EDCF TCID, Queues, and Access Parameters Relationship

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /272a Submission June 2001 S. Choi, Philips Research Slide 1 Problems with IEEE (e) NAV Operation and ONAV Proposal Javier del.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 1 Aligning e HCF and h TPC Operations Amjad Soomro, Sunghyun.
Doc.: IEEE /413r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 1 Can EDCF Support QoS? Sunghyun Choi Philips Research-USA Briarcliff Manor,
Doc.:IEEE /223r1 Submission March 2002 J. del Prado and S. Choi, Philips Slide 1 CC/RR Performance Evaluation - Revisited Javier del Prado and.
Doc. :IEEE /314r0 Submission Sai Shankar et al., Philips ResearchSlide 1 May 2002 TXOP Request: in Time vs. in Queue Size? Sai Shankar, Javier.
Doc.: IEEE /630r1a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research November 2001 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.
Doc.: IEEE /630r4a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research January 2002 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.
Doc.: IEEE /289r0 Submission Bobby Jose,Slide 1 March 2002 CC/RR Alternatives HCF Adhoc Discussion Work Sheet V00.04 Bobby Jose, et.al
Doc.: IEEE /1123r0 Submission September 2010 Zhu/Kim et al 1 Date: Authors: [TXOP Sharing for DL MU-MIMO Support]
Doc.: IEEE /605r3 Submission November 2001 S. Kandala, et. al. Slide 1 CFB Ending Rule under HCF Srinivas Kandala, Ken Nakashima, Yashihiro Ohtani.
3rd NYMAN Javier, Sai and Sunghyun Sept Philips Research USA Slide 1 Multimedia Clock Synchronization over WLAN Javier del Prado and Sai Shankar.
IEEE EDCF: a QoS Solution for WLAN Javier del Prado 1, Sunghyun Choi 2 and Sai Shankar 1 1 Philips Research USA - Briarcliff Manor, NY 2 Seoul National.
IEEE MAC Enhancements for Quality of Service
Doc.: IEEE /195 Submission July 2000 Sunghyun Choi, Philips ResearchSlide 1 Dynamic Channel Selection (DCS) Scheme for G. Cervello, S.
doc.: IEEE /243r2 Submission May 2001 Mathilde Benveniste, AT&T Labs - ResearchSlide 1 Proposed Changes to the e D1.0 Draft Mathilde Benveniste.
Doc.: IEEE /243r1 Submission May 2001 Mathilde Benveniste, AT&T Labs - ResearchSlide 1 Proposed Changes to the e D1.0 Draft Mathilde Benveniste.
QoS Guarantees for Real Time Applications in WLANs Kiran P Diwakar Guide: Prof. Sridhar Iyer.
Doc: IEEE /625r1 Submission Amjad Soomro et. al September 2002 Slide 1 TGe ‘Fast track’ proposed Draft Normative Text Changes Sai Shankar, Javier.
Doc.: IEEE /361 Submission October 2000 Wim Diepstraten, LucentSlide 1 Distributed QoS resolution Greg Chesson-Altheros Wim Diepstraten- Lucent.
Doc.: IEEE /577r0 Submission July 2003 Qiang NI, Pierre Ansel, Thierry Turletti, INRIASlide 1 A Fair Scheduling Scheme for HCF Qiang Ni, Pierre.
Doc.:IEEE /517r0 Submission August 2002 IBM Research Slide 1 Some Clarifications to IEEE e, Draft 3.2, August 2002 H.L. Truong and G. Vannuccini.
Doc.:IEEE /566r2 Submission November 2001 S. Choi, Philips & M.M. Wentink, Intersil Slide 1 Multiple Frame Exchanges during EDCF TXOP Sunghyun.
Doc.: IEEE /110 Submission May 2000 Sunghyun Choi, Philips ResearchSlide 1 QoS Support in : Contention-Free MAC Perspective Sunghyun Choi.
IEEE e Performance Evaluation
An Access Mechanism for Periodic Contention-Free Sessions
Implementation for Intra-AC Differentiated Services
AP access procedure for UL MU operation
IEEE : Wireless LANs ALOHA, Slotted ALOHA
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
HCF medium access rules
EDCF TXOP Bursting Simulation Results
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
CC/RR Performance Evaluation - Revisited
802.11e features for the enterprise
EDCF Traffic Categories and Access Parameters
Speaker:Fu-Yuan Chuang Advisor:Ho-Ting Wu Date:
New OFDM SERVICE Field Format for .11e MAC FEC
Simulation for EDCF Enhancement Comparison
HCF Duration Field Set Rules
PCF vs. DCF: Limitations and Trends
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Resolution for CID 118 and 664 Date: Authors: Month Year
EDCF Issues and Suggestions
Terminology Corrections and Improvements for the TGe Draft
MDA comments categorization
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
HCF Channel Access And Inter-BSS Channel Sharing
Clarification on Some HCF Frame Exchange Rules
HCF medium access rules
Management Frame Channel Access Latency in TGh
Neighborhood Capture and OBSS
Clarification on Some HCF Frame Exchange Rules
802.11e features for the enterprise
HCF medium access rules
Acknowledgement for Multicast Streams
A Fair Scheduling Scheme for HCF
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Multiple Frame Exchanges during EDCF TXOP
HCF medium access rules
Schedule Element Synchronization and Simplification
NAV Operation Rules under HCF
Request Element for DFS in TGh
802.11g Contention Period – Solution for Co-existence with Legacy
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
NAV Operation Rules under HCF
Month Year doc.: IEEE /1081r0 May, 2016
Power Consideration for Multi-link Transmissions
TXOP Request: in Time vs. in Queue Size?
Presentation transcript:

EDCF TCID, Queues, and Access Parameters Relationship Month 1998 doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/xxx October 2001 EDCF TCID, Queues, and Access Parameters Relationship Sunghyun Choi, Sai Shankar, and Javier del Prado Philips Research USA Briarcliff Manor, New York sunghyun.choi@philips.com Atul Garg Philips Semiconductors San Jose, California S. Choi, Philips

Problem Statement per 802.11e/D1.2 October 2001 Problem Statement per 802.11e/D1.2 TCID (from 0 to 7) = priority parameter in MA-UNIDATA.request 802.11e EDCF AP is required to implement at least 4 physical queues. 802.11e ESTA may implement fewer than 8 physical queues. Which queue each frame should be fed to, and how to access channel for each frame? S. Choi, Philips

8 EDCF Access Parameters (AIFS, CWmin, ...) October 2001 Three Mappings >8 Traffic Types M0 8 Priorities = TCID M1 <= 8 Physical Queues M2 8 EDCF Access Parameters (AIFS, CWmin, ...) S. Choi, Philips

October 2001 Goal M1 & M2 should be specified in 802.11e to achieve a fair access by ESTAs M0 is out of the scope of 802.11e Refer to other spec, e.g., 802.1d Annex H.2 S. Choi, Philips

Problematic Descriptions in D1.2 October 2001 Problematic Descriptions in D1.2 9.1.1: “A station may implement fewer than 8 physical queues and provide a mapping from traffic categories to the available queues.” 9.2.3.4: “An EDCF station that provides fewer than 8 output queues shall use the TxAIFS[TC] slot boundary for queue[i] where TC is the highest priority TC assigned to queue[i].” What happens if a STA assigns TC=0-7 to one queue when it knows that it will need to serve TC=0 frames only? TC=0 frames will be served using TC=7 parameters!!! S. Choi, Philips

Questionable Descriptions in D1.2 October 2001 Questionable Descriptions in D1.2 9.2.3.4: “A STA using the EDCF shall be allowed a transmit opportunity (TxOP) for a particular Traffic Class (TC) if its carrier sense mechanism (see 9.2.1) determines …” 9.10: “ESTAs may transmit multiple frame exchange sequences within these TXOPs, as well as in {E}DCF TXOPs under HCF, subject to the limit of TXOP duration.” What happens if you have frames of different TCs in one queue? Are you allowed to transmit these frames in one TXOP limit? S. Choi, Philips

October 2001 Proposed Solutions S. Choi, Philips

M1: TCID -> Queue Number October 2001 M1: TCID -> Queue Number Reference: 802.1d-1998 Table 7-2 S. Choi, Philips

M2: Queue -> Access Parameters October 2001 M2: Queue -> Access Parameters Use access parameters of the frame at the head of the queue. By using this mapping, we can make M1 a recommended practice. S. Choi, Philips

October 2001 EDCF TXOP Operation During an EDCF TXOP, ESTA may transmit multiple frames from the same physical queue. After the final frame within an EDCF TXOP, the post back-off for the queue will be done using: the access parameters, used for the TXOP acquisition, if the queue is empty, or the access parameters, corresponding to the frame at the head of the queue, if the queue is non-empty. S. Choi, Philips

October 2001 EDCF TXOP Operation During an EDCF TXOP, ESTA may transmit multiple frames from the same physical queue. After the final frame within an EDCF TXOP, the post back-off will be done using: the access parameters, used for the TXOP acquisition, if all the queues are empty, or the access parameters, corresponding to the next frame to be transmitted, if there is any non-empty queue. S. Choi, Philips

Number of Queues Comparison October 2001 Number of Queues Comparison Implementing smaller number of queues may degrade the performance of the high priority frames. It may upgrade the performance of the low priority frames though. S. Choi, Philips