Prioritising soil conservation and water quality issues for the Waikato River and Waipā River Restoration Strategy, New Zealand. Reece Hill1,2, Dan Borman1,2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Measuring Progress: Monitoring and Evaluation in WRIA 8 WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council November 19, 2009 Scott Stolnack WRIA 8 Technical Coordinator.
Advertisements

3-Year Implementation Schedule. What is the 3-Year Implementation Schedule? A list of prioritized projects for implementers with a time frame to complete.
Utilization of Remotely Sensed Data for Targeting and Evaluating Implementation of Best Management Practices within the Wister Lake Watershed, Oklahoma.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
The LIFE Integrated Projects
Sierra Water Work Group Summit June Upper Mokelumne River Watershed Authority.
Indiana 6217 Coastal Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program – What it is, and What it Means!
The Canadian Approach to P Indexes (or, at least, my approach) D. Keith Reid Presentation to Soil Test P Stratification Working Group 24 July, 2013.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
2012 West Virginia GIS Conference The Nature Conservancy of West Virginia Ruth Thornton Conservation Information Manager.
A. N. Gichu Kenya Forest Service REDD+ and REDD Readiness.
Adaptation in Eastern and Southern Africa Supporting ground level and policy change Jo-Ellen Parry, Program Manager
2013 Spokane River Conference March 26, Shelley Lake Gravel Pit Spokane River.
Application of GLOBIO3 Biodiversity Modelling to KENYA 2 ND JANUARY 2007 MOSES MALOBA.
Proposed Action Purpose and Need A proposal to authorize, recommend, or implement an action in response to the need identified in the Purpose and Need.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.
Dr Richard Johnson, Mountain Environments, UK.  Lead Partner: Germany: Research Institute of Forest Ecology and Forestry  Partner countries: Germany,
Michigan Watershed Plan Reviews Presentation at the Michigan Watershed-Based Planning Workshop, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan
La Moine River Ecosystem Partnership: Organizing for Success Dan Moorehouse & Jeff Boeckler.
Environmental Information Initiatives Stocktake and Assessment Perth Workshop 30 th April 2009.
Lower Columbia River Conservation and Recovery Plan Implementation Team August 19, 2013.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
The Impact of Agriculture on the Taranaki soils. The Taranaki region 414,000 ha (57%) used for high intensity pastoral farming 2300 dairy farms (17% of.
ES407 Senior Seminar Working Group Earth and Physical Science Department Western Oregon University Monmouth, Oregon.
CLUES: Modelling the impacts of mitigation on sediment and nutrient loads to the Kaipara Harbour Annette Semadeni Davies Kelly May National Institute of.
Sierra Water Workgroup Water Summit Kings Beach, California June 11, 2013 Barry Hill, Hydrologist Pacific Southwest Region USDA Forest Service.
Introduction of the Study of the GEF Contributions to the South China Sea Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
Observations and Ideas for Payment for Ecosystem Services in Central Asia.
TRAP 5 th interregional meeting & Site Visits Limerick & Lough Derg, Ireland 9 th October 2013 CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional.
IOWA NUTRIENT REDUCTION STRATEGY A science and technology-based framework to assess and reduce nutrients to Iowa waters and the Gulf of Mexico James Gillespie.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Environmental Quality Improvement Program (EQIP) Edwards Aquifer State Resource Concern (EA SRC) Jim.
Kansas Streambank Database Erika Stanley Kansas Water Office March 16, 2016.
GIS M ETHODOLOGY Swearing Creek Watershed Restoration Plan 8/26/2015 Piedmont Triad Regional Council.
Estimating Annual Sediment Yield and a Sediment Delivery Ratio for Red Creek, Utah and Wyoming Paul Grams Department of Geography and Earth Resources.
Puget Sound Watershed Characterization Project
An Overview of the Flathead Subbasin Planning Process
Economic Joint Venture model: summary of progress
Benefit: Cost Ratio.
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
LCC Role in Conservation Science and Science Delivery
Integrating Wetlands and Watershed Management: Lessons from the U.S.
Prioritising soil conservation and water quality issues for the Waikato River and Waipā River Restoration Strategy, New Zealand. Reece Hill1,2, Dan Borman1,2.
Staying Connected in the Northern Appalachians
Keri Neilson, Michelle Hodges, Julian Williams, Nigel Bradly
Economic model for the Healthy Rivers process
Chesapeake Bay Program Budget & Finance Workgroup Meeting
Paper by: Bloniarz D. , M. Matteo, T
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Place your logo here WERRIBEE RIVER
Digital Elevation Models and Hydrology
Creating Partnerships: EPA R8, NRCS, and States
CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional Authority
Decision Support Systems Directory – an Envirolink Tools Project
Southfork of the Spring River Sub-Watershed Project ( )
MnDOT District Bicycle Plans
The Upper Paint Creek Watershed
Land Based Investment Program
Communicating Credit Where Credit is Due
State Agency Perspective of Estuary Program Subcommittees
Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework
Oak Creek Restoration feasibility study
A3 – Improving State Level Supports and Stakeholder Engagement through Effective Evaluation Kim Gulbrandson, Justyn Poulos – Wisconsin RtI Center Key.
West Virginia University
Lessons Learned - RCPP Shana Joy, Southcentral Regional Manager
Lessons from the Aorere River: The NZ Riverprize Winner
Stormwater Management June 2018 Andrea Phillips
The – new – LIFE program (Integrated Projects)
Restoration & Monitoring Prioritization Tool
Presentation transcript:

Prioritising soil conservation and water quality issues for the Waikato River and Waipā River Restoration Strategy, New Zealand. Reece Hill1,2, Dan Borman1,2 and Tane Desmond1 1 Waikato Regional Council 2 Landsystems Limited BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

About the Restoration Strategy The Restoration Strategy covers the Waikato and Waipā River Catchments as defined by several Treaty of Waitangi Iwi Settlement Acts. Through the Treaty settlements, around $6m NZD are available annually to fund river related improvements in the Waikato and Waipā River Catchments. The Restoration Strategy will guide the funding of projects to ensure they address priority areas and issues. This presentation focusses on the science component of the strategy that identifies priority areas for addressing land based issues and the impact of mitigations. BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Overview Science contribution Methods – the GIS framework Results and findings Lessons learned BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Science contribution To develop an easy to interpret spatial approach and outputs for identifying and prioritising soil conservation issues across sub-catchments. The information will inform the restoration strategy process. Including: Where soil conservation issues are greatest. The range of mitigations being used on the ground. Where mitigations can be placed. An estimate of the cost for mitigations by sub-catchment. An estimate of likely the sediment reductions if mitigations are implemented. BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Science contribution Based on previously developed GIS-based framework Using available model data Erosion and sediment generation Land use intensity Vegetation cover A broader approach Land focussed – mitigate the issues on the land A relative picture across sub-catchments Hydrologically connected and scalable Getting the best from different models BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Issues – multiple model data and ranking Hillslope erosion and sediment model data Streambank erosion and sediment model data Landuse and landcover model data Issues – multiple model data and ranking Stabilise landslides on pasture Plantation forests on pasture Retire pasture Sediment traps Riparian planting Riparian fencing Mitigations – spatially match issues Mitigation costs and sediment reductions Estimates – spatially match mitigations BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Issues Multiple model data was normalised to combine Hillslope erosion and sediment model data Streambank erosion and sediment model data Landuse and landcover model data Issues Multiple model data was normalised to combine Watershed scores - area weighted lengths and areas of issues. Sub-catchment scores – sum of watershed scores weighted by sub-catchment area Sub-catchments ranked by issue scores BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Issues – Upper Waikato sub-catchment sediment BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Ranking sub-catchments issues BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Ranking sub-catchments issues BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Mitigations Mitigations varied across the Waikato catchment. Stabilise landslides on pasture Plantation forests on pasture Retire pasture Sediment traps Riparian planting Riparian fencing Mitigations Mitigations varied across the Waikato catchment. Reality tested with land management staff workshops. Specific mitigations imposed on the land identified as having issues. BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Mitigation – streambank example BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Mitigation – streambank example Fencing completed BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Mitigation – streambank example Fencing required Planting required BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Mitigation – streambank example Costs BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Mitigation costs and sediment reductions Estimates Cost estimates aggregated for sub-catchments. Sediment reduction estimates for each mitigation were imposed on watersheds and aggregated for sub-catchments. Available literature was used to estimate reductions. A range of maps, graphs and data tables was useful to show the estimates across the sub-catchments. BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Whirinaki sub-catchment Estimates Mitigation cost Sediment reduction Reduction cost / ton Hillslope $20.8 m 52% 2325 t/yr $9000/t Streambank $2.2 m 8% 320 t/yr $6900/t Total $23.0 m 19% 2645 t/yr $8700/t BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Upper Waikato sub-catchments - hillslope sediment Reductions (t/yr) Costs ($) Reductions (%) BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Upper Waikato sub-catchments - streambank sediment Reductions (t/yr) Costs ($) Reductions (%) BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Application success A range of model derived spatial data were combined in a meaningful way to inform the restoration strategy. Provided a clear and realistic overview of relative sub- catchment land related issues, estimates of mitigation costs, and likely sediment reductions. The visual and spatial outputs were well received by a wide ranging audience. The approach was very flexible and could be updated in quick response to requested changes. BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Lessons learned Science information from multiple models can be made accessible to a broad audience. A spatial and visual approach assisted information uptake. Compromises are required for the GIS based mitigations. Science was essential but one of many consideration when prioritising sub-catchments for funding. Iterative process and full involvement of “on-the-ground” land managers was an essential requirement for success. BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Acknowledgements My Co-authors. Technical Advisory Group members. Waikato Regional Council and DairyNZ. Restoration Strategy team at Envirostrat. The INFFER team. Landsystems Limited for funding my attendance. Thank you BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY