Expanding Product Accessibility with Primary Market Research Techniques Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Begin with Knowledge Translation; Have the End – Technology Transfer – in Mind Begin with Knowledge Translation; Have the End – Technology Transfer – in.
Advertisements

Contextualized Knowledge Translation Packages for Technology Transfer and Product Development ATIA Orlando, Florida January 2012 James A. Leahy Center.
Core Monitoring Guide 2005 National Equal Opportunity Training Conference.
Overview of Technology Transfer Process RERC on Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
How to Translate Knowledge in Three States: Discovery, Invention, Innovation Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University.
Committed to Connecting the World 1 Joint ITU/G3ict/DCAD Workshop 89 Multi-Stakeholder Engagement: Imperative for Accessibility The ITU-G3ict Model ICT.
Slide 1 D2.TCS.CL5.04. Subject Elements This unit comprises five Elements: 1.Define the need for tourism product research 2.Develop the research to be.
Module CC3002 Post Implementation Issues Lecture for Week 1 AY 2013 Spring.
Best Practices in Technology Transfer Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
Expanding Product Accessibility with Primary Market Research Techniques Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, University.
Tools for Technical, Business & Consumer Analysis in AT Product Development: Expanding the Need to Knowledge Model Joseph P. Lane, Center on KT4TT University.
Managing & Communicating Knowledge in Three States Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer School.
VoIP Solutions Summit Focus on Disability Access Issues Cary Barbin RERC on Telecommunications Access Gallaudet University.
Knowledge Translation Conference KT Solutions for Overcoming Barriers to Research Use Hosted by SEDL’s Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and.
Knowledge Translation Conference KT Solutions for Overcoming Barriers to Research Use Hosted by SEDL’s Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and.
The KT4TT Knowledge Base: Steps and Supporting Evidence to Improve Your Process! Webcast sponsored by SEDL September 29, 2010, 2:00 pm (Central) / 3:00.
SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT SHARATH CHANDAR REDDY ALETI CSC 532 TERM PAPER.
How to Prepare Yourself for the Next Opportunity in a Tough Economy Bay Area SAS Users Group December 2 nd, 2008 Sri Seepana.
4 Chapter 4: Beginning the Analysis: Investigating System Requirements Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 3 rd Edition.
AmeriCorps Advantage: CaliforniaVolunteers Grantee Training Conference, July 2017 AmeriCorps Advantage: A Career Resource Guide for Life After AmeriCorps.
Stages of Research and Development
Awareness and Outreach Programs
Strategies for Supporting Home Visitors with Data Collection
Application Outsourcing: Achieving Success & Avoiding Risk
Core Competencies Training for Supervisors
Creating Skills-Based Job Postings: An Overview Guide
Core Competencies Training for Supervisors
SELF ASSESSMENT TOOL FURNITURE NEW EUROPEAN SKILLS 2020
Stephen Bauer NIDILRR Program Officer
PACCAR Leasing Marketing Internship
Limited English Proficiency (LEP)
Knowledge Translation Outcome Measurement
Four Models to Guide AT Projects Intending Innovative Technology Development Outcomes Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
Introduction to Internal Audits
Case Management: A Service Delivery Strategy
Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
The Social Model for A/T Technology Transfer – AAATE 2010 “From Problem Identification to Social Validation: An Operational Model” Joseph P. Lane,
Access LA Website Redesign Findings & Recommendations
Translating New Knowledge from Technology Based Research Projects: an End-of-Grant Intervention Evaluation Study. Rationale and Methods Vathsala I. Stone.
Managing & Communicating Knowledge in Three States
How to work a Job Fair.
Four Models to Guide AT Projects Intending Innovative Technology Development Outcomes Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
Tools for Technical, Business & Consumer Analysis in AT Product Development: Expanding the Need to Knowledge Model Joseph P. Lane, Center on KT4TT.
Industry – The missing link between S&T Policy and Societal Benefit.
Best Practices in Technology Transfer
ADA Basics Multiple Choice Quiz
Knowledge Translation Outcome Measurement
Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer (KT4TT)
RESNA 2018 Annual Conference
Knowledge Translation Across RERC Activities
Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
Reconciling Government Policies and Programs with Public Expectations: The Case of Innovation in AT Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation.
Knowledge Utility results from Rigor in Methods & Relevance in Content
The Need to Knowledge (NtK) Model: Orienting Scholar “Technology Grantees” to Best Practices in Transfer & Commercialization Joseph P. Lane, Director.
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
What’s New with VFC? A Lot
1 Stadium Company Network. The Stadium Company Project Is a sports facility management company that manages a stadium. Stadium Company needs to upgrade.
Introduction Acknowledgments Identified need Project objective
How to work a Job Fair.
Presenter: Diana Castillo
The FSDT Tanzania Experience
Nanotechnology & Society
RTW Self Assessment using the 5 Steps
Los Angeles Community College District Office of General Counsel
Re-Framing Agendas: From the Personal to the Policy Level
SPR-B Research Coordination Webinar
RTW Self Assessment using the 5 Steps
Summerour Middle Planning Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Expanding Product Accessibility with Primary Market Research Techniques Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, University at Buffalo

Voice of the Customer Overview of Paper Key Points Resources Introduction- Rather than reiterate what you can read in my conference paper, I would like to take this opportunity to discuss a few key points in the paper, and to introduce you to a few resources that may be helpful to those of you who are conducting focus groups and developing surveys of your own. Brief recap of paper: The paper discusses two case examples of academics utilizing voice of the customer techniques to gather consumer input to guide product development. In both cases, there was a goal of generating product specifications to increase the accessibility and usability of the products being developed. In one case, focus groups were used to generate a listing of desired function and features of an ideal accessible glucose monitoring device. In the other case, surveys were used to identify desired functions and features of a toaster oven. Both cases represented opportunities for academics to add value to projects being led by industry partners. However, these same techniques can be used for internal research and development projects as well. Whether you yourself will bring the product to market, or transfer it to another organization to do so, rigorous voice of the customer methods will help to increase your chances of success. 2

Key Point 1 Manufacturers and service providers R&D staff/ academics You MUST understand your customer’s needs! Manufacturers and service providers Customer = End User/Consumer R&D staff/ academics Customer = Manufacturer Academics can bring end user/consumer needs to a manufacturer, but the information must meet the manufacturer’s own needs. Worked hand in hand with company representatives to design appropriate survey questions Raised awareness of accessibility considerations through discussion and final report Provided services as technical assistance- no cost to the company so long as they provided a thank you letter to share with our sponsor Design suggestions presented such that engineering would decide what to implement and how to go about doing so Helped to avoid “not invented here syndrome”

Example Glucose Meter Specifications

Meeting the Manufacturer’s Needs 5

Key Point 2 Use methods recognized as rigorous by industry standards Problematic Approach Rigorous Approach Single focus group Multiple groups End users only Include other stakeholders Inexperienced moderator Trained knowledgeable moderator Inadequate facilities Accessible, state-of-the-art facilities Lengthy report Top line summary, concise function listing, appendices Structured focus group using industry standard techniques Expanded company’s concept of “the consumer” to include related stakeholders Navigated human subjects testing requirements Provided skilled and knowledgeable moderator Ensured accessibility of all focus group activities Sign language translators; electronic, braille and large print formats for documents; braille signage, handrails

Resources Primary Market Research Training Module Sampling and recruitment Focus groups Surveys Outsourcing considerations Evaluation Resource Guide Basic concepts Case studies Sample Instruments 7

U.S. Department of Education. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This is a presentation of the Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, which is funded by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Department of Education under grant #H133A080050. The opinions contained in this presentation are those of the grantee, and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Education.

Thank you! Any Questions?