FNAL Production Experience

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Silicon Technical Specifications Review General Properties Geometrical Specifications Technology Specifications –Mask –Test Structures –Mechanical –Electrical.
Advertisements

ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
US CMS Silicon Tracker Project – Breakout session Overview - DOE/NSF Review Brookhaven - May 20, Incandela 1 CMS Si Tracker: Breakout Session Dept.
Workshop on Silicon Detector Systems, April at GSI Darmstadt 1 STAR silicon tracking detectors SVT and SSD.
The Intermediate Silicon Layers detector OUTLINE ISL inside CDFII Why the ISL? Conceptual Design Ladders and Spaceframe Rasnik Online Alignment System.
Slide 1Module Testing Meeting March 7, 2003US Hybrid/Module/Rod Testing Model-Anthony Affolder US Hybrid/Module/Rod Testing Model Anthony Affolder (for.
US Production Report - September 4, Incandela 1 US Production Report CMS Tracker Steering Committee 4 September 2003 J. Incandela University of.
For high fluence, good S/N ratio thanks to: Single strip leakage current I leak  95nA at T  -5C Interstrip capacitance  3pF SVX4 chip 10 modules fully.
Slide 1US silicon group meeting 5/6/2003 Hybrid Testing Status 10 new hybrids brought by Lenny all tested à 9 tested with no flaws à 1 had 1 chip + 1 wirebond.
4/25/2006 Puneeth Kalavase, UC, Santa Barbara On behalf of US Tracker Outer Barrel group Construction and Testing of CMS “Rods”
US Module and Rod Production Overview and Plan For the US CMS Tracker Group.
Anthony AffolderUS CMS Meeting 12/3/02Previous Burn-in Experience CDF Burn-in Experience Hybrid Burn-in à 4 days with extensive tests at start/end à ~9.
The AMS-02 detector is based on a large acceptance (~0.5 m²sr) and high sensitivity spectrometer composed by a super-conducting magnet (0.8 T), cooled.
US Tracker Group Status Sep. 1, 2005 J. Incandela For the US CMS Tracker Group.
1 US Testing Status-Anthony AffolderModule Testing Meeting, Dec. 11, 2003 Update of US Testing Status Anthony Affolder On behalf of the US testing group.
UCSB Encapsulation Studies UC Santa Barbara Based upon a 6 week study by F. Garberson in collaboration with A. Affolder, J. Incandela, S. Kyre and many.
Module Production for The ATLAS Silicon Tracker (SCT) The SCT requirements: Hermetic lightweight tracker. 4 space-points detection up to pseudo rapidity.
1 US Testing Update-Anthony AffolderTracker Meeting, Feb 10, 2004 US Module Testing Update Anthony Affolder (On behalf of the US testing group) Update.
Slide 1-OGP status & module reinforcementDOE review, January 20, 2004 Status of OGP & Module reinforcement Andrea Allen Development Technician DOE Review.
US Module Production June 2, 2005 J. Incandela For the US CMS Tracker Group.
The BTeV Tracking Systems David Christian Fermilab f January 11, 2001.
SSD Operations Manual March 2014 SSD: 4 th layer of vertex detector Heavy Flavor Tracker Silicon Strip Detector – Operations Manual PXL Inserted from this.
CMS FPIX Reinstallation/Commissioning Lorenzo Uplegger 4/20/091.
1 TEC pilot run status Goal : test TEC module production rate capabilities - 15 R6 modules assembled on Brussels Gantry and bonded in Aachen I - 15 R7.
Guido_Tonelli / CMS_TSC / 5 February Time stability of ST sensors The problem The sensors re-measuring campaign Failure analysis Conclusions.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 SVT – Review January Sensors for the Silicon Vertex Tracker Amrit Yegneswaran.
Abe Seiden December 2003 SCT Week S USA SCT Barrel Module Assembly SCT Week CERN December 2003 Presented by Abe Seiden U.C. Santa Cruz.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, C Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS C: Ladder Fabrication A. Brez.
Ronald Lipton PMG June Layer 0 Status 48 modules, 96 SVX4 readout chips 6-fold symmetry 8 module types different in sensor and analog cable length.
DOE Rev of Run IIb Sep 24-26, Detector Production WBS James Fast Fermilab.
Fermilab PMG - Results from module testing - April 9, 2004 – E.Chabalina (UIC) 1 Results from module testing E.Chabalina University of Illinois (Chicago)
CMS Si Tracker Project - US CMS Meeting at Riverside – May 19, US CMS Tracker Outer Barrel (TOB) Silicon Project Tim Bolton (for Regina Demina)
Ronald Lipton Layer 0 Status PMG Sep Status of the Layer 0 Project – emphasis on hardware status, preproduction, and preparations for shutdown work.
Vertex ‘99, 6/21-25/1999 p. 1 CDF Run II SiliconAlan Sill, Texas Tech University CDF Run II Silicon Tracking Projects 8th INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON VERTEX.
Proposal for the assembly of the PHOBOS ring counters (H.P. 3/20/98) I would like to propose and discuss with you an alternative layout and assembly procedure.
Tracker Subsystem1 GLAST LAT Project TRAY DELTA MRR, 18 Nov., 2004 GLAST LAT Tracker Delta Manufacturer Readiness Review for Tray Assembly and Test at.
PS Module Ron Lipton, Feb A bit of History During much of the conceptual design phase of the outer tracker we had focused on the “long barrel”
R. Lipton Vertex ‘98 Santorini, Greece The D0 Silicon Microstrip Tracker (D0SMT) Outline  Design  Detector Studies Coupling capacitors Radiation Damage.
VEA’s proposal of automated assembly system WP6 meeting, 16/01/14.
A New Inner-Layer Silicon Micro- Strip Detector for D0 Alice Bean for the D0 Collaboration University of Kansas CIPANP Puerto Rico.
Electrical Tests of Modules and Ladders Markus Friedl (HEPHY Vienna) 2 October 2014.
Si Sensors for Additional Tracker
SVD Electronics Constraints
ATLAS pixel module assembly flow
Detector building Notes of our discussion
IBL Overview Darren Leung ~ 8/15/2013 ~ UW B305.
Mini-Tower test results
Hung-Chi Chu (1)1, Fang-Lin Chao (2)1 and Wei-Tsung Siao(3)1
On behalf of the US TOB testing group
UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder
Update of US Testing Status
US Module Production Status
UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder
UCSB Short-term Testing Plan
Results from module testing
UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
On behalf of the US TOB testing group
CMS Perugia Modules Production Review
Module production in Italy
Hybrid Testing Status 10 new hybrids brought by Lenny all tested
Hybrid & Module Electrical Testing
Sensor probing (Summary)
US Hybrid/Module/Rod Testing Model
US Module Testing Progress Report
TOB Module Production Overview and Plan
FNAL module testing summary
Wirebonding UCSB FNAL Machines
Setup for testing LHCb Inner Tracker Modules
US Module Testing Progress Report
Presentation transcript:

FNAL Production Experience J. Incandela CMS Tracker Week April, 2000

(A. Affolder, S. Baroiant, J. Goldstein, C.Hill, and D. Stuart) Outline Similarity of CDF ISL to CMS tracker Recent CDF ISL Production Experience at FNAL (A. Affolder, S. Baroiant, J. Goldstein, C.Hill, and D. Stuart) Production rates Testing results Mechanical quality Damage Expectation for CMS

CDF ISL Pisa-led Engineering 2 layers, 2 meters long

ISL Module Assembly at FNAL Karlsruhe Fixtures K&S 8090 ISL half modules 3 double-sided sensors 1 double-sided hybrid w/pitch adapters 512 channels/side 4096 total wirebonds

CDF ISL Production

Low Production Damage 0.4% average per module

Silicon Alignments x = -.002 mm sx = 2.1 mm y is orthogonal to strips x is parallel to strips y = .03 mm sy = 2.1 mm

Si-to-Mounting Hole Mounting Hole Alignment Factors into alignment in the final assembly. Use one machine to build module (B&S CMM) and another to check it (OGP) y-offset indicates the systematic uncertainty. different lighting (non-uniform) inherently difficult to measure a hole location. Spec. is 25 mm x = -0.5 mm sx = 4.3 mm y = -5.9 mm sy = 5.6 mm

Flatness Residuals sz = 22.6 mm Spec. 100 mm Module rms distribution

Damage Rates Silicon Loss rates (~420 HPK DS sensors used) 1 damaged during probing 6 lost in module construction (see below) Module Loss rates (~140 manufactured modules) Two modules irretrievably damaged by wirebonder new machine had an unexpected referencing feature no longer an issue no other damage None lost in testing or burn-in

Test Procedures Test parts at each stage of module construction Ensure no loss of functionality of SVX3D chips Identify damage due to construction (e.g. pinholes created in fabrication/wire-bonding) Characterize performance “Burn in” parts to test long-term reliability Hybrids are burned in for 72 hours continuous operation Half-ladders are burned in for 48 hours Bias Voltage cycled every 6 hours from 0V to 50% over depletion Thermally cycled every 6 hours over 20 degrees Testing should be fast, efficient, and accurate Testing is procedural, presentation of results is automated

Procedure Hybrids burned in at LBL, then shipped to FNAL Tested upon arrival at FNAL Pitch-adaptor is bonded and the hybrid is re-tested Silicon is bonded, pinholes identified, removed from readout Half-ladder is tested Operating voltage determined Occupancy and efficiency estimated from measured quantities Ladder graded (grade A is > 94% efficiency, < 2% occupancy) Half-ladders burned in then mated to make modules mates are selected to match in occupancy and efficiency Modules tested, put into storage until installed on space frame

Re-testing ISL Module Re-test rate is quite low since number of repairs needed is quite low hybrid re-test rate: 4.7% ladder re-test rate: 3.2% We would expect these rates to be significantly lower for CMS

Burn-in Hybrids operated 72 h before installed in half-ladders. Burn-in includes temp. and voltage cycling. Every 6 hours we simply turn off the chillers. Once things warm up, the power is automatically tripped off by the interlocks. Temperature swing is ~ 20 C. This is abrupt and a bit violent but not uncommon in actual operation. Up to now, the only failures observed in burn-in have been pinholes being formed. 8 in the first 15 minutes 1 at 4.5 h 1 at 16.5 h ISL Burn-in time was therefore reduced to 48 hours.

Expectations for CMS CMS modules simpler and more robust. 2 single-sided sensors and single-sided hybrid less likely to damage backside silicon itself more robust with fewer bad channels HPK single-sided sensors received for CDF L00 project were nearly perfect CMS construction times and loss rates should be lower than CDF ISL. Minimal damage possible Repair effort could be very small

Summary ISL is going really well CMS is simpler Easy to pace and schedule reliably (assuming hybrid supply is not interrupted) Very low losses from damage CMS is simpler With proper care we should have very low losses, and not a lot of repair required. Assuming electronics is robust and on-time, production schedule can be met.