Please silence your electronic devices.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2013 College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All.
Advertisements

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All of.
College and Career Ready Performance Index (CCRPI) The NEW Report Card in Georgia.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
Achievement Points (70 pts) Progress Points (15 pts ) Achievement Gap (15 pts) Challenge Points (10 pts) CRCTs (28 pts) Readiness (21 pts) Graduation Predictor.
Georgia’s College and Career Ready Performance Index Martha R. Reichrath, Ph.D. Deputy State Superintendent Georgia Department of Education Office of Curriculum,
CCRPI Trends and Achievement Gap Details. Pioneer RESA Evaluation & Assessment.
Understanding Wisconsin’s New School Report Card.
February 21, /6/ College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School Model Grades DRAFT Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent.
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
State Charter Schools Commission of Georgia SCSC Academic Accountability Update State Charter School Performance
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
J. W. DOBBS ELEMENTARY DATA OVERVIEW FOURTH GRADE TEAM NOVEMBER 21, 2013.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Sonoraville Elementary Parent Meeting February 3, 2015.
Glynn County Schools February 2010 Parent and Student Information Session.
California Standards Test (CST) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Results, Oakland Unified School District Division of Student Achievement.
School Climate and Culture- A Family Affair CCRPI-A Family Affair.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Rome City Schools Professional Learning Advisory Committee Results of the FY13 Professional Learning Needs Assessment Ms. Debbie Downer Director of Curriculum.
 Educator Effectiveness System  Comparative Measures  Resource for Professional Development.
Professional Learning Advisory Committee Results of FY-2011 Needs Assessment Ms. Debbie Downer April 28, 2011.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Tift County High School ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING SY16 Tap Knowledge – Capture Wisdom - Harness Talents -Sculpt Minds.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
Professional Learning Advisory Committee Results of FY Needs Assessment Ms. Debbie Downer April 30, 2012.
Test Scores Comparison completed using Spring CRCT reports Natalie Hayes.
JDES TEST DATA SCHOOL WIDE DATA – ALL SUBJECTS 2013 Reading92% ELA89% Mathematics84% Science75% Social Studies75%
Panter Elementary Title I Agenda Meet and Greet Invitation to provide input on the development of: Family-School Compacts (What can I do at.
CCRPI Title I Parent Involvement PowerSchool Attendance Welcome to Buford Middle School Curriculum & Parent Involvement Night.
CCRPI FY 2017 Data Collections Annual Conference August 24, 2016
Overview of the Redesigned CCRPI
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
Objectives Define what Title I is and why it is important to be a Title I school Highlight your rights as a Title I parent Describe ways you can be involved.
Eddie J. White K-8 Academy Clayton County Public Schools
West Haven Next-Generation Accountability Report
NHCS READY Report October 2016.
Understanding Your Child’s Report Card
CCRPI Progress/ Gap /SLDS They work hand in hand
Faculty Meeting July 28, :30 p.m.
Accountability Measures A perspective on how to “Beat the Odds”
Welcome to STAAR Parent Night January 18, 2018 Hutchison Elementary
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
ECHOLS COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL April 12, 2016 Middle School Teachers
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
PVSD PDE School Performance Profile
Overview of the GSGM Student Reports for Parents
Georgia’s College and Career Ready Performance Index
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model
College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades
Overview of the GSGM Student Reports for Parents
Every Student Succeeds Act Update
Florida Standards Assessment Parent Night
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Understanding the CCRPI
Presented by: Chesley Taylor
Understanding the CCRPI
Understanding the CCRPI
Georgia’s College and Career Ready Performance Index
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
Presentation transcript:

Please silence your electronic devices. Happy New Year! January 5, 2015 Please silence your electronic devices.

CCRPI Overall Scores 2012 - 66.8 2013 - 72.1 2014 - 66.7

Historical Scores by Category for WC Elementary Scores 2012 - 65.7 2013 - 71.6 2014 - 64.8 6th Grade Scores 2012 - 75.3 2013 - 76.5 2014 - 81.2

Comparison among RCS Schools East Central 86.2 West End 84.2 Elm Street 72.8 West Central 66.7 North Heights 65.5 Southeast 61.7 Main 49.5 Rome Middle 80.2 Rome High 69.5

Elementary Scores Comparison # School Indicators 2012 % change 2013 2014 1 Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds in ELA (required participation rate >= 95%) 90.6 1.8 88.8 87.8 2 Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds in reading (required participation rate >= 95%) 89.1 1.2 90.3 1.9 92.2 3 Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds in mathematics (required participation rate >= 95%) 85.1 3.8 81.3 80.1 4 Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds in science (required participation rate >= 95%) 67 5.8 72.8 0.1 72.7 5 Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds in social studies (required participation rate >= 95%) 57.5 20.5 78 1.7 76.3 6 Percent of English Learners with positive movement from one Performance Band to a higher Performance Band as measured by the ACCESS for ELLs 67.5 10.2 77.7 5.6 72.1

7 Percent of Students With Disabilities served in general education environments greater than 80% of the school day 96.8 6.8 90 5 95 8 Percent of students scoring Meets or Exceeds on the Grade Five Writing Assessment (required participation rate >= 95%) 65.8 12.4 78.2 1.8 80 9 Percent of students in grade 3 achieving a Lexile measure equal to or greater than 650 36.4 5.4 41.8 48.8 10 Percent of students in grade 5 achieving a Lexile measure equal to or greater than 850 31.2 20.6 51.8 2.6 54.4 11 Percent of students in grades 1-5 completing the identified number of grade specific career awareness lessons aligned to Georgia’s 17 Career Clusters na --------- 100 ------- 12 Student Attendance Rate (%) 97.4 0.7 96.7 0.9 97.6 13 Percent of students in Grade 5 passing at least 5 courses in core content areas (ELA, reading, mathematics, science, social studies) and scoring at Meets or Exceeds on all CRCT 49.4 14.7 64.1 73.1 14 Percent of CRCT assessments scoring at the Exceeds level (ELA, reading, mathematics, science, social studies) 16.1 4.9 21 21.3 42.3

ED/EL/SWD Performance Points Progress Progress Points Earned 2012 2013 2014 16 0.1 15.9 0.6 15.3 Achievement Gap Achievement Gap Points Earned 6 3 9 ED/EL/SWD Performance Points ED/EL/SWD Performance Points Earned 5.2 2.7 2.5 1.2 1.3 Exceeding the Bar Exceeding the Bar Points Earned 0.5 1 --------

6th Grade Comparison # School Indicators 2012 2013 2014 1 Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds in ELA (required participation rate >= 95%) 89.2 5.4 94.6 0.5 95.1 2 Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds in reading (required participation rate >= 95%) 93.2 2.7 95.9 1.7 97.6 3 Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds in mathematics (required participation rate >= 95%) 77 6.8 83.8 4 Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds in science (required participation rate >= 95%) 68.9 74.3 72.3 5 Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds in social studies (required participation rate >= 95%) 67.6 9.4 4.7 81.7

6th Grade 7 Percent of Students With Disabilities served in general education environments greater than 80% of the school day NA 8 Percent of students scoring Meets or Exceeds on the Grade Five Writing Assessment (required participation rate >= 95%) 9 Percent of students in grade 3 achieving a Lexile measure equal to or greater than 650 10 Percent of students in grade 5 achieving a Lexile measure equal to or greater than 850 11 Percent of students in grades 1-5 completing the identified number of grade specific career awareness lessons aligned to Georgia’s 17 Career Clusters 12 Student Attendance Rate (%) 97.9 0.7 97.2 0.6 97.8 13 Percent of students in Grade 5 passing at least 5 courses in core content areas (ELA, reading, mathematics, science, social studies) and scoring at Meets or Exceeds on all CRCT 14 Percent of CRCT assessments scoring at the Exceeds level (ELA, reading, mathematics, science, social studies) 25.2 2.4 22.8 7.7 30.5

ED/EL/SWD Performance 6th Grade Progress Progress Points Earned 2012 2013 2014 18.1 0.7 18.8 1.2 17.6 Achievement Gap Achievement Gap Points Earned 8 2 6 5 11 ED/EL/SWD Performance ED/EL/SWD Performance Points Earned 7.6 1.6 9.2 Exceeding the Bar Exceeding the Bar Points Earned 0.5

Comparison to State (elementary)

Comparison to State (6th Grade)

Achievement Gap - this is what hurt us! The distance between our lowest quartile (bottom 25%) and the state average 2012: 6 points 2013: 9 points 2014: 3 points We are trying to identify the students in our lowest quartile from the complicated data file!

Not good!

Student Growth Profiles (SGP) In grades 5-6, we will be sending home SGP reports (in color!) in our report cards. Please review these carefully (the info is also in LDS) to determine which students showed low growth last year (under 35%). These are (some) of your target students. Make a list of your homeroom students who showed low growth and which subject area it was! We will create a spreadsheet to share with you in order to document which interventions are being used with these students.

Median SGP’s by Subject and Grade WC Anything over 35% is typical growth. Anything over 65% is high growth

Now what? Continue RtI and update your data notebooks weekly Continue to update literacy and math spreadsheets in Google Drive twice a month Continue Read 180 (dynamic groups with data provided by Mrs. Combs) Continue ESOL math push-in with Ms. Hernandez Start grades 3-6 math remediation with Ms. Riddle (tomorrow!) Start After-School Program in Feb/March (6 weeks?) And….

To Do! 5-6 Make a list of homeroom students who showed low SGP (below 35%) and in which subject. We will provide a spreadsheet on Google Drive. K-6 Make a list of students who are not showing progress in their intervention groups. Include the intervention and data that shows their lack of progress. We will provide a spreadsheet for this. Give these lists to your Data Team rep before next Tuesday!

Other business... Mrs. Ross is still out with Riley Give Mrs. Ingram your condolences when she returns Mrs. Kidd has a new granddaughter! Canceled Gary Alderman training - Thur/Fri I need someone for Thursday morning duty! Thank you! Greet ‘em with a smile tomorrow!