DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supplement 43 Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HIMSS/RSNAParticipant Workshop, Oct 2004 Nuclear Medicine Image (NM) Integration Profile Kevin O’Donnell IHE Radiology Technical Committee Member, Toshiba.
Advertisements

Radiology Participant Workshop, Oct 2004 Nuclear Medicine Image (NM) Integration Profile Kevin O’Donnell IHE Radiology Technical Committee Member, Toshiba.
THE DICOM 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE & SEMINAR March 14-16Bangalore, India Enhanced CT Image advantages and potential Reinhard Ruf Siemens AG Healthcare.
Joe Luszcz Philips Ultrasound January 4, 2011 DICOM N-Dimensional Presentation State Description and Call for Participation.
ND Presentation State D. Sluis August 21, 2003, WG11 Meeting.
ND Presentation State What should it do? D. Sluis December 2, 2003, Open Discussion at WG11 Meeting, RSNA.
THE DICOM 2014 INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR August 26Chengdu, China Enhanced Multi-frame Images The New Core Paradigm for DICOM Harry Solomon Interoperability.
IHE Profiles for Enhanced DICOM (CT and MR) Kees Verduin Philips Healthcare Chair DICOM WG16.
SNM Info SNMWhat IHE Delivers 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Image Fusion Todd Kantchev TK Medical Systems Jerold Wallis Washington University.
The Medicine Behind the Image DICOM Display Update: Color Presentation States Hanging Protocols Dr. David A. Clunie, MB.,BS., FRACR Chief Technology Officer.
1 DICOM WG-02 Advances in X-Ray Angiography Projection Imaging and 3D SPIE Medical Imaging 2009, Orlando Authors: Tim BeckerEuropean Society of Cardiology.
Radiology Update: CT/MR Contrast Perfusion profile Wim Corbijn van Willenswaard Chair DICOM WG16 Philips Healthcare.
University of Texas at Austin CS 378 – Game Technology Don Fussell CS 378: Computer Game Technology Beyond Meshes Spring 2012.
What’s New in DICOM 2004 Robert Horn Agfa Healthcare Chair DICOM WG-06 (Base Standard)
Structured Reporting - More Complex Examples David A. Clunie NEMA SR Workshop 29th-30th March 2000.
1 DICOM Imaging Pipeline Model Cor loef Philips Medical Systems.
What’s New in DICOM Robert Horn Agfa Healthcare. SPIE, 20 February Extensions Upgrades to existing modalities Additions of new modality objects.
Advances in X-Ray Angiography Projection Imaging and 3D
DICOM International Conference & Seminar Work Item Implants – Current State and Outlook Michael Gessat Thomas Trommer,
What’s New in DICOM Robert Horn, Agfa Healthcare (Chair WG 6) Presented by Bas Revet, Philips Healthcare SPIE 2009.
1 A Glimpse at the emerging Enhanced XA/XRF Object (DICOM Supplement 83) Heinz Blendinger (Chair DICOM WG-02), Rainer Thieme Siemens Medical Solutions.
What’s New in DICOM Robert Horn, Agfa Healthcare SPIE Medical Imaging, 2008.
GE Medical Systems1 Charles Parisot May 5, 2002 GE Medical Systems DICOM Supplement 49 Extended MR DICOM Objects Korean PACS Conference.
IHE Workshop – February 2007What IHE Delivers 1 Marco Eichelberg IHE-D Technical Manager NM Image.
Blending in Functional MRI Wim Corbijn van Willenswaard Chair WG16 (MRI)
First Read of 3D Ultrasound Supplement 43 Working Group 12 Ultrasound (3D) Joe Luszcz, Chair Pro Tem.
Feb 7-8, 2007IHE Participant's Workshop 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Mammography Image – MAMMO Chris Lindop, GE Healthcare Co-Chair Radiology.
Harry Solomon, GE Healthcare RSNA 2007
DICOM INTERNATIONAL DICOM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE & SEMINAR April 8-10, 2008 Chengdu, China Exchanging Imaging Data Herman Oosterwijk Add logo if desired.
 Lossless › Integer wavelet (+/- reversible color transformation).  Either lossless or lossy › Integer or floating point wavelet  Many features! › Region-of-interest.
Exchanging Imaging Data
Sept 13, 2006IHE Webinar 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise NM Image Jerold Wallis Washington University Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Systems Co-chair,
IHE Workshop – June Note to IHE Committees: This is my draft of the IHE Mammography Image Integration Profile talk for the workshop. If I have the.
Supplement 94xx: CT Radiation Dose Reporting (Dose SR) CT Dose Report DICOM WG21 24-Jan-2007 Bernhard.
Volume Rendering Volumetric Presentation State Supplement 190 Public Comment Review Joe Luszcz, Philips Healthcare Chair, DICOM Working Group 11 January.
DICOM 2001: the old, the new and the future Andrei Leontiev Chairman, Working Group 6 IDX Systems Corporation.
DICOM INTERNATIONAL DICOM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE & SEMINAR April 8-10, 2008 Chengdu, China 1 Enhanced MR addresses Multi-Vendor interoperability issues.
DICOM INTERNATIONAL DICOM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE & SEMINAR April 8-10, 2008 Chengdu, China April 9, Application cases using the Enhanced XA SOP.
What’s New in DICOM 2004 Created by: Robert Horn – Agfa Healthcare Chair DICOM WG-06 (Base Standard) Presented by: Bas Revet – Philips.
Volume Rendering Volumetric Presentation State Supplement 190 Public Comment Review Joe Luszcz, Philips Healthcare Chair, DICOM Working Group 11 January.
Presentation to WG-06 by members from: GE, Hologic, Kodak, Philips, Planmed, Siemens DICOM WG-023D X-Ray IOD(s) 31-Oct-2005 Results from WG-02 Meeting,
Volume Rendering Volumetric Presentation State Supplement 190 DICOM Working Group 11 Letter Ballot March 24, 2016.
Consistent Presentation of Images Integration Profile
Understanding the DICOM SR Supplement
Working in the Forms Developer Environment
Procedure for Developing a Multimedia Presentation
Procedure for Developing a Multimedia Presentation
Introduction Multimedia initial focus
System Design.
Ellie Avraham Kodak Health Imaging
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise
Methodology – Physical Database Design for Relational Databases
Physical Database Design for Relational Databases Step 3 – Step 8
Cor Loef Philips Healthcare
Review of WG17 Work Item 1 Output: DICOM Encapsulated STL
ISO 9001:2015 Auditor / Registration Decision Lessons Learned
Ultrasound Image Encoding
SDMX Information Model
Procedure for Developing a Multimedia Presentation
Submission Title: [Channel Page/Number Proposal]
Procedure for Developing a Multimedia Presentation
Procedure for Developing a Multimedia Presentation
Procedure for Developing a Multimedia Presentation
DICOM in Ophthalmology, an Example of a New Enhanced Multiframe Object
Supplement XXX Title of the supplement DICOM Working group
Procedure for Developing a Multimedia Presentation
Procedure for Developing a Multimedia Presentation
Consistent Presentation of Images
Procedure for Developing a Multimedia Presentation
Procedure for Developing a Multimedia Presentation
Presentation transcript:

DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supplement 43 Overview Working Group 12 Ultrasound (3D) Joe Luszcz, Chair Pro Tem

Goal of Supplement 43 Storage of 3D Ultrasound Volume Datasets, 2D views derived from them, and related information Related information includes 3D Presentation State, 3D volume measurements, etc. 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43 Current Status of Sup 43 Just exited Public Comment phase ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/Dicom/Supps/sup43_pc.pdf WG-12 (3D) meeting this week to review comments and prepare Letter Ballot draft Present Letter Ballot draft to WG-6 in March, 2008 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

Characteristics of US Modality Operator-dependent interactive acquisition Multiple data types possible in each acquisition plane Non-image data types acquired with image Lack of a fixed frame of reference Different probe geometries and oblique acquisition planes Real-time imaging at relatively high rates 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43 3D Ultrasound Use Cases 1 Data-related cases 3D Volume Data Static and Dynamic Volume Datasets [1,2,22] Suitable for rendering and slicing [3,4] Volume calibration [5] 2D views derived from Volume Data [6,7,8] Static and Dynamic varieties [9] Calibrated frame data [10] Separation of Data Types [11] Integrate physio waveforms with image [12] 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43 3D Ultrasound Use Cases 2 Workflow-related cases Permit Two-Step Review [13] Frame of Reference Frame and Transducer-relative FoR Patient-relative FoR [14,15] Anatomical FoR (Fiducials) [16] Key Image identification [20] 3D Presentation State [17,18,19] 3D spatial coordinates in SR [21] Some Use Cases are achieved using existing DICOM mechanisms with new Enhanced US Image IOD Use Cases that are grayed out are not achieved in this Supplement 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43 Supplement 43 Concepts Uses same “Enhanced Image” structure used by MR, CT, XA/XRF in which a new Enhanced US Image IOD represents a 3D dataset as a cube of voxels (i.e., a spatial sequence of XY planes) Data types in separate planes (2D, Flow, etc.) with no embedded graphics or text Transducer Frame of Reference (primary) with optional Gantry and Patient Frames of Reference New Enhanced Blending and Display Pipeline for combining data types for display Uses companion Waveform IOD’s for related physio waveforms Derived 2D images represented by US Image IOD’s 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

Ultrasound 3D Image Types While a new Enhanced US Image IOD is created by this supplement, not all 3D-related image types rely on the new IOD 2D types rely on the existing Ultrasound Multi-frame IOD 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43 Why a role for 2D US IOD’s? Ease the transition for 3D ultrasound images on legacy PACS Provide separate SOP Classes for two-stage query/retrieval Maintain images with integrated data types for direct presentation on viewers Defer the work of generalizing Enhanced US for 2D images 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43 Not in Supplement 43 Line or frustum data representations (if desired, use linked Raw Data IOD) Use of Enhanced US IOD as 2D replacement (future activity) Oblique volume datasets (oblique views relegated to US-MF IOD) Attempts to standardize rendering and slicing algorithms (may differ in appearance) Interoperability considerations 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43 What is covered by Sup43? New Enhanced US Image IOD for 3D volume datasets Single (“3D”) or Multiple temporally-related volumes (aka “4D”, “3D loop”, “3D animation”) “Slices” consisting of one or more frames of distinct data types at same space and time 3 new Waveform IOD’s Frame of reference for hand-held transducer as well as gantry and patient Frames of reference 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

What is covered (continued) MONOCHROME2 data representation New Enhanced Blending and Display Pipeline defines grayscale and/or color presentation for single or multiple data types Support for multi-palette color LUTs for data frames in the same image New Ultrasound Application Profiles Carry-over of ultrasound exam context from existing US image IOD’s, many as Code Sequences 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43 Q & A 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

Backup Slides

DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43 Slice Registration Each Volume is represented as a collection of “slices”. 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

Separation of Data Types 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

Use of Multi-Frame Dimension Attributes defining data type alignment use existing Multi-frame Dimensions Typical order of significance: Stack ID (most significant) Temporal Position Index In-Stack Position Data Type (least significant) 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

Common Values Sequence New “Common Values SQ” provides high-level view of dimensional symmetry For each dimension, indicates those attributes that share the same value in every frame with the same value of the dimension attribute Augments, but doesn’t replace “Per-Frame Functional Groups” 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

Transducer Marker Orientation Attribute specifying the orientation of a “tactile marker” relative to the image data. Enumerated values: POS_X the image is oriented such that the tactile marker is in the direction of positive X NEG_X the image is oriented such that the tactile marker is in the direction of negative X 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43 US Frames of Reference 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

Patient Frame Of Reference 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

Patient FoR Transformation Transducer Gantry Position and Orientation attributes containing a translation vector SXYZ and 3 “directional cosines” XXYZ, YXYZ, and ZXYZ indicating the position and orientation of the Gantry FoR relative to the Transducer FoR according to the following transformation: 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

Representation of Color Images “MONOCHROME2” photometric interpretation used for all Enhanced US Image data values Presentation State used to associate palette color LUT’s for color representation (colorized tissue or flow/TDI data) Types combined in the new Enhanced Blending and Display Pipeline 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

Blending and Display Pipeline 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43 Is Blending for 2D or 3D? Written in terms of 2D Data Frames, but it is applicable to any 2D result of a slicing or rendering operation that preserves individual data types transformation into RGB volume prior to slicing or rendering operation 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43 Physio Waveforms Conveyed in separate Waveform objects… Linked with the image object via bi-directional SOP Instance UID references Synchronized via Acquisition Datetime values in a common time reference With each waveform type in a separate Waveform SOP Class With gated acquisition info via R-Wave identification through the Waveform Annotation Module and excluded beats identified via the Volume Timing module, permitting our “Live 3D stacked ECG display” 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43 Stacked ECG Display 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43 Volume Timing 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43 Known Open Issues 1) Section C.8.X.1: Coverage of 3D Stress and improved 2D Protocols (Staged and Non-Staged) is intended. Does this provide enough flexibility for so-called “custom protocols”? 2) Section C.8.X.1: Not sure what should be included in “Protocol Context” or its Modifier. [added v25] 9) The Enhanced Palette Color Lookup Table describes an improved Enhanced Blending and Display Pipeline. Is the level of complexity correct (flexible enough, yet implementable in readers). Please review this pipeline to verify whether the flexibility is sufficient yet not excessively complex. [added v31] 10) No new Presentation State SOP Class has been defined to reference the Enhanced Blending and Display Pipeline. [added v31] 11) Add authoritative references for sample frequency range for Arterial Pulse Waveform, Respiratory Waveform and Phonocardiographic Waveform. [added v32] 12) What are the appropriate numbers of channels and sample frequencies for the new Pulse, Respiration, and Phonocardiologic Waveform IODs? Are the Waveform Sample Interpretation attribute values correctly defined (linear, logarithmic, etc.)? [added v33] 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43 More Known Open Issues 13) Should the Enhanced US IOD require the use of the VOI LUT module or macro? [added v33] 14) Would a blending pipeline with symmetric primary and secondary path be more helpful in terms of easier implementation considering that it would be implementation of symmetric path or would that increase the complexity of the pipeline without much value to it? [added v33] 15) What should be the media application profile for Ultrasound? Should the General Purpose media profile be used, or should the existing Ultrasound application profile be extended for Enhanced Ultrasound object, as appears in this draft? [added v35] 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43

DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43 More Known Open Issues 16) The Enhanced US Image Module (Section C.8.X.3) includes a number of optional attributes from the existing US Image Module (ps3.3 Section C.8.5.6). Is it appropriate to keep the following Type 3 attributes in the Enhanced US Image Module, and if so, is the form correct (defined terms vs. code sequence values, for example)? Beat Rejection Flag (0018,1080) Transducer Data (0018,5010) Focus Depth (0018,5012) Preprocessing Function (0018,5020) Mechanical Index (0018,5022) Bone Thermal Index (0018,5024) Cranial Thermal Index (0018,5026) Soft Tissue Thermal Index (0018,5027) Soft Tissue-focus Thermal Index (0018,5028) Soft Tissue-surface Thermal Index (0018,5029) Depth of Scan Field (0018,5050) 17) The Transducer Type attribute (0018,6031) attribute has been replaced with the two code sequence attributes: Transducer Type Code Sequence (0018,xx09) and Transducer Type Modifier Code Sequence (0018,xx0A), with corresponding Context Groups CID xxx05 and CID xxx06. Is this information necessary? Is this scheme acceptable and are the choices in the Context Groups correct and complete? [added v35 and modified v38] 11/11/2018 DICOM 3D Ultrasound Supp 43