Items in red require your input

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Robin Largue Dr. Janet Pilcher
Advertisements

2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
Genius online Appraisal Management System 1. Appraiser Configuration Getting Started Appraisal Management let the user to effectively conduct a users.
2010 Annual Employee Survey Results
Lenovo Listens Manager Training Step 2: Interpret and Communicate Results 1.
Lenovo Listens Manager Training Executive Summary
Employee engagement Guide Global Human Resources June 2014.
12-14 Pindari Rd Peakhurst NSW 2210 p: e: Employee Survey Links2Success.
Office of Human Resources1 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT 2008 AT HKS.
2005 All-Staff Survey: Survey Results Summary Presentation
Hawaiian Airlines Na Leo Survey 2010 Your Results.
Chapter 9 Review How can you measure employee engagement levels over time?
Employee Survey Results Presentation Template. 2 Introduction  This template is designed to assist you in discussing the Employee Survey results with.
Community LCAP Survey Stockton Unified School District
Main Page.
Main Page.
2016 Duck River EMC Employee Survey
Local Points of Contact Webinar
Student Growth What does it Mean for Principals and Teachers?
This training references results from the 2017 TELL Kentucky Survey available online at The intent is to begin discussion among staff.
2017 Winter Employee Engagement Survey
Networking Tips and Strategies
Performance and Development Cycle
SAMPLE Drive Engagement Through Interdepartmental Collaboration
Items in red require your input
Empower Managers to Take Ownership of Employee Engagement
Readiness Consultations
Engagement Discussion A3
Performance Management Workday Module
Employee Engagement Survey Education Session #3
Academic representative Committee CHAIR training
Cycle of Continuous Improvement for
Louisiana Early Childhood Quality and Progress
PLANNING INTO ACTION: ROLLOUT & SCORECARDS
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY RESULTS
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Items in red require your input
Employee Engagement Survey
Items in red require your input
School-wide Positive Behavior and Intervention Supports (PBIS)
Engagement Follow-up Resources
Highlights from the NYC School Survey: Results and implementation
Empire Southwest 2017 Companywide EOS Results.
Nuts and Bolts of Peer Coaching
Before you begin… If you are prepared to share your team’s survey results prior to receiving the overall Business Unit results, simply modify this presentation.
Before you begin… If you are prepared to share your team’s survey results prior to receiving the overall Business Unit results, simply modify this presentation.
Grantee Guide to Project Performance Measurement
Identifying enablers & disablers to change
Background This slide should be removed from the deck once the template is updated. During the 2018 Legislative Session, Act 555 was passed requiring schools.
Employee Performance Management System (EPMS)
Highlights from the NYC School Survey: Results and implementation
Workforce Engagement Survey
2018 SMU Staff Performance Review Training
Engagement Follow-up Resources
THE GOOD CLUB GUIDE EXTRA: FOR A CLUB CAPTAIN
Sample Individual (to communicate with them about Pilot)
Departure View Glossary
School-wide Positive Behavior and Intervention Supports (PBIS)
Employee Engagement Defined
Suggestions for developing trust:. 1
Organization-level Results
School-wide Positive Behavior and Intervention Supports (PBIS)
Specialized Training Program: Investing in Teacher Practice to Maximize Student Learning Investment Schools Data Inquiry Training Session II.
Enter Your Work Unit Here Enter Date Here
Background This slide should be removed from the deck once the template is updated. During the 2019 Legislative Session, the Legislature updated a the.
Highlights from the NYC School Survey: Results and implementation
Quality and Patient Safety Framework for Health and Social Services
Introduction to myIMPACT-Adjuncts
Louisiana Early Childhood Quality and Progress
Presentation transcript:

Items in red require your input Items in red require your input!! Please refer to the resource “A Guide to Understanding and Sharing Your Survey Results” for information found in this template. Specifically, refer to page 13 “Sharing Your Survey Results” for instructions on how to fill-out and complete this template for your Results Rollout Session with your work unit. Enter Work Unit Here Work Unit Results Review Enter Date of Review Session Here

You are a valued member of our team! Thank You! For completing the survey For participating in the Work Unit Results Review Session For helping us understand our results You are a valued member of our team!

Why We Survey Provide an opportunity for confidential team member feedback Identify strengths to build upon Recognize opportunities for improvement Take action to improve the team member experience

Objectives Understand the Press Ganey survey model Review and discuss work unit results Identify key actions Communicate our follow-up plan

Ground Rules We request that you… Help us understand the meaning behind the results Provide honest and candid feedback Offer constructive suggestions for improvement Identify the highest priority items Help us focus on those areas we can control within the department and team The Ground Rules listed are a foundation for ensuring an effective and efficient Results Rollout Session. You are invited to add additional ground rules if you see a need based on your work unit.

Employee Voice Model Organization Domain Engagement High Workforce Manager Employee High Performance Engagement Workforce All of the items on the survey come together in our Employee Voice Model, which is the foundation for the survey. Along the left side of the model there are three domains: Organizational, Manager, and Employee The Organization Domain reflects the degree to which your employees feel connected to the overall organization. The Manager Domain reflects the degree to which your employees feel connected to their supervisor/manager. The employee domain reflects the degree to which your employees feel connected to their colleagues and jobs.

Employee Voice Model Engagement Workforce I am proud to tell people I work for this organization. I would stay with this organization if offered a similar job elsewhere. I would recommend this organization to family and friends who need healthcare. I would like to be working at this organization three years from now. I would recommend this organization as a good place to work. Overall, I am a satisfied employee. Engagement reflects the degree of commitment your employees feel towards the workplace. Commitment may be maximized as employees feel connected to the overall organization, their supervisor/manager, and their colleagues. Engagement is measured using these six items.

Work Unit Feedback Process Review Engagement, Action Planning Readiness, and Tier Scores Review Strengths Review Concerns Clarify Results with Team Define Potential Actions Prioritize Next Steps

Engagement Score Work Unit Average Organizational Average Engagement Indicator Enter # Here 4.04 Domain Work Unit Average Organizational Average Organizational Domain Enter # Here 3.90 Manager Domain 4.02 Employee Domain 4.09 DESCRIPTION The Engagement Score indicates the degree of commitment team members feel toward the organization. Work units that are very connected to the organization will have a very strong level of commitment.

Action Planning Readiness (APR) Score Enter Work Unit Here Enter APR Score Here Please remind the group that we share and review the results first, then come back to action plan. DESCRIPTION The APR Score represents team members’ readiness to engage in feedback and action planning. The score is assigned through calculations on a 100-point scale from survey items specific to manager performance. INDEX READINESS SCORE High readiness 90-100 Moderately high readiness 80-89 Moderate readiness 70-79 Moderately low readiness 60-69 Low readiness 0-59

Tier Score Enter Work Unit Here Enter Tier Here (I, II, or III) Enter Power Item Score Here DESCRIPTION The Tier Score is a team outcome metric based on items that most powerfully impact team performance INDEX TIER PERFORMANCE POWER ITEM SCORE Tier I Above Average Performance 5.0 - 4.15 Tier II Average Performance 4.14 - 3.80 Tier III Below Average Performance 3.79 or below

Strengths Item Domain Enter Item Here Enter Domain Here

Concerns Item Domain Enter Item Here Enter Domain Here

Summary Enter any summary information or observations here

Clarification of Results - Strengths What are our strengths that we want to build upon as a team? Did any of our strengths surprise you?

Clarification of Results - Concerns What help can you provide in understanding the identified areas of concern? Did any of these areas of concern surprise you?

Next Steps Summarize Feedback Hold Action Planning Session Share Action Plan with Team Regularly Review Action Plan

THANK YOU!