Toru Kouyama Supported by SELENE/SP Team HISUI calibration WG

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluating Calibration of MODIS Thermal Emissive Bands Using Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer Measurements Yonghong Li a, Aisheng Wu a, Xiaoxiong.
Advertisements

Preliminary Study of Lunar Calibration for Geostationary Imagers Japanese Multi-functional Transport SATellite-2 (MTSAT-2) incorporates the special device.
Resolution.
A U R A Satellite Mission T E S
Class 8: Radiometric Corrections
School of Earth and Space Exploration Existing Lunar Datasets M. S. Robinson School of Earth and Space Exploration Arizona State University.
Remote Sensing What can we do with it?. The early years.
Lunar Observations of Changes in the Earth’s Albedo (LOCEA) Alexander Ruzmaikin Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology in collaboration.
Meteorological satellites – National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)-Polar Orbiting Environmental Satellite (POES) Orbital characteristics.
Rachel Klima (on behalf of the MASCS team) JHU/APL MASCS/VIRS Data Users’ Workshop LPSC 2014, The Woodlands, TX March 17,2014 MASCS Instrument & VIRS Calibration.
On-orbit Cross-calibration of AM Satellite Remote Sensing Instruments Using the Moon International Workshop on Radiometric & Geometric Calibration Grand.
Resolution A sensor's various resolutions are very important characteristics. These resolution categories include: spatial spectral temporal radiometric.
Resolution Resolution. Landsat ETM+ image Learning Objectives Be able to name and define the four types of data resolution. Be able to calculate the.
Terra Launched December 18, 1999
Hyperspectral remote sensing
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
Use of the Moon as a calibration reference for NPP VIIRS Frederick S. Patt, Robert E. Eplee, Robert A. Barnes, Gerhard Meister(*) and James J. Butler NASA.
NASA NPP-SDS VCST NPP VIIRS On-Orbit Calibration Using the Moon J. Fulbright a, Z. Wang a, and X. Xiong b a SSAI (formerly with Sigma Space), Greenbelt,
Lunar Calibration based on SELENE/SP data
Thomas C. Stone U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ USA GSICS Research Working Group Meeting EUMETSAT 24−28 March 2014 Using the Moon as a Radiometric.
Deborah L. Domingue, Mario D’Amore, Sabrina Ferrari, Jörn Helbert, Noam R. Izenberg PHOTOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF MERCURY’S SURFACE AT VISIBLE TO NEAR-INFRARED.
Cassini Huygens EECS 823 DIVYA CHALLA.
PLEIADES Lunar Observations Sophie Lachérade, Bertrand Fougnie
The Lodore Falls Hotel, Borrowdale
Lunar Radiance Calibration ABI/AHI Solar Reflective Bands
Determination of photometric properties of Steins
NOAA VIIRS Team GIRO Implementation Updates
Hyperspectral Sensing – Imaging Spectroscopy
Benjamin Scarino, David R
Lunar observation data set preparation
V2.0 minus V2.5 RSAS Tangent Height Difference Orbit 3761
Fangfang Yu and Xiangqian Wu
MODIS and VIIRS Reflective Solar Bands Calibration Methodologies and
Vicarious calibration by liquid cloud target
The ROLO Lunar Calibration System Description and Current Status
Verifying the DCC methodology calibration transfer
Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC Height-resolved aerosol R.Siddans.
GOES-16 ABI Lunar Data Preparation to GIRO
Aqua MODIS Reflective Solar Bands (RSB)
Using SCIAMACHY to calibrate GEO imagers
Sébastien Wagner (1) Tom Stone (2), Gary Fowler (1), Tim Hewison (1)
Calibration and Performance MODIS Characterization Support Team (MCST)
MODIS Lunar Calibration Data Preparation and Results for GIRO Testing
Update on Advancing Development of the ROLO Lunar Calibration System
Mina Kang1, Myoung-Hwan Ahn1, Quintus Kleipool2 and Pepijn Veefkind2
Data Preparation for ASTER
Using the Moon for Sensor Calibration Inter- comparisons
Example of sensitivity analysis Sophie Lachérade, Bertrand Fougnie
Calibration monitoring based on snow PICS over Tibetan Plateau
Lunar reflectance model based on SELENE/SP data
Satellite Sensors – Historical Perspectives
Effort toward Characterization of Selected Lunar Sites for the Radiometric Calibration of Solar Reflective Bands Fangfang Yu1, Xi Shao1, Xiangqian Wu2.
Changchun Institute of Optics Fine Mechanics and Physics
S-NPP Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Lunar Calibration using GSICS Implementation of the ROLO model (GIRO) for Reflective Solar Bands.
Progress in Radiance-Based Lunar Calibration
Lunar Observation Data for GIRO Landsat–8 Operational Land Imager
Lu Zhang, Peng Zhang , Xiuqing Hu, Lin Chen
GOES -12 Imager April 4, 2002 GOES-12 Imager - pre-launch info - radiances - products Timothy J. Schmit et al.
TanSat/CAPI Calibration and validation
Presentation Overview
Lu Zhang, Peng Zhang , Xiuqing Hu, Lin Chen
Lunar Observation Activities with a Small Satellite and a Planetary Exploration Satellite. Hodoyoshi-1 Hayabusa-2 Toru Kouyama, AIST
Current Status of ROLO and Future Development
Cross-Comparison Between China HJ1A-CCD and Landsat TM Data
Igor Appel TAG LLC, Washington, USA
Preliminary SCIAMACHY Lunar observations as intercalibration source
Strawman Plan for Inter-Calibration of Solar Channels
Department of Geography
Lunar Calibration Workshop Activities
MERIS Level 1b processing Ludovic Bourg
Presentation transcript:

Toru Kouyama Supported by SELENE/SP Team HISUI calibration WG Lunar Reflectance model developed from SELENE/SP data for Lunar Calibration Toru Kouyama Supported by SELENE/SP Team HISUI calibration WG

SELENE(KAGUYA) and SP SELENE: Polar orbit (non sun-synchronous) Altitude: 100 km Grand track repeat cycle: ~ 30 days Mission period: 2007 – 2009 (1.5 years) Observation with various solar incident angle condition.

SELENE(KAGUYA) and SP SP: Spectral Profiler Sensor type: Spectrometer Spectral range: 500-2600 nm Spectral resolution: 6 nm (VNIR 520-960 nm) 8 nm (NIR-SWIR > 900 nm) Observation swath 500 m

SELENE(KAGUYA) and SP SP: Spectral Profiler http://global.jaxa.jp/press/2007/12/20071214_kaguya_e.html

SELENE(KAGUYA) and SP http://l2db.selene.darts.isas.jaxa.jp/index.html.en At this time, SP Lunar reflectance model has not been distributed from this archive.

Key persons PI Yokota et al., 2011,Icarus, 215, 639-660: 松永恒雄 Tsuneo Matsunaga PI 横田康弘 Yoshihiro Yokota Yokota et al., 2011,Icarus, 215, 639-660: Lunar photometric properties at wavelengths 0.5–1.6 lm acquired by SELENE Spectral Profiler and their dependency on local albedo and latitudinal zones

SELENE/SP Lunar Reflectance map Reflectance Wavelength [nm] [Yokota et al., 2011] Spectral range: 512 – 1650 nm (160 channels) Δλ = 6 nm(VNIR) & 8 nm (SWIR) 1˚ x 1˚ resolution: published 0.5˚ x 0.5˚: to be published 0.5x0.5: Corresponding to ~40 μrad resolution viewing from Earth @ nadir Hyper spectral reflectance map Also including the lunar surface photometric properties depending on incident, emission and phase angles. Newkur data

Reflectance to be calculated Model equations After Yokota et al., 2011, Eq (11) Reflectance to be calculated i: incident angle e: emission angle α: phase angle XL: Lunar lambert function c1=-0.019, c2=0.242x10-3, c3=-1.46x10-6 Correction terms for Limb darkening effect f: Empirical function of phase angle dependencies B: Shadow hiding opposition effect P: Regolith phase function h, c, g, B0: Model coefficients

Reflectance to be calculated Model equations After Yokota et al., 2011, Eq (11) Reflectance to be calculated i: incident angle e: emission angle α: phase angle XL: Lunar lambert function Correction terms for Limb darkening effect f: Empirical function of phase angle dependencies B: Shadow hiding opposition effect P: Regolith phase function h, c, g, B0: Model coefficients High land, mare and medium albedo

Reflectance to be calculated Model equations After Yokota et al., 2011, Eq (11) Reflectance to be calculated i: incident angle e: emission angle α: phase angle XL: Lunar lambert function Correction terms for Limb darkening effect f: Empirical function of phase angle dependencies B: Shadow hiding opposition effect P: Regolith phase function h, c, g, B0: Model coefficients

Estimation of Lunar radiance Input geometry data Incident angle Reflectance map (30,0,30) Emission angle + Solar Irradiance model Phase angle at observation timing Lunar radiance map at the observation time Highland, mare and middle albedo region map

Simulated hyperspectral images SRF convolution Simulated band image

Observed ASTER/Band 2 (660 nm) April 14, 2003 Simulated

Simulating Moon observations April 13, 2003 April 15 April 18

Brightness Comparison: ASTER vs SELENE/SP Band 1 Observed radiance (W/m2/μm/str) Frequency Brightness Comparison: ASTER vs SELENE/SP Band 2 Band 3N Simulated radiance (W/m2/μm/str) Band 1 Band 2 Band 3 Observed / Simulated (= Bias) 1.20 1.01 0.95 Correlation Coefficient 0.992 0.993 Standard deviation 0.03 0.04 Standard error 0.0002

=> Pixel registration error should be considered. Known problems Large bias Worse model accuracy in high emission angle and high latitude regions ASTER Model In SP observation, emission angle was basically ~0 degree because of nadir viewing. Yokota recommends using only the region where emission angle is less than 45 degrees. This model requires estimating where each pixel looks at on the moon surface (= LOS ray tracing). => Pixel registration error should be considered.

Summary Lunar reflectance model based on SELENE/SP hyper-spectral data has been developed. Using the model, we can simulate/predict any moon observation. This model describes surface contrast and phase angle dependencies well. => The model can be used for evaluating relative degradations of sensors. Large brightness bias exits. Some limitations (emission angle and latitude dependences, etc..) should be considered. Collaboration of ROLO/GIRO is very important phase angle dependence, bias, etc..

ASTER@2003.04.14 vs Model (SELENE/SP) ASTER (Band 1) Large bias Observed radiance (W m-2 str-1 μm-1) Relative Frequency Modeled radiance (W m-2 str-1 μm-1) Observed / Model Mean (Observed/Model) = 1.20 SD = 0.04 SE (= SD/√Number of pixels used) = 0.0002

SP’s reflectance In shorter wavelength region, SP tends to describe Moon reflectance darker than other sensors (Ohtake et al., 2010 & 2013) Ohtake,M. et al., Deriving the Absolute Reflectance of Lunar Surface Using SELENE (Kaguya) Multiband Imager Data, 2010, Space Sci. Rev., 154, 57-77 Ohtake,M. et al., One Moon, Many Measurements 3: Spectral reflectance, 2013, Icarus., 226, 364-374

The hyperspectral imager: Multispectral Imager HISUI Panchromatic Stereo Camera ALOS-3 (JAXA) Hyperspectral Image “Cube” The hyperspectral imager: Contiguous and high resolution spectral information from visible to short-wave IR The multispectral imager: 4 Bands observation with a high spatial resolution by a wide swath

Band 1 Band 2 Band 3 1.0 0.7 0.9 0.8 3000 Day since launch

[Kouyama et al., 2014, LPSC]

Simulating Moon observations April 13, 2003 April 15 April 18

XL: Empirical function of sun-light scattering i: incident, e: emission, α: phase anlge Fsun: Sun light Flux (W/m2/um) S: SRF Model equations r: reflectance using i=30, e=0, α=30 as the basis condition [Yokota et al.,2011] (11) From SP model XL: Empirical function of sun-light scattering f: Empirical function of phase angle dependencies

Hayabusa-2 Japanese satellite for exploring a small asteroid Successfully launched Yesterday !