LRO Pointing Allocations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 ENVISAT Calibration Review, ESTEC 9-13 Sept 2002, DORIS & ORBIT, Berthyl Duesmann.
Advertisements

Conclusions on torque and grease1 Alexander Dierlamm, Michael Eppard (CERN) Measurements of thermal contact between TOB module and rod May 2004.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter NASA’s Next First Step To The Moon Noah E. Petro NASA Goddard Space Flight Center May 12 th, 2009.
Pre-launch Characterization of the CERES Flight Model 5 (FM5) Instrument on NPP S. Thomas a, K. J. Priestley b, M. Shankar a, N. P. Smith a, M. G. Timcoe.
DIRECT TROPOSPHERIC OZONE RETRIEVALS FROM SATELLITE ULTRAVIOLET RADIANCES Alexander D. Frolov, University of Maryland Robert D. Hudson, University of.
Towards Creation of a JWST Astrometric Reference Field: Calibration of HST/ACS Absolute Scale and Rotation Roeland van der Marel Jay Anderson, Colin Cox,
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) is the first mission in NASA's Vision for Space Exploration, a plan to return to the moon and then to travel to.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lunar Mapping and Modeling Project Summary and Status Go for Lunar Landing Conference Tempe,
System/Subsystem Requirements, Overview Determining requirements –Top level definition of driving requirements –Derived requirements Verification process.
Bearing Systems General Principle: Need two signals: –1. One whose phase varies with bearing from (or to) the transmitter –2. A reference signal whose.
Level 1 - LRO Requirements ESMD-RLEP-0010
Plans for interim data release J E Russell (Imperial)
1 Project Name Solar Sail Project Proposal February 7, 2007 Megan Williams (Team Lead) Eric Blake Jon Braam Raymond Haremza Michael Hiti Kory Jenkins Daniel.
1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center 2005/4/14 LRO/CRaTER Technical Interchange Meeting LRO Mechanical Systems Giulio Rosanova / /
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Integration and Test Joanne Baker GSFC Code 568 August 16-17, 2005.
1 LRO Mission Overview Craig Tooley - GSFC/431 September 7, 2005.
A New Algorithm for Improving the Remote Sensing Data Transmission over the LEO Satellite Channels Ali Payandeh and Mohammad Reza Aref Applied Science.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
Blue: Histogram of normalised deviation from “true” value; Red: Gaussian fit to histogram Presented at ESA Hyperspectral Workshop 2010, March 16-19, Frascati,
DSB-SC AM Tx signal  AM Tx signal spectrum
1 of 28 A design study of a Cryogenic High Accurate Derotator.
Philip Luers NASA/GSFC Code 561 August 16-17, 2005
EKT 451 CHAPTER 5 DC & AC Bridge..
1 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Instrument Accommodations Review April 28, 2005 Thermal Design Charles Baker/GSFC Bill Chang/ESS
Section Number - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Communication Systems Jason A. Soloff NASA/GSFC Code 567 August 16-17, 2005.
RECORD PROCESSING CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE EFFECTS OF TILTING AND TRANSIENTS VLADIMIR GRAIZER California Geological Survey.
24a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Mission Assurance Ron Kolecki Senior Systems Assurance Manager August 16-17, 2005.
Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar Status- 5/22/14 Sidelobes surface return seen in sidelobes at both nadir incidence and off-nadir in Ku data; not evident.
24b - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Safety Dave Bogart Code 302 August 16-17, 2005.
DC-DC Fundamentals 1.5 Converter Control. What is Converter Control? A converter can provide a constant voltage output at various condition because of.
1 Electrical Systems RLEP Avionics Systems Eng. Philip Luers (301) LRO C&DH Lead Quang H. Nguyen
20c - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Propulsion Chuck Zakrwski NASA/GSFC Code 597 August 16-17, 2005.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
Spacecraft Systems Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB.
Characteristics of remote sensing satellites. Satellites generally vary in their architecture Usually remote sensing satellites are having two plateforms.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO SRR LRO Mission Level 1 Requirements.
XRT SOT Alignment DeLuca With comments from Tarbell & Metcalf 21-Jan-2006.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 ACS Dave Auslander, Dave Pankow, Han Chen, Yao-Ting Mao, UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
Space Robotics Seminar On
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) SRR/Mechanical System August 16-18, 2005
EKT 314/4 WEEK 6 : CHAPTER 3 SIGNAL CONDITIONING EKT 314 Electronic instrumentation.
Power Philip Luers NASA/GSFC Code 561 August 16-17, 2005.
Mark Beckman NASA/GSFC Code 595 August 16-17, 2005
Craig Tooley - GSFC/431 September 7, 2005
Thomas Herring, IERS ACC, MIT
Communications Design Review
Internal Standard method (experiment lab-4)
OSIRIS Calibration Report (Lab Calibration)
Relative Spectral Response and Flat Fields with Internal Calibration Lamps Luisa M. Lara IAA-CSIC Granada (SPAIN)
Deeper insight in the Steins flyby geometry:
I.- Relative Spectral Response: Corrected of green light contamination II.-Flat Fields with Internal Calibration Lamps during Commissioning Luisa M.
OSIRIS flight calibrations so far
Technical Resource Allocations
Mini-RF Requirements Overview
ACS UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory
Image Stabilization System (ISS)
SDO Flight Dynamics Subsystem
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera
Spacecraft Thermal System
LRO Mission Operations Concept
روشهای گرد آوری اطلاعات
LROC Meeting 2005/11/30 LRO CONCEPT-.
LRO SRR Planned for 8/16-18/2005.
Arturo Martinez Mark Robinson Mentor Sam Lawrence Project Manager
NASA Satellite Laser Ranging Moblas 4 Monument Peak, CA LRO and HPWREN Scott Wetzel NASA Satellite Laser Ranging Program Near Earth Networks Programs.
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)
LRO CRaTER Preliminary Temperature Predictions Design A Concept  Old Concept April 12, 2005 Cynthia Simmons/ESS.
Unit 2 Unmanned Aircraft
Transformations Review
THERMAL CONTROL SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

LRO Pointing Allocations Stephen Andrews Code 595 August 16-17, 2005

Introduction some data products and instruments drive knowledge, some drive accuracy instruments on spacecraft bus have different allocations than instruments on instrument module pointing allocations will be shown for each of the LRO Instruments the mini-RF the High Gain Antenna System the Solar Array System

Notes All values are 3-sigma, zero (or mean) to peak Allocations derived so that if allocations are met, requirements will be met Considering rotational errors only; no orbit (translation) errors included Difference between knowledge and accuracy is ACS control error

CRaTER Knowledge Allocation = 7.42 deg CRaTER knowledge requirement = 10 degrees two-axis RSS

CRaTER Accuracy Allocation = 7.44 deg CRaTER accuracy requirement = 35 degrees two-axis RSS

Diviner Knowledge Allocation Diviner spacecraft knowledge requirement = 3000 microrad = 619 asec

Diviner Accuracy Allocation Diviner spacecraft accuracy requirement = 6000 microrad = 1238 asec

LAMP Knowledge Allocation LAMP knowledge desired = 0.2 pixel = 0.06 deg = 216 asec

LAMP Accuracy Allocation LAMP accuracy requirement = 0.15 deg = 540 asec

LEND Knowledge Allocation LEND knowledge requirement = 0.1 deg = 360 asec

LEND Accuracy Allocation LEND accuracy requirement = 0.1 deg = 360 asec

LOLA Knowledge Allocation LOLA knowledge requirement = TBD asec

LOLA Accuracy Allocation LOLA accuracy requirement = 1 deg = 3600 asec

LROC NAC Knowledge Allocation LROC NAC knowledge requirement = TBD asec

LROC NAC Accuracy Allocation LROC NAC accuracy requirement = TBD asec

LROC NAC Coalignment Allocation LROC NAC coalignment accuracy requirement = TBD asec

LROC WAC Knowledge Allocation LROC WAC knowledge requirement = TBD asec

LROC WAC Accuracy Allocation LROC WAC accuracy requirement = TBD asec

Mini-RF Knowledge Allocation Mini-RF knowledge requirement = TBD asec

Mini-RF Accuracy Allocation Mini-RF accuracy requirement = TBD asec

HGA Pointing Accuracy Allocation HGA pointing accuracy requirement = 0.3 deg

HGA Pointing Accuracy Notes Known bias errors assumed measurable/predictable, removable by compensation. Ground-to-orbit bias errors can be measured and corrected after on-orbit deployment. Assumes a calibration is done right after ephemeris upload. Single calibration done to remove thermal distortion bias. Random/ground to orbit column total is analytical calibration residual error.

SA Pointing Accuracy Allocation SA pointing accuracy requirement = 5 deg

SA Pointing Accuracy Notes Known bias errors assumed measurable/predictable, removable by compensation. Ground-to-orbit bias errors can be measured and corrected after on-orbit deployment No calibration needed.

Conclusion Pointing allocations understood Thermal distortions will vary from component to component Allocations meet component requirements