Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Chapter 22 Comparing Two Proportions.
Advertisements

Christopher Dougherty EC220 - Introduction to econometrics (chapter 2) Slideshow: exercise 2.16 Original citation: Dougherty, C. (2012) EC220 - Introduction.
1-1 Copyright © 2015, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 21, Slide 1 Chapter 21 Comparing Two Proportions.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 18 Sampling Distribution Models.
t scores and confidence intervals using the t distribution
Creative Commons Licensing
EC220 - Introduction to econometrics (review chapter)
Psy B07 Chapter 1Slide 1 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE. Psy B07 Chapter 1Slide 2 t-test refresher  In chapter 7 we talked about analyses that could be conducted.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 22 Comparing Two Proportions.
© 2015 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Comparing Two Proportions
Chapter 11 Chi-Square Procedures 11.3 Chi-Square Test for Independence; Homogeneity of Proportions.
EngageNY.org ©2014 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Psy B07 Chapter 4Slide 1 SAMPLING DISTRIBUTIONS AND HYPOTHESIS TESTING.
©2013 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Slide
Hypothesis Testing. The 2 nd type of formal statistical inference Our goal is to assess the evidence provided by data from a sample about some claim concerning.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 22 Comparing Two Proportions.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 22 Comparing Two Proportions.
Chapter 13 Inference for Counts: Chi-Square Tests © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 Business Statistics: A First Course.
Author(s): Brenda Gunderson, Ph.D., 2011 License: Unless otherwise noted, this material is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–Non-commercial–Share.
© 2014 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
USING GAPMINDER in the classroom 6 th July 2011 GI Forum Salzburg, Austria Bob Lang FRGS C.Geog Geography teacher King Edward VI Five Ways School, Birmingham.
Considering the source...
SCIENCE FAIR PROJECT 4TH GRADE.
Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview
Comparing Two Proportions
Chapter 7 Lecture 2 Section: 7.2.
FOURTEEN COUNTRY STUDY
Psychology Unit Research Methods - Statistics
Statistical Reasoning in Everyday Life
STA 291 Spring 2010 Lecture 18 Dustin Lueker.
Sampling Distributions and Hypothesis Testing
How to show what you know!
Comparing Two Proportions
Chapters 20, 21 Hypothesis Testing-- Determining if a Result is Different from Expected.
Morning Reflections / Today’s objectives
Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview
Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview
Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview
Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview
Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview
Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview
Hypothesis Testing for Proportions
Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview
Reading Comprehension Questions
Reading Comprehension Questions
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing
Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview
Using Data to Explore Global Health Issues
Comparing Two Proportions
Do Now: How do you learn best. Do you like to look at pictures
How accurate can models from social media be?
Comparing Two Proportions
Multiple Choice Winning!!!!.
Required attribution: ”Free teaching material from
Year 12 into 13 bridging work
1 WORLD POPULATION Billion people
Comparing Two Proportions
STA 291 Summer 2008 Lecture 18 Dustin Lueker.
Comparing Two Proportions
DeveloPING/ DeveloPED Countries
Comparing Two Proportions
Estimating a Population Proportion Notes
Stats: Modeling the World
Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview
Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview
Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview
Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview
Presentation transcript:

Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview TEST QUESTION 4 Literacy www.gapminder.org/test-questions www.gapminder.org/teach Version: 1 Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview

Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview TEST QUESTION: LITERACY Q4.1 What percent of adults in the world today are literate – can read and write? ? A A 80% are literate A B 60% are literate C A 40% are literate www.gapminder.org/teach Version: 1 Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview

Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview TEST QUESTION: LITERACY Q4.1 What percent of adults in the world today are literate – can read and write? CORRECT ANSWER A A 80% are literate A B 60% are literate In 20 years the proportion of adults in the world who can read and write has increased from 75% to 84%. C A 40% are literate That’s a great improvement in education across the world! Source: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.ADT.LITR.ZS/countries?display=graph www.gapminder.org/teach Version: 1 Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview

Large Ignorance A A B B C Results from our public knowledge surveys TEST QUESTION: LITERACY Q4.1 Large Ignorance Remember: Chimpanzees pick the correct answer 33% of the time, just by random! Results from our public knowledge surveys All three countries below present a similar pattern of ignorance in regards to the literacy rate in the world. The question was asked to a representative sample of their population. Sweden Norway US A 80% are literate A 20% 21% 22% 33% B B 60% are literate 52% 60% 52% 33% C 40% are literate 28% 19% 26% 33% The public scored below random! Sources for survey results SWE & NOR: http://www.gapminder.org/GapminderMedia/wp-uploads/Novus-Gapminder-Ignorance-Survey-SWE-NO-nov_dec_20131.pdf US: http://www.novus.se/media/29390/novus-gapminder_ignorance_survey_us_nov_2013.pdf www.gapminder.org/teach Version: 1 Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview

Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview TEST QUESTION: LITERACY Q4.1 WHY IGNORANCE? It’s a very interesting fact that all countries surveyed showed similar results for all three options! It’s very important to understand why people think like this and answer alike. Here are some possible ideas on why the public answered this question so poorly. Macrotrends are not news worthy People might be unaware the the improvements in basic education across the world has started decades ago. These kind of improvements take many years to show relevant results, which is why they are portrayed in media channels. Big changes in statistics of literacy rates happens only after many years or decades, so the public doesn’t hear about it. Wrong assumptions More than half of the public in these countries chose the alternative in the middle. Perhaps they assumed that literacy would not be so high as 80%, nor so low as 40%. This clearly shows that the public is completely unaware about the current state of the world. Exaggeration of extremes Another hypothesis is that the public might still have the misconceptions that the majority of people are still very poor and uneducated. Although there is an awfully large number of extremely poor people in the the world, the majority actually lives in-between extreme poverty and extreme wealth. Most people in the world do have the opportunity to get at least basic education and learn how to read and write. Chimpanzees have none of the problems above. They simply guess. That’s why they beat humans on knowledge questions. They just pick random answers without distortion of preconceived ideas and intuition. To learn more about our Global Ignorance Project and what we do to fight ignorance, visit: www.gapminder.org/ignorance, or watch this TED talk: http://www.ted.com/talks/hans_and_ola_rosling_how_not_to_be_ignorant_about_the_world www.gapminder.org/teach Version: 1 Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview

LICENSE This file is freely available under Creative Common Attribution License 4.0 Which means: Please use it and spread it in any way you want! You are allowed to Remix - You are allowed to change the material and include fragments of it in other works. Spread - You are allowed to make copies, distribute, publish and transmit the material. Sell - You are allowed to include the material in commercial products or services that you charge for. The only requirements are: Trademark - Don't include the word "GAPMINDER" and the logotypes in your products or service, and if you change the meaning of the slides, you must remove the Gapminder trademarks. Attribution - You must make clear to others the license terms of this work and include the citation below. Required attribution: “Free test questions from www.gapminder.org” The Gapminder Foundation is a Swedish not-for-profit organization, independent from all political, commercial and religious affiliations. Gapminder’s mission is to fight devastating ignorance with a fact-based worldview that everyone can understand. Gapminder’s chairman Hans Rosling is a professor of International Health at the Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. For more information visit: www.gapminder.org www.gapminder.org/teach Version: 1 Free teaching material for a fact-based worldview