Resource Request/Response Discussion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0866r1 Submission September 2005 Michael Montemurro, Chantry NetworksSlide 1 Mobility Domain Definition and Description Notice: This.
Advertisements

Use of KCK for TGr Management Frame Protection
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
Motions Date: Authors: January 2006
London TGu Motions Authors: January 2007 Date: Month Year
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
March 2014 Election Results
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2005 Month Year
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Miscellaneous Updates
3GPP liaison report May 2006 May 2006 Date: Authors:
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
3GPP liaison report July 2006
[place presentation subject title text here]
Miscellaneous Updates
Motions Date: Authors: January 2006
Fast Transition Mobility (FTM) Domain
TGp Motions Date: Authors: November 2005 Month Year
Fast Transition Report
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
Emergency Call Motion Date: Authors: January 2006
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
Quick Beacon Impacts on LB 92
TGr Closing Report January 2005
JTC1 Ad Hoc Mid-week Report
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
CID#102 - Channel Allocation for P2P
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
ADS Study Group Mid-week Report
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
Impact of KTP Non-definition
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2007 Month Year
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Liaison Report From Date: Authors: Month Year
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
Motion to go to Letter Ballot
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
Location Capability Negotiation
Transition Nowhere Date: Authors: Sept 2005 Sept 2005
Motion for request of assigned numbers
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
Reserve Option Contradiction
11k Public Awareness Program
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Use of KCK for TGr Management Frame Protection
Use of KCK for TGr Management Frame Protection
Use of Nonces in Fast Transitioning Flows
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGp Motions Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

Resource Request/Response Discussion Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 September 2005 Resource Request/Response Discussion Date: 2005-09-19 Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.11. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.11. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures <http:// ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <stuart.kerry@philips.com> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.11 Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at <patcom@ieee.org>. Michael Montemurro, Chantry Networks John Doe, Some Company

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 September 2005 Abstract Review of requirements for the Mobility Domain for the purpose of BSS Transition. Propose changes to the TGr draft which combine the Resource Mobility Domain and Security Mobility Domain concepts. The text changes for Mobility Domain are included in Document 11-05/0867r0 Michael Montemurro, Chantry Networks John Doe, Some Company

September 2005 Background Currently, the TGr draft introduces Resource Mobility Domain and Security Mobility Domain. Practically speaking, the security domain is really governed by the R0 Key Holder (or possibly a set of R0 key holders). A STA can only BSS-Transition to: Another BSS in the ESS A BSS that advertises the same R0KeyHolder Michael Montemurro, Chantry Networks

Mobility Domain Requirements September 2005 Mobility Domain Requirements Allow a STA to determine which AP’s are BSS-transition targets. Identify the AP as reachable over the DS. A STA can only BSS-Transition to a target AP only if the AP is part of the same Mobility Domain and shares the same R0KeyHolder. This implies that the Security Domain is the same as the Mobility Domain. Michael Montemurro, Chantry Networks

Mobility Domain Definition September 2005 Mobility Domain Definition A set of BSSs, within the same ESS, identified by a Mobility Domain Identifier that provide the following assurances to the STA: fast transition is possible between any two BSSs using either "over the DS" or "over the air" procedures. a common key infrastructure is accessible at all BSSs common network services are accessible through all BSSs. Michael Montemurro, Chantry Networks

Protocol Requirements September 2005 Protocol Requirements The Mobility Domain will be advertised by the Mobility Domain IE. The Mobility Domain IE will be included by the AP in the Beacon and Probe Response messages. Michael Montemurro, Chantry Networks

Mobility Domain IE Element ID Length Mobility Domain Identifier September 2005 Mobility Domain IE Element ID Length Mobility Domain Identifier Octets: 1 1 6 The Mobility Domain Identifier is unique for each network and specified with 6 octets. The Mobility Domain Identifier is included in the Beacon and Probe Response messages. Michael Montemurro, Chantry Networks

Summary of Text Changes September 2005 Summary of Text Changes Change all references to Resource Mobility Domain and Security Mobility Domain to Mobility Domain. Remove all references to Resource Mobility Domain Identifier and Security Mobility Domain Identifier. Add the definition of Mobility Domain IE and add the IE to the Beacon and Probe Response messages. The changes are captured in Document 11-05/xxxxr0 Michael Montemurro, Chantry Networks

September 2005 Motion Instruct the editor to incorporate the changes into the TGr draft as described in document 11-05/0867r0. Michael Montemurro, Chantry Networks