22th International AIDS Conference

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2013.
Advertisements

TasP is not enough Stipulated that TasP is effective in reducing infectiousness of the treated person – But much more is required. TasP requires effective.
HIV Science Update: From Rome to Addis – Biomedical Prevention Elly T Katabira, FRCP Department of Medicine Makerere University College of Health Sciences.
Intermittent PrEP Opportunities and Challenges of Oral iPrEP Jean-Michel Molina Department of Infectious Diseases Saint-Louis Hospital, INSERM U941 University.
Characteristics and Oral PrEP Adherence in the TDF2 Open-Label Extension in Botswana Henderson FL 1, Taylor AW 1, Chirwa LI 2,Williams TS 1,3, Borkowf.
N ORTHWEST AIDS E DUCATION AND T RAINING C ENTER PrEP 201: Beyond the Basics Joanne Stekler, MD MPH Associate Professor of Medicine University of Washington.
Effects of an HIV/AIDS peer prevention intervention on sexual and injecting risk behaviors among injecting drug users (IDUs) and their risk partners in.
Pragmatic Open-Label Randomised Trial of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis: the PROUD study
Michael Hughes, MD Assistant Clinical Professor UCR Eisenhower Medical Associates.
N ORTHWEST AIDS E DUCATION AND T RAINING C ENTER CROI 2015: HIV Prevention Updates Ruanne V Barnabas, MBChB Dphil Global Health and Medicine University.
Pharmacist-Managed HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Clinic: Preliminary Outcomes From an Urban Community Health Clinic Mark T. Sawkin, PharmD, AAHIVP.
PrEP Update: The science, new tools, and next steps Dawn K. Smith MD, MS, MPH Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, CDC “The findings and conclusions in this.
N ORTHWEST A IDS E DUCATION AND T RAINING C ENTER Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention Efficacy and the importance of adherence Joanne Stekler,
Looking Ahead to MTN-017 Ross D. Cranston MD, FRCP Microbicide Trials Network IRMA.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
HIV and Women Collaborating Across Borders to Advance the Health of Women IAS 2012 Gina M. Brown, M.D. July 22, 2012.
PrEP Roll-Out In France Jean-Michel Molina Saint-Louis Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Inserm U941, Paris, France.
#AIDS2016 Efficacy of “On Demand” PrEP in the ANRS IPERGAY Open-Label Extension Study JM. Molina, I. Charreau, B. Spire, L. Cotte, J.
Incidence and Correlates of STIs among Black Men who have Sex with Men Participating in a US PrEP Study HPTN 073 Lisa Hightow-Weidman, Manya Magnus, Geetha.
Expanded PrEP implementation across Australia Expanded implementation of PrEP across Australia 1.
Expanded PrEP implementation in NSW (EPIC-NSW) 1 AIDS 2016 | 22 July 2016.
Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV Prevention: What’s the Future? Joanne Stekler, MD MPH Assistant Professor of Medicine University of Washington.
Review of Non-Daily PrEP Clinical Research and Experience
PrEP Case Consultation
The Epidemiology of STIs in the HIV and AIDS Era
Towards ending the AIDS Epidemic: Progress and Evidence
Is on-demand PrEP a suitable tool for MSM who practice chemsex
RALTEGRAVIR vs LPV/R FOR LATE-PRESENTERS PREGNANT WOMEN.
PrEP for HIV Prevention
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Efficacy of “On Demand” PrEP The ANRS IPERGAY Trial
High level of retention and adherence at week 48 for MSM and TGW enrolled in the PrEP Brasil demonstration study Beatriz Grinsztejn, Brenda Hoagland, Ronaldo.
Darrell H. S. Tan1, Jayoti Rana1, Shawn Fowler2, Trevor A
Michael M. Chanda, Katrina F. Ortblad, Magdalene Mwale,
Module 4 (c) Stopping PrEP
A protocol in development IMPAACT Prevention Scientific Committee
On behalf of The MTN-020/ASPIRE Study Team
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
On Demand PrEP for Men at High Risk for HIV IPERGAY
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
David Magnuson, Trevor Hawkins, Robertino Mera
Antibody Mediated Prevention: HVTN 703/HPTN 081 Update
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve Injection Drug Use
PrEP Effectiveness. Preexposure Prophylaxis Translating the Clinical Trials Into Clinical Practice.
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV Infection
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Biomedical Interventions and Risk Compensation
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
The Politics of PrEP The French Experience
Key population-led health services (KP-LHS) critical to PrEP introduction among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) in Thailand.
The cost-effectiveness of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in high-risk men who have sex with men and transgendered women in Brazil Paula M. Luz, Ben Osher,
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
MTN-037 Protocol Overview
100 Partners PrEP[5] Efficacy 75% Adherence 81% 80
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Design Randomisation * 2 : 1 Double blind W12 W16 W24 W28
Share your thoughts on this presentation with #IAS2019
WHO technical brief on event-driven PrEP (ED-PrEP)
It’s Time for PrEP in Latin America and the Carribean
Incidence of HIV-Infection with Daily or On Demand PrEP with TDF/FTC in the Paris Area: An Update of the Prevenir Study JM. Molina, J. Ghosn, M. Algarte-Genin,
STIs in PrEP Users: Are We Propelling the Epidemic?
Bob Holtkamp, Director of Prevention & Outreach
Share your thoughts on this presentation with #IAS2019
Presentation transcript:

22th International AIDS Conference Incidence of HIV-infection in the ANRS Prevenir Study in the Paris Region with Daily or On Demand PrEP with TDF/FTC J.-M. Molina, J. Ghosn, L. Béniguel, D. Rojas-Castro, M. Algarte-Genin, G. Pialoux, C. Delaugerre, Y. Yazdanpanah, C. Katlama, C. Ségouin, S. Morel, C. Pintado, B. Loze, S. Le Mestre, S. Gibowski, V. Doré, L. Assoumou, B. Spire, D. Costagliola, and the Prevenir ANRS study group Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM, Sorbonne University, IPLESP, Coalition PLUS, AIDES, ANRS, SESSTIM, ORS PACA, France 22th International AIDS Conference Amsterdam, July 25, 2018 1

Disclosures Research grants: Gilead Advisory Boards : Merck, Gilead, ViiV, Teva Shareholder: none 2

Background ANRS IPERGAY: high effectiveness of PrEP with oral TDF/FTC taken « On Demand » in high risk MSM. 86% relative reduction in HIV-incidence in the TDF/FTC arm vs placebo (95% CI: 40-98, P=0.002) 97% relative reduction in HIV-incidence in the TDF/FTC arm vs placebo during the open-label extension (95% CI: 81-100) Limited data on real-world experience with On demand PrEP Confirm public health impact of PrEP on the HIV epidemic like in San Francisco and New South Wales Molina et al. NEJM 2015, Lancet HIV 2017

Study Design Open-Label Prospective Cohort Study in the Paris Region http://prevenir.anrs.fr/ Open-Label Prospective Cohort Study in the Paris Region n = 3,000 May 3rd 2017 May 31st 2020 HIV-negative high risk adults Inconsistent Condom use Creat. Clearance > 50 mL/mn HbS Ag negative if On Demand TDF/FTC Daily On Demand Show 15% reduction in new HIV diagnoses among MSM in the Paris Region Participants opted for either Daily or On Demand PrEP and could switch regimens Follow-up every 3 months with 4th Gen ELISA HIV test and plasma creatinine STI screening at physicians’ discretion (Guidelines recommend every 3 months in MSM) Condoms, gels, risk reduction and adherence counseling, Q on sexual behavior 4

Study Objectives Primary Objective To show > 15% reduction of new HIV diagnoses among MSM in the Paris region in comparison with the numbers provided by the National Surveillance network in 2016 (mandatory notification of HIV diagnoses in France) Secondary Objectives Participants characteristics Overall HIV incidence and by dosing regimen (Daily or On Demand) PrEP adherence and coverage of sex events (self-report, dried blood spots) Impact of peer counseling on adherence and retention Sexual behavior (condom use, Nb of sexual acts, Nb of partners, STIs) Safety, tolerability 3,000 pts to be enrolled (85% MSM) with the hypothesis of PrEP efficacy: 80% July 2, 2018: 1628 pts enrolled across 22 sites

Baseline Characteristics Characteristics (Median, IQR) or (n, %) N = 1628 Age (years) 36 (30-44) Caucasian 1385 (85.2) MSM 1607 (98.8) Heterosexual men or women 12 (0.8) Transgender 8 (0.5) No regular sex partner 839 (51.7) History of PrEP use 930 (57.2) Use of Chemsex* 257 (15.8) Slam (drug injection during sexual intercourse) 26 (1.6) On Demand dosing regimen 870 (54.6) Nb condomless sex acts in prior 4 weeks 2 (0-5) Nb sexual partners in prior 3 months 10 (6-20) * at last sexual intercourse : cocaine, GHB, MDMA, mephedrone

Baseline Characteristics Characteristics (Median, IQR) or (n, %) Daily n = 724 (45.4%) On Demand n= 870 (54.6%) P-value Age (years) 36 (30-44) 0.10 MSM 708 (98) 865 (99.4) Heterosexual men or women 7 (0.1) 5 (0.6) <.01 Transgender 8 (1.1) 0 (0) No regular sex partner 380 (53) 437 (51) 0.41 History of PrEP use 408 (56.5) 515 (59.2) 0.28 Use of Chemsex* 128 (17.7) 124 (14.3) 0.06 No. condomless sex acts in prior 4 weeks 3 (1-8) 2 (0-4) <.001 No. sexual partners in prior 3 months 15 (7-25) 10 (5-15) * at last sexual intercourse : cocaine, GHB, MDMA, mephedrone..

Dosing Regimen over Time

Adherence to PrEP / Condoms PrEP / Condom use at last sexual intercourse 2279 sex acts assessed in 1102 participants > M3 (n, %) Daily n = 1088 acts On Demand n = 1191 acts Total n= 2279 Total PrEP use 1068 (98.2) 967 (81.2) 2035 (89.2) Correct use* 1024 (95.8) 931 (96.2) 1955 (96.1) Suboptimal 44 (4.1) 36 (3.7) 80 (3.9) No PrEP 20 (1.8) 224 (18.8) 244 (10.7) Condoms 206 (18.9) 258 (21.6) 464 (20.4) * According to the protocol, or at least one pill before (<24h) and one pill after sex (<24h)

HIV Incidence (ITT Analysis) Treatment Follow-Up Pts-years HIV Incidence per 100 Pts-years (95% CI) TDF/FTC (Daily) 443 0 (0-0.8) TDF/FTC (On Demand) 506 0 (0-0.7) Mean Follow-up in this Open-Label Study: 7 months (SD: 4) Incidence of study discontinuation: 3.3/100 PY including 1.5/100 PY who discontinued PrEP 85 HIV-infections averted* * assuming an incidence of 9.17/100 PY as observed in the ANRS Ipergay study in Paris 10 10

Sexual Behavior Daily On Demand

Viral Hepatitis Infections 11 cases of viral hepatitis were diagnosed in 11 participants Daily 443 Pts-years On Demand 506 Pts-years No. Events Incidence per 100 PY (95% CI) Bacterial STIs Pending All Viral Hepatitis 5 1.1 (0.4-2.6) 6 1.2 (0.4-2.6) HAV 1 0.2 (0.0-1.3) 0.2 (0.0-1.1) HCV 3 0.7 (0.1-2.0) 4 0.8 (0.2-2.0) HEV HBV 0 (0-0.8) 0 (0-0.7) Incidence rate of first Viral Hepatitis 1.1 vs 1.2 per 100 PY in the Daily and On Demand groups

Incidence per 100 Pts-years Adverse Events Daily 443 Pts-years On Demand 506 Pts-years Incidence rate ratio (95% CI) No. Events (Nb pts) Incidence per 100 Pts-years No. Events (Nb pts) Drug-Related AEs 75 (51) 11.5 (8.6-15.1) 91 (63) 12.5 (9.6 -15.9) 0.9 (0.6-1.4) Gastrointestinal 52 (40) 62 (48) Asthenia 7 (6) 7 (7) Cutaneous 3 (2) 5 (5) Headache 3 (3) Any Grade 3 or 4 AE 24 (16) 3.6 (2.1-5.9) 26 (24) 4.7 (3.0-7.1) 0.8 (0.4-1.5) Viral Hepatitis 6 (6) Neuro-psychiatric 11 (5) Treatment D/C due to drug-related AE 0 (0.0-0.8) 0 (0-0.7) .

Incidence per 100 Pts-years Lab Abnormalities Daily 443 Pts-years On Demand 506 Pts-years Incidence rate ratio (95% CI) Nb of first events Incidence per 100 Pts-years All Grades ALAT 202 45.6 (39.5-52.3) 204 40.3 (35.0-46.3) 1.1 (0.9-1.4) Grade 3 or 4 1 2.3 (0.1-12.6) 2.0 (0.1-11.0) (0.0-89.7) Grade 1 Creatinine (<1.5 ULN) 69 15.6 (12.1-19.7) 89 17.6 (14.1-21.7) 0.9 (0.6-1.2) Creat. Clearance [50-70[ ml/mn 67 15.1 (11.7-19.2)

Summary Interim report of an open-label cohort study enrolling mostly MSM High efficacy of Daily and On Demand PrEP in MSM: No breakthrough HIV-infection and 85 HIV-infections averted Pts using Daily TDF/FTC have more partners and more frequent sex High and correct use of PrEP Good safety profile with both dosing regimens and no drug discontinuation for AEs High retention rate Trend toward some increase in risk compensation Data on STIs rates and HIV epidemic are pending 15

PrEP “On Demand”

Acknowledgments The Participants The Sites Investigators and Counselors The Trial Scientific Committee The Community Advisory Board The ANRS Staff INSERM IPLESP http://prevenir.anrs.fr/ 17 17