Uses of STROBE in real life Questionnaire results

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Choosing a Journal APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.
Advertisements

Doug Elliott Professor, Critical Care Nursing The final step: Presentation and publication Research Workshop: Conducting research in a clinical setting.
How to Review a Paper How to Get your Work Published
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel Member.
Research article structure: Where can reporting guidelines help? Iveta Simera The EQUATOR Network workshop.
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel Co-Chair.
Participation Requirements for a Patient Representative.
Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.
Doug Altman Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, UK
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel PGIN Representative.
How to choose a journal and submit a manuscript Papa Salif Sow.
Critical Appraisal Dr Samira Alsenany Dr SA 2012 Dr Samira alsenany.
Statistical Editor, Health & Social Care in the Community
Publishing in Medical Journals Richard Saitz MD, MPH Section of General Internal Medicine, BMC Professor of Medicine & Epidemiology, BUSM and BUSPH Associate.
“But WHAT did they actually do?” Poor reporting of interventions: a remediable barrier to research translation Associate Professor Tammy
Manuscript Writing and the Peer-Review Process
Publishing a Journal Article: An Overview of the Process Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University
Shobna Bhatia.  Telephone instrument  Computer  Software Instructions nearly always provided However, frequently not read At least, not until things.
Dr. Dinesh Kumar Assistant Professor Department of ENT, GMC Amritsar.
The Online Submission Process: Guidelines and Training for Authors Marlowe H. Smaby, Michael R. Smith, Cleborne D. Maddux.
How your submission will be evaluated by European Urology reviewers: Reviewer template and Publication guidelines Jim Catto Associate Editor European Urology.
Writing a Research Manuscript GradWRITE! Presentation Student Development Services Writing Support Centre University of Western Ontario.
What do editors want? Steve Milanese. Do not remove this notice. Copyright Notice COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 WARNING This material.
INDEXATION CRITERIA Christian Kieling, MD Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Online Editorial Management On-line Management of Scholarly Journals Mahmoud Saghaei.
BMH CLINICAL GUIDELINES IN EUROPE. OUTLINE Background to the project Objectives The AGREE Instrument: validation process and results Outcomes.
"Writing for Researchers" Monday, July :35-3:45PM. Laurence R Weatherley– Spahr Professor of Chemical Engineering, Department of Chemical and.
AuthorAID Workshop on Research Writing Tanzania June 2010.
INANE Meeting –Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing Charon Pierson Geraldine Pearson August 5, 2015.
Intensive Course in Research Writing: Session 1 (27 June 2011)
IADSR International Conference 2012 Aiwan-e-Iqbal Lahore, Pakistan 27–29 April 2012.
FEMS Microbiology Ecology Getting Your Work Published Telling a Compelling Story Working with Editors and Reviewers Jim Prosser Chief Editor FEMS Microbiology.
Jim Neaton PubH 8403 Presentation. Perspective of an Editor: How it Works Controlled Clinical Trials (now Clinical Trials) –25 Associate Editors; a Book.
Research article structure: Where can reporting guidelines help? Iveta Simera The EQUATOR Network workshop 10 October 2012, Freiburg, Germany.
STESEG taskforce on timeliness and benchmarkingJune The Short-term economic statistics: STES Timeliness Framework Richard McKenzie OECD.
Unit 11: Evaluating Epidemiologic Literature. Unit 11 Learning Objectives: 1. Recognize uniform guidelines used in preparing manuscripts for publication.
Jim Neaton PubH 8400 December 12, Perspective of an Editor: How it Works Controlled Clinical Trials (now Clinical Trials) –25 Associate Editors;
해외저널에 논문게재하기 고려대학교 이상민 “scholarly work is rooted in the lively exchange of ideas – conversation at its best” (Huff 1999)
4 Steps to follow when writing an original research article.
Publishing research in a peer review journal: Strategies for success
Dr.V.Jaiganesh Professor
BIO1130 Lab 2 Scientific literature
Manuscript Submission and Review: Perspective of an Editor and Author
Charles R Clark, MD Deputy Editor, JBJS
The peer review process
Journal of Mountain Science
Writing for “Innovations in Family Medicine Education”
AXIS critical Appraisal of cross sectional Studies
Role of peer review in journal evaluation
How to Publish with IEEE
Journal of Tissue Viability & Journal of Clinical Biomechanics Award 2019 Call for papers! The EPUAP Scientific Committee is pleased to invite applications.
STROBE Statement revision
How to publish from your MEd or PhD research
What are reporting guidelines The EQUATOR Network workshop
Engleski jezik struke 3 Sreda,
HOW TO WRITE A SYSTEMATIC/NARRATIVE REVIEW
Firstly, you need to find your journal…
Starter- Debriefing List the Six parts to a debriefing process.
African Journal Partnership Project
Adam J. Gordon, MD MPH FACP DFASAM
BIO1130 Lab 2 Scientific literature
Journal of Tissue Viability & Journal of Clinical Biomechanics Award 2019 Call for papers! The EPUAP Scientific Committee is pleased to invite you to submit.
What the Editors want to see!
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.
Presenting and publishing work
Publication of research
Roya Kelishadi,MD Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Dec18,2018.
MANUSCRIPT WRITING TIPS, TRICKS, & INFORMATION Madison Hedrick, MA
Dr John Corbett USP-CAPES International Fellow
Presentation transcript:

Uses of STROBE in real life Questionnaire results Myriam Cevallos ISPM Bern 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Outline Objectives Methods Results Conclusions 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Objectives Assess how the STROBE recommendations are used in real life 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Methods Online survey about the use of STROBE in real life (May – Aug 2010) Sent to: participants of previous STROBE meetings authors of commentaries, editorials or letters about STROBE journals’ editors, authors of reporting guidelines (Moose, STREGA) translators of STROBE Published in STROBE website and EQUATOR Network newsletter (Aug. 2010) 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Methods 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Methods 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Results N=35 (%) Persons returning completed STROBE questionnaire Researcher active in epidemiological research 24 (69) Editors of biomedical journals 8 (23) Interested but not actively involved in epidemiological research 3 (8) 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Results N=35 (%) When do you use the STROBE checklist Yes No Not applicable When preparing a report of an observational study? 24(73) 5(15) 4(12) When reviewing or making an editorial decision on a given study report, to assess the submitted article? 22(69) 7(22) 3(9) When conducting a systematic review including observational studies? 14(45) 9(29) 8(26) 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Other uses Teaching Young researchers when writing their first paper Appraisal of observational studies workshop Writing workshops Epidemiology lectures Talks on how to write and submit papers to journals Preparing / writing study protocols Planning final manuscript writing process Designing observation epidemiological studies Setting up analysis plan Fulfilling journal’s requirement for paper’s submission Preparing manuscript for external editors 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Particularly useful Structure, simplicity, clarity, easy to apply Concise and practical checklist Template flowcharts Evidence based approach Examples and definitions Open source publication (e.g. PLoS Med) 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

Particularly useful for teaching Checklist (Item 10, 12, 20) Examples and Explanation Detailed explanations Statistical analysis Sources of bias and confounding Interpretation of results Discussion of matching Definitions and Boxes Translations Links and references Objectivity of the guidelines 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

Suggestions for the website A link to the PRISMA-website would be useful Checklists should probably be on the home page, rather than background to STROBE Not clear when authors should used single or combined checklist 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Conclusions Most uses differ from original purpose STROBE has become an important teaching tool STROBE group may considered developing teaching module based on STROBE recommendations Common website structure for all reporting guidelines or common website (EQUATOR?) 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

Journals’ endorsement Myriam Cevallos ISPM Bern 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Outline Objectives Methods Results Examples Conclusions 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Objectives Determine how journals that endorse STROBE incorporated the STROBE recommendations into their online version of “Instructions to authors” 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Methods Random selection of 100 journals that endorse STROBE from the STROBE website Examination of Instructions to authors published on journals’ website (Jun.-Aug. 2010) Extraction of all the text mentioning STROBE Extraction of subject category and impact factor (ISI Journal Citation Reports® Ranking 2009) Google Alerts are emails sent to you when Google finds new results -- such as web pages, newspaper articles, or blogs -- that match your search term You can use Google Alerts to monitor anything on the Web. For example, people use Google Alerts to: find out what is being said about their company or product. 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE website: endorsement section + To: strobe@ispm.unibe.ch + Google Alerts are emails sent to you when Google finds new results -- such as web pages, newspaper articles, or blogs -- that match your search term. You can use Google Alerts to monitor anything on the Web. For example, people use Google Alerts to: find out what is being said about their company or product. 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Results N=100 Instructions to authors Published in journal’s website 98 Not available online 2 ISI web of knowledge Listed in the journal citation report 2009 56 Subject category* MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL 11 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 8 ORTHOPEDICS 4 Others 58 * Some journals are listed in more than one category 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Results N=98  Types of journals‘ endorsement of the STROBE recommendation Journal informs authors on STROBE 27 Journal recommends authors to comply with STROBE 39 Journal requires authors to comply with STROBE Submit completed checklist 14 Refers to EQUATOR or ICMJE* 5 * Mentioned STROBE in previous version of Instructions to authors. Link to EQUATOR or to ICMJE 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Information “Reporting guidelines may be accessed as follows” “The following links may be useful as you prepare your manuscript for submission” “we draw your attention in particular to the following guidelines on the presentation of particular forms of scientific article:” Author Tools & Resources Reporting Guidelines for Specific Study Designs STROBE Observational studies in epidemiology… 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

Journals’ recommendations “Observational studies please follow the STROBE guidelines” “we recommend authors to adhere to the following reporting guidelines:” “Authors are strongly recommended to consult the following reporting guidelines: “ Reports of case control, cohort and crosssectional studies should conform to the STROBE guidelines. 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

Journals’ requirements When an observational study is submitted we will ask authors for: * a completed STROBE checklist - uploaded as a supplemental file to the submitted paper. Research articles must satisfy the following criteria: 7. The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines (e.g. CONSORT, MIAME, STROBE, EQUATOR) and community standards for data availability. The board of Academic Editors, and any invited external peer reviewers, will evaluate submissions against these criteria. Authors are required to follow these guidelines, include a flow diagram within the manuscript, and complete the most appropriate checklist for the submitted paper (cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional design), including it as the last page of the manuscript. Observational studies (cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional designs) must be reported according to the STROBE statement (see also External link http://www.strobe-statement.org). 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

Refers to EQUATOR or ICMJE … AJPM joins other major medical journals in supporting the following reporting guidelines. * The EQUATOR (Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research) network …the ICMJE’s Uniform Requirements. In those requirements, it is also recommended that certain study designs follow particular structures for optimum reporting. Links to those specific recommendations can be obtained from the ICMJE website. 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication (April 2010) Authors are encouraged also to consult reporting guidelines relevant to their specific research design. A good source of reporting guidelines is the EQUATOR Network (http: //www.equator-network.org/home/) 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Results N=87  Included a web address STROBE Statement homepage 63 STROBE publication 9 EQUATOR network website 11 Journal’s internal webpage (STROBE checklist) 3 ICMJE website 1 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Results ISI web of knowledge N=56 Citation report 09 Impact factor median(min/max) Requires 25 4.693 (0.716/30.758) Recommends 21 2.597 ( 0.57/17.457) Informs 8 1.389 (0.203/9.792) Equator/ICMJE 2 5.298 (4.235/6.36) 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Inconsistencies (?) Describe the study design in detail using standard methodological terms, such as retrospective or prospective cohort study, ... …Submissions reporting cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies should conform to the format suggested by the STROBE panel. [Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery] For study types other than Randomized Controlled Trials, the Editors request that you please check the following guidelines prior to submitting your manuscript to ensure that the highest ethical standards for research are maintained. [Annals of Surgery] We encourage creativity and originality and recognize that not all papers can or should meet these guidelines. You will increase the likelihood of acceptance, however, by identifying and justifying deviations from guideline recommendations in the paper or in your cover letter [Annals of Emergency Medicine] STROBE recommend that authors refrain from simply calling a study ‘prospective' or ‘retrospective' because these terms are ill defined [29]. 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Conclusions Encouraging that after 3 years more than 100 journals endorse STROBE Ambiguity in the wording of some journals to whether they require or recommend authors to adhere to STROBE Journals should enforce the use of STROBE recommending authors to submit a completed checklist as a requirement for submission STROBE group may consider providing journals recommendations on how to endorse STROBE 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision

STROBE Statement revision Thanks! 11.11.2018 STROBE Statement revision