DR Measurement & Verification

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

Demand Response Forecasting, Measurement & Verification Methods/Challenges/Considerations National Town Meeting on Demand Response Washington, DC - June.
NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
National Town Meeting on Demand Response Session A – Estimate It, Measure It, Verify It Demand Response Coordinating Committee (DRCC) Renaissance Washington.
New England Developments in Demand Response and Smart Grid 2010 National Town Meeting on Demand Response and Smart Grid Henry Yoshimura, Director, Demand.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
Interest, Rent, and Profit. Interest It is the price for credit or loanable funds. It is also called the return earned by capital as an input in the production.
Ramping and CMSC (Congestion Management Settlement Credit) payments.
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
1 RELIABILITY AND COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKETS POWER Research Conference UC Berkeley March 19, 2004 Paul Joskow MIT, CEEPR, CMI and Jean Tirole IDEI,
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen 1 © 2011 D. Kirschen and the University of Washington.
Demand Side Management The Natural Purview of Utilities The Customer Viewpoint Rates on the Rise in a Rough Economy - Responding to New Realities Marketing.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
MEC: Customer Profitability Models Topic DSM – DR, Advanced EE and Dispatch Ability Jesse Langston, OG&E Oct 20 th 2013.
NAESB MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION MODEL BUSINESS PRACTICE RETAIL ELECTRIC DEMAND RESPONSE NARUC update 9/14/09.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Revise Lecture 2 1. Revise Lecture The regulatory system 2.2. A conceptual framework 2.
Joint Agency Workshop on the Governor’s Energy Efficiency Goals CEC IEPR Workshop on 2030 Efficiency Goals Panel Topic Codes and Existing Buildings Monday.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
Settlement Accuracy Analysis Prepared by ERCOT Load Profiling.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
Advanced Lighting Control Systems (ALCS) Energy Estimation Tool Pacific Gas & Electric Company Dave Alexander.
Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, Session 6 Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary? Reluctantly…yes But States should also be.
NAESB Conference Call October 10, 2008 DSM EE RETAIL GROUP.
Building Blocks for Premise Level Load Reduction Estimates ERCOT Loads in SCED v2 Subgroup July 21, 2014.
AEMO: DR Mechanism Baseline Methodology DRM Working Group July 2013.
JOINT WORKSHOP ON MULTIPLE-USE APPLICATIONS. AMS’S 50 MW FLEET FOR SO. CAL EDISON MULTIPLE USE CASE #5: BEHIND- THE-METER DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES.
Joint Energy Auction Implementation Proposal of PG&E, SCE and SDG&E California Public Utilities Commission Workshop – November 1, 2006.
ERCOT Market Education Market Role in Emergency Operations OTS 2016.
Wind Management at MISO
Distribution Strategies
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
GENESYS Redevelopment Strawman Proposal
Profiling Working Group
PJM Load Product (Consumption Product)
Alternative Approach for Loads in SCED v.2
Load Participation in Real-Time Market: Loads in SCED version 2
Northwest Demand Response Symposium
Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012
Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
The New Texas Wholesale/Retail Market
Which Goals, and What Assumptions?
Grid Integration of Intermittent Resources
Electricity Wholesale Markets: Designs for a low-carbon future
Flexible Forward Contracts for Renewable Energy Generators
The Future of Demand Response in New England

SMART REGULATORY APPROACH FOR SMART GRID INVESTMENTS
Rate-of-Return Regulation
Framing the Issue and a Roadmap
Ch 15 Energy and Sustainability Homework
The Price is Right!.
Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments
Demand resource emergency energy measurement and verification
Transmission Pricing & Regional Electric Markets
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen
Making the Demand Side a Real Resource
THE INVESTMENT SETTING
DECISION
A Business Simulation for Corporate Finance Courses
35.1 – Describe the cognitive strategies that assist our problem solving, and identify the obstacles that hinder it. Problem Solving Strategies: 1) Trial.
Market Pricing Initiatives Update September 9th, 2003
System Operational Update and Review December 4, 2018
EM&V Planning and EM&V Issues
Presentation transcript:

DR Measurement & Verification Common sense, practicality, and lessons from experience

When and why do we need baselines? Baselines are necessary when customer is being incentivized by a means different than paying for metered load. Time-based pricing does not require a baseline Uptake is slow; volumes often don’t warrant the accounting costs Requires painfully high prices to induce behavior Difficult to reliably plan the system around voluntary behavior – leads to inefficient overbuilds. Supply-side DR requires calculation of a baseline. DR programs are more popular than dynamic pricing with customers Requires proving a negative: the counterfactual proposition of what the customer did not consume. Baselines are important because operators rely upon the resource and resources are paid for performance.

Attributes of a quality baseline from a practitioner’s perspective Attributes of a quality baseline from a practitioner’s perspective . . . ACCURACY Accuracy Baseline should not overestimate or underestimate “but for” consumption. May need different baselines for variable loads RRMSE Test for customer load variability Need a different baseline for weekends and holidays Baseline should be seeded with recent consumption data with similar days of consumption Discard outliers – dispatch days and days that deviate from normal consumption excluded Differences between “10 of 10”, “High 4 of 5”, “Middle 6 of 10” Weather adjustments – addresses inherent bias of most baselines

Attributes of a quality baseline from a practitioner’s perspective Attributes of a quality baseline from a practitioner’s perspective . . . INTEGRITY Baseline “gaming” must be avoided Rules that permit customer to inflate performance artificially is cheating DR is vulnerable to accusations of gaming because performance is based upon the counter-factual Gaming is sort of unnatural for customers, which makes it generally rare Most forms of gaming have been identified and there are best practices to avoid them Locking in a stale baseline Overconsuming prior to event start Inflating peak load contribution Rules should be adopted with an eye toward limiting gaming potential Vigilance and enforcement and serious consequences for abuse is better than trying to stamp out all possible forms of gaming.

Attributes of a quality baseline from a practitioner’s perspective Attributes of a quality baseline from a practitioner’s perspective . . . SIMPLICITY Baseline is the basis for customer payment. Customers do care about baselines. Must be simple enough to explain to the customer how performance is measured. Must be simple enough for customer to calculate to verify performance/settlements. Should be determinable in advance of event so that real time performance can be managed. Must be administrable Needs to be based upon enough data to calculate an accurate baseline, but not so much data that baselines become burdensome to calculate or susceptible to errors. Compliance is a paramount concern. Data is more complex, noisier and contains more errors than most realize. Data set used to calculate baselines for settlement must be validated carefully. There is major overhead and compliance risk associated with verification of complex baselines that increase program costs.

Attributes of a quality baseline from a practitioner’s perspective Attributes of a quality baseline from a practitioner’s perspective . . . ALIGNMENT Different types of baselines should be considered depending upon goals of the DR program.

Two basic types of baselines

Attributes of a quality baseline from a practitioner’s perspective Attributes of a quality baseline from a practitioner’s perspective . . . ALIGNMENT Different types of baselines should be considered depending upon goals of the DR program. Guaranteed Load Drop is often utilized in economic and/or reliability DR programs where it is important to know how much energy the demand response is intended to replace. Firm Service Level may be fine for programs built a reliability program around resource planning needs where it is important to know the level of customer consumption rather than the amount of reduction May need both types in a program due to variable patterns of customer consumption

GLD vs. FSL from a nomination and performance perspective. Guaranteed Load Drop Firm Service Level

Attributes of a quality baseline from a practitioner’s perspective Attributes of a quality baseline from a practitioner’s perspective . . . ALIGNMENT Different types of baselines should be considered depending upon goals of the DR program. Guaranteed Load Drop is often utilized in economic and/or reliability DR programs where it is important to know how much energy the demand response is intended to replace. Firm Service Level may be fine for programs built a reliability program around resource planning needs where it is important to know the level of customer consumption rather than the amount of reduction May need both types in a program due to variable patterns of customer consumption Ancillary Service programs with short duration dispatches may be better served by a Meter Before/Meter After type of measure. Meter Before/Meter After doesn’t work with long duration dispatches. More lead time leads to broader participation – Meter Before/Meter After generally requires short lead time.

Final Thought Baseline design is local utility or regulatory decision, but serious consideration should be given to standardization in order to attract innovation to serve customers and utilities on a regional basis.

Kenneth D. Schisler Vice President of Regulatory Affairs 410-725-1462 kschisler@enernoc.com