The Mutual Recognition Regulation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rule-Making Book II EU Administrative Procedures – The ReNEUAL Draft Model Rules 2014 Brussels, May th Herwig C.H. Hofmann University of Luxembourg.
Advertisements

Free movement of goods in the Internal Market
The Mutual Recognition Regulation (EC) 764/2008 Rita L’ABBATE 6th MARS Group meeting Bratislava, 2 October 2008.
EU Cross-Border Care Directive from the Primary Care perspective Results of a simulation Rita Baeten Gothenburg, 3 September 2012.
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Marko Jovanovic, LL.M. MASTER IN EUROPEAN INTEGRATION Private International Law in the.
S4: Market Surveillance Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Session 4: Market surveillance Peter Ulbig, Harry Stolz Belgrade, 31 October.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
European Commission Enterprise and Industry Market surveillance and automotive type-approval legislation - 28/06/2012 | ‹#› WP.29 Enforcement Working Group.
Small claims procedure Regulation (EC) No 861/2007of European Parlament and of the Council of 11 July establishing a European Small Claims Procedure (OJ.
TAIEX Seminar on the Directive on Services in the Internal Market Warsaw, Freedom to Provide Services Clause Article 16 Sophie Malétras.
Overview of the EU Food Safety Requirements
Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation system – EuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN Training on standardisation Support to the Modernisation.
Service of documents within European Union Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the service.
2010 Florida Building Code: I nterpretation P rocess O verview.
Finding a PPP Partner Essential EU Law Considerations Bernard Wilson Maribor, 18 January 2005 Bernard Wilson Maribor, 18 January 2005.
Challenges and Impact of Private Standards Delilah A. Cabb Ayala B.Sc. M.Sc. Belize Agricultural Health Authority 19 October 2009.
S tefano S oro European Commission Health and Consumer Protection DG OBLIGATION OF PRODUCERS AND DISTRIBUTORS TO NOTIFY DANGEROUS PRODUCTS.
Seminar on EC case-law Bedanna Bapuly Brno, 2007 October 15th.
Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation system – EuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN Business seminar on export to Europe Support to the Modernisation.
16-17 November 2005 COSCAP – NA Project Steering Group Guangzhou, China 1 Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency.
WHO, Almaty 2002 Food Legislation of the European Union and its effect on Slovak legislation1 Food legislation of the European Union and its effect on.
Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry European Commission The New Legislative Framework - Market Surveillance UNECE “MARS” Group meeting Bratislava,
Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation system – EuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN Training on standardisation Support to the Modernisation.
Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation system – EuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN Training on standardisation Support to the Modernisation.
Health & Consumers Directorate General EU SPS Notification Authority and Enquiry Point - working methods Brussels, 23 November 2011.
Evaluation of restrictions: art. 15 and art TAIEX Seminar on the EU Service Directive, 3 May 2007 Carlos Almaraz.
Dace Berkolde Director State Aid Control Department Ministry of Finance Latvia 1.
TAIEX GPSD Free Movement and Safety Vitomir Fister Beograd,
DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Modernised Social Security Coordination Zagreb, June 2010 Coordination in the field of sickness,
CLAUDIA PANAIT TAIEX Expert – European Commission Legal Adviser Ministry of Health, ROMANIA.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 14 – Transport Bilateral screening:
Freedom to Provide Services Clause Why does the Country of Origin Principle not exist anymore? Martin Frohn.
Conditions and procedures to obtain authorisation to access the service market Carlos AlmarazTAIEX Seminar on the EU Service Directive, 3 May 2007.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
competition rules in inland transport
Marek Stavinoha Legal officer DG MOVE A4 European Commission
Seminar on EU Service Directive Budapest, 3 May 2007 Thibaut Partsch
Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary
THE NEW GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION: A EUROPEAN OR A GLOBAL STANDARD? Bart van der Sloot Senior Researcher Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology,
Support of the foreign language profile of law tuition at the Faculty of Law in Olomouc CZ.1.07/2.2.00/
The New Legislative Framework Miniseminar New Legal Framework Reykjavík, 10 December 2008 Doris Gradenegger Unit C1: Regulatory Approach for the Free.
Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency
REGULATORY PROBLEMS IN CARING OUT PRE- AND POST- AUTHORISATION CLINICAL TRIALS Dr Penka Decheva GCP Inspector, BDA.
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Overview of the WTO SPS Agreement and the role of
Vesa Tanner European Commission Directorate-General Energy
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
EU legislation on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
TRACEABILITY REQUIREMENTS UNDER EU GENERAL FOOD LAW
Workshop ESF and tendering 11 October 2006, Brussels Directive 2004/18/EC Tendering of public contracts Robert Wein, European Commission Disclaimer:
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
European actions.
Health and Consumer Protection Sector: Biotechnology
Institutional changes The role of Bilateral Oversight Boards
Is Data Protection a Fundamental Right Protecting the Individual?
FISHERIES AND ENVIRONMENT
Internal (single) market
Avv. Roberto Panetta LL.M. Ph.D. ISCL Secretary General
Andrea Sundstrand Associate Professor
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF EUPAN
The EDPS: competences and processing of personal data in EU funds
Legal Foundations of European Union Law II
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
4th Meeting of the Mutual Recognition Committee
INTERNAL MARKET.
Link between Directive 98/34/EC and Regulation (EC) No 764/2008
Modernisation of EU public procurement policy
THE EU LEGAL FRAMEWORK ON EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT
Presentation transcript:

The Mutual Recognition Regulation Mutual recognition of Goods in the Internal Market TAIEX Seminar on New Legislation in the Internal Market 16 April 2010

Index I. The principle of Mutual Recognition II. Problems with Mutual Recognition III. The Mutual Recognition Regulation 764/2008

I. The principle of Mutual Recognition (1) A product lawfully marketed in one Member State and not subject to Community harmonization should be allowed to be marketed in any other Member State, even when the product does not fully comply with the technical rules of the Member State of destination. Exception: the Member State of destination may refuse the marketing of a product only where this is strictly necessary for the protection of, for example, public safety, health or environment.

I. The principle of Mutual Recognition (2) The principle of mutual recognition emerged out of the Court of Justice's famous "Cassis de Dijon" and subsequent judgements, and was discussed in a Commission interpretative communication of 3 October 1980.  There was a Council resolution of 28 October 1999 on mutual recognition, incorporated into the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 1 March 2002.

II. Problems with Mutual Recognition (1) Lack of awareness of the principle Legal uncertainty about its scope and the burden of proof Risk of not getting access to market in another Member State Absence of dialogue between authorities and with the economic operators

II. Problems with Mutual Recognition (2) 1. Lack of awareness National rules give the impression that they always prevail (Businesses and administrations take the national rule for granted) Mutual recognition is a concept developed in the jurisprudence of the Court of justice on Articles 34 and 36 TFEU (Few people are familiar with mutual recognition)

II. Problems with Mutual Recognition (3) 2. Legal uncertainty about its scope and burden of proof Scope: which products are covered? (Businesses and administrations take the national rule for granted) Widespread legal uncertainty about the burden of proof: specialized legal knowledge required (National administrations and businesses take a very cautious attitude)

II. Problems with Mutual Recognition (4) 3. The risk for businesses in another Member State Difficult for businesses to know whether, how and when mutual recognition will be applied (Risk avoidance through dialogue (negotiations?) with administration of Member State of destination)

II. Problems with Mutual Recognition (5) 4. Absence of dialogue between competent authorities Lack of common address book for authorities that wish to contact their colleagues in another Member State where the product is lawfully marketed (Difficult for competent authorities to identify and contact their colleagues in other Member States)

III. The Mutual Recognition Regulation (EC) N° 764/2008 (1) Summary of the Regulation Denial of mutual recognition becomes the exception. Definition of rights and obligations: Burden of proof on receiving Member State Tight deadlines for receiving Member State (20 w. days) Product Contact Points in Member States Repeals Decision 3052/95/EC Indicative list of products

III. The Mutual Recognition Regulation (EC) N° 764/2008 (2) Administrative decisions: Addressed to economic operator Directly or indirectly denying access to the market Based on a technical rule Denial of market access - effect of the decision: Prohibition Modification (1 or + characteristics) Additional testing Withdrawal

III. The Mutual Recognition Regulation (EC) N° 764/2008 (3) Regulation does not apply to: Most railway equipment Withdrawal of dangerous products under GPSD Withdrawal of food and feed in order to protect human health and requiring rapid action Emergency measures for food and feed Measures regarding non-compliance with EU food and feed law

III. The Mutual Recognition Regulation (EC) N° 764/2008 (4) Mutual recognition = basic rule (EC Treaty) Both actual and possible denial of mutual recognition governed by Regulation Possible denial of mutual recognition? Obligation for national authorities to start dialogue with the economic operator and to follow the procedural requirements established by the Regulation

III. The Mutual Recognition Regulation (EC) N° 764/2008 (5) Possible denial of mutual recognition Intended decision: Step 1: Written notice to economic operator Specifying the technical rule Setting out technical or scientific evidence: that the intended decision is justified by overriding reason of public interest; that no less trade-restrictive measure can be taken Intended decision must be based on the characteristics or type of product

III. The Mutual Recognition Regulation (EC) N° 764/2008 (6) Possible denial of mutual recognition Intended decision: Step 2: economic operator can submit comments within time limit set out in written notice Step 3: assessment of comments (if any) Step 4: decision by public authorities

III. The Mutual Recognition Regulation (EC) N° 764/2008 (7) Possible denial of mutual recognition Final decision - Competent authorities must: Immediately inform economic operator and the Commission Provide technical or scientific justification for their decision Specify the remedies available under the law

III. The Mutual Recognition Regulation (EC) N° 764/2008 (8) Product Contact Points (PCP) Member States must designate at least one PCP and inform Commission & MS Member States are free to entrust the role of PCP to new or existing private or public bodies Tasks: to be performed upon request and free of charge within 15 working days

III. The Mutual Recognition Regulation (EC) N° 764/2008 (9) Product Contact Points (PCP) – Tasks: Provide technical rules applicable to a specific type of product in that Member State Advise whether the product is subject to prior authorisation Give contact details of the competent authorities Describe remedies generally available in the national territory in the event of a dispute between competent authorities and economic operators

For more information For more information please visit: Contact: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/regulation/goods/mutrec_en.htm Contact: European Commission Directorate-General Enterprise and Industry, Unit C/2 B-1049 Brussels, Belgium Fax: +32 2 296 7679 E-mail: entr-mutual-recognition@ec.europa.eu

Thank you for your attention!