Discussion of: How do Platform Participants respond to an Unfair Rating? An Analysis of a Ride-Sharing Platform using a Quasi-Experiment Anuj Kapoor and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LIST QUESTIONS – COMPARISONS BETWEEN MODES AND WAVES Making Connections is a study of ten disadvantaged US urban communities, funded by the Annie E. Casey.
Advertisements

UHCL Support Staff Association (SSA) and Professional and Administrative Staff Association (PASA) In consultation with Dr. Lisa M. Penney RAs: Lisa Sublett,
Information for teachers This PowerPoint presentation gives examples of responses for the Conclusion section of the report. Students own answers will differ.
Discussion of „Employment risk and the living arrangements of young adults“ Martin Biewen, University of Mainz.
Obtain and review client feedback. Creating evaluation or feedback tools Importance of client feedback  The use of client feedback is very useful to.
ASH EDU 644 W EEK 6 DQ 1 C OURSE R EFLECTION Check this A+ tutorial guideline at course-reflection.
The top 5 ways to get customer reviews
Ensuring High Quality and Productivity
Shelter Employee Engagement & Development Survey
UBER VS TAXIS !! BY: Graham.
GIVING FEEDBACK ON PERFORMANCE CONCERNS IN A 1:1 MEETING -
Chapter Six What Makes a Teacher Effective?
Consumer Satisfaction Research
ABSTRACT        The topic of our study was “Is your cumulative Grade Point Average (GPA) higher for living in a two or more parent household rather than.
TIM 58 Chapter 3, continued: Requirements Determination Ch
Software Quality Assurance
Karin Karako Hunter college, the city university of new york
CHAPTER 7 LINEAR RELATIONSHIPS
A nationwide US student survey
October: National Anti-Bullying Month Lesson on Differences, Perspective and Empathy TAA 12th Grade 10/4/2017.
Psychometric Benefits of Removing Different Types of Bad Responders
AF1: Thinking Scientifically
Sociological Research Methods
Using NPMRDS Data for System Performance
Nepal Administrative Staff college
ECN741: Urban Economics Notes Based on: “Now You See It, Now You Don’t: Why Do Real Estate Agents Withhold Available Houses from Black Customers?” Jan.
Performance Reviews, Design Reviews, and Code Reviews
Fostering a Community of Learners and Leaders
PDCA Problem Solving Guide
Director, Institutional Research
Delivering Feedback Effectively
Randomized Evaluation of HIV Testing
The Value of Reviews Hello everyone! Thanks for joining us today in our weekly sales webinar, today's focus will be the value of reviews for local businesses.
HOW TO SELL ON AMAZON SUCCESSFULLY 1.
Raising student achievement by promoting a Growth Mindset
Interpreting Your Results
Looking at Texts from a Reader’s Point of View
PERFORMANCE AND TALENT MANAGEMENT
Week 6 Statistics for comparisons
Academic Skills Adviser
GIVING FEEDBACK ON PERFORMANCE CONCERNS IN A 1:1 MEETING -
ABAB Design Ethical considerations
Chapter 13 Motivation MGMT Chuck Williams
Social Practical Charlie.
Workforce Engagement Survey
Five Forbidden Phrases
Ch. 13. Pooled Cross Sections Across Time: Simple Panel Data.
The Question … Ahmed owns a stationary manufacturing business. He has changed the prices of some of his products. Ahmed has also changed his paper supplier.
Preparing a PROFILOR® Feedback Report
National 5 PE Command Words.
Nepal Administrative Staff college
Workforce Engagement Survey
Section 3 Monitoring, recording and evaluating performance development.
7th Grade science Study Skills
John Johnson, PMP CSM SPC November 2018
Creative assessment and feedback
Handout 5: Feedback and support
Sample Individual (to communicate with them about Pilot)
ECN741: Urban Economics Notes Based on: “Now You See It, Now You Don’t: Why Do Real Estate Agents Withhold Available Houses from Black Customers?” Jan.
Integrating Textual Evidence into Your Writing
Unit 2 - Global Information
Negotiating for a Raise August 27, 2015
Conflict Management Ashok Raj Article presentation
Ch. 13. Pooled Cross Sections Across Time: Simple Panel Data.
Seminars Module 1 Roles and Responsibilities
A Moodle-based Peer Assessment Tool
Social Media Audit.
Implementation Business Case
DISRUPTIVE TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGIES: IS SOUTH AND SOUTHERN AFRICA READY?
ECN741: Urban Economics Notes Based on: “Now You See It, Now You Don’t: Why Do Real Estate Agents Withhold Available Houses from Black Customers?” Based.
Presentation transcript:

Discussion of: How do Platform Participants respond to an Unfair Rating? An Analysis of a Ride-Sharing Platform using a Quasi-Experiment Anuj Kapoor and Catherine Tucker By Qiang (David) Gao Baruch College, City University of New York

Summary Study how biased negative reviews from taxi riders affect taxi driver’s behaviors using six-month a taxi-sharing data. Exploit the driver replacement It may cause rider to give biased lower ratings Examine the effect of biased lower ratings on driver’s response Negative response to biased lower rating (i.e., less driver efforts) leads to more lower ratings Investigate the consequence of biased lower rating Drivers are more likely to leave the platform

From https://thepointsguy From https://thepointsguy.com/2017/04/uber-changing-rating-system/ If you’re a driver, well, if your rating goes below a certain threshold, you won’t be driving for much longer. Uber is encouraging riders to be more fair when it comes to rating their UberPool driver. Say, for example, you request an UberPool and aren’t happy with the rider(s) you got paired with and gave the driver a lower rating because of it. Now, if you don’t give a five-star rating to your UberPool driver, you’ll be able to give more feedback on why you rated the way you did.

from https://www. theverge from https://www.theverge.com/2016/10/3/13155578/amazon- incentivized-reviews-ban-vine-program-product-biasAmazon Amazon is cracking down on biased customer reviews Yet studies have shown that incentivized reviewers are less likely to give products negative feedback and review hundreds of products on average, potentially affecting the overall sales performance of otherwise mediocre items.

Importance Important question to study. Most existing studies regarding peer reviews focus on The reliability of review ratings The impact of review The impact of biased positive review How about the impact of biased negative reviews?

Comments Comment #1: Biased review definition Comment #2: Selection issue Comment #3: Result interpretations and alternative models

Comment 1: Biased review definition Negative Rating Biased Rating Current definition Biased rating: Drivers with 5* ratings earlier but lower rating later as replacements Original argument: “a bad review is often an absent review” Using other drivers’ reviews as benchmark? Using all rating levels? Negative reviews About drivers or other things? Any text?

Comment #2: Selection issue Current data: Total 550,000 trips 3% of these trips reassigned Many missing reviews after reassignment Selection biases?

Comment #3: Results interpretations and alternative models Result interpretations Some interpretations need to be clearer e.g., Using IV will increase driver negative responses effects, why? Some results need further explanations. e.g., “drivers with a low rating are not more likely to leave the platform than the drivers with higher ratings”. How large is this effect? It may be better using standard deviation. Alternative models To verify LPM, conditional logit model with individual fixed effects.

Thank You!