Professor Ronald L. Carter

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Advertisements

Ideal Diode Equation.
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 12 – Spring 2011 Professor Ronald L. Carter
Experiment 5 EE 312 Basic Electronics Instrumentation Laboratory Wednesday, September 27,
Chapter 3 – Diodes Introduction Textbook CD
EXAMPLE 9.1 OBJECTIVE pn(xn) = 2.59  1014 cm3
L11 February 241 EE5342 – Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization Lecture 11 - Spring 2004 Professor Ronald L. Carter
L08 Feb 081 Lecture 08 Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization EE Spring 2001 Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 15 - Fall 2009 Professor Ronald L. Carter
L08 07Feb021 EE Semiconductor Electronics Design Project Spring Lecture 08 Professor Ronald L. Carter
Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization – EE5342 Lecture 12 – Spring 2011 Professor Ronald L. Carter
L9 February 151 Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization EE5342, Lecture 9-Spring 2005 Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 22 – Spring 2011 Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE5342 – Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization Lecture 10 Spring 2010 Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 23 – Spring 2011 Professor Ronald L. Carter
L09 12Feb021 Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization EE5342, Lecture 9-Spring 2002 Professor Ronald L. Carter
Recall-Lecture 5 DC Analysis Representation of diode into three models
Recall-Lecture 3 Atomic structure of Group IV materials particularly on Silicon Intrinsic carrier concentration, ni.
ECE 333 Linear Electronics
Chapter 6. pn Junction Diode
Recall-Lecture 4 Current generated due to two main factors
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Diodes Introduction Textbook CD
Recall-Lecture 4 Current generated due to two main factors
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Diode Equation and Models
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 16 – Spring 2011
Recall-Lecture 3 Atomic structure of Group IV materials particularly on Silicon Intrinsic carrier concentration, ni.
Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 13 - Fall 2010
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Recall-Lecture 4 Current generated due to two main factors
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Changing Device Parameters in PSpice
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 12 - Fall 2009
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 22 – Spring 2011
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 12 – Spring 2011
Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 26 - Fall 2009
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Lecture 3 OUTLINE Semiconductor Basics (cont’d) PN Junction Diodes
Ministry of teaching& high education Al- Mustansiriya University College of engineering Computer &
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Semiconductor Device Modeling & Characterization Lecture 15
PN junction Diode By Dr. Vaibhav Jain Associate Professor, Dept. of Physics, D.A.V (PG) College, Bulandshahr, U.P., India.
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 17 - Fall 2003
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 16 - Fall 2009
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Professor Ronald L. Carter
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 11 - Fall 2003
The Junction Diode Junction Diodes:
EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 17 – Spring 2011
The Junction Diode Junction Diodes:
Professor Ronald L. Carter
Chapter 3 Solid-State Diodes and Diode Circuits
Chapter 3 Solid-State Diodes and Diode Circuits
Presentation transcript:

Professor Ronald L. Carter ronc@uta.edu http://www.uta.edu/ronc/ EE5342 – Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization Lecture 10 - Spring 2004 Professor Ronald L. Carter ronc@uta.edu http://www.uta.edu/ronc/ L10 February 19

Estimating Junction Capacitance Parameters Following L29 – EE 5340 Fall 2003 If CJ = CJO {1 – Va/VJ}-M Define y  {d[ln(CJ)]/dV}-1 A plot of y = yi vs. Va = vi has slope = -1/M, and intercept = VJ/MF L10 February 19

Derivatives Defined The central derivative is defined as (following Lecture 14 and 11) yi,Central = (vi+1 – vi-1)/(lnCi+1 – lnCi-1), with vi = (vi+1 + vi-1)/2 Equation A1.1 The Forward derivative (as applied to the theory in L11 and L14) is defined in this case as yi,Forward = (vi+1 – vi)/(lnCi+1 – lnCi), with vi,eff = (vi+1 + vi-1)/2 Equation A1.2 L10 February 19

Data calculations Table A1.1. Calculations of yi and vi for the Central and Forward derivatives for the data in Table 1. The yi and vi are defined in Equations A1.1 and A1.2. L10 February 19

y vs. Va plots Figure A1.3. The yi and vi values from the theory in L11 and L14 with associa-ted trend lines and slope, intercept and R^2 values. L10 February 19

Comments on the data interpretation It is clear the Central derivative gives the more reliable data as the R^2 value is larger. M is the reciprocal of the magnitude of the slope obtained by a least squares fit (linear) plot of yi vs. Vi VJ is the horizontal axis intercept (computed as the vertical axis intercept divided by the slope) Cj0 is the vertical axis intercept of a least squares fit of Cj-1/M vs. V (must use the value of V for which the Cj was computed). The computations will be shown later. The results of plotting Cj-1/M vs. V for the M value quoted below are shown in Figure A1.4 L10 February 19

Calculating the parameters (the data were generated using M = 0.389, thus we have a 0.77% error). VJ = yi(vi=0)/slope =1.6326/2.551 = 0.640 (the data were generated using fi = 0.648, thus we have a 1.24% error). Cj0 = 1.539E30^-.392 = 1.467 pF (the data were generated using Cj0 = 1.68 pF, thus we have a 12.6% error) L10 February 19

Linearized C-V plot Figure A1.4. A plot of the data for Cj^-1/M vs. Va using the M value determined for this data (M = 0.392). L10 February 19

Doping Profile The data were equal-ly spaced (DV=0.1V), the central differ-ence was used, for -7.4V ≤ V ≤ 0.4V, which for Cj = e/x, corresponds to a range of 2.81E-5 cm ≤ x ≤ 8.99E-5 cm. These data are shown. The trend line is also shown for a linear fit. Since R^2 = 1.000, a linear N(x) relationship can be assumed. L10 February 19

SPICE Diode Model t Dinj Drec N~1, rd~N*Vt/iD rd*Cd = TT = Cdepl given by CJO, VJ and M Drec N~2, rd~N*Vt/iD rd*Cd = ? Cdepl =? t L10 February 19

Irec = rec. cur. = ISR(exp (Vd/(NR·Vt))- 1) DC Current Id = area(Ifwd - Irev) Ifwd = forward current = InrmKinj + IrecKgen Inrm = normal current = IS(exp ( Vd/(NVt))-1) Kinj = high-injection factor For: IKF > 0, Kinj = (IKF/(IKF+Inrm))1/2 otherwise, Kinj = 1 Irec = rec. cur. = ISR(exp (Vd/(NR·Vt))- 1) Kgen = generation factor = ((1-Vd/VJ)2+0.005)M/2 Irev = reverse current = Irevhigh + Irevlow Irevhigh = IBVexp[-(Vd+BV)/(NBV·Vt)] Irevlow = IBVLexp[-(Vd+BV)/(NBVL·Vt)} L10 February 19

.MODEL <model name> D [model parameters] D Diode General Form D<name> <(+) node> <(-) node> <model name> [area value] Examples DCLAMP 14 0 DMOD D13 15 17 SWITCH 1.5 Model Form .MODEL <model name> D [model parameters] .model D1N4148-X D(Is=2.682n N=1.836 Rs=.5664 Ikf=44.17m Xti=3 Eg=1.11 Cjo=4p M=.3333 Vj=.5 Fc=.5 Isr=1.565n Nr=2 Bv=100 Ibv=10 0u Tt=11.54n) *$ L10 February 19

Diode Model Parameters Model Parameters (see .MODEL statement) Description Unit Default IS Saturation current amp 1E-14 N Emission coefficient 1 ISR Recombination current parameter amp 0 NR Emission coefficient for ISR 1 IKF High-injection “knee” current amp infinite BV Reverse breakdown “knee” voltage volt infinite IBV Reverse breakdown “knee” current amp 1E-10 NBV Reverse breakdown ideality factor 1 RS Parasitic resistance ohm 0 TT Transit time sec 0 CJO Zero-bias p-n capacitance farad 0 VJ p-n potential volt 1 M p-n grading coefficient 0.5 FC Forward-bias depletion cap. coef, 0.5 EG Bandgap voltage (barrier height) eV 1.11 L10 February 19

Diode Model Parameters Model Parameters (see .MODEL statement) Description Unit Default XTI IS temperature exponent 3 TIKF IKF temperature coefficient (linear) °C-1 0 TBV1 BV temperature coefficient (linear) °C-1 0 TBV2 BV temperature coefficient (quadratic) °C-2 0 TRS1 RS temperature coefficient (linear) °C-1 0 TRS2 RS temperature coefficient (quadratic) °C-2 0 T_MEASURED Measured temperature °C T_ABS Absolute temperature °C T_REL_GLOBAL Rel. to curr. Temp. °C T_REL_LOCAL Relative to AKO model temperature °C For information on T_MEASURED, T_ABS, T_REL_GLOBAL, and T_REL_LOCAL, see the .MODEL statement. L10 February 19

In the following equations: The diode is modeled as an ohmic resistance (RS/area) in series with an intrinsic diode. <(+) node> is the anode and <(-) node> is the cathode. Positive current is current flowing from the anode through the diode to the cathode. [area value] scales IS, ISR, IKF,RS, CJO, and IBV, and defaults to 1. IBV and BV are both specified as positive values. In the following equations: Vd = voltage across the intrinsic diode only Vt = k·T/q (thermal voltage) k = Boltzmann’s constant q = electron charge T = analysis temperature (°K) Tnom = nom. temp. (set with TNOM option) L10 February 19

ln iD ln(IKF) ln[(IS*IKF) 1/2] ln(ISR) ln(IS) vD= Vext VKF Vext-Va=iD*Rs low level injection ln iD ln(IKF) Effect of Rs ln[(IS*IKF) 1/2] Effect of high level injection ln(ISR) Data ln(IS) vD= Vext recomb. current VKF L10 February 19

Interpreting a plot of log(iD) vs. Vd In the region where Irec < Inrm < IKF, and iD*RS << Vd. iD ~ Inrm = IS(exp (Vd/(NVt)) - 1) For N = 1 and Vt = 25.852 mV, the slope of the plot of log(iD) vs. Vd is evaluated as {dlog(iD)/dVd} = log (e)/(NVt) = 16.799 decades/V = 1decade/59.526mV L10 February 19

Static Model Eqns. Parameter Extraction In the region where Irec < Inrm < IKF, and iD*RS << Vd. iD ~ Inrm = IS(exp (Vd/(NVt)) - 1) {diD/dVd}/iD = d[ln(iD)]/dVd = 1/(NVt) so N ~ {dVd/d[ln(iD)]}/Vt  Neff, and ln(IS) ~ ln(iD) - Vd/(NVt)  ln(ISeff). Note: iD, Vt, etc., are normalized to 1A, 1V, resp. L10 February 19

Static Model Eqns. Parameter Extraction In the region where Irec > Inrm, and iD*RS << Vd. iD ~ Irec = ISR(exp (Vd/(NRVt)) - 1) {diD/dVd}/iD = d[ln(iD)]/dVd ~ 1/(NRVt) so NR ~ {dVd/d[ln(iD)]}/Vt  Neff, & ln(ISR) ~ln(iD) -Vd/(NRVt )  ln(ISReff). Note: iD, Vt, etc., are normalized to 1A, 1V, resp. L10 February 19

Static Model Eqns. Parameter Extraction In the region where IKF > Inrm, and iD*RS << Vd. iD ~ [ISIKF]1/2(exp (Vd/(2NVt)) - 1) {diD/dVd}/iD = d[ln(iD)]/dVd ~ (2NVt)-1 so 2N ~ {dVd/d[ln(iD)]}/Vt  2Neff, and ln(iD) -Vd/(NRVt)  ½ln(ISIKFeff). Note: iD, Vt, etc., are normalized to 1A, 1V, resp. L10 February 19

Static Model Eqns. Parameter Extraction In the region where iD*RS >> Vd. diD/Vd ~ 1/RSeff dVd/diD  RSeff L10 February 19

Getting Diode Data for Parameter Extraction The model used .model Dbreak D( Is=1e-13 N=1 Rs=.5 Ikf=5m Isr=.11n Nr=2) Analysis has V1 swept, and IPRINT has V1 swept iD, Vd data in Output L10 February 19

diD/dVd - Numerical Differentiation L10 February 19

dln(iD)/dVd - Numerical Differentiation L10 February 19

Diode Par. Extraction 1/Reff iD ISeff L10 February 19

Results of Parameter Extraction At Vd = 0.2 V, NReff = 1.97, ISReff = 8.99E-11 A. At Vd = 0.515 V, Neff = 1.01, ISeff = 1.35 E-13 A. At Vd = 0.9 V, RSeff = 0.725 Ohm Compare to .model Dbreak D( Is=1e-13 N=1 Rs=.5 Ikf=5m Isr=.11n Nr=2) L10 February 19

Hints for RS and NF parameter extraction In the region where vD > VKF. Defining vD = vDext - iD*RS and IHLI = [ISIKF]1/2. iD = IHLIexp (vD/2NVt) + ISRexp (vD/NRVt) diD/diD = 1  (iD/2NVt)(dvDext/diD - RS) + … Thus, for vD > VKF (highest voltages only) plot iD-1 vs. (dvDext/diD) to get a line with slope = (2NVt)-1, intercept = - RS/(2NVt) L10 February 19

Application of RS to lower current data In the region where vD < VKF. We still have vD = vDext - iD*RS and since. iD = ISexp (vD/NVt) + ISRexp (vD/NRVt) Try applying the derivatives for methods described to the variables iD and vD (using RS and vDext). You also might try comparing t0he N value from the regular N extraction procedure to the value from the previous slide. L10 February 19

References Semiconductor Device Modeling with SPICE, 2nd ed., by Massobrio and Antognetti, McGraw Hill, NY, 1993. MicroSim OnLine Manual, MicroSim Corporation, 1996. Device Electronics for Integrated Circuits, 2nd ed., by Muller and Kamins, John Wiley, New York, 1986. L10 February 19