RECAP what’s the difference between state-dependent forgetting and context dependent forgetting? Outline the research to support context-dependent forgetting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reconstruction of Automobile destruction
Advertisements

Loftus and Palmer Leading Questions.
Memory. Watch this clip and answer the following questions qaLrc4.
PYA1: Critical Issue Eye Witness Testimony EWT. Eye Witness Testimony EWT The statements provided by witnesses of a crime or situation which help to establish.
BIG 12 - Powerpoint #1 Loftus & Palmer 1974; Bartlett 1932.
Cognitive Approach AS Level Psychology The core studies.
Eye Witness Testimony Objectives 1.Be able to appreciate the importance of memory research 2.Be able to describe the key study 3.Be able to evaluate the.
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Loftus and Palmer Evaluation Cognitive Core Study.
Loftus & Palmer (1974) - Aim: - To see the effect of leading questions on Eye Witness Testimony.
Eye-witness testimony
LOFTUS AND PALMER CORE STUDY SLIDES Get out your APFC.
Readings 25 & 26. Reading 25: Classic Memory and the eye-witness Experiment 1 Experiment 2 Conclusion Reading 26: Contemporary Misinformation Effect Memory.
Class Experiment Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
Memory and the power of suggestion
Contents Cognitive Psychology What is Cognitive Psychology? Assumptions Methods of Investigation Core Studies from Cognitive Psychology - Loftus and Palmer.
Reconstruction of Memories Elizabeth Loftus’ Research.
Memory Construction Period 3 #10
Reliability of one cognitive process
AS Level Psychology The core studies Cognitive Approach.
AREA OF STUDY 2 MEMORY UNIT 3 THE CONSCIOUS SELF.
Question Wording and Eyewitness Testimony © POSbase 2005 The study of Loftus & Palmer (1974):Loftus & Palmer (1974): Participants viewed films about a.
Memorise these words, you have until I have finished reading them out. sournicecandy honeysugarsoda bitterchocolategood hearttastecake toothtartpie.
Loftus And Palmer The Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction.
Factors affecting eyewitness testimony. Eyewitness testimony Eye witnesses who have ‘seen with their own eyes’ tend to be believed more by juries than.
Do Now What are some factors that you think could influence eyewitness testimony?
Memory Eyewitness Testimony. Learning objectives Understand what is meant by eyewitness testimony (EWT) Be aware of some of the factors that affect the.
MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE Factors Affecting EWT Anxiety.
Eyewitness Testimony Elizabeth Loftus.
AS Level Psychology The core studies
PSY.MemoryRetrieval. The Willpower Instinct Independently read pg. 41 – 45 Explain one theory of memory retrieval. Before answering – do 15 jumping jacks.
Loftus & Palmer Cognitive Psychology The Core Studies.
Eyewitness Testimony Violence and Recall Loftus & Burns: showed participants a filmed bank robbery. One version shots were fired but no one was hurt.
About how fast were the cars going when they hit each other? collided smashed bumped contacted.
Research methods Designing an experiment Lesson 5.
Reliability in Memory.  In 1984 Jennifer Thompson, a 22-year-old college student was raped at knifepoint. She testified that during the crime she made.
Memory Bingo! HypothesisIndependent variable Dependent variable Weapon focusDecaySensory store CapacityEncodingPeterson and Peterson LoftusCentral ExecutivePhonological.
Getting you thinking: Extension: Read the ‘Apply your knowledge’ section on p55. Discuss the task with your neighbour.
Pop Quiz Define the following key terms: Social rolesUnanimity Agentic state Authoritarian personality Locus of Control Minority influence CodingCapacity.
Eyewitness Testimony Reliability in Memory.
Discussion Loftus and Palmer suggest 2 explanations for the results of Experiment 1: Response Bias: The different speed estimates occurred because the.
How reliable is your memory? PART 2
Loftus and Palmer Study one Study two Aim Reconstructive memory is….
MEMORY FALLIBLITY OF MEMORY.
Multiple choice questions
Memory Construction “To Some Degree All Memory is False”
Loftus and Palmer (1974) (A2) Reconstruction of automobile destruction and example of the interaction between language and memory.
Eye Witness Testimony EWT.
Lesson objectives Starter: Identifing different types of validity
4.3 Classic Evidence: Loftus and Palmer (1974)
Presentation by Jordan Cline, Sarah Swift, and Anita Bainbridge
AO3 anxiety – ethical issues
Post event discussion (PED) and EWT
Reliability of Memory Ms. Carmelitano.
1a the context of recall whether participants recalled the words in the same room or a different room the classroom or the school hall.
Starter: how good is your memory?
Elizabeth Loftus and John Palmer
PSYA1: Cognitive Psychology Memory
4.3 Classic Evidence: Loftus and Palmer (1974)
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
what have we learned from past two lessons?
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Sour Nice Candy Honey Pie Toffee Taste Cake Tooth Tart Sugar Pop
L.O: Misleading information leading questions post-event discussion.
The cognitive area.
Eye Witness Testimony EWT.
Reconstructing Memory
The effect of Anxiety on Eyewitness Testimony
RECAP How can anxiety have a positive effect on accuracy of EWT?
Presentation transcript:

RECAP what’s the difference between state-dependent forgetting and context dependent forgetting? Outline the research to support context-dependent forgetting Outline the research to support state-dependent forgetting

Factors affecting Eyewitness Testimony Objectives: To be able to outline factors affecting eyewitness testimony including leading questions

Key Word Eyewitness Testimony The testimony, based on memory, of an individual who saw an incident take place. EWT is important because… Troy davis

Starter Can your memories be changed? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=il0u2s_WGXA

Item list □ Fan □Refrigerator □ Fire extinguisher □Oven □ Purse □ Clock □ Hawaiian garland □ Pom pom □ Television □ Pill bottle □ Cell phone □ Hammer □ Shoes □ Perfume □ Mr. Potato Head □ Book □ Baseball glove/mitt □ Iron □ Deodorant □Refrigerator □Oven □Cabinets □Dish rack □Toaster □Microwave □ Toaster oven □ Coffee maker □ Rice cooker □ Cereal box □ Pot □ Pan □ Sink □ Kitchen magnet □ Salt and pepper shaker □ Can opener □ Paper towel holder □ Cup □ Plate □ Dish towel □ Spoon □ Fork □ Bowl □ Washing up liquid □ Fruit □ Picture frame □ Water bottle □ Oven mitt □ Plant □ Watch □ Knife set/block

Item list □ Fan □Refrigerator □ Fire extinguisher □Oven □ Purse □ Clock □ Hawaiian garland □ Pom pom □ Television □ Pill bottle □ Cell phone □ Hammer □ Shoes □ Perfume □ Mr. Potato Head □ Book □ Baseball glove/mitt □ Iron □ Deodorant □Refrigerator □Oven □Cabinets □Dish rack □Toaster □Microwave □ Toaster oven □ Coffee maker □ Rice cooker □ Cereal box □ Pot □ Pan □ Sink □ Kitchen magnet □ Salt and pepper shaker □ Can opener □ Paper towel holder □ Cup □ Plate □ Dish towel □ Spoon □ Fork □ Bowl □ Washing up liquid □ Fruit □ Picture frame □ Water bottle □ Oven mitt □ Plant □ Watch □ Knife set/block

Who would you most trust to have given a good account?

Which factors effect EWT? Schemas (previous experiences) Anxiety Which factors effect EWT? Consequentiality (thinking you’re responsible) Leading Questions/ Misinformation

Key Terms Misleading information: incorrect information given to the eye witness usually after the event (post-event information). This can be leading questions or post-event discussion between other witnesses and people. Leading question: a question which, because of the way it was phrased, suggests a certain answer. “was the knife in the accused’s left hand?” this suggests that the answer is left hand. Post-event discussion (PED): occurs when there is more than one witness to an event. Witnesses may discuss what they have seen with co-witnesses or with other people. This may influence the accuracy of each witness’s recall of the event.

Car Crash Video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rg5bBJQOL74 Watch the video and answer the questions on your sheet.

Loftus and Palmer An investigation into leading questions. Notice that there were different sheets, one said ‘bumped’ the other said ‘smashed’ – what did our experiment show? What is a leading question?

Key Word Leading question A question phrased in such a way as to prompt a particular answer. For example “What colour was the man’s hat?” rather than, “Was the man wearing a hat?”

Research into Leading Questions Loftus and Palmer (1974) Loftus (1975)

Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction Loftus and Palmer (1974) Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction

Aim To investigate how information provided to a witness after an event will influence their memory of that event

‘About how fast were the cars going when they ________ each other’ Method – Experiment 1 45 student participants were shown short video clips They were split into 5 groups, with 9 participants in each one All of the participants were asked: ‘About how fast were the cars going when they ________ each other’ Each group was given a different verb to fill in the blank. These verbs were ‘smashed, collided, bumped, hit or contacted’. Therefore the independent variable was the verb used. The dependent variable was the estimate of speed given by the participants Experimental Designs There are different types of experimental design. These are: # Independent Measures Design - Each participant in one group only - Larger sample needed - Larger sample is more likely to be truly representative – But costly and time consuming. # Matched Participants Design – Similar to independent measures in that each participant is in one group only, but here the participants in each group are matched on certain relevant characteristics, e.g. sex, age, IQ, etc… # Repeated Measures Design – Here each participant is in both groups or conditions – means that you need a smaller sample, which would be easier to obtain, but a smaller sample is unlikely to be representative of the population.

MEAN ESTIMATE OF SPEED (mph) Results – Experiment 1 How the question was phrased influenced the participants’ speed estimates When the verb ‘smashed’ was used, participants estimated that the cars were travelling much faster than when the verb ‘contacted’ was used. VERB MEAN ESTIMATE OF SPEED (mph) Smashed 40.8 Collided 39.3 Bumped 38.1 Hit 34.0 Contacted 31.8 What do these results show?

Method – Experiment 2 150 student participants were shown a short film that showed a multi-vehicle car accident and then they were asked questions about it. The participants were split into 3 groups (with 50 in each group). One group was asked: ‘How fast were the cars going when they hit each other?’ The second was asked: ‘How fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other?’ The third group was not asked about the speed of the vehicles One week later, all participants returned and were asked: ‘Did you see any broken glass?’ There was no broken glass in the film.

What do these results show? Results – Experiment 2 Did you see any broken glass? Response Smashed Hit Control Yes 16 7 6 No 34 43 44 What do these results show? The results show that the verb used in the original question influenced whether the participants thought they had seen broken glass.

Why do leading questions affect EWT? Response-bias explanation suggests the wording of the question has no real effect on the participants memory as such, but influences how they decide to answer e.g the word ‘smashed’ encourages participants to increase the speed estimate substitution explanation – the wording of a leading question actually changes the participants memory of the film clip. Participants who heard ‘smashed’ were more likely to report a broken headlight (there wasn’t actually a broken headlight) later on than those who heard ‘hit’.

Evaluation Discuss the evaluation of Loftus & Palmer Can you think of any strengths? Are there any limitations? Complete your booklet using page 59

Post-event discussion When co-witnesses to a crime discuss it with each other (post-event discussion), their eye-witness testimonies become contaminated. This is because they combine (mis)information from other witnesses with their own memories. Research to support… Read page 28 of your booklet and highlight key points.

The correct answer is… c) Knocked Test Yourself… 1. Which of the following was not a cue word in the experiment by Loftus and Palmer? Smashed Contacted Knocked Hit The correct answer is… c) Knocked

The correct answer is… a) Estimate of Speed Test Yourself… 2. The DV in the first experiment was… Estimate of speed The verb ‘smashed’ The question about broken glass The film The correct answer is… a) Estimate of Speed

The correct answer is… c) 5 Test Yourself… 3. In Experiment 1, how many experimental conditions were there? 1 3 5 7 The correct answer is… c) 5

The correct answer is… b) 2 Test Yourself… 4. In Experiment 2, how many experimental groups were there? 1 2 3 4 The correct answer is… b) 2

The correct answer is… c) 1 week Test Yourself… 5. In Experiment 2, participants were tested immediately and then asked to return for some more questions. How long afterwards was this? 1 day 3 days 1 week 2 weeks The correct answer is… c) 1 week

Test Yourself… 6. In Experiment 2, which group saw the most broken glass? The ‘smashed’ group The ‘collided’ group The ‘hit’ group The control group The correct answer is… a) The ‘smashed’ group

7. Which of the following is true? Test Yourself… 7. Which of the following is true? Experiment 1 and 2 were both repeated measures Experiment 1 and 2 were both independent measures Only Experiment 1 was repeated measures Only experiment 1 was independent measures The correct answer is… b) Experiment 1 and 2 were both independent measures

The correct answer is… b) Students Test Yourself… 8. The participants in this study were: Children Students Teachers Adults The correct answer is… b) Students

Supporting evidence – A03 P: there is further supporting the fact that leading questions can distort EWT EE: Loftus (1975) found that 17% percent of participants who watched a video of a car ride and were asked ‘how fast was the car going when it passed the white barn’ recalled seeing a barn a week later E: this supports the idea that post-event information added to a memory after the event has occurred, can affect recall.

Exam Question “Outline and evaluate research into the effects of leading questions on eyewitness testimony (12)”