LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Agenda Team Introduction Daedalus Concept Subsystem Overview Concept of Operations Daedalus Performance Daedalus Vision Questions

Team LunaTech Nick Case, Project Manager Morris Morell, Systems Engineer Travis Morris, GN&C Greg Barnett, Thermal Systems Adam Garnick, Power Systems Katherine Tyler, Power Systems Tommy Stewart, Structures and Mechanisms Julius Richardson, Conops John Grose, Payload and Communications Adam Fanning, Communications Eric Brown, Technical Editor

Partners Mobility Concepts Sample Return Vehicle Design Southern University Robert Danso McArthur Whitmore Sample Return Vehicle Design ESTACA Julie Monszajin Sebastien Bouvet

Daedalus Lander

Daedalus Lander

Concept of Operations

Daedalus LPES

Daedalus Thermal

Daedalus Power

Daedalus GN&C

Daedalus Communications

Daedalus Performance Figures of Merit Goal Daedalus Number of surface objectives accomplished 15 Samples in permanent dark and 5 samples in lighted terrain 16 Samples in permanent dark and 6 samples in lighted terrain Percentage of mass allocated to payload Higher is better 40% of Dry Mass Ratio of objectives (SMD to ESMD) validation 2 to 1 Efficiency of getting data in stakeholders hands vs. capability of mission Redundant Communication Percentage of mass allocated to power system Lower is better 17% of Dry Mass Ratio of off-the-shelf hardware to new development hardware

Proposed LPRP Timeline Using Daedalus Daedalus Vision Proposed LPRP Timeline Using Daedalus LRO (2008) LCROSS (2008) LCS (2010) Daedalus I (2012) Daedalus II (2014)

Daedalus Vision Starting with a basic, yet powerful and adaptable lander; building on the good design practices and valuable data will allow the Daedalus concept to evolve with each lunar mission and provide a low-cost solution for the Lunar Precursor Robotic Program. This is the Vision of Daedalus, and the mission of Team LunaTech.

Questions