Calculating Hydrologic Parameters for Estimating Surface Water Flow at Ungaged Locations Richard Hoffpauir Water Resources Engineering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WRAP Hydro Data Model: Its Structure and application to find Input Parameters for the Water Rights Analysis Package Centre For Research In Water Resources.
Advertisements

Introduction to NHDPlus: A Framework for Advanced Water Applications Cindy McKay Horizon Systems Corporation Cindy McKay Horizon Systems Corporation.
Kinematic Routing Model and its Parameters Definition.
Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
City of Austin Water Quality Master Planning - GIS Model David Maidment Francisco Olivera Mike Barrett Christine Dartiguenave Ann Quenzer CRWR - University.
National Hydrography Data Use and Applications.
CURVE NO. DEVELOPMENT STEP 8 Soils data, land use data, watershed data, and CN lookup table are used to develop curve numbers for use in the SCS Curve.
PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005.
1-Degree USGS DEM Control Points Locations National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Drainage Lines Corrected Stream Lines Filled DEM Burned DEM Flow Area Accumulation.
Application of HEC- HMS for Hydrologic Studies Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering CVEN689 – Applications of GIS in CE Instructor: Dr.
CVEN 689 Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Estimating Salt Concentration at Ungaged Locations from Parameters derived using GIS Ganesh Krishnamurthy Water.
School of Geography FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT School of Geography FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT GEOG5060 GIS and Environment Dr Steve Carver
Urban Storm-Water Management Plan Utilizing Arc View and HEC-HMS College Station, Texas Kara Corcoran CVEN 689.
SPARROW Water- Quality Modeling: Application of the National Hydrography Dataset What is SPARROW? Use of NHD SPARROW results By Craig Johnston and Richard.
NHD Watershed: Tools and Applications
NHD Stream Order Possibilities Timothy R. Bondelid Research Triangle Institute Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (919) ; fax (919)
A Cell to Cell Routing Model A Cell to Cell Routing Model By : Rajeev Raina CVEN 689 Civil Engineering Applications of GIS Instructor : Dr. Francisco Olivera.
Flow Time Time Series Hydro FeaturesHydro Network Channel System Drainage System ArcGIS Hydro Data Model.
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation Understanding How to use Reading
Introduction National Hydrography Dataset Plus (NHDPlus) Version 2.
GIS in Watershed Analysis. Why watershed Analysis with GIS? Concepts Important datasets Analysis Tools.
WATER AVAILABILITY MODELING for the SULPHUR RIVER BASIN Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Austin, Texas Consultant: R. J. Brandes Company.
Hydrology Laboratory Research Modeling System (HL-RMS) Introduction: Office of Hydrologic Development National Weather Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric.
Vision for the National Geospatial Framework for Surface Water Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological.
Section 5. New England SPARROW River Reach Network Assembling the stream network Generation of reach catchments Estimation of Stream-flow and velocity.
The Effects of Vegetation Loss on the Two Elk Creek Watershed as a Result of the Proposed Vail Category III Ski Area Development CE 394 K.2 By Dave Anderson.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Processing ArcHydro Datasets with NHDPlus Version 2, Emphasizing StreamStats Data Development Webinar.
Processing Elevation Data. Limitations of DEMs for hydro work Dates Static, does not evolve Matching to linear line work due to scale Processing errors.
Arc Hydro and Modeling Intrinsic Modeling – within a particular application eg Excel, ArcGIS Dynamic Linked Library – tightly coupled package of functions.
Map-Based Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics David R. Maidment Jan 10, 1998.
1 Contractor for the USGS at the EROS Data Center NHD Plus as a geospatial framework for drought indicators Jim Verdin.
Introduction to GIS in Water Resources David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin CRWR.
Using GIS to aid in Modeling the Susquehanna River Basin Presented by Monica Wedo December 5, 2000.
Hydrologic Objects for Modeling: One Viewpoint Thomas A. Evans US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Idaho District Office (208) Estimating Hydropower Potential Using EDNA Stage.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Reston, Virginia (703) NHD Flow and Velocity Project Greg Schwarz, Reston,
Determining Watershed Parameters for Water Rights in the Cypress River Basin By: Hema Gopalan GIS in Water Resources (C E 394K) Fall 2001.
Building Hydrologic Information Systems David R. Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Modeling.
Watershed Parameters for Water Rights in the Trinity River Basin Melissa Figurski CE 394K.
HEC-PrePro Workshop GIS Research Group Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Francisco Olivera HEC-PrePro v. 2.0 Workshop.
Water Availability Modeling in the State of Texas CE 394 K.2 - Surface Water Hydrology University of Texas at Austin David Mason.
WATERWAYS AND BRIDGES IN TEXAS “Final” Presentation by: Brandon Klenzendorf CE 394K Dr. Maidment.
Section 5. Chesapeake Bay Network Generation CB watershed –~ 64,000 square miles –~ 166,000 square kilometers Constructed 3 models Version I –ERF1, ~1300.
Using the NHDPlus for drainage area delineation and site matching Kirsten Cassingham, NC Water Science Center Silvia Terziotti, NC Water Science Center.
Water Availability 1996 Texas drought –Governor Bush asks “how much water do we have? How much are we using? How much do we need?” -- Ooops. No good answers!
Submitted by: Stephanie L. Johnson
Ten Reasons to Use South Carolina’s Surface Water Quantity Models
Map-Based Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics
National Hydro Data Programs
Approaches to Continental Scale River Flow Routing
Map-Based Hydrology and Hydraulics
Water Rights Analysis Package A Front-end Look at the WRAP Model
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation
Midwest Regional Flood Frequency Analysis
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
GIS in Water Resources Presentation By: Zac Sharp
GIS FOR HYDROLOGIC DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN OF HIGHWAY DRAINAGE FACILITIES by Francisco Olivera and David Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources.
CRWR-PrePro HMS Schematic and Basin File
Relating Actual Runoff to Potential Runoff
Regional Hydraulic Model for the City of Austin
Provo River Watershed Modeling with WMS Ryan Murdock.
Little Bear River 100-Year Storm Flood
Calculation of River Stages in Bastrop, Lee and Milam Counties Overlying the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer Shiva Niazi 4/29/99 CE 394K2.
From GIS to HMS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center University of Texas at Austin Center for Research in Water Resources Francisco.
Rainfall Runoff in the Guadalupe River Basin
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Development of a Hydrologic Model for the Wichita Falls District
HEC-HMS Runoff Computation Modeling Direct Runoff with HEC-HMS Empirical models Empirical models - traditional UH models - traditional UH models - a.
Hydrologic modeling of Waller Creek
Presentation transcript:

Calculating Hydrologic Parameters for Estimating Surface Water Flow at Ungaged Locations Richard Hoffpauir Water Resources Engineering

Gaged Locations

Ungaged Locations

Estimating Flow at Ungaged Locations Proportional change in drainage area and average upstream parameters

Linear Relationship Assumed Gaged Ungaged

Other Methods for Estimating Flow at Ungaged Locations Modifying an emperical model calibrated to a gaged location (e.g. SCS Curve Number Method) Regionalized precipitation-runoff regression Hydrologic simulation (e.g. HEC-HMS)

Why is this important? Surface water withdrawl permits are not always granted next to stream gaging stations. Flow at the permitted location is used to determine the user’s withdrawl reliability. Further complicating the scenario, the permitted volume of withdrawl affects the flow and reliability for downstream users.

1997 Texas Senate Bill 1 Comprehenisive regional water resources planning for future demands and droughts Water Availability Modeling (WAM) Water Rights Analysis Package (WRAP)

Application of WRAP Flow at ungaged locations is typically modeled using parameter ratios. Priority based water allocation model Existing water management policies can be evaluated with historical stream flow data. Proposed water withdrawl permits are evaluated based on their impact to downstream users.

WRAP Parameters ArcView Script Brad Hudgens CRWR Online Report 99-4 Interface to simplify calculation of upstream parameters for a set of control points on a stream network

Objectives of My Project Develop GIS datasets for the Brazos River Basin (e.g. flow accumulation, stream network, control points, CN, precip, etc) and to become proficient with the WRAP Parameters ArcView tools. Compare hydrologic parameters obtained at 67 control points to the values submitted to the TNRCC as part of the WAM project for the Brazos.

Datasets Used for this Project Grid: USGS 1-Degree DEM (1:250,000 accuracy) Grid: U.S. Curve Number Grid: U.S. Mean Annual Precipitation Lines: EPA RF3 and NHD Channel Lines (1:100,000 accuracy) Points: Control Point Locations

Brazos River Basin Los Brazos de Dios 46,000 sq. miles 36,000 sq. miles contributing 16% of surface area of Texas 25 Hydrologic Unit Codes (HUC’s)

WRAP Parameters Method Stream Channels Corrected Channels Burned DEM Flow Area Accumulation Stream Network DEM Filled DEM CN and Avg. Rain Area, CN, Rain Accumulation Control Points Flow Distribution Parameters original datasets

Correcting RF3 Channel Lines Replacing open water boundaries with channel centerlines Deleting braided channels Removing or connecting broken channels Erasing interior dangling nodes

Replacing Open Water Body Boundaries

Deleting Braided Channels

Flow Area Accumulation Grid

Stream Network

Why Build a Stream Network? Control point locations may match exactly to channel grid cells in the flow accumulation grid. Snapping control points to the stream network lines ensures the control points will define the correct outlet locations on the flow accumulation grid. Downstream control points can be identified on the stream network and incremental subwatershed changes in hydrologic parameters can be computed.

67 Control Points

WRAP Parameters Method Stream Channels Corrected Channels Burned DEM Flow Area Accumulation Stream Network DEM Filled DEM CN and Avg. Rain Current Status Area, CN, Rain Accumulation Control Points Flow Distribution Parameters original datasets