat King Specialist – MME.

A Principled Approach to Accountability Assessments for Students with Disabilities CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, Michigan June.

1 Alternate Assessments Based on Modified Academic Achievement Standards Fen Chou, Ph.D. Louisiana Department of Education GSEG Project Kick-off Meeting.

Modified Achievement Tests for Students with Disabilities: Design Strategies and Experimental Results Stephen N. Elliott Vanderbilt University CCSSO’s.

Michigan Educational Assessment Program MEAP. Fall Purpose The Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) is Michigan’s general assessment.

What are States Doing to Prepare for the Next Generation of Assessments? Planning for and Beyond West Virginia Department of Education Office.

2013 Fall Forum State Assessment Update November 5, 2013 Linda Howley - OSA Joanne Winkelman - OSE.

Enhancing the Technical Quality of the North Carolina Testing Program: An Overview of Current Research Studies Nadine McBride, NCDPI Melinda Taylor, NCDPI.

Guidelines for Participation in State Assessment Vince Dean, State Assessment Manager.

8th Grade Criterion-Referenced Math Test By Becky Brandl, Shirley Mills and Deb Romanek.

Establishing the Validity of Test Accommodations for Students with Disabilities: A Collaborative of State-based Research CTEAG Project Summary of Accomplishments.

Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.

MDE / OEAA 1 Un-distorting Measures of Growth: Alternatives to Traditional Vertical Scales Presentation on June 19, 2005 to 25 th Annual CCSSO Conference.

Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.

The Michigan Department of Education Program Evaluation Tool (PET) Lessons Learned & Support Documents.

Scaled Leadership Professional Development Middle and K-8 Center Administrators Department of English Language Arts-Secondary.

So What is Going to be Happening with State Assessment for Students with Disabilities for 2007/2008? Peggy Dutcher Fall 2007 Assessment and Accountability.

How was LAA 2 developed?  Committee of Louisiana educators (general ed and special ed) Two meetings (July and August 2005) Facilitated by contractor.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California English Language Development Test (CELDT) Program.

Lessons Learned. Communication, Communication, Communication Collaborative effort Support of all stakeholders Teachers, Principals, Supervisors, Students,

The ABCs of Accessibility and Accommodations in State Assessments Martha Thurlow, Sheryl Lazarus, and Laurene Christensen National.

CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study

2016 Back-to-School Update Next-generation MCAS and updating our learning standards District Name Date, 2016.

“Grade-level” and “Competency” Portfolios

Russell Glasgow Marina McCreight Borsika Rabin

The California Alternate Assessments What’s New in 2017–18?

Florida Standards Alternate Assessment Performance Task

Improving the Accessibility of Locally Developed Assessments CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment 2016 Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction,

Next-Generation MCAS: Update and review of standard setting

The California Alternate Assessments What’s New in 2017–18?

Scaled Leadership Professional Development Senior High Administrators

Guidance, Requirements and Preparation for Peer Review of the AA-MAS

Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities

MEAP-Access & MOPLS Update

Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS

OEAA Accountability Update

Recommendation to the Board of Directors: New District Assessments

F1: What’s New for Grade 8 Assessments?

WPIC Research Administrators’ Forum

New Assessments and Accommodations

Perspectives on Equating: Considerations for Alternate Assessments

Presentation transcript:

Michigan’s Lessons and Uses of the CTEAG Adam Wyse and Steve Viger Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability

Michigan’s Part of CTEAG Study Part of larger pilot study to develop a new 2% AA-MAS Focused on grade 6 ELA for CTEAG Investigated Scaffolding and Removing Answer Choices Students in study took general assessment and modified 2% pilot test with scaffolding Results from CTEAG suggested that scaffolding had a positive impact in grade 6 11/10/2018

Challenges Michigan Faced Recruiting schools to do multiple separate administrations Conducting a stand-alone administration Flexibility to fit study within other state administrations and research initiatives Changes in MI staff involved in different stages and parts of project Timing of study Need to provide data back to study participants 11/10/2018

Michigan’s 2% AA-MAS Administered operationally for first time in Fall 2009 Included scaffolding and fewer answer choices Sample of students changed drastically from students identified and administered pilot version in Winter of 2009 Found some technical challenges due to change in student population Decided that additional revisions and modifications were needed before setting cut scores 11/10/2018

Michigan’s 2% AA-MAS Even though revisions of AA-MAS needed still required to submit documents for peer review Submitted results from CTEAG as evidence that MI investigated and will continue to investigate accommodations and modifications on its AA-MAS 11/10/2018

Future Steps for AA-MAS Examined strategies other states are considering on their AA-MAS to increase student access Convened panel of MI stakeholders for what strategies MI should consider Stakeholders provided new recommendations for strategies which included scaffolding in ELA and several new approaches 11/10/2018

Future Steps for AA-MAS New strategies suggested were applied to items and tried out in a cog lab study as part of redesign Results from cog lab study were positive and scaffolding remained an important factor for increasing access in ELA Planning to embed AA-MAS items and new formats on general assessment and top level of AA-AAS to further investigate their performance for a range of students 11/10/2018

Michigan’s Experience Enjoyed project and working with researchers and people from other states Challenged us to think about student accommodations and score comparability in greater depth Learned quite a bit about accommodations and policies in other states 11/10/2018

Conclusions and Other Future Steps Investigating additional approaches to examine score comparability for students with disabilities and students that receive different types of accommodations Interested in working with other states and researchers on projects for AA-AAS and AA-MAS 11/10/2018

Michigan Department of Education 608 W. Allegan St. Lansing, MI 48909 Contact Information Adam Wyse (517) 373-2435 WyseA@Michigan.gov Steve Viger (517) 241-2334 VigerS@Michigan.gov Michigan Department of Education 608 W. Allegan St. Lansing, MI 48909 11/10/2018