Nathan R. Treff PhD Chief Science Officer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Patterns of Heredity 4.1 Living things inherit traits in patterns. 4.2
Advertisements

Chromosomal Basis of Inheritance
Announcements 1. Dr. Swanson’s powerpoint lecture is now linked to our lecture schedule. There will be a question on exam 2 from his guest lecture. 2.
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD)
New England Fertility Institute Lifeline Cryogenics Gad Lavy, M.D., F.A.C.O.G. Life begins here…
Chapter 11: MEIOSIS The Cellular Basis of Sexual Reproduction AP Biology RussellAP Biology Russell B. RhodesB. Rhodes.
DR MUHTEREM BAHÇE GATA TIBBİ GENETİK B.D. ÜREME GENETİĞİ VE TEKRARLAYAN ART BAŞARISIZLIĞINDA PGT.
Chapter 15 The Chromosomal Basis of Inheritance. Concept 15.2: Sex-linked genes exhibit unique patterns of inheritance In humans and some other animals,
Meiosis IB Topic 4.2 – Page 93.
MEIOSIS AND CROSSING OVER Chromosomes are matched in homologous pairs Homologous chromosomes: the 2 members of a pair of chromosomes—contain genes for.
Anish A. Shah, MD, MHS, FACOG B OARD C ERTIFIED R EPRODUCTIVE E NDOCRINOLOGIST Preimplantation Genetic Testing Gateway to the Future of Fertility Dennis.
Meiosis: The Cellular Basis of Sexual Reproduction Chapter 11.
Chapter 23: Evaluation of the Strength of Forensic DNA Profiling Results.
Meiotic gene conversion in humans: rate, sex ratio, and GC bias Amy L. Williams June 19, 2013 University of Chicago.
SECTION 6.1 CHROMOSOMES AND MEIOSIS. YOU HAVE BODY CELLS AND GAMETES  Somatic Cells  Definition: body cells; make up most of your body tissues and organs;
Clinical Cytogenetics Mohamad Nusier M.D., Ph.D..
Chapter 12 CHROMOSOMES. Nucleosome and Chromatin
Eray ÇALIŞKAN MD Obstetrics and Gynecology
Improved effectivity of PGS techniques in clinical IVF: The role of embryo stage and technique selection on efficiency M. Cristina Magli, Alessandra Pomante,
In The Name Of God. In The Name Of God Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Disorders Dr. Gita Hatamizadeh OBGYN- Infertility Fellowship Assisted professor.
Seefried, F., von Rohr P., Drögemüller C.
Meiosis Formation of Gametes (Eggs & Sperm)
Check/Take up Homework
Chapter 6.
Asexual vs Sexual Reproduction
PROVISIONAL PROGRAM, PGDIS 2018: DAY ONE
Distribution patterns of segmental aneuploidies in human blastocysts identified by next- generation sequencing  María Vera-Rodríguez, M.Sc., Claude-Edouard.
Evaluation of targeted next-generation sequencing–based preimplantation genetic diagnosis of monogenic disease  Nathan R. Treff, Ph.D., Anastasia Fedick,
Mitosis and Meiosis This PowerPoint file contains a number of slides that may be useful for teaching of genetics concepts. You may use these slides and.
MicroRNAs in spent blastocyst culture medium are derived from trophectoderm cells and can be explored for human embryo reproductive competence assessment 
Meiosis & Mendel Chapter 6
First systematic experience of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for de-novo mutations  Svetlana Rechitsky, Ekaterina Pomerantseva, Tatiana Pakhalchuk,
Dihybrid Crosses and Polygenic Traits
Development and validation of a next-generation sequencing–based protocol for 24- chromosome aneuploidy screening of embryos  Francesco Fiorentino, Ph.D.,
Sexual reproduction How many chromosomes do we have in body cells?
Abnormally fertilized oocytes can result in healthy live births: improved genetic technologies for preimplantation genetic testing can be used to rescue.
Technology requirements for preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve assisted reproduction outcomes  Santiago Munné, Ph.D., Dagan Wells, Ph.D., Jacques.
Single-gene testing combined with single nucleotide polymorphism microarray preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy: a novel approach in optimizing.
Meiosis Formation of Gametes
Preimplantation genetic testing: polar bodies, blastomeres, trophectoderm cells, or blastocoelic fluid?  M. Cristina Magli, M.Sc., Alessandra Pomante,
How cells create gametes
Development and validation of an accurate quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction–based assay for human blastocyst comprehensive chromosomal.
Reproduction at an advanced maternal age and maternal health
Simultaneous assessment of aneuploidy, polymorphisms, and mitochondrial DNA content in human polar bodies and embryos with the use of a novel microarray.
The origin and significance of additional aneuploidy events in couples undergoing preimplantation genetic diagnosis for translocations by array comparative.
Chapter 6 Chromosomes and Cell Reproduction
The Chromosomal Basis of Inheritance
Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays  Nathan R. Treff,
Use of single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays to distinguish between balanced and normal chromosomes in embryos from a translocation carrier  Nathan.
Richard T. Scott, M.D., Daniela Galliano, M.D.  Fertility and Sterility 
Optimizing the culture environment and embryo manipulation to help maintain embryo developmental potential  Jason E. Swain, Ph.D., Doug Carrell, Ph.D.,
Incidence and origin of meiotic whole and segmental chromosomal aneuploidies detected by karyomapping  David Kubicek, Miroslav Hornak, Jakub Horak, Rostislav.
Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray–based concurrent screening of 24- chromosome aneuploidy and unbalanced translocations in preimplantation human.
Introduction to Genetics
The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive.
Alterations of Chromosomes
Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical.
Meiosis Objectives To learn the phases of Meiosis
Assessing the true incidence of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos
Outcome of twin babies free of Von Hippel–Lindau disease after a double-factor preimplantation genetic diagnosis: monogenetic mutation analysis and comprehensive.
Robust embryo identification using first polar body single nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based DNA fingerprinting  Nathan R. Treff, Ph.D., Jing Su,
2d. Know new combinations of alleles may be generated in a zygote through the fusion of male & female gametes (fertilization)‏ 1.
Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study  Richard.
S Evsikov, Ph.D., J Cieslak, Y Verlinsky, Ph.D. 
Assessing the reproductive competence of individual embryos: a proposal for the validation of new “-omics” technologies  Richard T. Scott, M.D., H.C.L.D.,
Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery.
Requirements PRACTICAL Other Prepared slides to observe (optional)
Comprehensive chromosome screening alters traditional morphology-based embryo selection: a prospective study of 100 consecutive cycles of planned fresh.
Principles of meiosis and non-disjunction
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Presentation transcript:

Nathan R. Treff PhD Chief Science Officer Detection of segmental and mosaic aneuploidy in preimplantation embryos and their reproductive potential Nathan R. Treff PhD Chief Science Officer

Frequency of mosaicism is misconceived

Primarily maternal meiotic (not mosaic) Hassold and Hunt Nature 2001 2:280

Origin of errors in preimplantation human embryos 1st polar body 2nd polar body TE biopsy maternal meiotic Treff et al Fertil Steril 2008

Origin of errors in preimplantation human embryos 1st polar body 2nd polar body TE biopsy mitotic or paternal meiotic Treff et al Fertil Steril 2008

~67% of errors from maternal meiosis Treff et al Fertil Steril 2008

Why are some mosaicism estimates so high?

Mosaicism or technical error? 0% consistency in embryos with aneuploidy!

Self correction or technical error? 0% consistency between day 3 and day 5! Kearns et al., ASRM 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 ASHG 2011, 2012, 2013, ESHRE 2011, 2012, 2013

aCGH False Positives False Positive Rate P=0.006 n=159 embryos Capalbo et al. EJHG 2014

S-phase artifacts

Mosaicism classification schemes Capalbo et al. Hum. Reprod. In Press

Mosaicism is not common Capalbo et al. Hum. Reprod. In Press

Predictive Value of CCS? Important to know if the test can be used to safely discard an embryo

SNP array predictive value Scott et al. Fertil Steril 2012 97 870-875

tNGS predictive value None with aneuploidy Sustained Implantation Werner et al ASRM 2015

Impact of Mosaicism No method of CCS can give a correct diagnosis when testing a mosaic embryo; by definition there will always be a sampling error +15 N +15 -15 N N N +15 -15 -15 +15 -15

Mixture Model Goodrich et al. JARG 2016

Comparison of methods to detect aneuploidy in a mixture Goodrich et al. JARG 2016

↑ sensitivity = ↓ specificity Goodrich et al. JARG 2016

Mosaicism or artifact? No evaluation of specificity/false positives!

Mosaicism classification schemes Capalbo et al. Hum. Reprod. In Press

Contamination can look like mosaicism VeriSeq PGS NexCCS Copy Number Chromosome

Contamination detection (genotyping) NexCCS Copy Number Pure Chromosome Allele Ratio 1 0.66 0.5 0.33 Chromosome

Contamination detection (genotyping) NexCCS Copy Number Contaminated Pure Chromosome Allele Ratio 1 0.66 0.5 0.33 Chromosome Chromosome

Triploidy can also look like mosaicism NexCCS Triploidy can also look like mosaicism Copy Number Triploid (2:1 allele ratios) Allele Ratio 1 Diploid (1:1 allele ratios) 0.66 0.5 0.33 Allele Ratio 1 0.66 0.5 0.33

Segmental Aneuploidy

SNP array for translocations

Mitotic (reciprocal) segmental errors 5_2_B - 45,XX,+2p,+3, ++8p, -21,-22 2_2_A - 46,XY,-8,+10 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5_2_C - 44,XX,-3p,-21,-22 2_2_B - 47,XY,+8 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5_2_E - 44,XX,++3p,-21,-22 1 2 3 4 2_2_C – 44,XY,-8,-10 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 X 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 X Chromosome # Chromosome # 5_3_A - 46,XX,-6,+8q 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1_3_F- 45,XY,-15 5_3_D - 46,XX,i(8) 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1_3_C - 48,XY,++15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 X 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 X Chromosome # Chromosome # Kort et al. Human Reproduction. 2015

Segmental mosaicism platform comparison Frequency of Detection Mixture Level

Segmental mosaicism platform comparison

Segmental Aneuploidy Study Design Prediction of segmental error Original TE Bx TE reBx 1 TE reBx 2 TE reBx 3 ICM section Randomized blinded analysis Juneau et al ASRM 2016

Uniform segmental Juneau et al ASRM 2016

Reciprocal segmental Juneau et al ASRM 2016

Observed in original biopsy only Juneau et al ASRM 2016

Confirmed in at least one rebiopsy Juneau et al ASRM 2016

Segmental Aneuploidy Predictive Value 88% predictive of remaining embryo 60% mitotic origin artifact or true mosaicism Juneau et al ASRM 2016

Segmental aneuploidy is associated with reduced success 115 20 189 12 p = 0.0118 Werner et al ASRM 2016

Conclusions Mosaicism is overestimated by inaccurate methods and weak criteria Altered log2 ratios can originate from phenomena other than mosaicism Criteria for diagnosing mosaicism from a single biopsy needs evaluation for specificity prior to clinical utilization Segmental aneuploidy originates primarily from mitotic errors and may be predictive of reproductive potential