LHCb Physics, Status, and Perspectives

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHCb Alignment 12 th April 2007 S. Viret Coseners Forum « LHC Startup » 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
Advertisements

27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
CERN June HERA-LHC Workshop Status and startup for physics with LHCb G. Passaleva (INFN-Firenze) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration.
Search for B s oscillations at D  Constraining the CKM matrix Large uncertainty Precise measurement of V td  properly constrain the CKM matrix yield.
Aurelio Bay Institut de Physique des Hautes Energies July 13-25, 2000, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Physics with bottom quarks: The LHCb experiment Marcel Merk Nikhef and the Free University Jan 20, 2009 Contents: Physics with b-quarks  CP Violation.
Workshop on Quarkonium, November 8-10, 2002 at CERN Heriberto Castilla DØ at Run IIa as the new B-Physics/charmonium player Heriberto Castilla Cinvestav-IPN.
Jeroen van Hunen The LHCb Tracking System. May 22, 2006 Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Jeroen van Huenen 2 The LHCb Experiment LHCb.
1 Performance of the LHCb VELO Outline LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb VELO LHCb VELO VELO performance.
Physics Performance of LHC-B Neville Harnew University of Oxford Beauty-97, Los Angeles October Outline Introduction The LHC-B Experiment New.
June 28, 2002BEACH2002 B Physics at the Tevatron B Physics at the Tevatron Jack Cranshaw Texas Tech University For the CDF and D0 Collaborations.
Future b and c experiment with hadron machine Tomasz Skwarnicki Representing LHCb collaboration.
Chris Parkes First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator Act 1: LHCb Intro. Act 2: Velo Design Act 3: Initial Performance for LHCb VELO groupVienna Conference.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
1 Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Marcel Merk NIKHEF Representing the LHCb collaboration 19 th.
DIS 2004, Strbske Pleso,April LHCb experiment sensitivity to CKM phases and New Physics from mixing and CP violation measurements in B decays LHCb.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Status of the LHCb Experiment 高原宁 清华大学高能物理研究中心 Introduction & physics motivations Status of the detector construction Topics on physics potentials Conclusions.
Prospects for B  hh at LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration CKM2008 Workshop, Rome, 9-13 September 2008 LHCb.
F.-H. Heinsius (Universität Freiburg) on behalf of the COMPASS collaboration Gluon polarization measurements at DIS 2004, Štrbské Pleso,
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
LHCb performance for B s  J/   and B d  J/  K s decays Jeroen van Hunen.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
Clara MatteuzziFPCP, Paris 2-6 june 2003 The LHCb experiment: status and physics program Clara Matteuzzi On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Università.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Trigger Strategy and Performance of the LHCb Detector Mitesh Patel (CERN) (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) Thursday 7 th July 2005.
1 outline ● Part I: some issues in experimental b physics ● why study b quarks? ● what does it take? ● Part II: LHCb experiment ● Part III: LHCb first.
On behalf of the LHCb collaboration
Simulated vertex precision
Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, 20 Nov 2013
The Status of the LHC Machine and the Experiments
Hadron Physics Lecture Week
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
LHCb Status and Prospects Doris Eckstein (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration 3rd International Conference on Flavor Physics Chungli, Taiwan,
The LHC collider in Geneva
CKM Status In this lecture, we study the results summarized in this plot. November 17, 2018 Sridhara Dasu, CKM Status.
Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration)
FRONTIERS OF MATTER XI th RENCONTRES DE BLOIS
Lepton Number and Lepton Flavour Violation
Status of the LHCb experiment
LHCb Status and Prospects Doris Eckstein (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration 3rd International Conference on Flavor Physics Chungli, Taiwan,
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
High Level Trigger for rare decays at LHCb
The LHCb vertex detector
Overview of LHCb Poland Ukraine Brazil UK Switzerland France Spain
July 13-25, 2000, Hanoi, Vietnam Aurelio Bay Institut de Physique
B physics prospects at LHCb
LHCb Particle Identification and Performance
(Towards) First Physics with LHCb
T. Bowcock University of Liverpool For the LHCb Collaboration
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
B Physics at the LHC Neville Harnew University of Oxford.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
The Large Hadron Collider beauty Experiment & Physics
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna CKM Workshop Durham, April 8th 2003
LHCb Trigger LHCb Trigger Outlook:
B-physics at the LHC Beyond 2010, february
How can we study the magnetic distortion effect?
First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator
Presentation transcript:

LHCb Physics, Status, and Perspectives 13th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics, Moscow 2007 LHCb Physics, Status, and Perspectives Bernhard Spaan Universität Dortmund on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Motivation CP Violation, Search for New Physics LHCb Design, Status, Physics Conclusions Supported by bmbf:

LHCb: a dedicated B-Physics Experiment at the LHC > 600 scientists 47 universities and laboratories 15 countries Geneva CERN LHCb ATLAS CMS ALICE LHC Tunnel

CP-Violation in the Standard Model Standard model: Origin of CP-Violation: Higgs-Sector! Cabibbo Kobayashi Maskawa (CKM) Matrix CP complex, unitary 4 parameters: 3 Euler angles, 1 Phase CKM Matrix: Test of the Standard Model wrt origin of CP Violation  test unitarity of CKM matrix! Representation as „Unitarity Triangles“:

Unitarity Test of the CKM-Matrix:    Unitarity Test:  overconstrain Unitarity Triangles  determine angles and magnitude of sides

CKM Parametrizations ,A,, V has 4 observable parameters and an infinite number of choices for these 4 L. Wolfenstein 1983: ,A,, relevant for Bs Expect sizeable „phases“ for: Vub, Vtd, and Vts,

Unitarity Triangles d = 2: Bd mixing phase s = 2: Bs mixing phase Im  Wolfenstein: Vub ei   Almost identical triangles (differences at the percent level) 1 Re Im   + Precision Test requires measurements with Bu-, Bd-, and Bs-mesons  Re

Need Precision Measurement on  LHCb Unitarity Triangle - 2007 Need Precision Measurement on  LHCb +further decrease errors on  and  Possible impact of a LHCb measurement on  Hardly any significant constraint on  sin2  (LHCb)

CP in Interference between Mixing and Decay B0J/KS and Bs J/ Oscillations new particle loop dominated by top quark Mixing Vtb Vtd Wolfenstein: only „real“ CKM elements in decay  no weak phase need to consider V Time resolved measurements! New Physics may influence mixing Phase! , shifted!

Interference between Mixing and Decay Bs  Oscillations dominated by top quark new particle loop Mixing Details on CKM angle measurements @LHCb  Talk of Sergey Barsuk Vtb Vts new particle loop Vtb Vts An Observation of CP Violation  New Physics!

Rare decays Details on rare decays @LHCb  Talk of Victor Egorychev Small Branching Fractions More interesting (penguin) mediated modes: e.g. Details on rare decays @LHCb  Talk of Victor Egorychev Need huge statistics! LHCb -more diagrams

LHCb Physics Programme precision measurements of CKM angles rare decays Victor Egorychev Sergey Barsuk Search for New Physics B production, Bc , b-baryon physics charm decays (e.g. D-mixing) tau lepton flavour violation

B production in pp Collisions at s = 14 TeV (LHC) Interactions of 2 partons (quarks, gluons) with fractional momenta xi Parton 1 x1 Parton 2 x2 p p Examples: „sea quarks“ p all b-hadron species are produced: Challenge ~40% ~40% ~10% ~10%

B production B hadrons are mostly produced in the forward (beam) direction Choose a forward spectrometer 10–300 mrad Both b and b in the acceptance: important for tagging the production state of the B hadron b–b correlation Boost (PYTHIA)

LHC environment Bunch crossing frequency: 40 MHz sinelastic = 80 mb  at high L >> 1 pp collision/crossing  run at <L> ~ 2 × 1032 cm-2s-1  dominated by single interactions in acceptance region: bb230 b  collect 1012 bb events/year Beams are less focused locally to maintain optimum luminosity even when ATLAS and CMS run at <L> ~ 1034 cm-2s-1 Reconstruction easier e.g. b-quark vertex identification Lower radiation level LHCb-detector must be able to operate in a high rate and high multiplicity environment Inelastic pp collisions/crossing

Time Resolved Measurements sin2, sin2, (), sin2, etc., Oscillations Measurements, .. opposite side lepton and kaon tag same side kaon tag (for Bs) opposite B vertex charge tagging Flavour-determination of other b-Quark („tag“)  Flavour of Brec at t=0 p- K m- p+ s K- D0 B0 p+ D*+ p+ Exclusive B-reconstruction (e.g. CP Eigenstates)  Measure momentum p from decay products (1-100 GeV/c) Identify decay products (Leptons, /K separation) B0  e+ J/ nm e- Determination of t = /c typically 1 cm Proper time res.:  40 fs Primary Vertex res: 50 m in z, 10 m in xy Secondary Vertex res.: 100 m in z, 10 m in x,y

5th Four Seas Conference LHCb - Cavern Proton beam Shielding wall (against radiation) Cavern ~100m below surface Electronics + CPU farm Detectors can be moved away from beam-line for access Offset interaction point (to make best use of existing cavern) Proton beam Iasi, 29 May 2007 5th Four Seas Conference 16

LHCb VELO: primary vertex impact parameter displaced vertex Muon System RICHES: PID: K, separation PileUp System Interaction region Trigger Tracker: p for trigger and Ks reco Calorimeters: PID: e,, 0 Tracking Stations: p of charged particles ~1 cm B

 LHCb p p Beam Pipe (produced in Russia) Beryllium ~ 250 mrad p p 10 mrad Beam Pipe (produced in Russia) Beryllium Status: installed, fully tested Forward spectrometer (running in pp collider mode) Inner acceptance 10 mrad from conical beryllium beam pipe

 Vertex Locator (VELO) 21 VELO stations (r and  silicon sensors) Placed in a secondary vacuum vessel 3cm separation, 8mm from beam Separated by a 300 m of Al RF foil Detector halves retractable for injection  30 m impact-parameter resolution

VELO 1m Status: installation of completed detector halves starting Interaction Region, 5,3 cm Impact Parameter Resolution pile-up veto RF foil interaction point Silicon sensors 1/pt distribution for B tracks Status: installation of completed detector halves starting

Tracking Inner Tracker Silicon strips 2% of area 20% of tracks TT T1 T2 T3 IT OT TT: 144k channels, Silicon Strip IT: 129k channels, Silicon Strip installation proceeding OT: 54k channels, Straw Tubes installed  Tracking system and dipole magnet to measure angles and momenta B-mass resolution ~ 15 MeV, p/p  0.4 % Magnetic field will be reversed to reduce experimental systematics

Tracking By /T Inner Tracker Trigger Tracker Silicon strips pT information for trigger By /T z /cm Outer Tracker

Particle Identification - RICH  Two Cherenkov detectors (RICH) for charged hadron identification  excellent p–K separation for momenta up to 100 GeV/c

RICH RICH1 RICH2 Readout: Hybrid PhotoDiodes HPD 80mm 120mm RICH2 Readout: Hybrid PhotoDiodes HPD – 1024 pixels – LHCb development

RICH Detectors 3 radiators: RICH1 Aerogel (2-10 GeV), C4F10 (10-60 GeV) RICH2 CF4 (16-100 GeV)  invariant mass With PID No PID Status: RICH2 installed RICH1 installed Aug 2007

 Calorimeters e Preshower (Scintillator Pad) Pb/Scint., 2.5 X0 ECAL (shashlik) Pb-Scint., 25 X0 HCAL (Scintillator Tile) Fe/Scint, 5.6 0 Status: installed h  Calorimeter system (Preshower PS/SPD, ECAL and HCAL) provides Identification of electrons, hadrons and neutrals Important for the first level of the trigger Major russian contribution to the experiment!

Calorimeters ECAL 10 MeV/c2 ECAL: HCAL: Resolved π0 2 isolated photons ECAL ECAL: HCAL:

 Muon System m 1368 MWPCs (M2-M5), outer M1 region 24 3-GEMs (inner M1 region) 3-GEM detector parts are ready Installation planned in Autumn M2-M5 chambers mostly installed M1 chamber was slightly delayed Work should completed by march 2008  Muon system to identify muons, also used in first level of trigger Efficiency ~ 95% for pion misidentification rate < 1%

Trigger Efficient and selective trigger crucial for LHCb: 10 MHz (visible bunch crossings) Hardware trigger (L0) Fully synchronized (40 MHz), 4 s fixed latency High pT particles: , , e,  and hadron (typically pT ~1-4 GeV/c) reject multiple interactions (PileUp system) 1 MHz (readout of all detector compnents) Software trigger (HLT) Full detector info available, only limit is CPU time Use more tracking info to re-confirm L0 decision + high IP Full event reconstruction: exclusive and inclusive streams tuned for specific final states L0, HLT and L0×HLT efficiency PC farm of ~1000 nodes (multicore) ≤ 2 kHz (storage: event size ~35kB) 30

Simulated Event

Performance figures (1 year, 2 fb-1) Perfect U-Spin symmetry

e.g. DD Mixing Mixing modifies exponential decay-time distribution: DCS interference mixing Ldt=384fb-1 Estimated yield from Ldt=10fb-1

Conclusions LHCb: a dedicated B-Physics Experiment at LHC all B-Hadron species are accessible huge statistics compared to B-Factories Construction of the experiment is progressing well Commissioning started ready for data taking in 2008  full detector ready for early physics – competitive measurements even with low LHC luminosity! (e.g. , , ms , Bs, ….) LHCb will contribute significantly to the search for New Physics! via precise and complementary measurements of CKM angles and of rare decays LHCb also started to investigate option for a possible detector upgrade  SuperLHCb